A Tailored Curriculum and Students’ General English Achievement across Gender

محورهای موضوعی : Teaching

Bizhan Hekmatshoar Tabari ¹ , Ramin Rahimi ² , Mohammad Reza Khodareza ³

1 - Department of English Language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azaz University, Tonekabon, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azaz University, Tonekabon, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azaz University, Tonekabon, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/10/17 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/11/27 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/11/27

کلید واژه: English for general purposes (EGP), needs analysis (NA), curriculum development, curriculum tailoring, curriculum evaluation,

چکیده مقاله :

The current study attempted to investigate the effect of a newly tailored curriculum on students’ general English achievement across gender as compared to the standard curriculum at Iranian tertiary education. The participants were 120 non-native undergraduate students of Pre-requisite General English course majoring in different disciplines at Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education in Tonekabon city. They were assigned into four groups including female control and experimental as well as male control and experimental. The experimental groups received teaching through the tailored curriculum and the control groups through the standard one. All the groups were given pretest and posttest on general English achievement. In order to analyze the data, a Kolmogrove-Smirnov test and an Independent Samples T-test were utilized. The findings of the study indicated female participant’s outperformance compared to the male ones, after being treated with tailored curriculum (TC) and standard curriculum (SC). However, the male participants experienced higher degree of progress after receiving TC as compared to SC, while such progress was not seen for the female.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The current study attempted to investigate the effect of a newly tailored curriculum on students’ general English achievement across gender as compared to the standard curriculum at Iranian tertiary education. The participants were 120 non-native undergraduate students of Pre-requisite General English course majoring in different disciplines at Ayandegan Institute of Higher Education in Tonekabon city. They were assigned into four groups including female control and experimental as well as male control and experimental. The experimental groups received teaching through the tailored curriculum and the control groups through the standard one. All the groups were given pretest and posttest on general English achievement. In order to analyze the data, a Kolmogrove-Smirnov test and an Independent Samples T-test were utilized. The findings of the study indicated female participant’s outperformance compared to the male ones, after being treated with tailored curriculum (TC) and standard curriculum (SC). However, the male participants experienced higher degree of progress after receiving TC as compared to SC, while such progress was not seen for the female.

منابع و مأخذ:

Ahmadi Safa, M. Ghonchepoor, A., Malek Mohamadi, R., Seifi, Z. & Zekrati, S. (2017). Prospect II: a textbook evaluation study based on EFL teachers’ perspective. Journal of language research (JLR), 9(24), 7-32. doi:10.22051/JLR.2016.2437
Ahmadi, A. & Derakhshan, A. (2015). An evaluation of the Iranian junior high schoolEnglish textbooks “Prospect 1” and its old version “Right Path to English 1” from. International Journal of English Language and Literature, 4(1), 37- 48. doi:10.18488/journal.23/2015.4.1/23.1.37.48
Ahmadi, M. R. (2011). The effect of integrative and instrumental motivation on Iranian EFL learners’ language learning. ELT Voices, 1(2), 7-15.
Alwan, F. H. (2006). An analysis of English language teachers' perceptions of curriculumchange in the United Arab Emirates [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Exeter, England.
Arap, B. (2016). An investigation into the implementation of English preparatory programs attertiary level in Turkey [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Turkey.
Ariane, R., & Pascale, H. (2012, March 5-7). The impact of age and gender on the learners’ motivation and attitudes towards French in secondary education in Flanders [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of INTED 2012 Conference, (pp. 159–165). Valencia, Spain. doi:hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2094488
Asadi, M., Kiany. G. R., Akbari, R. & Ghafar Samar, R. (2016). Program Evaluation of the New English Textbook (Prospect1). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 291-301. doi:10.17507/tpls.0602.10
Atai, M. R. & Mazlum, F. (2013). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: planning and practice. The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389-411. doi:org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744327
Atai, M. R. (2000). ESP revisited: A reappraisal study of discipline-based EAP programsin Iran [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Isfahan, Iran.
Bayram, İ. & Canaran, Ö. (2019). Evaluation of an English preparatory program at a Turkish Foundation University. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 48- 69. doi:10.17263/jlls.547606
Becirovic, S. (2017). The Relationship between Gender, Motivation and Achievement in Learning English as a Foreign Language. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(2), 210-220. doi:10.13187/ejced.2017.2.210
Brown, J. R. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Heinle & Heinle.
Burgos, S. (2012). Behind classroom doors: Consistency between policy and practice in the English as a second language classroom [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad Del Turabo, Puerto Rico.
Camarata, S., & Woodcock, R. (2006). Sex differences in processing speed: Developmental effects in males and females. Intelligence,34(3), 231–252. doi:org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.12.001
Carr, J., & Pauwels, A. (2006). Boys and foreign language learning: Real boys don’t do languages. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chavez, M. (2001). Gender in the language classroom (1 st ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Dooey, P. (2010). Students' perspectives of an EAP pathway program. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 184-197. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.013
Field, K. (2000). Why are girls better at modern foreign languages than boys? In K. Field (Eds.). Issues in modern foreign language teaching (pp. 125-135). Routledge.
Ghanbari, B. & Ketabi, S. (2011). Practicing a change in an Iranian EFL curriculum: from ivory tower to reality. The Iranian EFL Journal, 7(6), 268 – 282.
Gillett, A. J., & Hammond, A. C. (2011). Pre-Master's course design: What can we learn from assessment? In S. Etherington (Eds.). English for specific academic purposes (pp. 95-100). Reading: Garnet Education.
Glówka, D. (2014). The impact of gender on attainment in learning English as a foreign Language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 617-635. doi:org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.12.001
Glynn, S. M., & Koballa Jr., T. R. (2006). Motivation to learn in college science. In J. J. Mintzes & W. H. Leonard (Eds.). Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25-32). NSTA Press.
Gooniband, Z. (1988). On the Effectiveness of ESP Courses of Shiraz University [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Shiraz University, Iran.
Guo, Z & Xu, L. (2016). Study on the integration mode of computer network technology and college English curriculum. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(8), 40-46. doi: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/173397/
H., T. M. (1990). A summative evaluation of teaching English in Iranian universities. Research Bulletin of Esfahan University, 6(2), 101-142.
Harris, L. S. (2010). A case study of the English second language programs of a North Carolina school district [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of North Carolina, U.S.A.
Hayati, A. M. (2008). Teaching English for special purposes in Iran problems and Suggestions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 149-164. doi:org/10.1177/1474022208088645 Accessed 21 March 2019
Hekmatshoar Tabari, B., & Rahimy, R. (2021). Tailored vs. Standard Curriculum and General English Achievement: A Study of Teachers’ Views. The Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning (LACLIL), 14(1), 123-149. doi:10.5294/laclil.2021.14.1.5
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes (1st ed.). Routledge.
İnal, B., & Aksoy, E. (2014). “Evaluation of the curriculum of English preparatory classes at Çankaya University.”. Journal of Education and Training Research, 3(3), 85-98.
Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of EFL materials taught at Iranian public high schools. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 130-150.
Johnson, K. & Johnson, H. (1999). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics: A handbook for language teaching. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Khansir, A. K. (2014). Needs analysis and General English Language. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 7(2), 161-174.
Khany, R., &Tarlani-Aliabadi, H. (2016). Studying power relations in an academic setting: Teachers' and students' perceptions of EAP classes in Iran. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 72-85. doi:10.1016/J.JEAP.2015.12.002
Kiely, R. (2009). Small answers to the big question: Learning from language program evaluation. Language Teaching Research, 13(1), 99-116. doi:org/10.1177/136216889800200105
Kissau, S. (2006). Gender differences in motivation to learn French. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(3), 401–422.
Kissau, S.P., Kolano, L. Q. & Wang, C. (2010). Perceptions of gender differences in high school students’ motivation to learn Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 43(4), 703-721. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01110.x.
Kleckova, G. & Dalle, T. (2018). Working with a course book and the curriculum. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (1 st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0208
Krekeler, C. F. (1993). An evaluation of the elementary English-as-a-second language program in Klein, Texas Independent School District [Unpublished doctoral Dissertation]. Texas A & M University, U.S.A.
Lynch, B. (1996). Language Program Evaluation: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University.
Marsh, C. (2004). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum (3rd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer.
Mazdayasna, G. &Tahririan, M. H. (2008). Developing a profile of the ESP needs of IranianStudents: The case of students of nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 277-289. doi:org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.10.008
Michonska-Stadnik, A. (2004). Gender differences and preferred learning environment in a foreign language classroom. In J. Arabski (Eds.). Pragmatics and language learning (pp. 183-192). Universitas.
Mohamadi, Z. (2013). Program evaluation on general English course: a case study at Tabriz University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(6), 1285-1297. doi:10.4304/jltr.4.6.1285-1297
Moiinvaziri, M. (2014). Students’ voice: A needs analysis of university general English course in Iran. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 14(1), 57-75. doi:10.17576/GEMA-2014-1401-05
Mukundum, J. & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). An evaluation of English teaching courseware in Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 142-150. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n3p142
Murphy, B. (2010). Foreign language learning in Irish second level schools: Gender very much on the agenda. Irish Educational Studies, 29, 81-95.
Nam, J. M. (2005). Perceptions of Korean college students and teachers about communication-based English instruction: Evaluation of a college EFL curriculum in South Korea [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Ohio State University, U.S.A. doi:rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1110161814
Nation, I.S.P & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. Routledge.
Nation, I.S.P. & Macalister, J. (Eds.). (2011). Case studies in language curriculum design:Concepts and approaches in action around the world. Routledge.
Nemati, A. (2009). Evaluation of an ESL English course book: A step toward systematic vocabulary evaluation. Journal of Social Sciences, 20(2), 91-99. doi:org/10.1080/09718923.2009.11892726
Nichols, B, Shidaker, S, Johnson, G. and Singer, K. (2006). Managing Curriculum and Assessment.A Practitioner's Guide. Linworth Books.
Norris, J. M. (2016). Language Program Evaluation. The Modern Language Journal, 100,(Supplement), 160-189. doi:10.1111/modl.12307
Nunan, D. (1998). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge University Press.
Powell, J. M. (2008). English language learner programs and services: A case study of Nebraska middle Schools [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Nebraska,U.S.A. doi:digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3315207
Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Longman (Pearson) Education.
Seedhouse, P. (1995). Needs analysis and the general English classroom. ELT Journal, 49(1), 59-65. doi:org/10.1093/elt/49.1.59
Soodmand Afshar, H., & Movassagh, H. (2016). EAP education in Iran: Where does the problem lie? Where are we heading? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 132-151. doi:org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.002
Tavakoli, M. &Tavakol, M. (2018). Problematizing EAP education in Iran: A critical ethnographic study of educational, political, and sociocultural roots. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 28-43.
Tunc, F. (2010). Evaluation of an ELT Program at a Public University Using CIPP Model. Lambert Academic Publishing.
Üstünlüoğlu, E., Akgül Zazaoğlu, K.F. Keskin, M. N., Sarayköylü, B. & Akdoğan, G. (2012). Developing a CEF Based Curriculum: A Case Study. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 115-129.
Wang, L. H. (1996). A formative evaluation of the English language program in Fong Shin senior high school, Kaohsiung country, Taiwan [Unpublished doctoral Dissertation]. Florida State University, U.S.A.
Zarrabi, F. & Brown, J. R. (2015). English Language Teaching and Learning Analysis in Iran. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 9(10), 3485-3493.
Zohrabi, M. and Sabouri, H. (2012). An assessment of strengths and weaknesses of Iranian first year high school English course book using evaluation checklist. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 213-222. doi:10.5539/ells.v2n2p89