A Critical Approach to the Experience of Home Attachment in Assessing Spatiality of Contemporary Iranian Housing
محورهای موضوعی : Space Ontology International Journal
1 - Department of Architecture, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
کلید واژه: Space Syntax, Place attachment, Iranian Housing, Spatiality, Contemporary Housing,
چکیده مقاله :
Place, as one of the basic concepts in architecture, is an area for habitation, relief and tranquility. In other words, man chooses to live in a place and through a place. On the other hand, attachment to housing is an emotional bond between human beings and housing, which leads to a feeling of trust, security and satisfaction. Therefore, the spatiality of housing is the subject of the present study, which aims to rethink the concept of dwelling and promote the experience of attachment in contemporary houses to evaluate the components that shape the spatiality and the physical approaches affecting it in study samples. The main research question is How are the shaping spatiality components in contemporary Iranian houses evaluated? The research method includes a combination of qualitative approach (descriptive analytical method) to analyze and interpret library information about theories of spatiality and place attachment as well as quantitative / qualitative approach (logical reasoning method) and software based on case study that is observed and analyzed with Depthmap computer simulator to study the spatial arrangement of five contemporary housing types in hot and dry climate cities. The samples include 10 outstanding residential buildings from 5 types of garden villas, single-unit attached houses, multi-unit attached houses, apartment houses and residential complexes in 4 cities with hot and dry climate. The comparison of housing types shows that courtyard houses have a better situation in terms of spatiality indicators, which are mainly related to the role of distribution areas such as courtyards and porches. In this way, removing the distributing role of the yard leads to a decrease in spatial coherence. Also, soft structures, obstacles and physical interface elements play a major role in determining visibility level and people following and, accordingly, visual and physical enclosure.
Place, as one of the basic concepts in architecture, is an area for habitation, relief and tranquility. In other words, man chooses to live in a place and through a place. On the other hand, attachment to housing is an emotional bond between human beings and housing, which leads to a feeling of trust, security and satisfaction. Therefore, the spatiality of housing is the subject of the present study, which aims to rethink the concept of dwelling and promote the experience of attachment in contemporary houses to evaluate the components that shape the spatiality and the physical approaches affecting it in study samples. The main research question is How are the shaping spatiality components in contemporary Iranian houses evaluated? The research method includes a combination of qualitative approach (descriptive analytical method) to analyze and interpret library information about theories of spatiality and place attachment as well as quantitative / qualitative approach (logical reasoning method) and software based on case study that is observed and analyzed with Depthmap computer simulator to study the spatial arrangement of five contemporary housing types in hot and dry climate cities. The samples include 10 outstanding residential buildings from 5 types of garden villas, single-unit attached houses, multi-unit attached houses, apartment houses and residential complexes in 4 cities with hot and dry climate. The comparison of housing types shows that courtyard houses have a better situation in terms of spatiality indicators, which are mainly related to the role of distribution areas such as courtyards and porches. In this way, removing the distributing role of the yard leads to a decrease in spatial coherence. Also, soft structures, obstacles and physical interface elements play a major role in determining visibility level and people following and, accordingly, visual and physical enclosure.
Altman, I. & Low, S. M. (2012). Place Attachment. Volume 12 of Human Behavior and Environment. Springer Science & Business Media.
Bell, S. (2008). Elements of visual design in the landscape. Translated by Mohammad Reza Masnavi. Tehran: University of Tehran. (In Persian)
Castello, L. (2016). Rethinking the Meaning of Place Conceiving Place in Architecture-Urbanism. Routledge.
Chermayeff, S. I. & Alexander, C. (2015). The fields of private life and collective life on behalf of a human architecture. Translated by Manouchehr Mozaiani. Tehran: University of Tehran. (In Persian)
Cheung, L.T.O. & Hui, D.L.H. (2018). Influence of residents’ place attachment on heritage forest conservation awareness in a peri-urban area of Guangzhou, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 33: 37-45.
Counted, V. (2016). Making Sense of Place Attachment: Towards a Holistic Understanding of People-place Relationships and Experiences. In T.R.E. Paddock and C.P Heidkamp (Eds.), Environment, Space, Place, 8(1), 7-32. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Gibson, James J. (2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Classic Edition (Psychology Press & Routledge Classic Editions). New York: Psychology Press.
Habibi, A., Fallahi, E., Karmirad, S. (2020). Learning from the past; applying space syntax theory in Atrvash and Mohtasham houses in continuity of sense of place in contemporary houses. Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 7(10), 227-250. doi: 10.29252/ahdc.2020.12198.1268 (In Persian)
Haghparast F, Asefi M, Abizadeh E. (2019). Effect of the Place Identity Components on Place Attachment; Study of the Tabriz Historic Bazaar. Geographic Researches; 34 (3):303-312. URL: http://georesearch.ir/article-1-674-fa.html (In Persian)
Haq, S. U. (2001). Complex Architectural Setting: an investigation of spatial and cognitive variable through way finding behavior, Doctoral Dissertation, Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Heidegger, M. (1971) Building, Dwelling, Thinking, In A. Hofsdater (Ed.), Poetry, Language and Thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Hillier, B. & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T. & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement, Environment and Planning B, 20: 29-66.
Hojat, I., Mozafar, F., Saadati, S. P. (2017). Investigating Home Effective Attributes in Developing Dwellers' Attachment. (Presenting a Causal Process Model). Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 22(2), 51-62. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2017.63994 (In Persian)
Keshavarz Ghadimi, H., Tabibian, M. & Moinifarar, M. (2022). Rethinking the Power of place in the Age of Virtual Social Media. Space Ontology, 11(3), 45-56.
Khamenehzadeh, H. (2017). An Introduction to the Concept of Privacy and how it is realized in the House Life-World1 Comparative Study in Pre-modern and Modern Iranian Houses. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 14(49), 33-44. (In Persian)
Mirzamohammadi, A., Bagherzadeh Kasiri, S., Zeynaly Azim, A. (2020). Design and Architecture Analysis of Sustainable Residential Complex with Emphasis on Environmental Psychology from the Sensibility of Place (Case Study: Tabriz Aseman Towers). Journal of Architectural Thought, 4(8), 105-119. doi: 10.30479/at.2020.11262.1278 (In Persian)
Montello, D. (2007). The Contribution of Space Syntax to a Comprehensive Therory of Enviromental Psychology. The 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. Istanbul. 1- 12.
Moztarzadeh, H. & Nikounam Nezami, H. (2022). Social Sustainability Components & Improving the Physical Quality of Contemporary Residential Complexes. Space Ontology, 11(2), 73-86.
Norberg Schultz, C. (2012). Genius loci: towards a phenomenology of architecture. Translated by Mohammadreza Shirazi. Tehran: Something new happened.
Pakzad, J., Bozorg, H. (2015). Alphabet of environmental psychology for designers. Tehran: Armanshahr. (In Persian)
Partovi, Parvin. (2012). Phenomenology of place. Tehran: Art Academy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (In Persian)
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 169–147.
Punter, J. (2007). Developing Urban Design as Public Policy: Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management. Journal of Urban Design, 12(2): 167-202. (In Persian)
Ralph, E. C. (2017). Place and placelessness. Translated by Mohammad Reza Noghsan Mohammadi, Kazem Mandegari and Zaheer Motaki. Tehran: Armanshahr. (In Persian)
Rapaport, Amos. (2019). Pour une anthropologie de la maison. Translated by Khosrow Afzalian. Tehran: Kasra Library. (In Persian)
Rashid Kolvir, H., Abbaszadeh Diz, F., Akbari, H., Shahroudi Kolour, M. (2020). Examining the Sense of Belonging to Places in terms of Physical and Non-physical Indices in Stand-alone Houses and Apartment Complexes (Case Study: Tabriz City), Geography and Urban Space Development. 6(2): 195-215. (In Persian)
Sakurai, R., Kobori, H., Nakamura, M. & Kikuchi, T. (2015). Factors influencing public participation in conservation activities in urban areas: A case study in Yokohama. Japan. Biological Conservation, 184: 424-430.
Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. (2017). Place Attachment Enhances Psychological Need Satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 1-13. DOI: 10.1177/0013916516637648.
Shahcheraghi, A. & Bandar Abad, A. R. (2015). Environmental: Application of environmental psychology in architecture and urban planning', First Edition, Tehran: The Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR). (In Persian)
Shirazi, M. (2011). The architecture of the senses and the subtle phenomenology of Johanni Palasma. Tehran: Rokhdad No. (In Persian)
Simon, D. (2019). A phenomenological look at life and place: the event of life needs a place. Translated by Sara Amiri and Mohammad Saber Bagherian. Qazvin: Imam Khomeini International University. (In Persian)
Soltani Y., Feyzi M., Falamaki M., Mahmoudizarandi M. (2020). The explanation design pattern of contemporary housing based on sense of belonging to place from the perspective of users and designers- Case study: Kermanshah city. Haft Hesar, 8 (30): 5-16. URL: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-781-fa.html (In Persian)
Stedman, R. C., Masterson, V. A., Enqvist, J., Tengö, M., Giusti, M., Wahl, D. & Svedin, U. (2017). The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecology and Society. 22(1): 49-64.
Steele, F. (1981). The Sense of Place. Boston: CBI Publishing Company.
Taghizadeh, A., Taghvaei, V. (2019). Spatial Orientation of the Manifestation of Unity in Multiplicity in the Architecture of Traditional Houses in Shoushtar: Case Study Aminzadeh House and Gazor House. Hoviatshahr, 13(4), 91-108. (In Persian)
Ujang, N. & Zakariya, K. (2015). The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 170: 709-717.
Varmaghani H. (2022). Searching for the Concept of Iranian House Based on the Adaptation of Historical Descriptions and Physical Structure (Study of Yazd and Isfahan Houses). Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal, 7(1): 173-191. URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-380-fa.html (In Persian)
