Development of EFL Learners’ Referential and Expressive Writing Performance: Task-based Instruction vs. Project-based Instruction
محورهای موضوعی : Research Paper
Delaram Pourmandnia
1
(
Department of English Language Teaching, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
)
Ahmad Mohseni
2
(
Department of English Language Teaching, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
)
Hossein Rahmanpanah
3
(
Department of English Language Teaching, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
)
Ali Asghar Rostami Abusaeedi
4
(
Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman , Iran
)
کلید واژه: Task-based Instruction, EFL learners, writing skill, Project-based Instruction,
چکیده مقاله :
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of task-based instruction (TBI) and project-based instruction (PBI) on the improvement of EFL learners' referential and expressive writing performance. To accomplish this objective, 60 students majoring in English translation participated in Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT), but out of them 50 students were selected as the members of a homogeneous sample. Then, they were assigned into two experimental groups. They were exposed to IELTS module task-based writing pre-test, treatment, and post-test, to assess the participants' writing performance. The participants in first experimental group received TBI to practice the referential and expressive types of writing, while those in the second group received PBI. The results showed that TBI and PBI affected the development of both referential and expressive writing among EFL learners. In addition, the results revealed that there was not any statistically significant difference between the effect of PBI and TBI on developing expressive and referential writings among EFL learners. The pedagogical implications of the study are discussed at the end of the paper.
Brooks, G. & Wilson, J. (2014). Using Oral Presentations to Improve Students’ English Language Skills. Humanities Review, 19, 199-2012.
Cheng, L., Myles, J., and Curtis, A. (2004). Targeting language support for non-native English-speaking graduate students at a Canadian university. TESL Canada Journal, 21 (2), 50-71.
Dekdouk, F. (2013). Effects of oral presentations on developing EGAP students' communicative competence. (Unpublished M.A. Dissertation). Ouargla University, Algeria.
Enas, A. H. (2020). The impact of oral presentations on Al-Aqsa University EFL students' speaking performance, speaking anxiety and achievement in ELT Methodology. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 8(1), 1-27.
Farabi, M., Hassanvand, S. and Gorjian B. (2017). Using guided oral presentation teaching English language learners' speaking skills. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 3(1), 17-24
Ferris, D. (1998). Students’ views of academic aural/oral skills: A comparative needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 289-318.
Ferris, D., and Tagg, T. (1996). Academic oral communication needs for EAP learners: What subject-matter instructors actually require. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 31-58.
Fraioui, R. (2016). Improving students' speaking proficiency in EFL classes through presentation techniques. (Unpublished M.A. Dissertation). University of Biskra, Algeria.
Evans, S., and Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 3-17.
Evans, S., and Morrison, B. (2011). Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes,30, 198- 208 TESOL Quarterly, 32, 289-318.
Gan, Z. (2012). Understanding L2 Speaking Problems: Implications for ESL Curriculum Development in a Teacher Training Institution in Hong Kong. Australian Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 43-59.
Hyland, K. (1997). Is EAP necessary? A survey of Hong Kong undergraduates. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7, 77-99.
Kim, S. (2006). Academic oral communication needs of East Asian international graduate students in non-science and non-engineering fields. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 479-489.
Lindsay, C. and Knight, P. (2006) Learning and Teaching English. Oxford: OUP.
Riadil, IG. (2021). Does Oral Presentation Affect the Development of the Students’ Ability to Speak in EFL Classroom? Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal, 1(2),13-21.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Developing classroom speaking activities: From theory to practice. Guidelines, (RELC, Singapore), 28, 3-9.
Morita, N. (2000). Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 279–310.
Myles, J., and Curtis, A. (2004). Targeting language support for nonnative English-speaking graduate students at a Canadian university. TESL Canada Journal, 21(2), 50-71.
O’Malley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: practical approaches for teachers. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
Richards, J.C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., Platt, J. & Weber, H. (1985). The Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Essex, England: Longman.
Scrivener J (2005) Learning Teaching (2nd Edition). Oxford: Macmillan ELT.
Shimo, E. (2011). Implications for effective ways of conducting and assessing presentations in EFL classes. Language Education in Asia, 2(2), 227-236.
Sotoudehnama, E., & Hashamdar, M. (2016). Oral presentation vs. free discussion: Iranian intermediate EFL learners' speaking proficiency and perception. Applied Research on English Language, 5(2), 211-236.
Tam, W.M., and Cheng, Y.C. (1996). Staff development for school education quality: implications of multimodal. Training for Quality, 4(4), 16-24.
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. England: Pearson Educational Limited.
Yahay, M., & Kheirzadeh, S. (2015). The impact of oral presentation on fluency and accuracy of Iranian EFL learners’ speaking. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(5), 114-123.
