The Role of Physical-Behavioral Patterns Based on Conventional Wisdom in the Identity of Residential Complexes (Case Study: Urmia Elahieh Complex)
محورهای موضوعی : Space Ontology International JournalSamira Nabavi 1 , Ali Javan Forouzande 2 , Ghasem Motalebi 3 , Masoome Yaghoobi 4
1 - Department of Architecture, Ardabil branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.
2 - Department of Architecture, Ardabil branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.
3 - Department of Architecture, University of Tehran, School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, Iran
4 - Department of Architecture, Ardabil branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.
کلید واژه: Residential Complex, public places, Conventional Wisdom, Physical-behavioral Pattern, visual diversity,
چکیده مقاله :
Conventional wisdom, as an interdisciplinary concept, plays a significant role in shaping daily behavior and the long-term use of spaces, particularly in residential complexes. Despite its importance, there has been limited research in architecture that has addressed and explored the relationship between conventional wisdom and architecture, as well as its impact on the use and formation of spaces. The main problem addressed in this paper is the need to understand the relation between conventional wisdom and architecture, and how conventional wisdom affects the use and formation of spaces within residential complexes. The research method employed in this paper is both quantitative and qualitative, with data being analyzed using interpretative-analytical techniques. Data collection was carried out through observations and interviews. Through a review of the literature, the research model was proposed by parameters of rationality, collective cognition, and reality with four minor dimensions including social, cultural, functional, and physical. The results of the study indicate a significant relationship between architecture and conventional wisdom in residential complexes, particularly in the social and physical dimensions. The findings highlight the importance of public spaces as micro-components of the social dimension, and emphasizing the need for compliance with proportions, legibility of form, and visual diversity as part of the physical dimensions. Conclusions emphasizes the importance of considering conventional wisdom in architectural design in residential complexes. Also, among the others, social and physical dimension by legible public places and visual diversity has main role of relation between conventional wisdom and architecture. These conclusions can be utilized by designers and researchers working in residential complexes to better understand the impact of conventional wisdom on architectural design and the use of public spaces within these complexes.
Conventional wisdom, as an interdisciplinary concept, plays a significant role in shaping daily behavior and the long-term use of spaces, particularly in residential complexes. Despite its importance, there has been limited research in architecture that has addressed and explored the relationship between conventional wisdom and architecture, as well as its impact on the use and formation of spaces. The main problem addressed in this paper is the need to understand the relation between conventional wisdom and architecture, and how conventional wisdom affects the use and formation of spaces within residential complexes. The research method employed in this paper is both quantitative and qualitative, with data being analyzed using interpretative-analytical techniques. Data collection was carried out through observations and interviews. Through a review of the literature, the research model was proposed by parameters of rationality, collective cognition, and reality with four minor dimensions including social, cultural, functional, and physical. The results of the study indicate a significant relationship between architecture and conventional wisdom in residential complexes, particularly in the social and physical dimensions. The findings highlight the importance of public spaces as micro-components of the social dimension, and emphasizing the need for compliance with proportions, legibility of form, and visual diversity as part of the physical dimensions. Conclusions emphasizes the importance of considering conventional wisdom in architectural design in residential complexes. Also, among the others, social and physical dimension by legible public places and visual diversity has main role of relation between conventional wisdom and architecture. These conclusions can be utilized by designers and researchers working in residential complexes to better understand the impact of conventional wisdom on architectural design and the use of public spaces within these complexes.
Askarizad, R., & Safari, H. (2020) ‘The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran)’, Cities, 101.
Altman, I. (2003) ‘Environment and Social Behavior’, (Ali Namazian, translator). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. (original publication of the work in 1930).
Alexander, C. (2007) Architecture and the Secret of Immortality: The Timeless Way of building. (Mohrdad Qayyumi Bidhendi, translator). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. (Originally published in 1979).
Arbab, P; Azizi, M; and Zebardast, E. (2013) ‘Examining the relationship between the duration of residence and the formation of place identity in new urban development’, Scientific Quarterly Journal of Urban Studies 3(12), 59-72.
Bahraini, H. (2008). Analysis of urban spaces in relation to user behavior patterns and criteria for design. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Bachelard, G. (2007). The oneiric house; Housing and Dwelling; Perspectives on Modern Domestic Architecture; Edited by Barbara Miller, Lane; published Routledge.
Bernardo, F., & Palma-Oliveira, J. M. (2016). ‘Urban neighbourhoods and intergroup relations: The importance of place identity’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 239-251.
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Ángeles, R., M. (2021). ‘Local place identity: A comparison between residents of rural and urban communities’, Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 242-252.
Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M. & Ercolani A. P. (1999). ‘Multidimensional perception of residential Environment Quality and neighborhood attachment in the urban environment’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 331-352.
Burkhart, T. (2002). Sacred Art. translated by Jalal Sattari, Tehran: Soroush.
Casakin, H., Hernández, B., & Ruiz, C. (2015). ‘Place attachment and place identity in Israeli cities: The influence of city size’, Cities, 42(B), 224-230.
Christiaanse, S., Haartsen, T. (2020). ‘Experiencing place-change: A shared sense of loss after closure of village facilities’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101432
Clarke, D., Murphy, C., & Lorenzoni, I. (2018). ‘Place attachment, disruption and transformative adaptation’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 81–89.
Droseltis, O., & Vivian L. V. (2010). ‘Towards an Integrative Model of Place Identification: Dimensionality and Predictors of Intrapersonal-Level Place Preferences’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp 23-34.
Duncan, J. s., (1981). housing and Identity: Cross-cultural perspective. London: Croom Helm.
Fakuhi, N. (2012). ‘Place-based identity and lack of identity in urban space: a case study of two residential complexes in Tehran’, Iranian Anthropology Research, 3(2), 44-7.
alahat, M. (2006). ‘The concept of place and its shaping factors’, Journal of Fine Arts, 6-57, 26.
rancis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). ‘Creating sense of community: The role of public space’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401-409
Javan Foruzandeh, A; and Motalebi, Qh. (2011). ‘The concept of a sense of belonging to a place and its constituent factors’, City Identity, 5(8), 27-37.
Javan Forouzandeh, A., & Motallebi, Gh. (2012). ‘The Role of Open Spaces in Neighborhood Attachment Case Study: Ekbatan Town in Tehran Metropolis’, International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 1(3), 11-20.
Kashi, H; and Bonyadi, N. (2012). ‘Explaining the place identity model - sense of belonging and examining its different elements and dimensions’, Fine Arts, 18(3), 43-52.
Kazemeini, M; Ghafourian, M and Hesari, E. (2019). ‘Identification of social factors affecting identity in Iranian-Islamic neighborhoods (case study: Shanbadi neighborhood of Bushehr)’, Islamic Architecture Research, 8(1).27-47.
Khatibi, M. (2012). ‘The mutual influence of behavioral patterns in revitalizing the identity of the city environment: a case study of the entry area of Sanandaj’, City Identity, 7(13), 63-73.
Habib, F; Naderi, M; and Forozan Gohar, H. (2008). ‘Dependent question in the discourse of the body of the city and identity (Is the body of the city subordinate to identity or is identity subordinate to the body of the city?)’, City Identity, 2(3), 13-23.
Habibi, M. (2005). ‘City without memory, city without identity’, New cities, 3 and 4 (1 and 2), 14-18.
Hosseinzadeh Dalir, K; Mousavi, S; Bayramzadeh, N; Pashachini, H. (2022). ‘Investigating the influence of urban spaces on the behavioral patterns of citizens (case example: Imam Street of Urmia)’, Journal of Geography and Development of Urban Space. 9(2), 37-53.
Hossini Ghiyasvand, A. Soheili, J. (2019) ‘The Role of Environmental Physical Indicators in Socibility of Cultural Spaces Using Space Syntax Technique, Case Study: Dezfol and Niavaran Cultural Complexes’, arman shahr, 11(25),361-372.
Hall, E. (1997). hidden dimension. T: Mansour Tabibian. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Heidegger, M. (2002). Poetry, language and liberation thought. (Abbas Manouchehri, translator). Tehran: Movalli Publications.
Lang, J. (2009). Creation of architectural theories, the role of behavioral sciences in environment design. T: Alireza Einifar. Tehran: University of Tehran
Lane, B. M. (Ed.). (2006). Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. London and New York: Routledge.
Lewicka, M. (2008). ‘Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 209-231
Marcus, C. C. (1995). House as a Mirror of Self: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of Home. Berkely, Calif: Conari Press.
Motalebi, Qh. (2001). ‘Environmental psychology is a new science in the service of architecture and urban design’, Fine Arts, 10, 67-52.
Madanipour, A. (2011). Designing a small city. (Bahadur Zamani, translator). Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Mir Mohammadi, D. (2004). Speeches about national identity in Iran. Irani Civilization Publications.
Madanipour, A. (2010). Public and private spaces of the city. translated by Farshad Noorian, Tehran: Publications of the Information and Communication Technology Organization of Tehran Municipality.
Miller, D. C. & Salkind, N. J. (2002), Handbook of Research Design and Social Measurement, Sage, London.
Moore, R.L., & Graefe, A.R. (1994). ‘Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail-trail users’, Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17-31.
Moulay, A., Norsidah Ujang, N., Maulan, S., Ismail, s., (2018). ‘Understanding the process of parks' attachment: Interrelation between place attachment, behavioural tendencies, and the use of public place’, City Culture and Society, 14, 28–36.
Nabavi, S; Javan Foruzandeh, A; Motalebi, Qh; Yaqoubi, M., (2022). ‘Semantics of conventional wisdom and its effect on retrieval the identity of residential complexes (case study: residential complexes of Urmia city)’, Hoviyat Shahr, 1(16), 35-48.
Pakzad, J; and Bozorg, H. (2011). Alphabet of environmental psychology for designers. Tehran: Armanshahr Publications.
Pakzad, J. (2006). Theoretical foundations and the process of urban design. first edition, published by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.
Paknejad, N. and Latifi, Gh. (2017). ‘Explaining and evaluating the effects of environmental components on the formation of behavioral patterns in urban spaces; From theory to practice: study of Tajrish field’, Bagh Nazar Monthly, 15(69), 51-66.
Partovi, P. (2003). place and placelessness; A phenomenological approach. Fine Arts, 14(14), 40-50.
Purdihimi, Sh. (2011). ‘Culture and housing’, Housing and rural environment. 30(134), 3-8.
Purdihimi, Sh; Mashaikh Faridni, S; and Nurtaqani, A. (2012). ‘identity and housing; Investigating the interaction -mechanism of residents' identity and residential environment’, Housing and Village Environment, 32(141), 18-3.
Peng, J., Strijker, D., & Wu, Q. (2021). ‘Place identity: How far have we come in exploring its meanings?’, Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(294).
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). ‘Place-Identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83.
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). ‘The City and Self- Identity’, Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147-169.
Gehl, J. (2014). How to study everyone's life?. Translation: Mustafa Behzadfar, Mohammad Rezaei Nadushan and Ahmad Rezaei Nadushan. Tehran: Institute of Architect Science.
Rappaport, A. (2005). The meaning of the built environment. Farah Habib, first edition, Harizi Shahri Processing and Program Publishing Company (affiliated to Tehran Municipality).
Rasulpour, H; Etesam, I; and Tahmasabi, A. (2017). ‘Evaluation of the impact of environmental quality components on behavioral patterns in urban physical spaces (case example: Vali Asr Street (AJ) Tehran)’, Haft Hesar Environmental Studies, (25) 7, 19-34.
Robert, T., & Di Masso, A. (2020). ‘Living there, leaving there: Identity, socio-spatial mobility and exclusion in “Stigmatized neighbourhoods”’, Political Psychology, 42, 53–69.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
Rowles, G. D. (2017). Being in place: Identity and place attachment in late life. In Geographical gerontology (pp. 203-215). Routledge.
Sattarzadeh, D. (2018). ‘The Effect of Designing Urban Public Spaces on Place Attachment (Case study: Tabriz, Iran)’. Space ontology international journal, 7(4), 53-64.
Sanul, G., & Van Heur, B. (2018). ‘Spaces of openness: Urban citizenship and cultural infrastructures of common life in Istanbul City’, Journal of Gökçe Sanul, 22)5–6(, 801-819.
Shaterian, Mo; Sohrabzadeh, M; Imamalizadeh, H; and Hosseinizadeh, Saeed. (2016). ‘Identity crisis and social isolation in new cities and its relationship with satisfaction with the place of residence (case study: new city of Pardis)’, Research and urban planning, 8(28), 111-134.
Smelser, N. (2002) Theory of Collective Behavior. Reza Deja Kam and Emad Afrogh, first edition, New Findings Publications, Davin.
Soini, K., Vaarala, H., & Pouta, E. (2012). ‘Residents’ Sense of Place and Landscape Perceptions at the Rural–Urban Interface’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(1), 124-134.
Stappers, N.E.H.; Schipperijn, J.; Kremers, S.P.J.; Bekker, M.P.M.; Jansen, M.W.J., Vries, N.K. de., Van Kann, D.H.H.(2022). ‘Visualizing changes in physical activity behavioral patterns after redesigning urban infrastructure’. Health and place, 76(102853).
Steele, F. (1981). The sense of place. Boston: CBI publishing Company.
Taban, M; Pourjafar, M; and Poorman, Hassan A. (2011). ‘Place Identity; A phenomenological approach’, City Identity, 6(10), 79-90.
Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). ‘Place and Identity Process’, Journal of Environmental Psychology 16(3), 205-220.
Ujang, N. (2012). ‘Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity’, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 156-167.
Williams, D.R., & Vaske, J.J. (2003). ‘The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach’. Forest Science, 49(6), 830-840.
Vaske, J.J., & Kobrin, K.C. (2001). ‘Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior’, The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16-21.
Velayat, H. (2003). Housing for a better life (design of a residential complex in the 22nd district of Tehran). master's thesis, Faculty of Fine Arts, Tehran.
