Contemporary Mason Master’s Tacit Knowledge in Restoration Process of Architectural Works; Defining Process and Criteria for Architectural Repair in Southern Khorasan, Iran
محورهای موضوعی : Space Ontology International Journal
Reza Rahimnia
1
,
Ali Zamanifard
2
,
Mehran Gharaati
3
1 - Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 - Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, University of Art, Iran
3 - Faculty of Architecture, Art University of Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Restoration, Repair, Architectural Heritage, Intervention Process, Contemporary Master mason,
چکیده مقاله :
Studies on monuments, repairs carried out on them, and the experience of the people who perform these repairs indicate a given method of repairing works. By focusing on the conservative thinking of contemporary master masons in southern Khorasan, the present study examines the “intervention process” for restoring the architectural heritage (decision-to-action). This research has been done qualitatively, field data collection method is applied, and data are collected through semi-structured interviews (conversation) with a group of contemporary master masons. The architects followed an achievable model while carrying out the restoration measures. Achieving the foundations and processes of intervention for the restoration of buildings is one of the major goals from the point of contemporary masonry masters’ views. What is the conservative thought structure that has developed from thinking to action for a restoration action will be one of the major questions. To achieve this goal, we utilize grounded theory. Finally, by comparing the extracted concepts presented the intervention process framework to restore architectural heritages. We can define this process with two critical sets. The first set is up to the intervention prerequisite, the "decision-making and diagnosis process". The next interval corresponds to the moment of intervention (repair or restoration), interpreted as a "planning and action process”.
Studies on monuments, repairs carried out on them, and the experience of the people who perform these repairs indicate a given method of repairing works. By focusing on the conservative thinking of contemporary master masons in southern Khorasan, the present study examines the “intervention process” for restoring the architectural heritage (decision-to-action). This research has been done qualitatively, field data collection method is applied, and data are collected through semi-structured interviews (conversation) with a group of contemporary master masons. The architects followed an achievable model while carrying out the restoration measures. Achieving the foundations and processes of intervention for the restoration of buildings is one of the major goals from the point of contemporary masonry masters’ views. What is the conservative thought structure that has developed from thinking to action for a restoration action will be one of the major questions. To achieve this goal, we utilize grounded theory. Finally, by comparing the extracted concepts presented the intervention process framework to restore architectural heritages. We can define this process with two critical sets. The first set is up to the intervention prerequisite, the "decision-making and diagnosis process". The next interval corresponds to the moment of intervention (repair or restoration), interpreted as a "planning and action process”.
Adler, Nancy J, and Allison Gundersen. 2001. International dimensions of organizational behavior: South-Western Cincinnati, OH.
Alva Balderrama, Alejandro. 2001. "The conservation of earthen architecture." Conservation: the GCI (The Getty Conservation Institute) newsletter 16 (1):4-11.
Andjomshoaa, Amineh, Seyed Gholamreza Islami, and Seyed Mostafa Mokhtabad-Amrei. 2011. "Application of Constructivist Educational Theory in providing Tacit Knowledge and Pedagogical Efficacy in Architectural Design Education: A Case Study of an Architecture school in Iran." Life Science Journal 8 (1):213-233.
Brandi, Cesare. 2005. Theory of restoration. Roma; Firenze: Istituto centrale per il restauro.
Brown, Lesley. 1993. New shorter Oxford English dictionary on historical principles: Clarendon.
Correia, Mariana Rita Alberto Rosado. 2016. Conservation in Earthen Heritage: Assessment and Significance of Failure, Criteria, Conservation Theory, and Strategies: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Correia, Mariana Rita Alberto Rosado , and Nicholas Stephen Robert Walliman. 2014. "Defining Criteria for Intervention in Earthen-Built Heritage Conservation." International Journal of Architectural Heritage 8 (4):581-601. doi: 10.1080/15583058.2012.704478.
Earl, John, and Andrew Saint. 2015. Building conservation philosophy: Routledge.
Efendi, Caʻfer. 1987. Risāle-i Miʻmāriyye. Vol. 1: Brill Archive.
Feilden, Berbard M, and Jukka Jokilehto. 1998. Management guidelines for world cultural heritage sites. Italy: ICCROM.
Gamarra, Ricardo Morales. 2007. "Arquitectura prehispánica de tierra: conservación y uso social en las huacas de moche, Perú." Apuntes. Revista de estudios sobre patrimonio cultural 20 (2).
Hojjat, Eisa. 2012. Tradition and innovation in architecture education. Iran: University of Tehran.
Honarfar, Loṭfallâh. 1965. "Ganjina-ye âsâr-e târikhi-ye Eṣfahân." Isfahan 1344:612-620.
Jokilehto, Jukka. 2017. A history of architectural conservation: Routledge.
Keshavarz, Mohsen. 2008. "History of architectural restoration education in Iran." Golestan Honar 11 (Special Issue 4):33-38.
Khan-Mohammadi, Ali Akbar. 1992. "Fotovvat-Nameh, The letter of Generosity." Soffeh 2 (1):10-15.
Matero, Frank, and Claudia Cancino. 2000. "The conservation of earthen archaeological heritage: An assessment of recent trends." Terra 2000:8th.
Matero, Frank G. 2003. "Managing Change: The Role of Documentation and Condition Survey at Mesaverde National Park." Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 42 (1):39-58.
Muñoz Viñas, Salvador. 2009. "Minimal Intervention Revisited." In Conservation : principles, dilemmas and uncomfortable truths, edited by Alison Bracker Alison Lee Victoria Richmond and Museum Albert. Amsterdam; Boston; London: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann ; In Association with the Victoria & Albert Museum.
Nadimi, Hadi. 1991. "An Introduction to Architectural Education." Soffeh 1 (2):4-17.
Nadimi, Hadi. 2014. "The ladder of architectural thought." In Ravagh-e Nazar (Ten Articles in Architecture). Iran: Iranian Academy of the Arts (IAA).
Nadimi, Hamid. 1996. "Conceptualizing a framework for integrity in architectural education: with some references to Iran." University of York.
Orbasli, Aylin. 2008. Architectural conservation: principles and practice. United Kingdom: Oxford.
Rahimnia, Reza, Mehran Gharaati, Ali Zamanifard, and Saied Saiedpour. 2019. "Describing the Paradigm of Masons’ Conservation Intervention by using Masons’ Tacit Knowledge in Southern Khorasan, Iran." Journal of Conservation and Architecture in Iran 8 (16):69-86.
Rahimnia, Reza, Amin Mahmoudzadeh, Farhad Tehrani, and Ali Zamanifard. 2013. "Recognition of indigenous architectural experiences, an approach for conservation and restoration of adobe buildings in the south of khorasan, iran." JHRE 32 (142):19-22.
Reed, Paul. 2020. "The Knowledge of Carpenters from the Early Medieval Period to the Eighteenth Century in Setting Out Roofs and Buildings Without Geometry and Numerical Measurement." Vernacular Architecture 51 (1):30-49.
Safaeipour, Hadi. 2016. "Architectural Anthology: A Method for the Documentation of Contemporary Master Mason’s Designerly Ideas." Journal of Methodology of Social Science and Humanities 22 (89):79-106.
Sharp, Ralph Norman. 1970. "The inscriptions in Old Persian Cuneiform of the Achaemenian emperors."
Torraca, Giorgio. 1982. Porous building materials-materials science for architectural conservation. Italy: ICCROM.
Windelband, Wilhelm. 1894. "Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. Rede zum Antritt des Rectorats der Kaiser-Wilhelms-Universität Strassburg, geh. am 1. Mai 1894."
