بررسی اثر علی سبک‌های دلبستگی مردان بر فرسودگی زناشویی همسر با تاکید بر نقش میانجیگری طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه

محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی زوجین

سلیمه دارمی ¹ , محسن منصوبی فر ^{2 *} , ناهید هواسی سومار ³ , شهره شکرزاده ⁴ , آرزو تاری مرادی ⁵

1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه روانشناسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران، [e-mail]
2 - (نویسنده مسئول): استادیار، گروه روان ¬شناسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران، پست الکترونیکی: ‌[e-mail] ؛ تلفن تماس: [phone]
3 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران
4 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد علوم تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
5 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1403/06/24 تاریخ پذیرش : 1403/08/06 تاریخ انتشار : 1404/04/20

کلید واژه: ازدواج, طلاق عاطفی, فرسودگی زناشویی, سبک‌های دلبستگی, طرح‌واره‌, طرح‌واره‌های ناسازگار, فرسودگی زناشویی,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه: هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی اثر علی سبک‌های دلبستگی مردان بر فرسودگی زناشویی همسر با تاکید بر نقش میانجیگری طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه در زوج‌های مراجعه‌کننده به کلینیک‌های مشاوره شهر تهران بود.

روش پژوهش: روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه‌ پژوهش شامل تمامی‌زوجین مراجعه‌کننده به کلینیک‌های روانشناسی و مشاوره منطقه شش و هفت شهر تهران در سال 1400-1402 بودند. حجم نمونه با توجه به فرمول کوکران برابر با 186 زوج (186 مرد و 186 زن) نفر بود که به‌صورت هدفمند دردسترس از مرکز مشاوره رها، مرکز مشاوره مهر تابان، مرکز مشاوره اکنون، مرکز مشاوره روان‌نما انتخاب شده‌اند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از مقیاس فرسودگی زناشویی پاینز (1996)، دلبستگی کولینز و رید (1990) و پرسشنامه طرح‌واره یانگ (1998) استفاده شد. از آزمون ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندمتغیری با روش ورود همزمان و الگویابی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد و نتایج با نرم‌افزار SPSS_28 و Amos_26، مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند.

یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد، اثر کل سبک دلبستگی دوسوگرا (019/0= P ،160/0= β) و سبک دلبستگی اجتنابی مردان (007/0= P ،196/0=β) بر فرسودگی زناشویی همسران آنان مثبت و اثر کل سبک دلبستگی ایمن مردان بر فرسودگی زناشویی همسرانشان (041/0= P ،157/0- =β) منفی و معنادار است. همچنین اثر طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه مردان نیز بر فرسودگی زناشویی همسران (001/0= P ،359/0=β) مثبت و معنادار بود. همچنین، اثر غیر مستقیم سبک دلبستگی دوسوگرا (001/0= P ،096/0=β) و دلبستگی اجتنابی (035/0= P ،196/0=β) مردان بر فرسودگی زناشویی همسران مثبت و اثر غیر مستقیم سبک دلبستگی ایمن آنان بر فرسودگی زناشویی همسرانشان(028/0= P ،073/0- =β) منفی و معنادار است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

© 2020 The Author(s). This work is published by family and health as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate the causal effect of men's attachment styles on spouse's marital burnout, emphasizing the mediating role of primary incompatible schemas in couples referring to counseling clinics in Tehran.

Research method: The descriptive research method was correlation type. The research population included all couples who referred to psychological and counseling clinics in six and seven districts of Tehran in 1402-1400. According to Cochran's formula, the sample size was equal to 186 couples (186 men and 186 women) who were purposefully selected from Raha Counseling Center, Mehr Taban Counseling Center, Nawan Counseling Center, Rwannema Counseling Center. To collect data, Pines' marital exhaustion scale (1996), Collins and Reed's (1990) attachment, and Young's schema questionnaire (1998) were used. Pearson's correlation coefficient test and multivariate regression with simultaneous entry method and structural equation modeling were used and the results were analyzed with SPSS_28 and Amos_26 software.

Findings: The results showed that the total effect of ambivalent attachment style (β=0.160, P=0.019) and avoidant attachment style of men (β=0.196, P=0.007) on the marital exhaustion of their wives is positive and the effect The whole secure attachment style of men has a negative and significant effect on the marital exhaustion of their wives (β = -0.157, P = 0.041). Also, the effect of men's initial incompatible schemas on spouses' marital burnout was positive and significant (β=0.359, P=0.001). Also, the indirect effect of ambivalent attachment style (β=0.096, P=0.001) and avoidant attachment (β=0.196, P=0.035) of men on marital exhaustion of positive spouses and the indirect effect of secure attachment style They have a negative and significant effect on the marital exhaustion of their spouses (P = 0.028, β = -0.073).

منابع و مأخذ:

References
1. Lebow J, Snyder DK. Couple therapy in the 2020s: Current status and emerging developments. Fam Process. 2022 Dec;61(4):1359-1385. doi: 10.1111/famp.12824. Epub 2022 Sep 29. PMID: 36175119; PMCID: PMC10087549.
2. Schofield MJ, Mumford N, Jurkovic D, Jurkovic I, Bickerdike A. Short and long-term effectiveness of couple counselling: a study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 3; 12:735. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-735. PMID: 22943742; PMCID: PMC3490822.
3. Khalifian C, Rashkovsky K, Mitchell E, Bismark A, Wagner AC, Knopp KC. A novel framework for ketamine-assisted couple therapy. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 13; 15:1376646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1376646. PMID: 39193577; PMCID: PMC11347343.
4. Taurogiński B, Janusz B, Bergmann JR, Peräkylä A. Spectrum of complaints: practices of complaining in therapeutic conversations as a window to spouses' personalities and couples' relationships. Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23; 14:1232594. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232594. PMID: 38078241; PMCID: PMC10701902.
5. Salimi C, Kachooei M, Dadashi M, Farahani H. Effects of integrative behavioral couple therapy on communication patterns and marital adjustment. J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 29; 13:276. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_201_23. PMID: 39309993; PMCID: PMC11414875.
6. Snellingen JF, Carlin PE, Vetere A. Is It Safe Enough? An IPA Study of How Couple Therapists Make Sense of Their Decision to Either Stop or Continue with Couple Therapy When Violence Becomes the Issue. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jan 5; 14(1):37. doi: 10.3390/bs14010037. PMID: 38247689; PMCID: PMC10813270.
7. Zahedi H, Alizadeh-Dibazari Z, Mirghafourvand M, Sahebihagh MH, Hosseinzadeh M. The effectiveness of couple-based interventions on the marital outcomes of women with genital and breast cancer and their partners: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2024 Mar 27; 24(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12088-x. PMID: 38539118; PMCID: PMC10976738.
8. Haase CM. Emotion Regulation in Couples across Adulthood. Annu Rev Dev Psychol. 2023 Dec; 5(1): 399-421. doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-120621-043836. PMID: 38939362; PMCID: PMC11210602.
9. Delghandi B, Namani E. Comparing the effectiveness of structural family therapy and mindfulness-based family therapy in cohesion and adaptability in couples with marital dissatisfaction. Heliyon. 2024 Feb 7; 10(4): e24827. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2024.e24827. PMID: 38404907; PMCID: PMC10884341.
10. Meng TJ, Qian Y, Wang YL, Gao BL, Liu JJ, Yue JL, Tang DH. The effect of systematic couple group therapy on families with depressed juveniles: a pilot trial. Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 28; 15:1283519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1283519. PMID: 38863609; PMCID: PMC11165141.
11. Morland LA, Perivoliotis D, Wachsman TR, Alam A, Knopp K, Khalifian C, Ramanathan D, Chargin BE, Bismark AW, Glynn S, Stauffer C, Wagner AC. MDMA-assisted brief cognitive behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD: Study protocol for a pilot study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 May 24; 40:101314. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101314. PMID: 38994348; PMCID: PMC11237689.
12. Kurbatfinski S, Woo J, Ntanda H, Giesbrecht G, Letourneau N. Perinatal Predictors and Mediators of Attachment Patterns in Preschool Children: Exploration of Children's Contributions in Interactions with Mothers. Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 21; 11(8):1022. doi: 10.3390/children11081022. PMID: 39201958; PMCID: PMC11352242.
13. Santaguida E, Bergamasco M. A perspective-based analysis of attachment from prenatal period to second year postnatal life. Front Psychol. 2024 May 22; 15:1296242. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296242. PMID: 38840732; PMCID: PMC11150629.
14. Parsons JD, Cocker CR, East AK, Wheatley RM, Ramachandran VK, Kaschani F, Kaiser M, Poole PS. Factors governing attachment of Rhizobium leguminosarum to legume roots at acid, neutral, and alkaline pHs.M Systems. 2024 Sep 17; 9(9): e0042224. doi: 10.1128/msystems 00422-24. Epub 2024 Aug 21. PMID: 39166858; PMCID: PMC11406972.
15. Peng C, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang Z. Relationship Between Father-Child Attachment and Adolescents' Anxiety: The Bidirectional Chain Mediating Roles of Neuroticism and Peer Attachment. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Aug 8; 17:2971-2985. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S467290. PMID: 39139850; PMCID: PMC11319102.
16. Pan T, Chen D, Yu Z, Liu Q, Chen Y, Zhang A, Kong F. Analysis of current situation and influencing factors of marital adjustment in patients with Crohn's disease and their spouses. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 15; 103(11): e37527. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037527. PMID: 38489689; PMCID: PMC10939668.
17. Makhanova A, McNulty JK, Eckel LA, Nikonova L, Bartz JA, Hammock EAD. CD38 is associated with bonding-relevant cognitions and relationship satisfaction over the first 3 years of marriage. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3; 11(1): 2965. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82307-z. PMID: 33536489; PMCID: PMC7859203.
18. Sarkhabi Abdolmaleki M., Dokanei Fard F, Behbodi M. Providing a Model for Predicting Couples' Emotional Divorce Based on Metacognitive Beliefs and Emotional Regulation Strategies Mediated by Marital Burnout in Married Women. Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 2021; 2(2): 1-28. doi: 10.22034/aftj.2021.276753.1059.
19. Karimi P., Karami J., Dehghan F. Relationship between Attachment Styles and Conflict Resolution Styles and Married Employees' Marital Burnout. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, 2015; 5(20): 53-70. https://jzvj.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_686.html.
20. Garavand H. The Mediating Role of Early Maladaptive Schemas in the Relationship Between Attachment Styles with Corona Anxiety. Applied Psychology, 2022; 16(1): 181-161. doi: 10.52547/apsy.2021.223946.1165.
21. Ebrahimi Z., Makvand Hoseini S., Tabatabaee SM. Prediction of Generalized Anxiety Disorder based on Attachment Styles by Mediating Early Maladaptive Schemas in Adolescents. Psychological Achievements, 2023; 30(2): 121-138. doi: 10.22055/psy 2022.38248.2731.
22. Rahiman R., Qamari M., Babakhani V., Jafari A. Modeling the structural relationship between personality dimensions and attachment styles with communication skills and marital conflicts with the mediation of primary maladaptive schemas in couples facing divorce, Journal of Applied Family Therapy. 2023; 4(5):251-265. doi: 10.22034/aftj.2023.393484.2014.
23. Fan Z, Wu H, Tao M, Chen L. Relationship between Chinese middle-aged and old couples' Confucian coping thinking and marital quality. Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23; 10:956214. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.956214. PMID: 36211692; PMCID: PMC9537638.
24. BaCh B, Lockwood G, Young JE. A new look at the schema therapy model: organization and role of early maladaptive schemas. Cognitive behavior therapy. 2018; 47(4): 328-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2017.141056.
25. Ghiasi M, Molavi M, Neshatdost H, Salavati M. The Factor Structure of the Farsi Version of Young Schema Questionnaire-S3 in Two Groups in Tehran, Psychological Achievement. 2011; 18(1): 93-118. https://psychac.scu.ac.ir/article_11692.html.
26. Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990; 58(4): 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644.
27. Pakdaman M, Karashki H. Inquiry of dysfunctional motivational beliefs based on data foundation theory. Journal of Psychological Science, 2021; 20(108): 2343-2358. doi:10.52547/JPS.20.108.2343.
28. Pines AM, Nunes R. The relationship between career& couple burnout: Implications for career & couple counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling. 2003; 740(2), 50-64.
29. Rakhshany P, Shahabizadeh F, Alizadeh HA. Model of Couple Burnout about the Multi-Dimensional Pattern of Connection with God and Thought and Language Controls. Studies in Islam and Psychology, 2016; 10(19): 7-30. doi: 10.30471/psy 2016.1081.
30. Adlparvar E, Safaeirad I, Erfani N, Jadidi H. Development of a Causal Model of Marital Conflict based on Attachment Styles with the Mediating Role of Disconnection/Rejection and Impaired Autonomy/Performance Schemas in Women on the Verge of Divorce. Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 2021; 2(2): 173-189. doi: 10.22034/aftj.2021.290623.1115.
31. Afshari Z, Mootabi F, Panaghi L. The mediating role of early maladaptive schemas in the relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction. Iranian Journal of Family Psychology. 2021; 2(1): 59-70. https://www.ijfpjournal.ir/article_245505.html?lang=en.
32. Malm EK, Oti-Boadi M, Adom-Boakye NA, Andah A. Marital Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction among Ghanaians. Journal of Family. 2022. 44(1): 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X221126752.
33. Brandão T, Matias M, Ferreira T, Vieira J, Schulz MS, Matos PM. Attachment, emotion regulation, and well-being in couples: Intrapersonal and interpersonal associations. J Pers. 2020 Aug; 88(4):748-761. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12523. Epub 2019 Nov 15. PMID: 31674659; PMCID: PMC7383855.