Sociological Study of Quality of life of the Youth and its Realization Priorities
محورهای موضوعی :
Masoud Ganji
1
,
Reza Ali Mohseni
2
,
Mansour Sharifi
3
,
Alireza Kaldi
4
,
Hassan Malek
5
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Sociology, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Semnan, Iran
4 - Professor, Department of Sociology, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
5 - Assistant Professor, Department of Social Studies, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Sciences, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: quality of life, Subjective quality, Objective Quality, Social quality, Social policy,
چکیده مقاله :
The present article examines the sociological concept of quality of life and its realization priorities. The research has used the Delphi Method by collecting and analyzing 30 questionnaires among professors, elites and informants using a heterogeneous method in two panels. The research results show that the quality of life is a complex, multidimensional, borderless and updating structure should be evaluated comprehensively and away from reductionism. Delphi results and 54 concepts for achieving quality of life showed that under the variables of income and employment, health, education, environment, leisure, housing, living facilities as a category of objective quality, social security, social communication, social support, social respect, freedom, social trust, social justice as social quality and life satisfaction as subjective quality can be categorized. The results also showed that the priority of achieving the dimensions of quality of life for citizens, from the average of 10 points, were identified as objective dimensions with 8.78, subjective with 8.5 and social with 8.14 points, respectively.
Abbott, P. & Wallace, C. (2012). Social quality: A way to measure the quality of society. Social Indicators Research, 108 (1), 153- 167.
Ballesteros, R. F. (1998). Quality of life- concept and assessment. Advances in Psychological Science,1, 387–706.
Ballesteros, R. F. (2011). Quality of life in old age- problematic issues. Applied Research Quality of Life, 6, 21- 40.
Diener, E & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective lndicators. Social Indicators Research, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 40(1), 189–216
Draper, P. (1997). Nursing perspectives on quality of lLife. London: Rouledge Company.
Fayers, P. M. & Machi, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and intervention. USA: Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Ghaffari, Gh & Omidi, R. (2009). Quality of life index of social development. Tehran: Shirazeh.
Ghaffari, Gh, Javanmard, K., & Ganji, M. (2011). Petrochemical companies and change in quality of life of Mahshahr residents (comparative study of Mahshahr and Hindijan residents), Social Development, 6 (1), 90-71.
Geno, N. (2004). Social indicators and quality of life research: Background, achievements and current trends, Advances in Sociological Knowledge, Over Half a Centur, VS Verlag Für Sozialwissenschaften, 1, 151- 181.
Inoguchi, T, & Fujii, S. (2013). The quality of life in Asia. A Comparison of quality of life in Asia. Netherlands: Springer.
Klarke, M. (2003). Is economic growth desirable? A welfare economic analysis of the Thai experience. PHD Thesis. Melbourne: Victoria University, www.vu.edu.au (2019).
Moons, ph & Budts, W & De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualization of quality of life: A review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(7), 891–901.
Morris, Ch. W (2010). Amartya Sen. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mousavi, M.T. & Mohammadi, M.A. (2009) Concepts and theories of social welfare, Tehran: Danjeh.
Sadeghi, H., Assari, A. & Masaeli, A. (2010). A new approach to estimating the welfare index in Iran using fuzzy logic during the years 1974-2006. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 10(3), 166-143.
Testa, M. A & Simonson, D. C. (1996). Assessment of quality of life outcomes. The New England Journal of Medicine, 334(13), 835- 840.
Van der Maesen, L. J.G & Walker, A. C. (2005). Indicators of social quality: outcomes of the European scientific network. European Journal of Social Quality, 5(1/2), 8- 24.
Wallace, C & Abbott, P. (2009). Social quality in Europe. United Kingdom: University of Aberdeen Press.
Zeng, W & Xiang, L & Zhang, W. (2020). Evaluation life quality and its spatial mismatch with local economic development in large Chinese Cities. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 239 – 258.
