E-Assessment via Apps/modules, Based on the Post Methods Theorizing
محورهای موضوعی : Research PaperAbbas Motamedi 1 , Sina Ghorbani 2
1 - Associate professor, Islamic Azad University, Kazeroun Branch
2 - Instructor, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch
کلید واژه: collaborative learning, interactivity, e-assessment, ESAP, App, meaning construction,
چکیده مقاله :
The post methods era has witnessed a dramatic change inapproaches to and methods of teaching as well as testing. At the heart of such a change, collaborative learning has received top priority and testing domain has actually gone under scrutiny. This new mode of education has made stakeholders, especially in higher education; reflect on an interactive e-assessment based instruction. Such a cyber-based environment provides immersive and authentic learning, mixed with a type of e-assessment task, no longer functioning like a summative test but it has become learning and teaching tool. The present research study intends to shed some lights on the characteristics of an e-assessment-based App in a descriptive format on one hand, and its viability in an exploratory design on the other, with emphasis on e-assessment at its core for teaching ESAP- English Specially for Academic Purposes- while instruction and assessment of language skills and sub skills are included. The descriptive and exploratory design of the study highlights the mode of interactivity inherent in this App, which provides a chance for learners to explore, make errors and construct meaning/solutions to their problems via hyperlinks in the created App.
Brown, J. D. & Rodgers, Theodore s. (2002). Doing second language research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cain, T. R., (2014, November) Assessment and Academic Freedom: In Concert, Not Conflict.National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment.
Cain, T. R., & Hutchings, P. (2015, January). Faculty and students: Assessment at the intersection of teaching and learning. In G. D. Kuh, S. O. Ikenberry, N. A. Jankowski, T. R.
Cain, P. T. Ewell, P. Hutchings, & J. Kinzie (Eds.), Using evidence of student learning to improve higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Clarke, Sophie. Lindsay, Katharine. McKenna, Chris. New, Steve − INQUIRE: a case study in evaluating the potential of online MCQ tests in a discursive subject − Volume 12, Number 3/September 2004 of ALT−J.
Crisp, Geoffrey. (2006) Interactive e-Assessments. EDU-COM International Conference Conferences, Symposia and Campus Events.University of Adelaide
Evans, C. and Sabry, K. (2003) Evaluation of the Interactivity of Web-Based Learning Systems: Principles and Process, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 89-99.
Lai, Emily R. (2011) Critical Thinking: A Literature Review. Research Report. Pearson. http://www.pearsonassessments.com/.
Masters, G. N. (2013) Reforming Educational Assessment: Imperatives, principles and challenges. Australian Council for Educational Research. First published 2013 by ACER Press Australian Council for Educational Research 19 Prospect Hill Road, Camberwell, Victoria, 3124.
McAlpine, Mhairi, (2002) Principles of Assessment. The blue print by Robert Clark Centre for Technological Education, university of Glasgow.
Nichol, D.J. &Macfarlane−Dick, D. (2005). Formative assessment and self−regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Accepted for publication by Studies in Higher Education (2005).
Powell, J. W. (2011). Outcomes assessment: Conceptual and other problems. AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom. ttp://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/JAF/2011%20JAF/ Powell.
Richards, Jack C. (1996) Teachers’ Maxims in Language Teaching.TESOL QUARTERLY Vol. 30, No. 2, Summer 1996.
Rovai, A. P. (2000). Online and traditional assessments: What is the difference?' The Internet and Higher Education 3, 3, 141−151
Schutz, Ricardo. (2014) Stephen Krashen's Theory of Second Language Acquisition: Assimilação Natural o Construtivismo Comunicativo no Ensino de Línguas. http://sk.com.br/sk-inst.html # inst . last revision: June 12, 2014.
Weller, Martin,(2002). Assessment Issues on a Web−based Course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Mar 2002, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p109, 8p.
Zakrzewski, S. and Steven, C. (2003) Computer−based assessment: quality assurance issues, the hub of the wheel. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 28 (6) 609−623.
