تحلیل ابعاد پایداری زنجیره تأمین شرکت‌های تولیدی سیمان مبتنی بر استراتژیهای رقابتی زنجیره تأمین LARG

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی

Mohammad Safari ¹ (Ph.D. Candidate in Industrial Management, Islamic Azad University of Masjed Soleyman, Iran)
Gholamreza Jamali ² (Industrial Management Department, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran)
Belghis Bavarsad ³ (Belghis Bavarsad, Associate Professor Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz,Ahvaz,Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/10/09 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/02/28 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/04/01

کلید واژه: زنجیره تأمین LARG, شرکتهای تولیدی سیمان, پایداری زنجیره تأمین,

چکیده مقاله :

شناسایی اهمیت و جایگاه استراتژی‌های مرتبط به زنجیره تأمین و ابعاد پایداری زنجیره تامین در راستای افزایش توان رقابتی، بهبود عملکرد و بهره‌وری در سرتاسر عملیات یکی از چالش‌های عمده‌ شرکت‌های تولیدی سیمان می‌باشد. بدین منظور، هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل ابعاد پایداری زنجیره تأمین شرکت‌های تولیدی سیمان مبتنی بر استراتژی‌های رقابتی زنجیره تأمین LARG در استان بوشهر می‌باشد. با مرور پیشینه پژوهش، استراتژی‌های رقابتی زنجیره تأمین LARG شامل: ناب، چابک، تاب‌آوری و سبز و ابعاد پایداری زنجیره تأمین شامل: اقتصادی، مسئولیت اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی شناسایی گردیدند. در این پژوهش از دو نوع پرسشنامه مربوط به تکنیک تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره سوارا جهت گردآوری داده و بمنظور رتبه‌بندی استراتژی‌های رقابتی زنجیره تأمین LARG و ابعاد پایداری زنجیره تأمین استفاده گردید. جامعه آماری شامل 15 نفر از کارشناسان و متخصصین شرکت‌های تولیدی سیمان در استان بوشهر می‌باشد که با توجه به سوابق و تجربیات آن‌ها 10 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب گردیدند. با بکارگیری تکنیک تصمیم-گیری چندمعیاره سوارا، نتایج نشان داد که برای شرکت‌های تولیدی سیمان استان بوشهر استراتژی سبز به‌عنوان مهمترین استراتژی زنجیره تأمین LARG دارای وزنی معادل با 41/0 استراتژی ناب با وزن 28/0، استراتژی چابک با وزن 18/0 و در رتبه آخر، استراتژی تاب‌آور با وزن تقریبی 13/0 قرار دارد. همچنین، بعد زیست‌محیطی به‌عنوان مهمترین بعد پایداری در زنجیره تأمین شرکت‌های تولیدی سیمان استان بوشهر دارای وزنی معادل با 50/0 را بدست آورده است و پس از آن ابعاد مسئولیت اجتماعی با وزن تقریبی 30/0 و بعد اقتصادی با وزن 20/0 به ترتیب دارای رتبه‌های دوم و سوم بوده‌اند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Identification the role of LARG supply chain competitive strategies and dimensions of supply chain sustainability toward competition ability, performance and sustainability improvement is one of the most important challenges in Bushehr province cement companies. This study aims to analyzing dimensions of dupply chain sustainability in cement companies based on LARG supply chain competitive strategies in Bushehr province. Based on literature review, LARG competitive strategies and dimensions include: Lean, Agile, Resilient, and Green and dimensions of supply chain sustainability include: economic, social, and environmental identified and classified. There are a population included 15 experts in Bushehr province cement companies and among them 10 people were selected due to their experience and background. A multi-criteria decision-making technique named SWARA, applied for calculation the weight and importance of each LARG competitive supply chain strategies and supply chain sustainability dimensions. The results showed that Green supply chain strategies as the most important strategy in Bushehr province cement companies supply chain with the weight of 0.41, Lean 0.28, Agile 0.18 and Resilient 0.13 ranked first to fourth respectively. The results also showed in order to gain supply chain sustainability in Bushehr cement industries, the environmental dimension having 0.50 weight, social responsibility dimension 0.30 and economic dimension 0.20 ranked first to third respectively.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Afonso, H., & do Rosário Cabrita, M. (2015). Developing a lean supply chain performance framework in a SME: a perspective based on the balanced scorecard. Procedia Engineering, 131, 270-279.


2. Ahmadi, H. B., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Rezaei, J. (2017). Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 126, 99-106.


3. Alomar, R., & Weriakat, D. (2012, July). A framework for a green and lean supply chain: A construction project application. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Istanbul, 289-299.


4. Amiri, M., Hosseini Dehshiri, S.J., Yousefi Hanoomarvar, A. (2018). Determining the optimal combination of larg supply chain strategies using SWOT analysis, multi-criteria decision-making techniques and game theory. Industrial Management Journal, 10(2), 221-246. [in Persian]


5. Amrina, E., & Vilsi, A. L. (2015). Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in cement industry. Procedia CIRP, 26, 19-23.


6. Anand, G., & Kodali, R. (2008). A conceptual framework for lean supply chain and its implementation. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 2(3), 313-357.


7. Andalib Ardakani, D., & Soltanmohammadi, A. (2019). Investigating and analysing the factors affecting the development of sustainable supply chain model in the industrial sectors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 199-212.


8. Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H. & Cruz Machado, V. (2011). A proposal of LARG supply chain management practices and a performance measurement system. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e- Learning, 1(1), 7- 14.


9. Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2016). LARG index: a benchmarking tool for improving the leanness, agility, resilience and greenness of the automotive supply chain. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(6), 1472-1499.


10. Badi, S., & Murtagh, N. (2019). Green supply chain management in construction: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of cleaner production, 223, 312-322.


11. Balaji, M., Velmurugan, V., & Subashree, C. (2015). TADS: An assessment methodology for agile supply chains. Journal of applied research and technology, 13(5), 504-509.


12. Bendul, J. C., Rosca, E., & Pivovarova, D. (2017). Sustainable supply chain models for base of the pyramid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, S107-S120.


13. Bergström, J., Van Winsen, R., & Henriqson, E. (2015). On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 141, 131-141.


14. Bubicz, M. E., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D., & Carvalho, A. (2019). Incorporating social aspects in sustainable supply chains: Trends and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production.


15. Cabral, I., Grilo, A., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4830-4845.


16. Carvalho, H., & Azevedo, S. (2014). Trade-offs among lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms in supply chain management: a case study approach. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on management science and engineering management (pp. 953-968). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.


17. Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2011). Integrating lean, agile, resilience and green paradigms in supply chain management (LARG_SCM). Supply chain management, 27-48.


18. Carvalho, H., Barroso, A. P., Machado, V. H., Azevedo, S., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(1), 329-341.


19. Carvalho, H., Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2017). Modeling green and lean supply chains: An eco-efficiency perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 75-87.


20. Cetinkaya, B., Cuthbertson, R., Ewer, G., Klaas-Wissing, T., Piotrowicz, W., & Tyssen, C. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: practical ideas for moving towards best practice. Springer Science & Business Media. 1, 303.


21. Chen, Q., & Grossmann, I. E. (2017). Recent developments and challenges in optimization-based process synthesis. Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering, 8, 249-283.


22. Chowdhury, M. M. H., Agarwal, R., & Quaddus, M. (2019). Dynamic capabilities for meeting stakeholders' sustainability requirements in supply chain. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 34-45.


23. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Sigma Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics, 15(2), 1-13.


24. Dieste, M., Panizzolo, R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Anosike, A. (2019). The relationship between lean and environmental performance: practices and measures. Journal of cleaner production, 224, 120-131.


25. Doolen, T., & Hacker, M. (2005). A review of lean assessment in organizations: An exploratory study of lean practices by electronics manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 24(1), 55-67.


26. Dües, C.M., Tan, K.H., & Lim, M. (2013). Green as the new Lean: how to use Lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. J Clean Prod, 40, 93–100.


27. Espadinha-Cruz, P., Grilo, A., Puga-Leal, R., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2011, December). A model for evaluating lean, agile, resilient and green practices interoperability in supply chains. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1209-1213). IEEE.


28. Farhadi, F., Taghizadeh Yazdi, M. R., Sajadi, S. M. (2018). Providing sustainable supply chain agility model in the brick industry of Isfahan province. Industrial Management Journal, 10(3), 335-352. (in Persian)


29. Galal, N. M., & Moneim, A. F. A. (2016). Developing sustainable supply chains in developing countries. Procedia Cirp, 48, 419-424.


30. Genc, T. S., & De Giovanni, P. (2018). Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics.


31. Ghasemiyeh, R., Jamali, G., & Karimi Asl, E. (2015). Analysis of LARG supply chain management dimensions in cement industry (an integrated multi-criteria decision making approach). Industrial Management, 7(4), 813-836. (in Persian)


32. Ghazizadeh, M., Norozzadeh, F., Raisi Ghorban Abadi, H. (2015). Integration of supply chain management approaches in the form of LARG supply chain using multi attribute decision making techniques in Saipa Company. Executive Management, 17(48), 12-19. (in Persian)


33. González, P., Sarkis, J., & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2008). Environmental management system certification and its influence on corporate practices: Evidence from the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(11), 1021-1041.


34. Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2015). Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1), 15-34.


35. Gurumurthy, A., & Kodali, R. (2009). Application of benchmarking for assessing the lean manufacturing implementation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(2), 274-308.


36. Hines, P. (2009). Lean and Green. Source Mag Home Lean Thinking. 3rd Ed, sapartners.


37. Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.


38. Hou, G., Wang, Y., & Xin, B. (2019). A coordinated strategy for sustainable supply chain management with product sustainability, environmental effect and social reputation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1143-1156.


39. Hu, A. H., & Hsu, C. W. (2010). Critical factors for implementing green supply chain management practice. Management research review.


40. Iakovou, E., Vlachos, D., & Xanthopoulos, A. (2007). An analytical methodological framework for the optimal design of resilient supply chains. International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, 1(1), 1-20.


41. Jabbarzadeh, A., Fahimnia, B., & Sabouhi, F. (2018). Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks. International Journal of Production Research, 56(17), 5945-5968.


42. Jamali, G., & Falah, M. (2017). Agility of supply chain for oil and gas and petrochemical equipment supporting businesses. Business Management Exploration, 9(17), 32-53. [in Persian]  


43. Jamali, G., & Karimi Asl, E. (2018a). Evaluation of LARG supply chain competitive strategies based on gap analysis in cement industries. Production and Operations Manageme, 9 (1), 29-54. (in Persian)


44. Jamali, G., & Karimi Asl, E. (2018b). Competitive positioning for LARG supply chain in cement industry and its strategic requirements importance-performance analysis. Industrial Management Studies, 16(50), 53-77. (in Persian)


45. Jamali, G., Karimi Asl, E., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Šaparauskas, J. (2017). Analysing LARG supply chain management competitive strategies in Iranian cement industries. Economics and Management, 20(3), 70-83.


46. Jasti, N. V. K., & Kurra, S. (2017). An empirical investigation on lean supply chain management frameworks in Indian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.


47. Katiyar, R., Meena, P. L., Barua, M. K., Tibrewala, R., & Kumar, G. (2018). Impact of sustainability and manufacturing practices on supply chain performance: Findings from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 303-316.


48.  Kersuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of business economics and management, 11(2), 243-258.


49. Leong, W. D., Lam, H. L., Ng, W. P. Q., Lim, C. H., Tan, C. P., & Ponnambalam, S. G. (2019). Lean and green manufacturing—a review on its applications and impacts. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 3(1), 5-23.


50. Lin, C., Chiu, H., & Chu, P. (2006). Agility index in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 285-299.


51. Maleki M., & Cruz Machado, V. (2013). Generic integration of lean, agile, resilient, and green practices in automotive supply chain. Review of International Comparative Management, 14(2), 237-248.


52. Maleki, M., da Cruz, P. E., Valente, R. P., & Machado, V. C. (2011). Supply chain integration methodology: LARG supply chain. Encontro Nacional de Engenharia e Gestão Industrial 2011, 57.


53. Martins, C. L., & Pato, M. V. (2019). Supply chain sustainability: A tertiary literature review. Journal of cleaner production.


54. Mohammadnezhad Chari, F., & Safaei Ghadikolaei, A. (2016). Supply chain identify and rank the criteria for selecting suppliers in the LARG (Case Study: KALLEH food industry). Journal of Operational Research and Its Applications, 13(4), 103-120. (in Persian)


55. Patriarca, R., Bergström, J., Di Gravio, G., & Costantino, F. (2018). Resilience engineering: Current status of the research and future challenges. Safety Science, 102, 79-100.


56. Paulraj, A. (2009). Environmental motivations: a classifi cation scheme and its impact on environmental strategies and practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(7), 453-468.


57. Rachid, B., Roland, D., Sebastien, D., & Ivana, R. (2017). Risk management approach for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(4), 742-750.


58. Ramezani Ghotbabadi, A. , Gandaee, S., & Gandaee, M. T. (2016). Making LARG supply chain management smart and identification of its conditions with management tools of SWOT, BI, and RFID technology. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(9), 321-333.


59. Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 9(25), 898-916.


60. Rayatpisha, S., Ahmady, R., & Abbasi, M., (2018). Using a combined approach of qualitative & multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach in order to presentation of sustainable supply chains model in petrochemical industry. Industrial Management Studies, 16(51), 145-180.


61. Rice, J., & Caniato, F. (2003). Building a secure and resilient supply network. Supply Chain Management Review, 7(5), 22-31.


62. Sangari, M. S., Razmi, J., & Zolfaghari, S. (2015). Developing a practical evaluation framework for identifying critical factors to achieve supply chain agility. Measurement, 62, 205-214.


63. Siddhartha, & Sachan, A. (2016). Review of agile supply chain implementation frameworks. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 8(1), 27-45.


64. Sukwadi, R., Wee, H. M., & Yang, C. C. (2013). Supply chain performance based on the lean–agile operations and supplier–firm partnership: An empirical study on the garment industry in Indonesia. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(2), 297-311.


65. Swafford, M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297.


66. Vachon, S. (2007). Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18), 4357-4379.


67. Verrier, B., Rose, B., & Caillaud, E. (2016). Lean and green strategy: the lean and green house and maturity deployment model. Journal of cleaner production, 116, 150-156.


68.  Yawar, A.S., & Seuring, S. (2017). Management of social issues in supply chains: A literature review exploring social issues, actions and performance outcomes. Journal Business Ethics, 141, 621–643.


69. Yun, G., Yalcin, M. G., Hales, D. N., & Kwon, H. Y. (2019). Interactions in sustainable supply chain management: a framework review. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(1), 140-173.


70. Zahiri, B., Zhuang, J., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Toward an integrated sustainable-resilient supply chain: A pharmaceutical case study. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 103, 109-142.


71. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Green supply chain management implications for closing the loop. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(1), 1-18.


72. Zhu, Q., Shah, P., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Addition by subtraction: Integrating product deletion with lean and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 201-214.