رابطه‌ی بین رفتار و هویت اخلاقی: نقش میانجی سود روان‌شناختی و موقعیتی
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش
ارزو دلفان بیرانوند
1
(دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران)
احمد بیات
2
(دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران)
کلید واژه: هویت اخلاقی, سود روان‌شناختی, سود موقعیتی, رفتار اخلاقی,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه و هدف: این پژوهش با هدف تبیین رابطه بین رفتار و هویت اخلاقی دانش آموزان دبیرستانی دوره متوسطه دوم با توجه به نقش میانجی سود روان‌شناختی و موقعیتی انجام شد.روش‌شناسی پژوهش: روش این پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. اندازه نمونه شامل تعداد 907 نفر (393 دختر و 514 پسر) دانش آموز دبیرستانی دوره متوسطه دوم در شهر همدان بودند که به شیوه نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه ای چند مرحله ای انتخاب شدند و مقیاس های رفتار اخلاقی (دلفان بیرانوند و رشید، 1400)، هویت اخلاقی (آکینیو و رید، 2002)، و مقیاس سود (دلفان بیرانوند و رشید، 1400) را تکمیل کردند. داده ها با روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری تحلیل شدند.یافته ها: نتایج تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها نشان داد که سود روان‌شناختی و موقعیتی در ارتباط بین ابعاد رفتار اخلاقی و ابعاد هویت اخلاقی نقش واسطه ای معناداری دارند.بحث و نتیجه گیری: برپایه نتایج این پژوهش می توان گفت که سود روان‌شناختی و موقعیتی می توانند به عنوان عوامل انجام رفتارهای اخلاقی از سوی افراد شناخته شوند. زیرا ارزیابی این‌که انجام رفتارهای اخلاقی مانند راست‌گویی، چقدر برای افراد سودآور است خود می تواند آنان را به انجام رفتارهای درست ترغیب کند.
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to explain the relationship between moral behavior and identity of high school students by the mediating role of psychological and situational benefit. Research Methodology: The research method was descriptive-correlational. The sample size included 907 (393 girls and 514 boys) high school students in the city of Hamedan who were selected by multi-stage cluster random sampling, and answered the Moral Behavior (Delfan Biranvand and Rashid, 1400), Moral Identity (Aquino and Reed, 2002), and the Benefit (Delfan Biranvand and Rashid, 1400) questionaries. Data were analyzed by structural equation modeling using Lisrel-8.8. Findings: The results showed that psychological and situational benefit play a significant mediating role in the relationship between moral behavior and identity. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, it can be said that psychological and situational benefit can be explained as good factors for explaining the reason for the individuals’ moral behaviors. Because evaluating how beneficial moral behaviors, such as honesty, can motivate individual to show the right behaviors.
References
1- Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440.
2- Ashuri, J. (2015). The Relationship between ethical reasoning, ethical behavior and nurses' health with their ethical metacognition. Medical Ethics, 9(34): 1-22. [In Persian]
3- Azimpour, A., & Nisi, A., Shahni Yilagh M, Arshadi N, Bashlideh K. (2014). Validation of the "Importance for Moral Identity" scale of personality and individual differences, 2: 19-38. [In Persian]
4- Bazerman, M. H., & Gino, F. (2012). Behavioral ethics: toward a deeper understanding of moral judgment and dishonesty. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 8: 85-104.
5- Bennis, W.M., Medin, D.L., & Bartels, D.M. (2010). The costs and benefits of calculation and moral rules. Perspect Psychol Sci; 5(2):187-202.
6- Cheng, C. (2014). The predictive effects of self-esteem, moral self and moral reasoning on delinquent behaviors of Hong Kong young people. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3, 133-145.
7- Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: Free Press.
8- Delfan Beiranvand, A., Rashid, Kh. Yaghoubi, A.B., & Kordnoghabi, R. (2022). Facilitating and Preventing Factors in Moral and Immoral Behaviors Based on the Implicit Theories of the Iranian People: The Role of Benefit and Costs. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health.
9- Delfan Biranvand, A., & Rashid, Kh. (2022). Constructing, validating, and standardizing the Moral Behavior Scale among adolescents. Sociology of Education, In Press. [In Persian]
10- Delfan Biranvand, A., & Rashid, Kh. (2022). Constructing, validating, and standardizing the Benefit and Cost Scale among adolescents. Educational Measurement, In Press. [In Persian]
11- Eysenck, M. W. (2004). Psychology: An International perspective. Canada: Psychology press.
12- George, B. (2007). True north: Discover your authentic leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
13- Ghiasizadeh M. (2012). The relationship between mental health and academic performance with the Growth of moral judgment of female students. Journal of Women and Culture; 3 (10), 122-111. (In Persian).
14- Gino F. (2015). Understanding ordinary unethical behavior: why people who value morality act immorally. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3:107–111.
15- Hardy, S. A., Bean, D. S., & Olsen, J. A. (2014). Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adole science. Advance online publication. Doi: 10.1007/ s10964-014-0172-1
16- Hardy, S. A., Walker, L. J., Olsen, J. A., Woodbury, R. D., & Hickman, J. R. (2014).Moral identity as moral ideal self: Links to adolescent outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 50 (1), 45-57.
17- Hardy, S.A., Bean, D.S., & Olsen, J.A. (2015). Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence; 44(8): 1542-1554.
18- Hardy, S.A., Francis, S.W., Zamboanga, B.L, Kim, S.Y., Anderson, S.G., Forthun, L.F. (2013). The roles of identity formation and moral identity in college student mental health, health‐risk behaviors, and psychological well‐being. Journal of Clinical Psychology; 69(4): 364-382.
19- Hertz, S. G. S. G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis. General Review of Psychology, 20 (2), 129–140
20- Hertz, S.G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior? A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology; 20(2): 129-140.
21- Hosseinian, S. (2006). Ethics in counseling and psychology. Tehran: Kamal Tarbiat Publications. [In Persian]
22- Jia, F., & Krettenauer, T. (2017). Recognizing Moral Identity as a Cultural Construct. Frontiers. Psychology, 8, 412. Available at: http://www. frontiersin.org:.Accessed, February 8, 2018.
23- Jokar, B., & Hagh-Neghdar, M. (2016). The relationship between moral identity and academic dishonesty: A study of the moderating role of gender. Education and Learning Studies, 8(2): 143-162. [In Persian]
24- Kingsford, J.M., Hawes, D.J., & De Rosnay, M. (2018). The moral self and moral identity: Developmental questions and conceptual challenges. British Journal of Developmental Psychology; 36(4): 652-566.
25- Krettenauer, T. (2020). Moral identity as a goal of moral action: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Journal of Moral Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1698414.
26- Krettenauer, T., Murua, L. A., & Jia, F. (2016). Age-related differences in moral identity across adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 52, 972–984.
27- Krettenauer, T., Murua, L. A., & Jia, F. (2016). Age-related differences in moral identity across adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 52, 972–984.
28- Lane, T. (2019). Commentary on Ethics and Morality (Ropiak, D. J). Edited by Thomas Lane.
29- Lapsley D. (2015). Moral identity and developmental theory. Human Development; 58(3): 164-171.
30- Lari-Dasht-Bayaz, M., Khadem, H., Abdi, A., & Marvian Hosseini, Z. (2014). Investigating the ethical behavior of large taxpayers from a postmodern ethical perspective. Taxation, 24(72). [In Persian]
31- Lowry, R., & Peterson, M. (2012). Cost-benefit analysis and non-utilitarian ethics. Poli Philoso Eco; 11(3):258-79.
32- McMahon, J.M., & Good, D.J. (2015). The moral metacognition Scale: Development and validation. Ethics & Behavior; 26 (5):357-394.
33- Mohagheghi, M., Farhadi, M., Rashid, KH. & Delfan Beiranvand, A. (2021) Predicting moral behavior based on moral intelligence and personality traits: The mediating role of the structure self-transcendence. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health; 23(4): 273-284.
34- Myyry, L., & Helkama, K. (2002). The Role of Value Priorities and Professional Ethics Training in Moral Sensitivity, Journal of Moral Education, 31, 35-50.
35- Nourbakhsh, M., & Alizadeh, M. (2004). Survey of job satisfaction of physical education teachers in Ahvaz. Movement, 22, 171-189. [In Persian]
36- Piran, M., & Nastizaie, N. (2015). The relationship between intellectual capital and social responsibility with the ethical behavior of faculty members. Iranian Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, 16(50): 454-464. [In Persian]
37- Pohling R, Diessner R, Strobel A. (2018). The role of gratitude and moral elevation in moral identity development. International Journal of Behavioral Development; 42(4): 405-415.
38- Reynolds, S. J. Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The Effects of Moral Judgment and Moral Identity on Moral Behavior: An Empirical Examination of the Moral Individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 6, 1610–1624. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1610
39- Reynolds, S.J. & Ceranic, T.L. (2007). The Effects of Moral Judgment and Moral Identity on Moral Behavior: An Empirical Examination of the Moral Individual, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, 1610–1624
40- Robbins, S. A., & Judge, T. A. (2012). “Organizational behavior”. Prentice Hall. P: 29
41- Shabani, Z. (2012). Meta-analysis of moral change in research conducted during 1986 - 2009. Research and writing of academic books, 27, 42 – 81. [In Persian]
42- Treviño, L.K., & Youngblood, S .A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4): 447-476.
43- Weber, J., & Gillespie, J. (1998). Differences in ethical beliefs, intentions, and behaviors. Business and Society, 37(4): 447-467.
44- Yaghoubi, A., & Abdollahi-Moghadam, M. (2016). Investigating the relationship between moral reasoning and moral behavior mediated by social cognition theory in adolescents. School Psychology, 5(2): 182-167. [In Persian]
_||_