چکیده مقاله :
هدف: سازمانها امروزه در محیطی نامطمئن، پیچیده و در حال تغییر فعالیت مینمایند که نیازمند توسعة قابلیتها و ظرفیتهایی بهعنوان کسب مزیت رقابتی است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر ارائه مدل توسعه استارتآپهای فناورانه جهت پویایی سازوکارهای راهبری برونسازمانی است.
روششناسی پژوهش: پژوهش از نظر هدف اکتشافی و از نظر روش ترکیبی (کیفی، کمی) بود. جامعه آماری در پژوهش کیفی شامل خبرگان و مدیران عالی شرکتهای صنعتی بورس اوراق بهادار بودند که ۲۰ نفر از آنها بهصورت هدفمند انتخاب شدند و نمونهگیری تا دستیابی به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. در بخش کمی نیز جامعه آماری شامل 5۰۰ نفر از اعضای هیأتعلمی، مدیران عالی، میانی و کارشناسان شرکتهای صنعتی بورس اوراق بهادار تهران بود و حجم نمونهگیری با استفاده از فرمول کوکران ۲۱۷ نفر برای سالهای ۱۳۹۱ تا ۱۴۰۱ به دست آمد. پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش نظریهپردازی زمینه بنیان، الگوی جامع توسعه استارتآپهای فناورانه مبتنی بر پویایی سازوکارهای راهبری برونسازمانی را ارائه و تبیین میکند.
یافتهها: نتایج بیانگر آن است که محدودیت منابع مالی (بودجههای پژوهش و توسعه) و تسهیم ریسک، تحول (چرخش) بهسوی اقتصاد دیجیتال همگام با تحولات منطقه و جهان، فرآیند نفوذ به بازار و افزایش رقابتپذیری و شکلگیری مقیاس اقتصادی برای توسعه محصول و تحولات اجتماعی و فرهنگی همچون شکلگیری طبقه متوسط تحصیلکرده و در نهایت ضرورت تأکید بر تفکر راهبردی در سازمان متناسب با تغییر محیط فعالیت بهعنوان مقولههای علی توسعه استارتآپها میباشد. همچنین مقولههای زمینهای و مداخلهگر به ترتیب شامل 10 و 5 مقوله شامل شرایط کلان اقتصادی و محدودیت در جذب سرمایهگذار خارجی و پیچیدگی ذاتی نوآوری و تجاریسازی بهویژه در حوزه فناوریهای پیشرفته است. بهعلاوه راهبردها شامل 16 مؤلفه منجمله اتخاذ رویکرد استارتآپ ناب (چابک) و ریسکپذیری و مدیریت بحران است. همچنین مقوله پیامدی شامل خلق ارزش برای کسبوکارها متعاقب رویکرد بازار محور با ادغام منابع و توسعه محصولات، انعطافپذیری فناورانه و سازمانی و کسب مزیت رقابتی پایدار، خلق و تصاحب فرصتهای توسعه و رشد در راستای توسعه اقتصادی با رویکرد بازآرایی، انطباق و ارتقای استارتآپ با گسترش سرمایهگذاری و تخصیص بهینه سرمایه تعیین شد. در بخش کمی نیز، مدل مفهومی پژوهش ارائهشده مورد آزمون قرار گرفت و فرضیه پژوهش مورد تأیید قرار گرفت.
اصالت / ارزشافزوده علمی: یافتههای پژوهش میتواند به توسعه سطح رقابت در بین شرکتهای بورس اوراق بهادار مؤثر باشد و انتظار میرود استقرار سازوکارهای راهبری برونسازمانی به اجرای اثربخش وظایف هیأتمدیره و رعایت الزامات قانونی کمک مؤثری بنماید.
چکیده انگلیسی:
Purpose: Organizations today operate in an uncertain, complex, and rapidly changing environment that necessitates the development of capabilities and capacities for competitive advantage. The aim of this research is to present a model for the development of technological startups to enhance the dynamics of extra-organizational navigation mechanisms.
Methodology: The research adopts an exploratory objective and a mixed-method approach (qualitative-quantitative). The qualitative research population consists of experts and top managers of industrial companies listed on the stock exchange, with 20 purposively selected participants, and sampling continued until theoretical saturation was achieved.Within the quantitative segment, the sample comprises 500 individuals drawn from the academic faculty, senior executives, middle managers, and industry experts associated with firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The sample size of 217 individuals was determined using Cochran's formula for the period spanning 2012 to 2022.
Findings: The results indicate that constraints on financial resources (research and development budgets) and risk-sharing, the transition towards the digital economy synchronized with regional and global developments, market penetration processes, increasing competitiveness, and the formation of an economic scale for product development, as well as social and cultural transformations such as the emergence of an educated middle class, underscore the necessity of strategic thinking in organizations commensurate with changes in the operating environment as key factors in the development of startups. Moreover, contextual and intervening factors include 10 and 5 categories, respectively, comprising macroeconomic conditions and constraints in attracting foreign investment, and the inherent complexity of innovation and commercialization, especially in advanced technology domains. Furthermore, strategies encompassing 16 components, including adopting an agile startup approach and risk-taking and crisis management. Additionally, consequential categories include creating value for businesses following a market-oriented approach through resource integration and product development. In the quantitative section, the conceptual research model was tested, and the research hypothesis was confirmed.
Originality/Scientific Contribution: The research findings can contribute to enhancing competition among companies listed on the stock exchange, and it is expected that the establishment of extra-organizational navigation mechanisms will effectively assist in the implementation of the board of directors' tasks and compliance with legal requirements.
منابع و مأخذ:
Alessandri, T. M., Tong, T. W., & Reuer, J. J. (2012). Firm Heterogeneity in Growth Option Value: The Role of Managerial Incentives. Strategic Management Journal, 33(13), 1557–1566.
Alkemade, F., Heimeriks, G., Schoen, A., Villard, L., & Laurens, P. (2015). Tracking the internationalization of multinational corporate inventive activity: national and sectoral characteristics. Research Policy, 44(9), 1763–1772.
Alvarez-Garrido, E., & Dushnitsky, G. (2016). Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 819–834.
Armanios, D. E., Eesley, C. E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2017). How Entrepreneurs Leverage Institutional Intermediaries in Emerging Economies to Acquire Public Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7), 1373–1390.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.
Baglieri, D., Baldi, F., & Tucci, C. (2018). University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76-77, 51-63.
Bandarian, R. (2018). Explaining the reasons for emerging tech startups in the upstream oil industry and their specific challenges. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 08(3), 7-20. [In Persian]
Basu, S., Phelps, C., & Kotha, S. (2011). Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 153–171.
Behfar, K., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2018). Perspective—Discovery Within Validation Logic: Deliberately Surfacing, Complementing, and Substituting Abductive Reasoning in Hypothetico-Deductive Inquiry. Organization Science, 29(2), 323–340.
Belderbos, R., Jacob, J., & Lokshin, B. (2018). Corporate venture capital (CVC) investments and technological performance: Geographic diversity and the interplay with technology alliances. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 20–34.
Benner, M. J., & Ranganathan, R. (2012). Offsetting Illegitimacy? How Pressures from Securities Analysts Influence Incumbents in the Face of New Technologies. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 213–233.
Berg, V., Birkeland, J., Nguyen-Duc, A., Pappas, I. O., & Jaccheri, L. (2020). Achieving agility and quality in product development - an empirical study of hardware startups. Journal of Systems and Software, 167, 110599.
Birhanu, A. G., Gambardella, A., & Valentini, G. (2016). Bribery and Investment: Firm-Level Evidence from Africa and Latin America. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1865–1877.
Breznitz, D. (2007). Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry. Research Policy, 36(9), 1465–1482.
Caseiro, N., & Coelho, A. (2019). The influence of Business Intelligence capacity, network learning and innovativeness on startups performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 139–145.
Choi, S.-K., Han, S., & Kwak, K.-T. (2021).
Innovation Capabilities and the Performance of Start-Ups in Korea: The Role of Government Support Policies. Sustainability, 13(11), 6009.
Cole, R. A., & Sokolyk, T. (2018). Debt financing, survival, and growth of start-up firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 609–625.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, 3.
Elhami, M., & Vakili Fard, H. R. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Corporate Governance, Competitiveness and Management Conservatism on Voluntary Disclosure of Information. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 11(41), 177-199. [In Persian]
Fu, Y. (2019). The value of corporate governance: Evidence from the Chinese anti-corruption campaign. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 461–476.
Gbadegeshin, S. A., Natsheh, A. A., Ghafel, K., Mohammed, O., Koskela, A., Rimpiläinen, A., Tikkanen, J., & Kuoppala, A. (2022). Overcoming the Valley of Death: A New Model for High Technology Startups. Sustainable Futures, 4, 100077.
Ghasemi, Gh., Khodamipour, A., & Shamsadini, K. (2022). The role of economic policy uncertainty in the relationship between voluntary disclosure of information and information asymmetry. Advances in Finance and Investment, 6(3), 31-52. [In Persian]
Ghouma, H., Ben-Nasr, H., & Yan, R. (2018). Corporate governance and cost of debt financing: Empirical evidence from Canada. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 67, 138–148.
Gonzaga, B. S., Figueiredo, P. S., Souza, E. L. R. da C., & Passos, F. U. (2020). Organizational learning capacity of startups in Northeast Brazil. Revista de Gestão, 27(3), 301–316.
Hosseini, S. A. (2021). Examining changes in the structure of companies due to the implementation of corporate governance mechanisms on conditional conservatism at the level of selected industries in Tehran Stock Exchange. New research approaches in management and accounting, 5(19), 1719-1747. [In Persian]
Huang, Z., Savita, K. S., & Zhong-jie, J. (2022). The Business Intelligence impact on the financial performance of start-ups. Information Processing & Management, 59(1), 102761.
Salehian, M., Bahrami, S., Rasekh, N., & Rizevandi, A. (2022). Providing a model for the development of sports startups in Iran. Contemporary Studies On Sport Management, 12(23), 81-94. [In Persian]
Sheikh, W., & Alom, K. (2021). Corporate governance, board practices and performance of shipping firms in Bangladesh. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(3), 259-267.
Shrives, P. J., & Brennan, N. M. (2017). Explanations for corporate governance non-compliance: A rhetorical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 49, 31–56.
Sohail, S., Rasul, F., & Fatima, U. (2017). Is internal and external mechanism of governance enriching the performance of the banking sector of Pakistan? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(4), 629–642.
Susanto, H., Fang Yie, L., Mohiddin, F., Rahman Setiawan, A. A., Haghi, P. K., & Setiana, D. (2021). Revealing Social Media Phenomenon in Time of COVID-19 Pandemic for Boosting Start-Up Businesses through Digital Ecosystem. Applied System Innovation, 4(1), 6.
Taghavi Rafsan
jani, E., Hakakzadeh, M., & Manouchehrinejad, M. (2020). Presenting the indigenous model of startup quality development in the country's sports, in accordance with global standards. Scientific Journal of Standard and Quality Management, 10(2), 107-125. [In Persian]
Tsvetanova, L., Carraresi, L., Wustmans, M., & Bröring, S. (2021). Actors’ strategic goals in emerging technological innovation systems: evidence from the biorefinery sector in Germany. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(7), 760–773.
Tulcanaza-Prieto, A. B., & Lee, Y. (2022). Real Earnings Management, Firm Value, and Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Korean Market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(1), 19.
Yang, M., Sulaiman, R., Yin, Y., Mallamaci, V., & Alrabaiah, H. (2022). The effect of business intelligence, organizational learning and innovation on the financial performance of innovative companies located in Science Park. Information Processing & Management, 59(2), 102852.
Yari, F., & Shayannia, S. A. (2021). Investigating the Role of Organizational Entrepreneurship in Organizational Performance with Regard to Strategic Entrepreneurship (Case Study: Ilam Steel Kord). Journal of Modern Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 5(18), 1-18. [In Persian]
Zamani, Sh., Zanjirdar, M., & Lalbar, A. (2022). Meta-analysis of the effect of information disclosure on market reaction. Advances in Finance and Investment, 9(3), 1-28. [In Persian]