Scrutinizing the Utility of Collaborative Tasks for Ameliorating Male and Female EFL Learners’ Flow Experiences
محورهای موضوعی : English Language Teaching (ELT)
سید حسین کاشف
1
,
هانیه خیری
2
1 - گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد ارومیه ارومیه ایران
2 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad
University, Urmia Branch, Urmia, Iran
کلید واژه: gender, collaborative language learning, flow experiences, language learning tasks, states of mind,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study strived to determine the degree to which collaborative tasks and EFL learners’ gender affected their flow experiences. To this end, first, the researchers selected 56 intermediate-level EFL learners in two intact classrooms at a private language institute in Urmia (Iran) as the participants. Second, they randomly assigned the classes to an experimental group and a control group. Third, they used a flow state questionnaire to determine the participants’ flow experiences prior to the onset of the study. Fourth, they provided the experimental group with collaborative language learning treatment during 12 sessions. Nonetheless, they deprived the control group of this treatment. Finally, they administered the flow state questionnaire to the groups anew to appraise the efficacy of collaborative tasks for augmenting the participants’ flow experiences. The results indicated that the above-mentioned tasks had an advantageous impact on the EFL learners’ flow state of mind. Furthermore, based on the results, female learners’ flow experiences were more positively affected by the collaborative tasks in comparison with the male learners’ flow experiences. The obtained results may empower the teacher educators, syllabus designers, and researchers to take account of the flow state of mind during the process of language acquisition.
The present study strived to determine the degree to which collaborative tasks and EFL learners’ gender affected their flow experiences. To this end, first, the researchers selected 56 intermediate-level EFL learners in two intact classrooms at a private language institute in Urmia (Iran) as the participants. Second, they randomly assigned the classes to an experimental group and a control group. Third, they used a flow state questionnaire to determine the participants’ flow experiences prior to the onset of the study. Fourth, they provided the experimental group with collaborative language learning treatment during 12 sessions. Nonetheless, they deprived the control group of this treatment. Finally, they administered the flow state questionnaire to the groups anew to appraise the efficacy of collaborative tasks for augmenting the participants’ flow experiences. The results indicated that the above-mentioned tasks had an advantageous impact on the EFL learners’ flow state of mind. Furthermore, based on the results, female learners’ flow experiences were more positively affected by the collaborative tasks in comparison with the male learners’ flow experiences. The obtained results may empower the teacher educators, syllabus designers, and researchers to take account of the flow state of mind during the process of language acquisition.
Abahussain, M. O. (2020). Investigating EFL learners’ perceptions of collaborative writing. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 32-47.
Afzali, K., & Astaraki, H. (2022). A multimodal analysis of Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to participate in collaborative tasks: A conversation analysis approach. Applied Research on English Language, 10(4), 167-190.
Afzali, Z., & Izadpanah, S. (2021). The effect of the flipped classroom model on Iranian English foreign language learners: Engagement and motivation in English language grammar. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-37.
Alizaded Tabaqi, A., Yaqubi, B., & Abadikhah, S. (2019). The effect of collaborative dialogue on EFL learners’ noticing of pragmatic forms. Journal of English language Teaching and Learning, 11(24), 1-28.
Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aubrey, S. (2017). Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: Learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51, 661- 692.
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Engagement with language: How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In M. Sato, & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihályi, M., Abuhamdeh S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598-698). New York: The Guilford Press.
Delle Fave, A., Massimini F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Work: A paradox in flow research. In A. Delle Fave, F. Massimini, & M. Bassi (Eds.), Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Cross-cultural advancements in positive psychology (pp. 155-175).Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Flowers, S. (2015). Friendship and reciprocity as motivators in CSCL. JALT CALL Journal, 11(3). 191-212.
Forsythe, E. (2014). Online intercultural collaborations using wikis: An analysis of students’ comments and factors affective project success. The JALT CALL Journal, 10 (3), 255–271.
Ghasemi, L., Rezvani, E., & Namaziandost, E. (2021). EFL Learners’ perception of task experience through flow outlook: Task complexity and modality in focus. Issues in Language Teaching, 10 (1), 301-334.
Gtowka, D. (2014). The impact of gender on attainment in learning English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 617-635.
Ishino, M. (2021). Teachers’ embodied mitigation against allocating turns to unwilling students. Classroom Discourse, 12(2), 1–22.
Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 17-35.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, T. E. (2012). Effects of a collaborative annotation method on students’ learning and learning-related motivation and affect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2), 350-359.
Khatib, M., & Dehghankar, A. (2018). The impact of task-based language teaching on ESP learners’ productive skills: From task-based instruction to investigation of learners’ and instructors’ attitudes toward the course. Issues in Language Teaching, 7(2), 1-28.
Kormos, J., & Préfontaine, Y. (2017). Affective factors influencing fluent performance: French learners’ appraisals of second language speech tasks. Language Teaching Research, 21, 699–716.
Lee, H., & Bonk, C. J. (2014). Collaborative learning in the workplace: Practical issues and concerns. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 7 (2), 10–17.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd Ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Milla, R., & Gutierrez-Mangado, M. J. (2019). Language learning strategy reported choice by bilingual children in CLIL: The effect of age, proficiency and gender in L3 learners of English. System, 87, 102-165.
Mohazabieh, S., Sahragard, R., Rassaei, E., & Zamanian, M. (2020). The potential combined effects of task complexity and planning types on Iranian EFL learners’ oral production performance. Applied Research on English Language, 9(4), 503-538.
Moneta, G. (2012). On the measurement and conceptualization of flow. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research (pp. 23-50). New York: Springer.
Mulyadi, D. (2018). Enhancing students’ listening proficiency through the instruction of (meta)-cognitive listening strategy. Getsempena English Education Journal, 5(2), 168–176.
Murphy, B. (2010). Foreign language learning in Irish second level schools: Gender very much on the agenda. Irish Educational Studies, 29, 81-95.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2001). Flow theory and research. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195-206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Naserpour, A., Zarei, A., & Esfandiari, R. (2020). The effects of task orientation and involvement load on learning collocations. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 39(1), 71-114.
Niemeier, S. (2017). Task-based grammar teaching of English: Where cognitive grammar and task-based language teaching meet. Tübingen: Francke Verlag.
Oga-Baldwin, W. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 102-128.
Oga-Baldwin, W., & Nakata, Y. (2020). How teachers promote young language learners’ engagement: Lesson form and lesson quality. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2(1), 101-130.
Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual. New York: McGraw Hill.
Payant, C., & Kim, Y. (2019). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614-627.
Reddington, E. (2018). Managing participation in the adult ESL classroom: Engagement and exit practices. Classroom Discourse, 9(2), 132-149.
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Gilabert, R. (2016). Measuring cognitive task demands using the dual-task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgments: A validation study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 703–737.
Salimi, E., & Karami, B. (2019). Pragmatic competence development: Demystifying the impact of task types and EFL students’ perceptions. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(1), 279-302.
Sato, M. (2017). Interaction mindsets, interaction behaviors, and L2 development: An affective-social-cognitive model. Language Learning, 67 (2), 249- 283.
Shirazifard, H., Abbasian, G. R., Mohseni, A., & Rashtchi, M. (2022). Implementation of task-based collaborative dialogues in EFL speaking classes: Focus on achievements and perceptions. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly, 41(3), 155-195.
Su, F., & Zou, D. (2020). Technology-enhanced collaborative language learning: Theoretical foundations, technologies and implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 1–35.
Taheri, P., & Abdollahi-Guilani, M. (2019). Investigating the effectiveness of using podcast, video short programs and topic preparation as pre-task activities on the performance of EFL learners’ listening comprehension task types. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 9(3), 879-910.
Thissen B. A., Menninghaus, W., & Schlotz, W. (2020). The pleasures of reading fiction explained by flow, presence, identification, suspense, and cognitive involvement. Psychology of Aesthetics, 15 (4), 710–724.
Tsay, M., & Brady, M. (2010). A case study of cooperative learning and communication pedagogy: Does working in teams make a difference?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 78-89.
Van der Linden, D., Tops, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2021). Go with the flow: A neuroscientific view on being fully engaged. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 53 (4), 947–963.
