The meaning of place, A constant or changing quality? Lynch,Rapoport and Semiotics view points

محورهای موضوعی : Space Ontology International Journal

Avideh Kamrani ¹ (Ph.D. Candidate , University of Science and Technology, Department of Architecture and Urbanism,Tehran,Iran)
Mustafa Behzadfar ² (Professor of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture, University of Science and Technology,Tehran.Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/05/13 تاریخ پذیرش : 1395/03/15 تاریخ انتشار : 1395/03/12

کلید واژه: Place, Meaning, Constant, changing,

چکیده مقاله :

The matter of meaning in place, is one of the main qualities of human life. People consciously or unconsciously looking for meanings in places. The importance of finding the meaning of place is that, Understanding the meaning will lead to “act” in place. Finding the place friendly, or finding it insecure will lead to act differently. Now the question is that, is the meaning of place, something constant to put in place for ever or something changing from time to time. Does it related to physical elements of place or to the people using the place? Understanding the answers of questions above, would help the placemakers plan and design places better than before and meaningless places won’t happen anymore.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Baird, G. (1998). la dimension amoureuse. K. hays -Architecture theory since 1968, New york: MIT press, 36-56.


2. Bani M. A., Populist Semiotics in shaping the post-modern architecture. Architecture and Culture, 23, 156-165.


3. Barthes. R., Semiotics and Urban Development. Architecture and Urban Planning, 18, 41-44.


4. Broadbent, c. (2001). Simple tips on the Theory of signs in architecture. Journal of Iranian Architecture (Ma), 3-4, 120-137.


5. Cassirer, A., (1998). Myth and time. (M. Salasi Translator) Tehran: Silver.


6. Chandler, D. (2008). Basics of Semiotics. (D. Parsa, Translator) Tehran: Soore Mehr.


7. Giro, P. (2001). Semiotics. (M. Nabavi, Translator) Tehran: Aware publication.


8. Hershberger, R. G. (1980). A study of meaning and architecture. R. b. Geoffrey Broadbent -Meaning and behaviour in the built environment John Wiley & Sons,Ltd. 21-43.


9. Kamrani, A., (2009). Urban Semiotics (Master's degree thesis). Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology.


10.  Lynch, K. (2005). A Theory of Good City Form (Q. Bahrain, Translator) Tehran: Tehran University Press.


11.  Mandani Pour, A., (2005). Urban design: a vision of social and spatial processes. (F. Morteza'i, Translator) Tehran: Processing and urban planning.


12.  Rapoport, A. (2009).  Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards a Man-Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. (I. Afzlyan, Translator) Tehran: Artists Profession.


13.  Rapoport, A. (2005). The meaning of the built environment: an approach in nonverbal communication. (V. Habib, Translator) Tehran: Processing and Town planning co.


14.  Rapoport, A. (1987). The Mutual Interaction of People and Their Built Environment. A Cross-Cultural Perspective. (R. Reza Zadeh, Translator) Tehran: University of Science and Technology.


15.  Raheb, Gh., Search for Meaning of the city - Exploring the city of Tehran. News of Construction and housing, 33, 13-25.


16.  Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of built environment. The university of Arizona press.               


17. Schulz, N. Ch., now. (2009). Genius Loci, Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, (D. Shirazi, Translator) Tehran, New event.


18. Sojudi. F., (2008). Semiotics application. Tehran: Science Publication.