The Explanation of Architectural Components Affecting Monumental Tombs in Contemporary Iran

محورهای موضوعی : Space Ontology International Journal

Masoumeh Yavari ¹ , Simon Ayvazian ²

1 - Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 - College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

تاریخ دریافت : 1396/12/25 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/08/06 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/09/10

کلید واژه: Monumental tombs, Architectural components, The durability of monumental tombs,

چکیده مقاله :

Monumental tombs are among the most important monuments of contemporary Iran; they have become the symbol of different cities over time and attracted the attention of the audiences with various tastes. This study tries to explain the architectural components that affect the durability of these buildings and answers these questions: What are the architectural components of the emergence of form in monumental tombs in contemporary Iran that have had the greatest impact on the durability of audience’s mind and does the construction of memorial of tombs based on ancient architectural components have a good result in the present eras? In this study, type of research is qualitative and the research tool is interview. These interviews were conducted based on the questions about eight monumental tombs of Society for the National Heritage of Iran; and cause in achieving a good result through qualitative content analysis. Many architectural components affecting the durability of these buildings are identified based on the gained results; they include ten different components: the impact of urban location, visual impact of form, use of familiar elements, visual impact of materials, use of perception concepts and conceptual elements, the impact of personality traits related to the monuments and audiences’ tastes, and the need for an independent context and functional spaces. This study also evaluates the impact rate of these categories in the current period. Because of attaining through qualitative method, these results can be used by designers of these buildings to obtain a favorable quality.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Abdolahzadeh Fard, A. & Zare, S. (2018). An Examination of the Effect of Social Dimensions on Peoples’ use of Urban Public Spaces (Case Study: Chamran Recreational Site of Shiraz Located Between Shahidan Sheikhi and Niayesh Bridge), Space Ontology International Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 1, Winter 2018, 67-76


2. Bahrololoumi, H. (1976). Workbook of national art association in Iran: from the beginning to 2535.  art association in Iran, Tehran.(In persian)


3. Bani Masoud, A. (2004). “ Monumental buildings by Houshang Seyhoon. The architect’s journal, N(28).


4. Bani Masoud, A. (2009). Contemporary architecture of Iran. Publication of  Honar va Memari gharb, Tehran.(In persian)


5. Burckhardt, T. (1992). Eternal values in Islamic art, articles of immortality and art. translation by Morteza Avini. Publication of  Barg, Tehran(In persian)


6. Elo S., Kyngas H.(2008). The qualitative vontent analysis process. J Adv Nurs. N(62). pp 107-150


7. Farvardin, F. & Daliri, V. (2013). The study of urban elements in strengthening  the tourism (case study: The city of Shiraz). The booklet of the articles of the national conference of urban aesthetic elements. municipality of Shiraz


8. Hosseini Rad (2013). Basics of visual arts, Iran’s textbooks printing and publishing company, Tehran. pp29-30.


9. Mirmoghtadaei, M. (2009). Criteria for measuring the possibility of formation. Record and transition collective memories in the city, case study: the city of Tehran. Journal of Honarhaye-Ziba. N(37). P6.


10. Mohammadi Parsa, R. (2004). Interview with Dr. Houshang Seyhoun. Journal of architecture and culture, Number 18 and 19. the sixth year , summer and autumn, p184.


11. Nazari Arshad(2006). Archaeological analysis of the Seljuk and Ilkhani monasteries in Hamadan province. Ph.D. in archeology. Tehran University of Science and Research.


12. Patton, M. (1993). Statements in Stone: Monuments and Society in Neolithic Brittany. Routledge, London, ISBN 0415067294. pp. 1-7.


13. Safari, H., Nazidizaji, S. & Fakori Moridani, F. (2018). Social Logic of Cities and Urban Tourism Accessibility; Space Syntax Analysis of Kuala Lumpur City Centre, Space Ontology International Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 3, Summer
    2018, 35- 46


14. Schultz, C. N. (2008). Meaning in western architecture. translation by Mehrdad Ghayoumi Bidhendi. Publication of Farhangestan-e-Honar, Tehran .(In persian)


15. Seyhoon, H. (1961). “ Interview with engineer Hoshang Seyhoon”, Construction bank 1, second edition, pp 10-13


16. Sobat Sani, N. (2012), Investigating the influential factors and their impact on contemporary architecture of Iran.1941 to 1978, The book of Mah-e Honar, July 2012, N(167). pp32-43.


17. Srour, H., Eslami, M., Kashani Asl, A., Salahi V. & Sarkhian, B. (2014). Investigation the effects of urban symbols and signals on tourism development (case study: the city of Tabriz). Tourism planning and development, winter 2014, N(11). pp 118-140.


18. Wilkinson, D. & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using Research Instruments: A Guide for Researchers. London: Routledge.