Teaching approaches to Computer Assisted Language Learning
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
Poone Abbasi
1
(
Department of English Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University, Takestan
Branch
)
کلید واژه: Technology, computer, speech, assist,
چکیده مقاله :
Computers have been used for language teaching ever since the 1960's.Learning a second language is a challenging endeavor, and, for decades now, proponents of computer assisted language learning (CALL) have declared that help is on the horison. We investigate the suitability of deploying speech technology in computer based systems that can be used to teach foreign language skills. In this case, we make a case for using speech processing technology in CALL. Whether or not Computer Assisted Language teaching offers wide range of accessories to ESL teachers to exploit language teaching. In order to appreciate the potential benefit of using speech technology in CALL, a basic understanding of both the core technology and its limitations-what it can and cannot do-is therefore essential. In this paper listening and computer, financial barriers and CALL and motivation will be covered. The first thing that a student needs to develop to be able to communicate in a foreign language is his listening comprehension skill.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles an interactive approach to language pedagogy, second edition. Addison Weseley: Longman.
Bruce, B. (1993). Innovation and social change. In B. Bruce, J.K. Peyton & T. Batson (Eds.), Network-based classrooms: promises and realities, pp. 9-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R., Nunan, D. (2002). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Davies G. (1997). Lessons from the past, lessons for the future: 20 years of CALL.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York: Plenum Press. Gardner, R. & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, Massachussets: Newbury House Publishers.
Genç, G. & Aydın, S. (2010). Students‟ motivation towards computer use in EFL learning. IETC, 1367-1369.
Krashen, S. D.(1985). The Input Hypothesis. London: Longman
Lai, C. (2006)The advantages and disadvantages of computer technology in second language Acquisition. National Journal for Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research. 3 (1), 1-6.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Pew.
LeLoup J. & Ponterio R. (2003). Interactive and multimedia techniques in online language
lessons: a sampler. Language Learning & Technology 7, 3. Retrieved October 12, 2011 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/net/default.html).
Lumley, D. (1991). Improving Student Motivation. Electronic Learning, 11(3), 14- . Retrieved Jan. 07, 2014, from ProQuest database.
Kavaliauskienė, G. (2008). Podcasting: A tool for improving listening skills. Teaching English with Technology. Vol 8, issue 4. http://www.tewtjournal.org
Mayer, R. (2005). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology review, 19, 309-326.
Morley J. (1991). Listening comprehension in second/foreign language instruction. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 81-106). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Prensky, M. (2000). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3): 365–398.
Schmitt, N. (2002). An introduction to applied linguistics. Great Britain: Arnold Publication.
Szendeffy, J. (2005). A Practical Guide to Using Computers in Language Teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hartoyo, Ma, ph.D. 2006 individual differences in computer assisted language learning (CALL).Semarang:Universitas Negeri Semarang Press.
Negotiation and TA (transactional analysis) in ESL
