ارائه الگویی جهت شناخت تأثیر عوامل چابک بر عملکرد زنجیره تأمین در صنعت خودروی ایران ( مطالعه موردی در زنجیره تأمین شرکت ساپکو)

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی

Reza Radfar ¹ , Nazanin Pilevarie ² , Atefe Motevali Abiazani ³ , Hadi Razmi ⁴

1 - Associate Professor of Management and Economics Faculty, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Shaher Ray Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shaher Rey, Iran
3 - M.A Student in Technology Management, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - M.A Student in Technology Management, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1396/10/20 تاریخ پذیرش : 1396/10/20 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/08/01

کلید واژه: معادلات ساختاری, عملکرد زنجیره تأمین, Structural equation, زنجیره تأمین چابک, Supply chain agile, Performance of supply chain,

چکیده مقاله :

پیچیدگی تکنولوژی‌های پیشرفته، کوتاه و کوتاه ‌تر شدن چرخه عمر محصولات، نیازمندی‌های متمایز مشتریان و گسترش میل به تنوع‌طلبی و تقاضا برای محصولات متنوع در بازار جهانی، شفافیت بازار را تقلیل داده و بر عدم اطمینان آن افزوده است. تا کنون راهکارهای زیادی برای پاسخ گویی به این مسائل ارائه گردیده است. از جمله این راهکارها می توان به چابکی زنجیره تأمین و عملکرد های زنجیره تأمین برای افزایش پاسخ گویی به نیاز مشتریان اشاره نمود. به دلیل تأثیر بسیار زیاد این دو راهکار، مطالعات فراوانی بر روی ابعاد ساختاری آنها صورت گرفته اما تا کنون ارتباط میان آنها مورد بررسی قرار نگرفته است. در این پژوهش در ابتدا مبانی نظری زنجیره تأمین چابک و عملکرد های زنجیره تأمین مورد بررسی قرار می گیرد و با استفاده از نظرات کارشناسان و نرم افزار معادلات ساختاری، روایی مدل ارائه شده سنجیده می شود ودر انتها مشخص می شود که میان چابکی زنجیره تأمین و عملکردهای زنجیره تأمین رابطه مثبت و معنا داری وجود دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The complexity of new technologies, shorter and shorter product life cycles, different customer needs and expansion of seeking diversity for different products in the global market have decreased market transparency and increased unreliability. So far many solutions have been proposed to handle these issues. Two of these solutions to customer needs are supply chain agility and supply chain performance. Because of the huge impact of these two approaches, many studies have been carried out on the structural aspects but the relationship between them has not been studied in this research. First the basic theoretical essentials of agile supply chain and function of agility are studied and the given model is measured and validated using experts' analyses and software of SEM, and finally shown supply chain agility have the positive effect on supply chain performance. 

منابع و مأخذ:

• Bayat, Ali. (2007). Performance evaluation of supply chain with FMADM approach(master of science dissertation). Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran.


• Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International

Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(3), 275-292.

• Choi, T. Y. & Eboch, K. (1998). The TQM paradox: Relations among TQM practices, plant performance, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management, 17, 59-75.


• Christopher, M. (2000). The Agile supply chain: Competing in volatile Markets, Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 37 –44.


• Dixon, J. R. Dixon. (1992). measuring manufacturing flexibility: An empirical investigation, European Journal of Operational Research 60 (2), 131-


• Feyzabadi, Javad. (2009). Explaining and evaluating a Model for strategic behavior of supply chain in industries with complex production (Doctoral dissertation). Tehran University, Tehran.


• Fynes,b, Mangan. J. & S. de Burca. (2008). The effect of relationship characteristics on relationship quality and performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 111(1), 56-69.


• Homan, H,A. (2008). Structural equation modeling using lisrel software. Tehran: Samt publication.


• Hu, Allen H. and Hsu, Chia-Wei. (2010). Critical factors for implementing green supply chain management practice: An empirical study of electrical and electronics industries in Taiwan, Management Research Review, 33(6), 586-608.


• Khaki, Gh. (2007). Method of research with approach of dissertation writing. Tehran : Baztab publication


• Lin, C. T. , Chiu, H. , Chu, P. Y. (2006). Agility index in the supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics100 (2). 285-99.


• Moazezestanjin, Reza. (2005). Review and provide a general framework of flexibility in the supply chain, 43, 14-10.


• Pilevari, Nazanin. (2009). Explaining and evaluating Model of agility in supply chain based expert systems (Doctoral dissertation). science and research university, Tehran.


• Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet, Harvard Business Review, 63-78.


• Power, D. , Sohal, A. , Rahman, S. (2001). Critical success factors in agile supply chain management, Intrnational Journal of Physical Distribution &Logistics management, 31(4). 247-265.


• Sarmad, Z. , & Bazargan, A. , & Hejazi, A. (2008). Method of research in the behavioral science. Tehran: Agah publication.


• Shahae, Behnam. , & Rajabzade, Ali. (2005). Dimension of organizational agility in government agencies with the approach of information technology. International conference of communication & information. Iran.


• Simchi-Levi, D. , Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, E. (2000). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concept, Strategy and Case Studies, McGraw-Hill, Higher Education, USA.


• Slack, N. , et al. (1998). Operations Management, London: Pitman Publishing.


• Swafford, P. M. Ghosh, S. and Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing, Journal of Operations Management, 24. 170-188.


• Teece, D. J. , Pisano, G. , and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capability and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18. 171-185.


• Voss, C. , Blackmon, K. (1994). Total quality management and ISO 9000: A European study. Working Paper, Centre for Operations Management, London: London Business School.