فهرست مقالات Hossein Erahimi


  • مقاله

    1 - Optimization of Location and Stiffness of an Intermediate Support to Maximize the First Natural Frequency of a Beam with Tip Mass-With Application
    International Journal of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology , شماره 58 , سال 15 , زمستان 2024
    The optimal position and minimum stiffness of an intermediate support is implemented to maximize the fundamental natural frequency of a vibrating cantilever Euler-Bernoulli beam with tip mass. According to Courant’s maximum-minimum theorem, maximum value of the fi چکیده کامل
    The optimal position and minimum stiffness of an intermediate support is implemented to maximize the fundamental natural frequency of a vibrating cantilever Euler-Bernoulli beam with tip mass. According to Courant’s maximum-minimum theorem, maximum value of the first natural frequency of a beam with a single additional rigid internal support, is equal to the second natural frequency of the unsupported beam. In literature, for a cantilever beam without tip mass, the optimum position of intermediate support was reported as 0.7834L and minimum dimensionless stuffiness as 266.9. In this paper, the effect of tip mass ratio on optimum location and minimum stiffness is investigated. The Finite element method is employed. Cross sectional area is uniform and material is homogeneous and isotropic. Numerical results demonstrate that as tip mass ratio increases the optimal position moves toward the tip mass and minimum stiffness increases. For instance, for tip mass ratio 0.5, optimal position is 0.92L and minimum dimensionless stiffness is 284. Optimal position and minimum stiffness are presented for various range of mass ratio. In many applications, it is not possible to place intermediate support at optimal position; therefore, the minimum stiffness does not exist. In these cases, a tolerances zone is considered and related design curves are proposed. As a practical example, an agitator shaft is considered and end impeller is modeled as tip mass. The effectiveness of the proposed design curves in order to maximize natural frequency is shown. A design of an intermediate support is presented; in this example the fundamental frequency has increased as much as 300 percent without any change in shaft diameter. پرونده مقاله

  • مقاله

    2 - Minimum Stiffness and Optimal Position of an Intermediate Elastic Support to Maximize the Fundamental Frequency of a Vibrating Timoshenko Beam using Finite Element Method and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm
    International Journal of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology , شماره 63 , سال 16 , تابستان 2023
    This paper explores the optimal position and minimum stiffness of two intermediate supports to maximize the fundamental natural frequency of a vibrating cantilever Timoshenko beam with tip mass using Finite Element Method (FEM) and a multi-objective genetic algorithm (G چکیده کامل
    This paper explores the optimal position and minimum stiffness of two intermediate supports to maximize the fundamental natural frequency of a vibrating cantilever Timoshenko beam with tip mass using Finite Element Method (FEM) and a multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA). After validating the results by comparison to previous works, the effects of the mass ratio and the position and stiffness of intermediate elastic support on the fundamental frequency are investigated. The numerical results demonstrated that as mass ratio increases, the optimal position moves toward the tip mass, and minimum stiffness increases. In many practical applications, it is not possible to place intermediate support in the optimal position; therefore, the minimum stiffness does not exist. In order to overcome this issue, a tolerance zone is considered, and design curves are proposed. The simultaneous optimization of the first and second natural frequencies of the beam with two intermediate supports was carried out using the genetic algorithm (GA) and the multi-objective GA. It was found that the optimization of the first and second natural frequencies did not require the two supports to have the same and high stiffness. The stiffness and optimal positions of the two supports differ at different mass ratios. Moreover, to optimize the first natural frequency, the second support should be stiffer, while the optimization of the second natural frequency requires the higher stiffness of the first support. پرونده مقاله