Evaluation and Comparison of LEED, BREEAM, and the 19th issue of National Building Regulations of Iran (NBRI) in Perspective of Sustainability by (MCDM) TOPSIS Method
محورهای موضوعی : Structural EngineeringMohammad Javad Mahdavinejad 1 , Mohammad Mehranrad 2 , Nasim Eslamirad 3
1 - Associated Professor in Architecture, Tarbiat Modares university, Tehran, Iran
2 - Architecture master of science student, Azad University of Iran, Central branch, Iran, Tehran
3 - Architecture master of science, International Imam Khomeini University, Iran, Qazvin
کلید واژه: Comparative Analogy, Sustainable assessment tools, LEED, BREEAM, 19th issue of the National Building Regulations of Iran (NBRI), (MCDM) TOPSIS method,
چکیده مقاله :
In this research, the features of LEED, BREEAM, and NBRI also, their principles, are reviewed, evaluated, and compared from the aspects of the sustainability. The compliance items of standards with the principles of sustainability determine that their goals are well matched. By comparing the different and shared principles, it discovered how each standard has succeeded from the aspect of the sustainable design also, the shortcomings in the 19th issue of NBRI were appeared. The evaluation of standards with sustainability principles is done by applying (MCDM) TOPSIS. furthermore, by ranking each sub-item of standards from weak to excellent, the respect of sustainability principle is recognized. plus, according to the TOPSIS and analyzing the data, any items of each standard has the most sustainability feature are considered. The alignment with the leading tools can result in the promotion of the Iranian regulations. Findings of this research provide suggestions for completing and localizing the criteria that are part of the LEED and BREEAM in energy section which are neglected in the 19th issue. Applying these solutions and paying more attention to all of building's sustainable aspects in Iran will lead to the success of the country to be adopted with the global counterparts.
[1] Cole, R.J., Building environmental assessment
methods: clarifying intentions. Building Research &
Information, 27(4-5), pp.230-246, 1999.
[2] Kibert, C.J., Sustainable construction: green
building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons,
2016.
[3] Rivera, A., International applications of building
certification methods: A comparison of BREEAM
and LEED, 2009.
[4] Formisano, A. and Mazzolani, F.M., On the
selection by MCDM methods of the optimal system
for seismic retrofitting and vertical addition of
existing buildings. Computers & Structures, 159,
pp.1-13, 2015.
[5] Bager, G., Paiman, R.A. and Odorige, C.E.,
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:
THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL
BACKGROUND. Actual problems of international
relations, (129), pp.90-113, 2017.
[6] La Viña, A.G., Hoff, G. and De Rose, A.M., The
outcomes of Johannesburg: Assessing the world
summit on sustainable development. SAIS review,
23(1), pp.53-70, 2003.
[7] Ruskin, J., The seven lamps of architecture (Vol.
521). John B. Alden, 1885.
[8] Kennedy, M.S., Protecting the" House Beautiful":
Eco-Consciousness in the Victorian Novel (Doctoral
dissertation, State University of New York at Stony
Brook), 2013.
[9] Ejlali. M, and Dashti Shafiei, A, and Kazemi, M.,
Sustainability in Historical House of Tabriz and its
Insignificant Role in Contemporary Houses, Journal
of Basic and Applied Science Research, 3(3)739-
745, 2013.
[10]Sofalaei, F., Sustainability of Climatic Elements in
Traditional Iranian Architecture (Hot and Rid
Climate). Proceedings of the Third Energy
Conservation Conference in Building, Tehran, Fuel
Conservation Optimizer Organization, pp. 133-154,
2003.
[11]Lee WL, Burnett J. Benchmarking energy use
assessment of HK-BEAM, BREEAM and D.
Building and Environment. Nov, 43(11):1882-91,
2008.
[12]Kamali M, Hewage KN. Performance indicators for
sustainability assessment of buildings. In
Proceedings of the International Construction
Specialty Conference of the Canadian Society for
Civil Engineering (ICSC), Vancouver, BC, Canada
(pp. 8-10), 2015.
[13]Rivera A. International applications of building
certification methods: a comparison of BREEAM
and LEED.
[14]Bernardi E, Carlucci S, Cornaro C, Bohne RA. An
analysis of the most adopted rating systems for
assessing the environmental impact of buildings.
Sustainability. 13; 9(7): 1226.Abdalla G, Maas G,
Huyghe J, Oostra M. Criticism on environmental
assessment tools. International Proceedings of
Chemical, Biological and Environmental
Engineering. 2011; 6:443-6, 2017.
[15]Bernardi E. An analysis of environmental
assessment schemes and identification of their
impact on building design (Master's thesis, NTNU).
[16]Todd JA, Crawley D, Geissler S, Lindsey G.
Comparative assessment of environmental
performance tools and the role of the Green
Building Challenge. Building Research &
Information; 29(5):324-35, 2001.
[17]Nguyen BK, Altan H. Comparative review of five
sustainable rating systems. Procedia Engineering. 1;
21:376-86, 2011.
[18]Forsberg A, Von Malmborg F. Tools for
environmental assessment of the built environment.
Building and environment. 223- 8, 2004.
[19] Mehranrad, M. Eslami-rad, N., Mahdavinejad, M. J,
Evaluation and Comparison of American LEED
Standard, British BREEAM Standard, and the 19th
Issue of Iran National Building Regulations, from
the Aspect of the Sustainable Design, Cogent
Journal, 2017.
[20] Ali HH, Al Nsairat SF. Developing a green building
assessment tool for developing countries–Case of
Jordan. Building and environment 44(5):1053-64,
2009.
[21] Waidyasekara KG, De Silva ML, Rameezdeen R.
Comparative study of green building rating systems:
In terms of water efficiency and conservation. In
Proceedings of the Second World Construction
Symposium, Colombo, Sri Lanka (pp. 14-15), 2013.
[22] Wei W, Ramalho O, Mandin C. Indoor air quality
requirements in green building certifications.
Building and Environment. 92:10-9, 2015.
[23] Demir G, Alyuz U, Okten E, Ozgoren H. A LEED
Environmental Performance Certificate Application
in Terms of Recyclable Content. International
Journal of Environmental Science and Development.
4(2):80, 2013.
[24] Gurgun AP, Komurlu R, Arditi D. Review of the
LEED category in materials and resources for
developing countries. Procedia engineering.
118:1145-52, 2015.
[25] Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA. Social life
cycle assessment for material selection: a case study
of building materials. The International Journal of
Life Cycle Assessment. 19(3):620-45, 2014.
[26] Flórez L, Castro D, Irizarry J. Impact of
Sustainability Perceptions on Optimal Material
Selection in Construction Projects. InProceedings of
the Second International Conference on Sustainable
Construction Materials and Technologies (pp. 719-
727), 2010.
[27] Rahardjati R, Khamidi MF, Idrus A. Green building
rating system: The need of material resources
criteria in green building assessment.
[28] Park J, Yoon J, Kim KH. Critical review of the
material criteria of building sustainability
assessment tools. Sustainability. 9(2):186, 2017.
[29] Adriaenssens V, De Baets B, Goethals PL, De Pauw
N. Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in
ecosystem management. Science of the Total
Environment. 319(13):1-2, 2004.
[30] Yang J, Ogunkah IC. A multi-criteria decision
support system for the selection of low-cost green
building materials and components. Journal of
Building Construction and Planning Research.
1(4):89-130, 2013.
[31]Rao RV, Davim JP. A decision-making framework
model for material selection using a combined
multiple attribute decision-making method. The
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology. 35(7-8):751-60, 2008.
[32]Rashid AF, Yusoff S. A review of life cycle
assessment method for building industry. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 45:244-8, 2015.
[33]Gurgun AP, Komurlu R, Arditi D. Review of the
LEED category in materials and resources for
developing countries. Procedia engineering.
118:1145-52, 2015.
[34]Rashid AF, Yusoff S. A review of life cycle
assessment method for building industry. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews.; 45:244-8, 2015.
[35]Çalışkan H, Kurşuncu B, Kurbanoğlu C, Güven ŞY.
Material selection for the tool holder working under
hard milling conditions using different multi criteria
decision making methods. Materials & Design.;
45:473-9, 2013.
[36]Liu HC, Liu L, Wu J. Material selection using an
interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method
considering subjective and objective weights.
Materials & Design (1980-2015). 52:158-67, 2013.
[37]Ball, J., Can ISO 14000 and eco-labelling turn the
construction industry green? Building and
environment, 37(4), pp.421-428, 2002.
[38]Gurgun AP, Komurlu R, Arditi D. Review of the
LEED category in materials and resources for
developing countries. Procedia engineering.
118:1145-52, 2015.
[39]Park J, Yoon J, Kim KH. Critical review of the
material criteria of building sustainability
assessment tools. Sustainability. 9(2):186, 2017.
[40]Bernardi E. An analysis of environmental
assessment schemes and identification of their
impact on building design (Master's thesis, NTNU).
[41]Ali HH, Al Nsairat SF. Developing a green building
assessment tool for developing countries–Case of
Jordan. Building and environment. 44(5):1053-64,
2009.
[42]Yang J, Ogunkah IC. A multi-criteria decision
support system for the selection of low-cost green
building materials and components. Journal of
Building Construction and Planning Research.
1(4):89-130, 2013.
[43]Rao RV, Davim JP. A decision-making framework
model for material selection using a combined
multiple attribute decision-making method. The
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology. 35(7-8):751-60, 2008.
[44] Roderick, Y., McEwan, D., Wheatley, C. and
Alonso, C.,. Comparison of energy performance
assessment between LEED, BREEAM and Green
Star. In Eleventh International IBPSA Conference
(pp. 27-30), 2009.
[45] Asdrubali, F., Baldinelli, G., Bianchi, F. and
Sambuco, S., A comparison between environmental
sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for
residential buildings. Building and Environment, 86,
pp.98-108, 2015.
[46] Bernardi, E., Carlucci, S., Cornaro, C. and Bohne,
R.A., An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating
Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of
Buildings. Sustainability, 9(7), p.1226, 2017.
[47] Z., Zarghami, E., Azemati, H., Fatourehchi, D. and
Karamloo, M., Customizing well-known
sustainability assessment tools for Iranian residential
buildings using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Building and Environment, 128, pp.107-128, 2018.
[48] Flórez L, Castro D, Irizarry J. Impact of
Sustainability Perceptions on Optimal Material
Selection in Construction Projects. In Proceedings
of the Second International Conference on
Sustainable Construction Materials and
Technologies (pp. 719-727), 2010.
[49] Nguyen BK, Altan H. Comparative review of five
sustainable rating systems. Procedia Engineering.
21:376-86, 2011.
[50] Ball, J., Can ISO 14000 and eco-labelling turn the
construction industry green? Building and
environment, 37(4), pp.421-428, 2002.
[51] Cole, R.J., Building environmental assessment
methods: clarifying intentions. Building Research &
Information, 27(4-5), pp.230-246, 1999.
[52] Park J, Yoon J, Kim KH. Critical review of the
material criteria of building sustainability
assessment tools. Sustainability. 9(2):186, 2017 .
[53] Park J, Yoon J, Kim KH. Critical review of the
material criteria of building sustainability
assessment tools. Sustainability. 9(2):186, 2017 .
[54] Rashid AF, Yusoff S. A review of life cycle
assessment method for building industry. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 45:244-8, 2015.
[55] Çalışkan H, Kurşuncu B, Kurbanoğlu C, Güven ŞY.
Material selection for the tool holder working under
hard milling conditions using different multi criteria
decision making methods. Materials & Design.
45:473-9, 2013.
[56]Akadiri, O.P., Development of a multi-criteria
approach for the selection of sustainable materials
for building projects, 2011.
[57]Sev, A., How can the construction industry
contribute to sustainable development? A
conceptual framework. Sustainable Development,
17(3), pp.161-173, 2009.
[58]Uher, T.E., Absolute indicators of sustainable
construction. In Proceedings of COBRA (pp. 243-
253), 1999.
[59]Adgate, J.L., Ramachandran, G., Pratt, G.C., Waller,
L.A. and Sexton, K., Spatial and temporal variability
in outdoor, indoor, and personal PM2. 5 exposures.
Atmospheric Environment, 36(20), pp.3255-3265,
2002.
[60]Farazjoo, F. Majdi, SH., Standard design in order to
advance the objectives of sustainable architecture
and climate (Being Familiar with Leed Standard),
The First National Conferences of Architecture,
rehabilitation, Urbanism and Sustainable
Environment, 2013.
[61]Eghtedari naieeni, M., Design of Isfahan
Information and Communication Technology Park
with approach of sustainable development. Master
Thesis, Honare Esfahan University, 2011.
[62]Braganca, L., Mateus, R. and Koukkari, H.,
Assessment of building sustainability, 2007.
[63]Abidin, N.Z., Investigating the awareness and
application of sustainable construction concept by
Malaysian developers. Habitat International, 34(4),
pp.421-426, 2010.
[64]Crawley, D. and Aho, I., Building environmental
assessment methods: applications and development
trends. Building Research & Information, 27(4-5),
pp.300-308, 1999.
[65]http://www.usgbc.org, 2017.
[66]Shi, Q. and Xie, X., September. A fuzzy-QFD
approach to the assessment of green construction
alternatives based on value engineering. In
Management and Service Science, 2009. MASS'09.
International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE, 2009.
[67]Adriaenssens, V., De Baets, B., Goethals, P.L. and
De Pauw, N., Fuzzy rule-based models for decision
support in ecosystem management. Science of the
Total Environment, 319(1-3), pp.1-12, 2004.
[68]Iwaro, J. and Mwasha, A., The impact of sustainable
building envelope design on building sustainability
using Integrated Performance Model. International
M. Mokhberi and S. Yazdanpanah Fard
56
Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2(2),
pp.153-171, 2013.
[69] http://www.breeam.com ,2017.
[70] The 19th issue of Iran National Building
Regulations, Deputy of housing and building. Tosee
Iran, Tehran, Iran, 2010,
[71] Assari, A., Mahesh, T.M. and Assari, E., Role of
public participation in sustainability of historical
city: usage of TOPSIS method. Indian Journal of
Science and Technology, 5(3), pp.2289-2294, 2012.
[72] Yoon, K.P. and Hwang, C.L., Multiple attribute
decision making: an introduction (Vol. 104). Sage
publications, 1995.
