Modeling and environmental risk assessment of Eastern Alborz Coal washing plant

Subject Areas : Mineralogy

Reza Ghaedrahmati ¹ , Hayati Hayati ² , Asghar Azizi ³

1 - Department of Mining, Faculty of Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
2 - Department of Mining, Faculty of Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
3 - Faculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

Received: 2017-05-29 Accepted : 2017-12-02 Published : 2018-10-01

Keywords: Linear Assessment, Modeling, Environmental factors, Coal washing plant, Risk Assessment,

Abstract :

Mining operations and mineral-related industries are closely and directly related with the environment. The negative impacts of mining industry on the environment, known as environmental risks, must be controlled and managed in a way to minimize harmful and destructive effects. Environmental risk assessment studies are a suitable step to identify, analyze and rank the risk factors. In this study a hybrid model has been presented to identify the environmental risks caused by coal washing plant in eastern Alborz in the form of 17 risk factors and introducing 8 criteria to assess them. Then their impact has been studied upon 12 environmental factors such as agriculture, ecology and so forth. In this regard, the risks for each of the affected environmental components have been assessed using linear assignment method, which is one of the most important multi- attribute decision-making methods. The results showed that in components of "area usage", "social issues", "surface water" and "underground water", the risks of "exposition of the plant and the tailing area", "tailing discharge considerations", "type of geological formations of the area" and "changing the usage of the area" have been ranked first, respectively and have been introduced as the most critical risks for the above-mentioned components.

References:

1. Aczel J, Saaty TL (1983) Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27: 93-102.


2. Amirkhani Shiraz F, Doulati Ardejani F, Moradzadeh A, Arab-Amiri AR (2013) Investigating the source of contaminated plumes downstream of the Alborz Sharghi coal washing plant using EM34 conductivity data, VLF-EM and DC-resistivity geophysical methods, Exploration Geophysics 44: 16-24.


3. Aryafar A, Yousefi S, Doulati Ardejani F (2013) The weight of interaction of mining activities: groundwater in environmental impact assessment using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), Environmental Earth Sciences 68: 2313-2324


4. Baccarini D, Archer R (2001) The risk ranking of projects: a methodology. International Journal of Project Management 19: 139-145


5. Bertolinia M, Bevilacquab M, Ciarapicab FE, Giacchettab G (2009) Development of Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance procedures for an oil refinery, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 22: 244–253


6. Chapman CB, Ward SC (2003) Project Risk Management: Processes, Techniques and Insights. John Wiley, Second edition, UK: Chichester


7. Favasa PJC, Pratasb J (2014) Uranium Bioavailability and Environmental Risk Assessment in Soils Contaminated by Mining, IERI Procedia 9: 43–46


8. Folchi R (2003) Environmental impact statement for mining with explosives: a quantitative method, In: I.S.E.E 29th Annual Conference Explosives and Blasting Technique, Northville, Tennessee, USA


9. Ghaedrahmati R, Doulati Ardejani F (2012) Environmental impact assessment of coal washing plant (Alborz- Sharghi –Iran), Journal of Mining and Environment 3: 69-77


10. Ghosh S, Jintanapakanont J (2004) Identifying and assessing the critical risk factors in an underground rail project in Thailand: a factor analysis approach, International Journal of Project Management  22: 633-643


11. Hamidi N, Rastidoost E, Roozbehnia K (2012) Comment on vikor method by combining this method and Linear assignment, International Journal of Management in Education 2: 1-15


12. Hong ES, Lee IM, Shin HS, Nam SW, Kong JS (2009) Quantitative risk evaluation based on event tree analysis technique: Application to the design of shield TBM, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 24: 269–277


13. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey, Springer–Verlag, New York


14. Wu J, Pu G, Ma Q, Qi H, Wang R (2017) quantitative environmental risk assessment for the iron and steel industrial symbiosis network, Journal of Cleaner Production 157: 106-117.


15. Klein JH, Cork RB (1998) An approach to technical risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management 16: 345-351


16. Laul JC, Simmons F, Goss JE, Boada-Clista LM, Vrooman RD, Dickey RL, Spivey SW, Stirrup T, Davis W (2006) Perspectives on chemical hazard characterization and analysis process at DOE, Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 13: 6–39


17. McDermott RE, Mikulak RJ, Beauregard MR (1996) The basics of FMEA, Quality Resources, New York, NY.


18. Mirabi M,Mianabadi H, Zarghami M, Sharifi M, Mostert E (2014) Risk- Based evaluation of wastewater treatment projects: A case study in Niasar city, Iran, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 93:168-177.


19. Mirmohammadi M, Gholamnejad J, Fattahpour V, Seyedsadri P, Ghorbani Y (2009) Designing of an environmental assessment algorithm for surface mining projects, Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 2422–2435.


20. Pertmaster Software (2002) Pertmaster Project Risk v7.5: Tutorial, manual and help, Available on: http://www.pertmaster.com


21. Pomerol JC, Romero SB (2000) Multi-criterion decision in management: Principles and practice, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.


22. Rao RV (2007) Introduction to Multiple Attribute Decision-making (MADM) Methods, Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment, Part of the series Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, Springer London, pp. 27-41.


23. Rebelo A, Ferra I, Gonçalvesb I, Marquesb AM (2014) A Risk Assessment Model for Water Resources: Releases of dangerous and hazardous substances, Journal of Environmental Management  140(1): 51–59.


24. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2006) Decision making with the analytic network process: economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks, Springer, New York


25. Shahriar A, Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2012) Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25: 505–523.


26. Wang Y, Cheng G, Hu H, Wu W (2012) Development of a risk-based maintenance strategy using FMEA for a continuous catalytic reforming plant, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 25: 958–965.


27. Waterland LR, Venkatesh S, Unnasch S (2003) Safety and Performance Assessment of Ethanol/Diesel Blends (E-Diesel), Cupertino, California.


28. Xu L, Liu G (2009) The study of a method of regional environmental risk assessment, Journal of Environmental Management 90: 3290-3296.


29. Guan Y, Chu C, Shao C, Ju M, Dai E (2017) Study of integrated risk regionalization method for soil contamination in industrial and mining area, Economical Indicator 83: 260-270.