شناسایی و اولویت بندی موانع بروز خلاقیت دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور مشهد
محورهای موضوعی : خلاقیت شناسی سازمانی و مدیریتی- مدیریت خلاقیت و نوآوریمریم ادیب زاده 1 , میثم چکین 2 , حسین مهدی رکن آبادی 3
1 - گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد تهران شمال،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - استادیار، گروه خط مشی و اداره امور عمومی، دانشکده مدیریت دولتی و علوم سازمانی، دانشکدگان مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: خلاقیت, موانع خلاقیت, ایده پردازی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و اولویت بندی موانع بروز خلاقیت به انجام رسیده است. در این تحقیق به منظور شناسایی موانع بروز خلاقیت در دانشگاه پیام نور، نسبت به اولویت گذاری موانع خلاقیت از مرحله ایده سازی تا حصول نتیجه، مورد کنکاش و بررسی و سپس در مرحله دوم رتبه بندی قرار گرفت. روش‌شناسی/رویکرد: در این تحقیق با توجه به فضای تحقیق و خلق مدلی بومی برای ایجاد مانع زدایی در محیط دانشگاهی از رویکرد کمی و کیفی و به روش آمیخته استفاده شد. در بخش کمی از روش مصاحبه به صورت غیر تصادفی و قضاوتی و به طور مشخص نمونه گیری گلوله برفی هدفمند بوده است. آن چیزی که در تعیین حجم نمونه در پژوهش کیفی نقش تعیین کننده دارد اصل اشباع است؛ جمع آوری داده‌ها را تا جایی ادامه تا دسترسی به مقوله ها و موضوع های جدید وجوده داشته باشد و زمانی که به اشباع داده ها برسد به افزایش تعداد افراد نمونه نیازی ندارد. سپس با انجام مصاحبه با گروه خبرگان و شناسایی مولفه های تحقیق از روش دلفی فازی دو مرحله‌ای مورد ارزیابی و رتبه بندی قرار گرفت. یافته‌ها: در این پژوهش، مصاحبه از نوع نیمه ساختار یافته است که از تمامی افراد سؤال های مشابه پرسیده شده که پس از رمزگردانی و طبقه بندی پاسخ‌ها، تعداد 26 مولفه اساسی شناسایی شد. در گام اول پش از امتیازگذاری گروه خبرگان، تعداد 4 گویه از روند تحقیق حذف گردد. در مرحله دوم این روند تکرار که مجددا 4 گویه دیگر حذف شد. و در نهایت 16 مولفه نهایی به عنوان عوامل موثر در بروز خلاقیت دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور تعیین گردید. ارزش/اصالت پژوهش: علاوه بر کشف عوامل بومی در مانع زایی عوامل کاهش خلاقیت، رهکارهایی مناسب برای مدیران و مسئولان شناسایی گردد. تا ضمت تصویب مصوبات کارشناسی شده، در روند اجرای قوانین توسط بخش های مختلف مساعدت نمایند. در این تحقیق عامل جذب افراد خلاق در مراکز دانش بنیان در رتبه اول پژوهش قرار گرفته، و در رتبه دوم کمک به تاسیس افراد خلاق در ایجاد استارت‌آپ‌ها جای گرفته است.
Purpose: The present research has been carried out with the aim of identifying and prioritizing barriers to creativity. In this research, in order to identify the barriers to creativity in Payam Noor University, prioritization of barriers to creativity from ideation stage to achievement of results was investigated and then ranked in the second stage. Method/Approach: In this research, according to the research environment and the creation of a local model to create obstacles in the university environment, a quantitative and qualitative approach was used in a mixed method. In a small part of the interview method, non-random and judgmental and specifically purposeful snowball sampling was used. What plays a decisive role in determining the sample size in qualitative research is the principle of saturation. Continue collecting data until new categories and topics are reached, and when data saturation is reached, there is no need to increase the number of sampled individuals. Then, by conducting an interview with the group of experts and identifying the research components, it was evaluated and ranked using the two-stage fuzzy Delphi method. Findings: In this research, the interview is of a semi-structured type, where all the people were asked the same questions, and after coding and classifying the answers, 26 basic components were identified. In the first step, after the scoring of the expert group, 4 items should be removed from the research process. In the second stage of this repetition process, 4 more items were removed again. And finally, 16 final components were determined as effective factors in the creativity of Payam Noor University students. The value/correctness of the research: in addition to discovering local factors in creating obstacles to reduce creativity, appropriate solutions for managers and officials should be identified. Helping in the process of implementing laws by various departments to approve expert approvals. In this research, the factor of attracting creative people in knowledge-based centers has been ranked first and helping to establish creative people in the creation of start-ups has been ranked second.
Adams, J. L. (2001). Conceptual blockbusting: A guide to better ideas (4th Edition). Basik Books. Agencia Nacional de Evaluaci´on de la Calidad y Acreditaci´on [The National Agency of Evaluation of Quality and Accreditation, Spain]. (2005). Libro blanco. Título de grado en magisterio, 1. ANECA. Vol.n https://educacion.uah.es/facultad/documentos/libroblanco_jun05_magisterio1.pdf.
Alencar, E. Fleith, D. S.de, & Pereira, N. (2017). Creativity in higher education: Challenges and facilitating factors. Temas Em Psicologia, 25(2), 553–561. https://doi. org/10.9788/TP2017.2-09
Alfonso-Benlliure, V. Motos Teruel, T. & Lee Fields, D. (2021). Is it true that young drama practitioners are more creative and have a higher emotional intelligence? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100788
Amabile, T. M. (2019). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity (eBook). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501234
Amabile, T. M. & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/ jocb.001
Barnes, R. (2015). Teaching art to young children (3rd Edition). Routledge. Baumeister, R. F. Campbell, J. D. Krueger, J. I. & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431
Buckley, B. & Conomos, J. (2010). Rethinking the contemporary art school: The artist, the PHD and the academy. Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art & Design.
Burton, J. Horowitz, R. & Abeles, H. (1999). Learning in and through the arts: Curriculum implication. In E. Fiske (Ed.), Champions of change: The impact of the arts of learning (pp. 35–46). Arts Education Partnership.
Cantero, M. J. Alfonso-Benlliure, V. & Melero, R. (2016). Creativity in middle childhood: Influence of perceived maternal sensitivity, self-esteem, and shyness. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1125246
Carver, C. S. Scheier, M. F. & Fulford, D. (2008). Self-regulatory processes, stress, and coping. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed). Guilford Press.
Chacón-López, H. and A. Maeso-Broncano, Creative development, self-esteem and barriers to creativity in university students of education according to their participation in artistic activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2023. 48: p. 101270.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. Reimers, S. Hsu, A. & Ahmetoglu, G. (2009). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 100(Pt 3), 501–516.
Charyton, C. Basham, K. M. & Elliott, J. O. (2008). Examining gender with general creativity and preferences for creative persons in college students within the sciences and the arts. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(3), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01296.x Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Corbal´an, J. & Limi˜nana-Gras, R. (2010). The genie in a bottle. The CREA test, questions and creativity. Introduction to special theme ‘The CREA test, creative intelligence. Anales de Psicología, 26, 197–205.
Cotter, K. N. Pretz, J. E. & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Applicant extracurricular involvement predicts creativity better than traditional admissions factors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039831
Da Costa, S. P´aez, D. S´anchez, F. Garaigordobil, M. & Gondim, S. (2015). Personal factors of creativity: A second order meta-analysis. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpto.2015.06.002
David, A. P. Morais, M. de, F. Primi, R. & Miguel, F. K. (2014). Met´aforas e pensamento divergente: Criatividade, escolaridade e desempenho em artes e tecnologias. Avaliaçao Psicologica: Interamerican Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 147–156.
De Backer, F. Lombaerts, K. De Mette, T. Buffel, T. & Elias, W. (2012). Creativity in artistic education: Introducing artists into primary schools. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2012.01715.x
Deng, X. & Zhang, X. K. (2011). Understanding the relationship between self-esteem and creativity: A meta-analysis. Advances in Psychological Science, 19, 645–651. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00645
Eisenberger, R. & Aselage, J. (2009). Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: Positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.543
Elisondo, R. C. Soroa, G. & Flores, B. (2022). Leisure activities, creative actions and emotional creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, Article 101060. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101060
Fern´andez-Díaz, J. R. Guti´errez-Ortega, M. Llamas-Salguero, F. & Cant´on-Mayo, I. (2021). Creativity and resilience as predictors of career success. Sustainability, 13 (8), 4489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084489
Gardner, H. (2011). Educaci´on artística y desarrollo humano (F. M. Ortí, Trans). Paid´os.
Ghaffari, K. (2015). The effect of teacher creativity in self-esteem of beginner EFL learners. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(1), 100–102. Gibson, R. (2010). The ‘art’ of creative teaching: Implications for higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13562517.2010.493349
Goldsmith, R. E. & Matherly, T. A. (2012). Creativity and self-esteem: A multiple operationalization validity study. The Journal of Psychology, 122(1), 47–56. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1988.10542942
Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students’ gender moderates accuracy of teachers’ ratings of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.36
Hallam, Dr. J. Gallagher, Mrs. L. & Owen, Dr. K. (2022). Im not the best at art”: An exploration of children’s growing sense of artistry within an outdoor, arts-based intervention. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, Article 101038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101038
Hetland, L. Winner, E. Veenema, S. & Sheridan, K. M. (2015). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education (2nd Edition). Teachers College Press.
Hilal, M. H. H. Husin, W. N. I. & Zayed, T. M. (2013). Barriers to creativity among students of selected universities in Malaysia. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 3(6), 51–60.
Jackson, N. (2006). Imagining a different world. In N. Jackson, M. Oliver, M. Shaw, & J. Wisdom (Eds.), Developing creativity in higher education. An imaginative curriculum. Routledge.
Johnson, W.R. (2022), "Bias in Creative Adoption Decision Points: Why Receivers Hinder the Creativity–Innovation Process", Cattani, G. Deichmann, D. and Ferriani, S. (Ed.) The Generation, Recognition and Legitimation of Novelty (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 77), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000077016
Jørgensen, U. Brodersen, S. Lindegaard, H. & Boelskifte, P. (2011). Foundations for a new type of design engineers—Experiences from DTU. In ICED 11 - 18th international conference on engineering design - Impacting society through engineering design (pp. 275–286). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url? scp=84858807585&partnerID=8YFLogxK.
Juhl, J. & Buch, A. (2019). Transforming academia: The role of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(8), 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00131857.2018.1508996
Kamak, A. Auelbekov, E. Zhumabekova, F. Zhiyentayeva, B. & Mandykaeva, A. (2017). Creative development of junior school students in the process of fine art training. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 20(3), 1–7.
Karwowski, M. Jankowska, D. M. Brzeski, A. Czerwonka, M. Gajda, A. Lebuda, I. & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Delving into creativity and learning. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712165
Kazerounian, K. & Foley, S. (2007). Barriers to creativity in engineering education: A study of instructors and students perceptions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129 (7), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2739569
Mareque ´Alvarez-Santullano, M. & de Prada-Creo, E. (2018). Evaluaci´on de las competencias profesionales a trav´es de las pr´acticas externas: Incidencia de la creatividad. Revista de Investigaci´on Educativa, 36(1), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.1.275651
Mareque, M. de Prada-Creo, E. & Gonzalez-Sanchez, M. B. (2019). Fostering creativity and communicative soft skills through leisure activities in management studies. Education+ Training, 61(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2018-0149
Morais, M. de, F. & Almeida, L. S. (2015). Perceç˜oes de obst´aculos `a criatividade em universit´arios de diferentes ´areas curriculares e níveis de graduaç˜ao || Perceptions of obstacles to creativity with university students from different subject areas and grade levels. Revista de Estudios e Investigaci´on en Psicología y Educaci´on, 2 (2), 122–129.
Mohammadi Akram، (1402) Barriers to the development of creativity from the perspective of students, 18th International Conference on Management, Economy and Development https://civilica.com/doc/1768696/
Morais, M.de F. Almeida, L.S.Azevedo, I. Alencar, E. & Fleith, D. (2014a). Inventory of barriers to personal creativity: A validation study involving university students. In Z. Bekirogullari & M. Y. Minas (Eds.), Cognitive—Social, and behavioural sciences – icCSBs 2014, vol 1. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences: Vol. Cognitive-Social, and Behavioural Sciences – icCSBs 2014 (pp. 135–145). Future Academy.
Nakano, T. de, C. Oliveira, K. da, S. & Zaia, P. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: A systematic literature review. In Psicologia: Teoria e pesquisa, 37. https://doi. org/10.1590/0102.3772e372116
Nordin, N. & Malik, M. (2015). Undergraduates’ barriers to creative thought and innovative in a new millennial era. In, 201. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences (pp. 93–101). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.136
Ozga, W. K. & Cudo, A. (2022). Exploring factors that differentiate art and non-art high school students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jocb.508
Pagnani, A. R. Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (2011). Gender differences. In Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd Edition, 1 pp. 551–557). Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect. com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/gender-differences.
Powers, A. (2018). Creativity is the skill of the future. Forbes. Retrieved 11 August 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/annapowers/2018/04/30/creativity-isthe- skill-of-the-future/.
Rahmani, Fatemeh and Asghari Nikah, Seyed Mohsen and Baghgoli, Hossein, 1402, investigating the relationship between personal barriers to creativity and the level of emptiness of preschool teachers in Mashhad, 8th International Congress of Psychological and Educational Sciences, Tehran, https://civilica.com /doc/1747530(in persian)
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sadi, M. A. & Al-Dubaisi, A. H. (2008). Barriers to organizational creativity: The marketing executives’ perspective in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Management Development, 27(6), 574–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810877839
Sol´e, L. Sole-Coromina, L. & Poole, S. E. (2020). Mind the gap: Identifying barriers to students engaging in creative practices in higher education. Journal of Work- Applied Management, 12(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-03-2020-0017
Sowden, P. T. Clements, L. Redlich, C. & Lewis, C. (2015). Improvisation facilitates divergent thinking and creativity: Realizing a benefit of primary school arts education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000018
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.003
Sunley, R. Harding, L. & Jones, J. (2019). Realising creativity in management education: Putting student energy into action. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.02.007
Talavera, M. Hurtado, A. Domenech, J. & Martin-Baena, D. (2015). Valoraci´on de la creatividad grupal y barreras del pensamiento creativo en universitarios [Assessment of group creativity and barriers to creative thinking among university students]. Journal of Learning Styles, 8, 70.
Taylor, C. L. & Barbot, B. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: Examining the greater male variability hypothesis in different domains and tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, Article 110661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110661
Thatcher, S. M. B. & Brown, S. A. (2010). Individual creativity in teams: The importance of communication media mix. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.004
Wang, Y. & Wang, L. (2016). Self-construal and creativity: The moderator effect of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 184–189. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.086
Winner, E. Goldstein, T. R. & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education: Educational research and innovation. Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development.
Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood: Meaning-making and children’s drawing. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251447
Yates, E. & Szenasi, J. (2021). Engaging the local community in cultural heritage through a children’s ceramic arts exhibition. In J. M. Salvador, & A. Pazos (Eds.), The museum for all people. Proposals for accessibility and social inclusion in the XXI century’. Peter Lang. http://hdl.handle.net/10545/625651.
Zhang, L. & Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Revisiting the investment theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10400419.2011.595974
