فهرست مقالات Nader Gholi Ghorchian


  • مقاله

    1 - Presentation of the Initial Model of Marketing of Iranian Universities
    International Journal of Finance, Accounting and Economics Studies , شماره 5 , سال 3 , پاییز 2022
    Considering that educational systems take a significant share of the budget of each country, it is undeniable to ensure the optimal quality of their performance in order to prevent the wastage of human and material capital and to have the ability to compete in the futur چکیده کامل
    Considering that educational systems take a significant share of the budget of each country, it is undeniable to ensure the optimal quality of their performance in order to prevent the wastage of human and material capital and to have the ability to compete in the future world where "marketing" is the most important component for the survival of any organization. So, the researcher decided to model the marketing of Iranian universities. This study is applied in terms of purpose and has a field data collection method and qualitative-quantitative implementation method. In the qualitative part, using thematic analysis method in two ways, the content analysis of written documents and the content analysis of interviews. then Maxqda 12 software was used for data analysis. in this field to measure reliability. Cronbach's alpha method was used. In the end, the modeling of Iranian universities' marketing with 2 educational and non-educational dimensions was sent to 20 experts for validation, and was evaluated with five dimensions of philosophy and goals with an average of 512.3, theoretical foundations with an average of 568.3, executive principles with an average of 452.3, evaluation system with an average of 3.342 and the executive mechanism with an average of 739.3. The results of the study showed that among the known dimensions, the educational dimension had a higher priority than the non-educational dimension, and among the components, the component of education method was the most important among 12 known components. پرونده مقاله

  • مقاله

    2 - Provide a Model for Identifying Indicators of Education Development (Tuition and Content Services, Health-Individual Education, etc.) in Working Children
    Curriculum Research Journal , شماره 2 , سال 2 , زمستان 1400
    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a model for the development of children's education.Methodology: The research method was mixed (qualitative-quantitative). The statistical population in this study was all experts in the field of educational management a چکیده کامل
    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide a model for the development of children's education.Methodology: The research method was mixed (qualitative-quantitative). The statistical population in this study was all experts in the field of educational management and curriculum planning and training of working children. After the 11th interview, theoretical saturation took place. Validity was obtained through 4 experts and by two colleagues and reliability of the Copa formula (0.632). To conduct this research, in addition to the documentary study, the content analysis technique with MAXQDA12 software was used to identify the dimensions, components, and indicators of the development of working children's education, and in the quantitative data analysis section, the structural equation technique was used.Findings: As a result of qualitative analysis, 3 dimensions, 8 components, and 43 indicators were identified. The dimensions of health-individual education, socio-cultural education, and education of knowledge and academic and professional skills were identified as the main dimensions of the development of education of working children. Finally, all indicators were approved using the structural equation technique and education of knowledge and academic skills. And vocational education with a coefficient of 0.858, health-individual education with a coefficient of 0.701, and socio-cultural education with a coefficient of 0.605 showed the most impact and importance in the model, respectively. The validity of the model was measured by 5 dimensions (philosophy and purpose with an average of 4.8, theoretical foundations with an average of 4.9, executive principles with an average of 4.70, evaluation system with an average of 4.8, and executive mechanism with an average of 4.8) that all dimensions were approved.Conclusion: Finally, a model with 5 dimensions (philosophy and purpose with an average of 4.8, theoretical foundations with an average of 4.9, executive principles with an average of 4.7, evaluation system with an average of 4.81, and executive mechanism with an average of 4.80) was designed and validated پرونده مقاله