شناسایی عوامل اقتصادی- اجتماعی موثر بر صنعت پرورش ماهی قزل آلا (مطالعه موردی؛ استان فارس)
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزیسعید یزدانی 1 , حامد رفیعی 2 , سیده فاطمه هاشمی دشتکی 3
1 - استاد گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران
2 - استادیار گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران
3 - دانشجو کارشناسی ارشد گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران
کلید واژه: پرورش ماهی, رگرسیون توبیت, متغیرهای اقتصادی- اجتماعی,
چکیده مقاله :
مطالعه حاضر با هدف شناسایی عوامل اقتصادی- اجتماعی موثر بر صنعت پرورش ماهی قزل‌آلا در استان فارس انجام شده است. نتایج حاکی از آن است که به طور میانگین مزارع پرورش ماهی منطقه مطالعاتی به لحاظ فنی و زیست‌محیطی کارا نبودند. نتایج مدل توبیت نشان داده است که متغیرهای تحصیلات، شرکت در کلاس‌های آموزشی و ترویجی، تجربه آبزی‌پروری و درآمد اثر مثبت و معنی‌دار و متغیر مساحت مزرعه اثر منفی و معنی‌دار برکارایی فنی داشته است. همچنین نتایج نشان داده است که متغیرهای تحصیلات، شرکت در کلاس‌های آموزشی و ترویجی و درآمد اثر مثبت و معنی‌دار بر کارایی زیست‌محیطی داشته است. متغیر نگرش نسبت به پایداری نیز معنی‌دار و تاثیر مثبت بر کارایی زیست‌محیطی داشته است. از آنجاییکه تغییر نگرش پرورش‌دهندگان می‌تواند تاثیر بسزایی در حفظ محیط‌زیست داشته باشد لذا پیشنهاد می‌شود که در کلاس‌های آموزشی و ترویجی مطالب مرتبط به اثرات زیست‌محیطی این صنعت در کنار مسائل اقتصادی آموزش داده شود تا نگرش و آگاهی پرورش‌دهندگان نسبت به پایداری و اثرات مخرب وارد شده به محیط زیست بهبود یابد.
The present study was conducted to identify Socio-economic factors affecting trout farming in Fars province. The results indicate that on average, fish farming was not technically and environmentally efficient. Also, the results of Tobit regression indicate that the education, participation in training classes, aquaculture experience, and income have a positive and significant effect and the farm`s area has a negative and significant effect on technical efficiency. The results also indicate that education, participation in training classes, and income have a positive and significant effect on environmental efficiency. The attitude towards sustainability was significant and had a positive effect on environmental efficiency. since changing the attitude towards sustainability have a significant effect on environmental protection, so it is suggested to teach about environmental effects along with economic issues in training classes to improve the attitude and awareness of sustainability.
1. Abdpor A, Asadabadi A, Shaban Ali Fami H. Analysis of the role of factors affecting the efficiency of date production in Bam city: with a data envelopment analysis approach. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research. 2018;2-48(3):507-518. (In Persian) [DOI:10.22059/IJAEDR.2017.63969]
2. Abu Samah B, D’Silva JL, Shaffril HA, Man N, Azman A. Malaysian contract farmers’ attitude towards sustainable agriculture. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research. 2012; 2(9): 9205-10. [https://www.textroad.com/pdf/JBASR/J.%20Basic.%20Appl.%20Sci.%20Res.,%202(9)9205-9210,%202012.pdf]
3. Alam MF, Khan MA, Huq AA. Technical efficiency in tilapia farming of Bangladesh: a stochastic frontier production approach. Aquaculture International. 2012 Aug; 20:619-34. [DOI: 10.1007/s10499-011-9491-3]
4. Alikhani L, Dashti Q, Raheli H, Hosseinzad J. Technical efficiency and production risk in cold-water fish farms in Kamyaran city. Journal of Animal Science Research. 2015; 25 (2). (In Persian)
5. [https://animalscience.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_3848.html?lang=en]
6. Cinemre HA, Ceyhan V, Bozoğlu M, Demiryürek K, Kılıç O. The cost efficiency of trout farms in the Black Sea Region, Turkey. Aquaculture. 2006 Feb 28;251(2-4):324-32. [https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201301102994]
7. Coelli T. A guide to DEAP version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Australia. 1996 Aug 16;96(08):1-49. [DOI: 10.4236/ib.2010.22016]
8. Dey MM, Paraguas FJ, Bimbao GB, Regaspi PB. Technical efficiency of tilapia growout pond operations in the Philippines. Aquaculture Economics & Management. 2000 Nov 1;4(1-2):33-47. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300009380259]
9. Dorandish A, Ramezani M, Aminizadeh, M. Investigating the factors affecting the use of chemical fertilizers in saffron farms (Case study: Gonabad city). Journal of Saffron Agriculture and Technology. 2019;7(3):359-376. (In Persian) [https://doi.org/10.22048/jsat.2018.120688.1289]
10. Darijani A. Evaluation of environmental and technical efficiencies of livestock slaughterhouses in Tehran province. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Economics and Development, University of Tehran. 2005. (In Persian)
11. Elhami B, Farahani SS, Marzban A. Improvement of energy efficiency and environmental impacts of rainbow trout in Iran. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. 2019 Jun 1; 2:13-27. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2019.06.002]
12. FAO. Part 1: World Review of fisheries and aquaculture. In the state of world fisheries and aquaculture (SOFIA). 2016; 2014: 4. [https://www.fao.org/3/i5555e/i5555e.pdf]
13. Farzaneh M, Larijani M, Rezvani, M. The effect of education on the attitude and behavior of aquaculture and aquaculture to reduce the pollution of rainbow trout farms. Journal of Renewable Natural Resources Research. 2013;3(4):49-59. (In Persian) [https://sid.ir/paper/212234/fa]
14. Gittinger P, Price J. Economic Analysis of Agricultural Projects, (3th ed.). Tehran: Tehran University., Iran. 1997. (In Persian)
15. Hall P O J, Holby O, Kollberg S, Samuelsson, M O. Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm. IV. Nitrogen. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1992;89: 81-91. [DOI: 10.3354/meps089081]
16. Hameed TS, Sawicka B. Farmers' attitudes towards sustainable agriculture practices inLublin Province. Advances in Sciences and Engineering. 2017 May:1. [http://www.techrev.org.uk/ase/9.1/ase.9.1.1.pdf]
17. Iliyasu A, Mohamed Z A. Evaluating contextual factors affecting the technical efficiency of freshwater pond culture systems in Peninsular Malaysia: A two-stage DEA approach. Aquaculture Reports. 2016; 3: 12-17.
18. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.11.002]
19. Iliyasu A, Mohamed Z A, Ismail M M, Amin, A M, Mazuki H. Technical efficiency of cage fish farming in Peninsular Malaysia: a stochastic frontier production approach. Aquaculture Research. 2016: 47(1): 101-113. [https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201600092824]
20. Jia B, St-Hilaire S, Singh K, Gardner IA. Biosecurity knowledge, attitudes and practices of farmers culturing yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces, China. Aquaculture. 2017 Mar 20; 471:146-56.[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.01.016]
21. Johnston, J, Dinardo J. Econometric methods (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill., USA. 1997. [https://economics.ut.ac.ir/documents/3030266/14100645/econometric%20methods-johnston.pdf]
22. Kareem RO, Idowu EO, Ayinde IA, Badmus MA. Economic efficiency of freshwater artisanal fisheries in Ijebu waterside of Ogun state, Nigeria. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research. 2012;12(11):30-43. [https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume12/4-Economic-Efficiency-of-Freshwater-Artis.pdf]
23. Leung KM, Chu JC, Wu RS. Nitrogen budgets for the areolated grouper Epinephelus areolatus cultured under laboratory conditions and in open-sea cages. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1999 Sep 17; 186:271-81. [http://hdl.handle.net/10722/92770]
24. Maddala G. S. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics (No. 3). Cambridge university press. 1986. [http://public.econ.duke.edu/~vjh3/e262p_07S/readings/Maddala_Models_of_Self-Selectivity.pdf]
25. Mokhtari A, Chizarb M, Salehi, H. A. Survey of Iranian Fisheries Experts' Attitudes Towards Sustainable Aquaculture. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Sciences. 2006; 2 (2): 87-97. (In Persian) [https://sid.ir/paper/109304/fa]
26. Molaei M, Sani f. Estimation of environmental efficiency of Sarab dairy farms (data envelopment analysis approach). Journal of Animal Science Research. 2015; 25 (4): 142-155. (In Persian) [https://www.sid.ir/fa/VEWSSID/J_pdf/41713940413.pdf]
27. Nazerani b. Investigation of technical and environmental efficiency of fish farms in ponds in Khuzestan province. Master Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tehran. 2016. (In Persian)
28. Osti JA, Moraes MA, Carmo CF, Mercante CT. Nitrogen and phosphorus flux from the production of Nile tilapia through the application of environmental indicators. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 2017 Jul 10; 78:25-31. [https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.02116]
29. Phiri F, Yuan X. Technical efficiency of Tilapia production in Malawi and China: Application of Stochastic Frontier production approach. J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2018; 9:1-7. [DOI: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000532]
30. Price C S, Morris Jr J A. Marine cage culture and the environment: Twenty-first century science informing a sustainable industry. National oceanic and atmospheric administration, united State. 2013; 172. [https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/2712]
31. Quddus MA, Rahman KM, Sen SK, Shama MA. Efficient Management of Farm Resources and Food Consumption Level of Pond Fishers in North-Central Bangladesh.Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research. 2020; 13(30; 35-46. [DOI: 10.9734/AJAAR/2020/v13i330107]
32. Rajanna N, Vijayalaxmi KG, Lakshminaryan MT, Chandregowda KN. Attitude of paddy farmers towards sustainable farming practices. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2009;43(3):522-6. [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5FGr_eYAAAAJ&hl=en]
33. Rodrigues W S, Mauad J R C, Vogel E, Sabbag O J, Ruviaro C F. Sustainability and technical efficiency of fish hatcheries in the STATE of MATO GROSSO do SUL, Brazil. Aquaculture. 2019; 500: 228-236. [https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201900134996]
34. Sadati SA, Shaabanali Fami H, Asadi A, Sadati SA. Farmer’s attitude on sustainable agriculture and its determinants: A case study in Behbahan County of Iran. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 2010 Aug 1;2(5):422-7. [https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu]
35. Shiri N, Khoshnoodifar Z, Soltanian s. Factors affecting the success and development of cold water fish farming industry from the perspective of salmon farming in Fars province. Journal of Aquaculture Development. 2019; 13 (2): 83-65. (In Persian) [https://sid.ir/paper/241923/fa]
36. Syandri H, Azrita A, Mardiah A. Water quality status and pollution waste load from floating net cages at Maninjau Lake, West Sumatera Indonesia. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2020 (Vol. 430, No. 1, p. 012031). IOP Publishing. [DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/430/1/012031]
37. Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society. 1958: 24-36. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/190738]
38. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research. 2001; 130(3): 498-509. [https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ejores:v:130:y:2001:i:3:p:498-509]
39. Whitmarsh D, Wattage P. Public attitudes towards the environmental impact of salmon aquaculture in Scotland. European Environment. 2006 Mar;16(2):108-21. [DOI: 10.1002/eet.406]
40. Yazdani, S., Rafiei, H. And Ramezani, M. (2019). Evaluation of total productivity of production factors and efficiency of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) farms in sea cages located in Mazandaran province. Journal of Aquaculture Development, 13 (4): 123-134. (In Persian) [http://aqudev.liau.ac.ir/article-1-581-en.html]
41. Yin X, Wang A, Zhou H, Wang Q, Li Z, Shao P. Economic efficiency of crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) polyculture farmers in the coastal area of Yancheng city, China. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2014 Jun 1;14(2):429-37. [DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v14_2_13]
42. Yuan Y, Yuan Y, Dai Y, Zhang Z, Gong Y, Yuan Y. Technical efficiency of different farm sizes for tilapia farming in China. Aquaculture Research. 2020 Jan;51(1):307-15. [DOI: 10.1111/are.14376]
_||_