Effects of Critical Pedagogy on Iranian Upper-intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Quantity and Quality
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Zhila Zabihi
1
(Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
Ahmad Ameri-Golestan
2
(Department of English, Majlesi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
کلید واژه: Quality, EFL learners, Critical Pedagogy, writing quantity,
چکیده مقاله :
Critical pedagogy is regarded as an exhaustive system of learning through which learners' critical consciousness, self-regulation and autonomy, individuality, and learning achievements are promoted. Therefore, 60 Iranian upper- intermediate EFL learners (both male and female) from among 75 students based on their OPT test scores were selected. These participants were divided into a control group (N = 30) and an experimental group (N = 30). In order to ascertain that the students in the two groups were homogeneous in terms of writing quantity, the writing pretest was administered. The control group (CG) received the traditional writing instructions, whereas the experimental group (EG), who was taught writing instructions as guideline, received critical pedagogy. After the treatment, the writing posttest was also constructed. The scores of the students on the placement test, writing pretest, and posttest of the two groups were analyzed using SPSS 20. In addition, an independent-sample t- test and a one-way ANCOVA were used to compare the CG and EG learners' writing quantity and quality on the posttest scores. The data obtained from the study indicated that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group counterparts. Implications for EFL teachers include drawing the attention to the importance and usefulness of critical pedagogy in L2 teaching classes.
Akbari, R. (2008). Transforming lives: Introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal, 62(3), 276-283
Alsamadani, H. A. (2010). The relationship between Saudi EFL students’ writing competence, L1 writing proficiency, and self-regulation. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(1), 53-63.
Arnaudet, M. L. & Barret, M. E. (1990). Paragraph Development: A Guide for students of English (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barjesteh, H., Nasroulahi, A., & Esmaili, M. R. (2014). Reformulating short stories through the lens of critical pedagogy: A critical literacy practice in essay-writing classrooms. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(3), 531-542.
Burbules, N.C. & Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences, and limits. In Popkewitz, T.S & Lynn, F. (Eds.), Critical Theories in Education (pp.45-66). New York: Routledge.
Cuenca-Sanchez, Y. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development through a critical literacy approach: Teaching students with disabilities to write persuasively by understanding the word and the world. Retrieved April 3, 2016, from:http://mason.gmu. edu/~ycuencas/documents/ Literacy%20course%20EDRD%20830/Final%20Paper%20Literacy%2005.12.08%20a.pdf
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Dujsik, D. (2008). The Effects of Pre-writing Strategy Training Guided by Computer-based Procedural Facilitation on ESL Students' Strategy Use, Writing Quantity, and Writing Quality. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. College of Education, University of South Florida, Florida, United States.
Freire, P. (1988). The adult literacy process as cultural action for freedom and education and Conscientization. In E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, & M, Rose (Eds.), Perspectives In literacy (pp. 398–409). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Giroux, H. (1997). Rewriting the discourse of racial identity: Towards a pedagogy and politics of whiteness. Harvard Educational Review, 67(2), 285-321.
Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). Handbook of writing research (pp. 187-207). New York: Guilford.
Harris, J. (1993). Introducing Writing. (pp.16-63). London: Penguim
Hill, L. A. (1980). Step to Understanding (pp.176-236). Oxford University Press.English language teaching.
Kessing-Styles, L. (2003). The relationship between critical pedagogy and assessment in teacher education. Radical Pedagogy, 5(1), 1-21.
Majid, F. A. (2007). Self-regulated learning: Effective practices in ESL writing classes. Journal of Language Studies, 3, 115-120.
McLaren, P. (1995). Critical Pedagogy and Predatory Culture, Oppositional Politics in a Postmodern Era (p.2). London: Routledge.
McLaren, P. (1998). Che: The pedagogy of Che Guevara: Critical pedagogy and globalization thirty years after Che. Cultural Circles, 3, 29-103.
Mekheimer, M. (2005). Effects of Internet-based instruction, using website and email on developing essay writing skills. Unpublished PhD Cairo University, Egypt.
Mohamed, A. A., & Malik, A. (2014). ELT teachers’ awareness of critical pedagogy: A Cross Culture Study. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(3), 13-27.
Mohammadi, N., Motallebzadeh, K., & Ashraf, H. (2014). Critical Pedagogy: A key factor for improvement of Iranian EFL learners’ self-regulation and writing ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(4), 46-54.
Mohebi, A., Beykmohammadi, M., & Farsani, M. A. (2011). On the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ goal oriented and self-regulated learning and their writing performance. International Conference on Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 26, 192-196.
Moreno-Lopez, I. (2005). Sharing power with students: The critical language classroom. Radical Pedagogy, 7(2), 1-25.
Mozaheb, M. A., Seifoori, Z., & Biglar Beigi, A. (2012). A Technology-based Framework: Effective Iranian EFL Writing Teachers, vol.70, pp.18-27.
Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. TESL-EJ, 6(2), 1-20.
Olshtain, E. (2001). Functional tasks for mastering the mechanics of writing and going just beyond. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3, 207-232.
Pennington, M. C. (2003). The impact of the computer in second language writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp.287-310). Cambridge England and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rahimi, M., & Noroozisiam, E. (2013). The effect of strategies-based instruction on the improvement of EFL learners’ writing quality. SAGE Open, 3(2), 2158244013494222.
Ruan, Z. (2005). A metacognitive perspective on the growth of self-regulated EFL student writers. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 175-202.
. Siha, A. A. (2014). Critical Pedagogy, Discourse Tensions, and the Basic Writing Classroom: A Critical Action Research Study (pp.485-490). Paper presented at Adult Education Research Conference. Harrisburg, PA.
Weir, C. (1990). Communicative Language Testing. Premice-Hall, London. Retrived from System 29 (2001), 371-383.
Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of second language Writing, 13(1), 29-48.
