Exploring the Potential of a Mobile Messaging Application for Self-Initiated Language Learning
محورهای موضوعی : English Language Teaching (ELT)داوود برزآبادی فراهانی 1 , مسعود اهرابی فخر 2
1 - Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: collaborative learning, Mobile Learning, Telegram, self-initiated language learning, mobile instant messaging,
چکیده مقاله :
With the rapid expansion of deploying mobile instant messaging applications such as Telegram for the purpose of language learning, it is quite apparent that language research in this regard is lagging behind the trend. This study addressed the matter by exploring how language learners utilize a Telegram group for the purpose of language learning. In this regard, the activities of a Telegram language learning group with 74 active members was observed and recorded for a week. To capture the patterns of utilization of the group, a thematic analysis was conducted on the compiled corpus of approximately 45000 words gathered by recording the messages posted by the group’s members. The analysis indicated that the themes of utilization of the Telegram language learning group were discussing content-based topics, seeking and sharing resources, recommending conversation opportunities, sharing learning strategies, and giving corrective feedback on each other’s language. The findings of this research illustrated the potential of mobile messaging applications for creating opportunities for self-initiated and collaborative language learning.
با توجه به گسترش سریع استفاده از نرم افزارهای پیام رسانی سیارهمچون تلگرام به منظور یادگیری زبان انگلیسی، پژوهش در این موضوع به وضوح از روند موجود عقب افتاده است. هدف پژوهش حاظر بررسی نحوه به کار گیری زبان آموزان از یک گروه تلگرامی به منظور زبان آموزی می باشد. در این راستا، فعالیت های یک گروه زبان آموزی تلگرامی با 74 عضو فعال به مدت یک هفته مشاهده و ثبت شد. به منظور ثبت الگوهای استفاده از گروه، مجموعه ای از حدود 45000 کلمه، که به وسیله ثبت پیام هایی که توسط اعضای گروه فرستاده شده بود جمع آوری شد، با روش تحلیل مضمون مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. بررسی نشان داد که الگوهای استفاده از گروه زبان آموزی تلگرامی این موارد را شامل می شد: بحث موضوع های محتوی محور، درخواست و به اشتراک گذاری منابع، پیشنهاد موقعیت های مکالمه، به اشتراک گذری فنون یادگیری، و دادن بازخورد اصلاحی در مورد زبان یکدیگر. یافته های این پژوهش توانایی نرم افزارهای پیام رسانی سیاربه منظور خلق موقعیت های زبان آموزی خود انگیخته و مشارکتی را به تصویر کشید.
References
Abednia, A., & Izadinia, M. (2013). Critical pedagogy in ELT classroom: exploring contributions of critical literacy to learners’ critical consciousness. Language Awareness, 22(4), 338-352.
Baleghizadeh, S., & Oladrostam, E. (2010). The effect of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) on grammatical accuracy of EFL students. MEXTESOL Journal, 34(2), 1–10.
Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193-224. doi:10.1159/000094368
Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, Ö. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students' English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3).
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41-58.
Boticki, I., Looi, C. K., & Wong, L. H. (2011). Supporting Mobile Collaborative Activities through Scaffolded Flexible Grouping. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 190-202.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Burgess, L.A. (2003). WebCT as an e-learning tool: A study of technology students’ perceptions. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 6–15.
Chuy, M., Zhang, J., Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2011). Does contributing to a knowledge building dialogue lead to individual advancement of knowledge. In Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 conference proceedings.1, pp. 57-63.
Crookes, G. V. (2013). Critical ELT in action: Foundations, promises, praxis. Routledge.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.
Demirbilek, M. (2010). Investigating attitudes of adult educators towards educational mobile media and games in eight European countries. Journal of Information Technology Education, 9(1), 235-247.
Dewey, J. (2009). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: WLC Books. (Orig. pub. 1916.)
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth. UK: Penguin.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Affinity spaces. Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling (pp. 77-83). Routledge.
Ghajar, A. (2017), A Messaging App That Can Change Iran, Retrieved from https://iranwire.com/en/features/4607/.
Gillet, D., El Helou, S., Yu, C. M., & Salzmann, C. (2008). Turning web 2.0 social software into versatile collaborative learning solutions. In Advances in Computer-Human Interaction, 2008 First International Conference on (pp. 170-176). IEEE.
Haneda, M., & Wells, G. (2008). Learning an additional language through dialogic inquiry. Language and education, 22(2), 114-136.
Heyden, R. (2003). Literature circles as a differentiated instructional strategy for including ESL students in mainstream classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59 (3), 463–75.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hsu, Y. C., Ching, Y. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2014). Web 2.0 applications and practices for learning through collaboration. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 747-758). Springer New York.
Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: a cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197-213.
Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89-119.
Kessler, G. (2009). Student initiated attention to form in wiki based collaborative writing. Language, Learning & Technology, 13, 79–95. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num1/.
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 41–58.
Khanna, A., & Singh, A. (2011). Efficacy of ‘stop TB cricket’: A mobile phone game for edutainment. In International Educational Technology Conference.
McCoy, M. L., & Scully, P. L. (2002). Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National Civic Review, 91(2), 117-135.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. (pp. 664-67).
Nami, F., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Wikis as discussion forums: exploring students’ contribution and their attention to form. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 483-508.
O'Keefe, V. P. (1995). Speaking to think, thinking to speak: The importance of talk in the learning process. Boynton/Cook.
O'Connor, H., & Madge, C. (2003). “Focus groups in cyberspace”: using the Internet for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 6(2), 133-143.
Ozok, A. A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., & Norcio, A. F. (2008). A comparative study between tablet and laptop PCs: User satisfaction and preferences. Intl. Journal of human–computer interaction, 24(3), 329-352.
Peterson, M. (2009). The use of computerized games and simulations in computer-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis of research. Simulation & Gaming, 41(1), 72–93
Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2009). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students' mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(4), 399–419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9142-9.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sharples, M. (2009). Methods for evaluating mobile learning. In G. Vavoula, N. Pachler, & A. Kukulska-Hulme (Eds.), Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs (pp. 17–39). Oxford, UK: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-425). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The development of creativity as a decision-making process. In R. K. Sawyer et al. (Ed.), Creativity and development (pp. 91-138). New York: Oxford University Press.
Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365-383.
Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology,14(2), 95-110.
Sullivan, N. (1993). Teaching writing on a computer network. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 34_35.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The modern language journal, 82(3), 320-337.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of computer assisted learning, 21(3), 217-228.
Van Lier, L. (2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wagner, E.D., & Wilson, P. (2005). Disconnected. T+D, 59, 40–43.
Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(4), 605_663.
Yamada, M., Kitamura, S., Shimada, N., Utashiro, T., Shigeta, K., Yamaguchi, E., Nakahara, J. (2011). Development and evaluation of English listening study materials for business people who use mobile devices: A case study. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 44–66.
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004a). A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 235–243.
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004b). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42(3), 289–314.
