Perceptual Learning Style Preferences and Computer-Assisted Writing Achievement within the Activity Theory Framework
محورهای موضوعی : language teaching
آرزو حاجی مقصودی
1
(
Department of English, College of Foreign Languages and Literature, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
)
Parviz Maftoon
2
(
دانشیار
گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه علوم وتحقیقات تهران
)
کلید واژه: learning style preferences, Activity Theory, computer-assistedlanguage learning, writing achievement,
چکیده مقاله :
Learning styles are considered among the significant factors that aid instructors in deciding how well their students learn a second or foreign language (Oxford, 2003). Although this issue has been accepted broadly in educational psychology,further research is required to examine the relationship between learning styles and language learning skills. Thus, the present study was carried out to investigate the relationship between the perceptual learning style preferences and the participants’ writing achievement after receiving instruction based on computer-assisted language learning within the activity theory framework. For this purpose, 67 students majoring in English translation at a university in Iran were selected as the participants of the study based on their performance on a version of The Oxford Placement Test. A correlational research design was employed using a writing pretest and posttest and a style preference questionnaire. The writing instruction was based on an e-learning platform designed according to the activity theory framework. The results indicated lack of significant relationship between the participants’learning style preferences and theirwriting achievement. It was also found that there was no significant difference in the writing achievement of the participants across different learning style preferences.
روش های یادگیری ازعوامل مهمی هستند که به مدرسان درتصمیم گیری اینکه چطوردانش آموزانشان زبان دوم یا زبان خارجه رابه خوبی یادمیگیرند کمک میکنند. اگرچه این موضوع درروانشناسی آموزشی به طورکلی مورد قبول واقع شده است اما تحقیق بیشتری نیازاست تارابطه بین روش های یادگیری ومهارت های زبان رابررسی کند. بنابراین این تحقیق برای بررسی رابطه بین روش های یادگیری ادراکی و پیشرفت مهارت نوشتن شرکت کنندگان پس ازدریافت آموزش به کمک کامپیوتردرقالب نظریه فعالیت محورپرداخت. برای رسیدن به این هدف ، ٦٧ نفر ازدانش آموزان رشته مترجمی زبان انگلیسی یکی ازدانشگهای ایران براساس نتیجه آزمون تعیین سطح آکسفورد به عنوان شرکت کنندگان این تحقیق انتخاب شدند. روش تحقیق رابطه ای بود بااستفاده ازیک امتحان نوشتن قبل ازشروع آموزش و یک امتحان بعدازاتمام آموزش و یک پرسشنامه روش های یادگیری. آموزش مهارت نوشتن براساس یک پلتفرم آموزشی بود که براساس نظریه فعالیت محور طراحی شده بود. نتایج تحقیق نشان دادکه رابطه معناداری بین روش های یادگیری ادراکی شرکت کنندگان و پیشرفت مهارت نوشتن انها وجود ندارد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که تفاوت معنا داری درمهارت نوشتن شرکت کنندگان با روش های یادگیری متفاوت وجود ندارد.
References
Ahmed, O. (2012). The effect of different learning styles on developing witting skills of EFL Saudi learners.British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 5(2), 220-233.Retrieved January 11, 2017from http://docshare01.docshare.tips/files/15612/156125285.pdf
Al-Hebaishi, S. M. (2012). Investigating the relationships between learning styles, strategies and the academic performance of Saudi English majors.International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(8),510-520.Retrieved June 21, 2017from http://www.iijoe.org/old/IIJE05i8v12012.pdf
Almigbal, T. H. (2015). Relationship between the learning style preferences of medical students and academic achievement. Saudi Medical Journal, 36(3), 349-355. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.3.10320
Arnaudet, M. L., & Barrett, M. E. (1990). Paragraph development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in education (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4thed.). White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Cano-Garcia, F.,& Hughes, E. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysisof their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement.Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413-430.doi: 10.108/713663755
Chaudhary, M. H., Ayub, S., Aftab, A., Faiza, F., Ahmed, U., Khursheed, J., & Ullah, E. (2015). Association of academic performance with learning style preference of medical students: Multi-center study from Pakistan.Journal of Contemporary Medical Education, 3(3), 110-113.doi:10.5455/jcme.20151011041452
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89.doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.x
Engeström, Y. (1987).Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fu, J. (2009). A study of learning styles, teaching styles and vocabulary teaching strategies in Chinese primary school: How do they differ and how can they be integrated? Retrieved March 9, 2017 from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:228945/fulltext01
Gappi, L. L. (2013). Relationships between learning style preferences and academic performance of students.International Journal of Educational Research and Technology,4(2), 70-76. Retrieved August 24, 2017 from http://soeagra.com/ijert/ijertjune2013/11.pdf
Gohar, M. J., & Sadeghi, N. (2015). The impact of learning style preferences on foreign language achievement: A case study of Iranian EFL students.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 754-764. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.188
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Inal, S., Büyükyavuz, O., & Tekin, M. (2015). A Study on preferred learning styles of Turkish EFL teacher trainees.Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3). 52-67 doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v40n3.4
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F., & Hughey, J. B. (1981).Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity theory: Understanding language learners as people. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research(pp. 141-158). Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
Nel, C. (2008). Learning style and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.),Lessons from good language learners (pp.49-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 271-278.doi:10.1515/iral.2003.012
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL quarterly, 21(1), 87-111. doi: 10.2307/3586356
Reid, J. M. (1998). Preface. In J. M. Reid (Ed.), Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom (pp. ix-xiv). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Renou, J. (2008). A study of perceptual learning styles and achievement in a university-level foreign language course. Retrieved July 18, 2017 from http://crisolenguas.uprrp.edu/Articles/JanetRenou.pdf
Riazi, A., & Mansoorian, M. A. (2008). Learning style preferences among Iranian male and female EFL students.The Iranian EFL Journal, 2, 88-100. Retrieved April 16, 2017 from http://www.iranian-efl-journal.com/index.php/2008-index
Richards, J. C. (2002). Theories of teaching in language teaching. In J. C. Richards& W. A. Renandya (Eds.),Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 19-25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Romanelli, F., Bird, E., & Ryan, M. (2009). Learning styles: A review of theory, application, and best practices.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(1), 1-5. doi: 10.5688/aj730109
Sabeh, G., Bahous, R., Bacha, N. N., & Nabhani, M. (2011). A Match or a mismatch between student and teacher learning style preferences.International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1), 162-172. doi:10.5539/ijel.v1n1p162
Sahragard, R., & Mallahi, O. (2014). Relationship between Iranian EFL learners' language learning styles, writing Proficiency and self assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1611-1620.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.585
Srijongjai, A. (2011). Learning styles of language learners in an EFL writing class. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1555-1560. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.397
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved April 15, 2017 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/
Umar, I. N., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2012). The effects of online teachers’ social role and learning style on students’ essay writing performance and critical thinking in a Wiki environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5730-5735. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.506
Wilson, M. L. (2011). Students' learning style preferences and teachers' instructional strategies: Correlations between matched styles and academic achievement (DoctoralDissertation, Liberty University). Retrieved May 13, 2017 from http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1504&co ext=doctoral
Yaseri Moghadam, Y. S., Razavi, A., & Jayervand, H. (2013). The Iranian ESL learners preferred conceptual learning style and the most used intelligence. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research, 2(2), 86-90. Retrieved April 25, 2017 from http://ijpbrjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/5.pdf
Yildirim, O., Acar, A. C., Bull, S., & Sevinc, L. (2008). The effect of teachers’ leadership style and students’ learning style on academic achievement: A field study on high school students. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 73-81.Retrieved April 25, 2017 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410701417945
