• صفحه اصلی
  • شناسایی و اولویت بندی شاخص‌های پایداری زنجیره تأمین و ارائه الگو جامع پایداری مرتبط با صنایع کاشی و سرامیک یزد با رویکرد داده بنیاد و روش بهترین-بدترین فازی

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : IMJ-2103-1577 (R1) بازدید : 71 صفحه: 23 - 47

10.30495/imj.2022.1926584.1577

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

شناسایی و اولویت بندی شاخص‌های پایداری زنجیره تأمین و ارائه الگو جامع پایداری مرتبط با صنایع کاشی و سرامیک یزد با رویکرد داده بنیاد و روش بهترین-بدترین فازی

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی

mohsen mirjalili 1 (yazd university)
Hasan Dehghan Dehnavi 2 (Associate Professor of Industrial Management, Department of Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University Yazd, iran)
shahnaz nayebzadeh 3 (yazd university)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/01/03 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/07/24 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/08/01

کلید واژه: پایداری زنجیره تامین, رویکرد داده بنیاد, روش بهترین و بدترین فازی, توسعه پایدار,

چکیده مقاله :

ضرورت رعایت عوامل توسعه پایدار (بخصوص مسائل زیست محیطی) در صنعت کاشی و سرامیک به علت سهم بالای کارخانجات این صنعت، همواره مورد تاکید بوده است. در این مقاله سعی شده است به بررسی عوامل موثر در توسعه پایدار زنجیره تامین صنعت کاشی و سرامیک استان یزد پرداخته شود. هدف از پژوهش حاضر شناسایی جامع شاخص‌ها و ارائه الگوی جامع پایداری زنجیره تامین در صنایع کاشی و سرامیک استان یزد و همچنین اولویت‌بندی شاخص‌ها می‌باشد. در ابتدا، ضمن مطالعه ادبیات تحقیق، تعداد 11 نفر از مدیران حوزه صنعت کاشی و خبرگان دانشگاهی انتخاب گردیدند. نمونه‌ها با روش نمونه-گیری غیراحتمالی نوع گلوله برفی انتخاب گردید و از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساخت یافته مولفه‌ها مورد شناسایی قرار گرفت و نمونه گیری تا حصول اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. در بخش کیفی، از رویکرد داده بنیاد استفاده گردید که زیرشاخص‌های بدست آمده براساس تحلیل داده‌بنیاد در 91 کد، 19 مفهوم و 6 مقوله دسته بندی شدند و همچنین یافته های بخش کیفی منجر به ارائه‌ی الگوی جامع پایداری زنجیره تامین در صنایع کاشی و سرامیک استان یزد گردید؛ تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات در بخش کمی، با استفاده از روش بهترین- بدترین فازی از طریق نرم افزار Lingo17 اجرا گردید و نتایج بخش کمی منجر به محاسبه وزن و همچنین اولویت‌بندی ابعاد و شاخص‌ها گردید که مفهوم تجهیزات با وزن نهائی 0.2777 بعنوان مهمترین شاخص و مفهوم جهانی شدن با وزن نهائی 0.0027 بعنوان کم اهمیت‌ترین اولویت‌بندی شدند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The need to observe the factors of sustainable development (especially environmental issues) in the ceramic-tile industry due to the high share of factories in this industry, has always been emphasized. In this article, we have tried to study the effective factors in the sustainable development of the supply chain of the ceramic-tile industry in Yazd province. The purpose of this study is to identify the indicators and provide a comprehensive model of supply chain sustainability in the ceramic-tile industry of Yazd province and to prioritize the indicators. Initially, while studying the research literature, 11 university administrators and experts were selected. Samples were selected by non-probabilistic snowball sampling method. The components were identified through semi-structured interviews and sampling was continued until theoretical saturation was obtained. In the qualitative part, the grounded theory approach was used. The obtained sub-indices were classified into 91 codes, 19 concepts and 6 categories based on the analysis of the grounded theory approach. Also, the findings of the quality sector led to the presentation of a comprehensive model of supply chain stability in the ceramic-tile industry of Yazd province. Quantitative data analysis was performed using the best-worst fuzzy method through Lingo17 software. And the results of the quantitative section led to the calculation of weight as well as the prioritization of dimensions and indicators. The concept of equipment with a final weight of 0.2777 was prioritized as the most important indicator and the concept of globalization with a final weight of 0.0027 as the least important.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Raj, A., Biswas, I., & Srivastava, S. K. (2018). Designing supply contracts for the sustainable supply chain using game theory. Journal of cleaner production, 185, 275-284.
    2.
  2. Amani, N., Taghizadeh, H., & Iranzadeh, S. (2020). Discriminant Analysis of Supply Chain Stability Clusters Based on Lean Tools. Journal of Executive Management, 12(23), 67-94.
    3.
  3. Chandra, D., & Kumar, D. (2021). Evaluating the effect of key performance indicators of vaccine supply chain on sustainable development of mission indradhanush: A structural equation modeling approach. Omega, 101, 102258.
    4.
  4. Dakov, I., & Novkov, S. (2008, May). Sustainable Supply chain management–Scope, activities and interrelations with other concepts. In 5th International Conference on Business and Management(pp. 16-17).
    5.
  5. Dehghan Nairi, M. & Shapouri, Sh. (2019). Presenting the model of sustainable development of the steel industry with a combined approach. Organizational Resource Management Research, 9(1), Spring. (In Persian).
    6.
  6. Dehghani, M. (2005). Review of the situation of the ceramic tile industry. Commercial Reviews, 11, 74-79. (In Persian).
    7.
  7. Ghasemi, , et al. (2015). Presenting a Model for Assessing Supply Chain Sustainability with a Hybrid Approach. Journal of Executive Management and Scientific-Research, 7, 14. (in Persian).
    8.
  8. Govindan, K., Jafarian, A., Khodaverdi, R., & Devika, K. (2014). Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food. International journal of production economics, 152, 9-28.
    9.
  9. Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23-31.
    10.
  10. Ince, H., Ozkan, A. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2020). The Impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Supply Chain Collaboration on Turkish Firms Performance: Moderator Effect of Uncertainty. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 16(19), 28-55.
    11.
  11. Isfahani Zanjani, M. & Najafi, A. & Naqilo, A. & Mohammadi, N. (2020). Explaining meta-analysis of supply chain sustainability issues and risk management. Journal of Business Management Exploration, 12 (23), 217-253. (In Persian).
    12.
  12. Kerdpitak, C., Chakphet, T., Maneechay, S., & Jaepho, S. (2020). The mediating role of sustainable supply chain in the relationship between ECO-strategic orientation and the reverse logistic in Thai electronic industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9, 10-18.
    13.
  13. Khalili Nasr, Arash. & Tavana, Majid. & Alavi, Behrouz.& Hassan Mina.(2020). A Novel Fuzzy Multi-Objective Circular Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Model for Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP 124994.
    14.
  14. Khoshsima, G. & Ebrahiminejad, M. (2008). An Empirical Study on the Correlation between KM Level and Efficiency in Ceramic Tile Industry. Lnai 5345, 160-172.
    15.
  15. Kodrat, K. F., Sinulingga, S., Napitupulu, H., & Hadiguna, R. A. (2020, May). Evaluation the effect of supply chain management on firm performance in passion fruit syrup company. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering(Vol. 801, No. 1, p. 012123). IOP Publishing.
    16.
  16. Liu, S. & Kasturiratne, D. & Moizer, J. (2012). A hub- and-spoke model for multi- dimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, No. 41, pp 581- 588.
    17.
  17. Ming, Xu. & Yuanyuan, Cui. & Meng, Hu. & Xinkai, Xu. & Zhechi, Zhang. & Sai, Liang. & Shen, Qu. (2019). Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP
    18.
  18. Motavalian, S. & Tabesh, M. & Roozbehani, A. (2012). Sustainability assessment of urban water supply and distribution systems: evaluation method and sustainability criteria. 4th Iran Water Resources Management Conference, Tehran, pp. 98-112. (In Persian).
    19.
  19. Nguyen, H., Ha, H & Doan, T. (2020). Retracted: The impact of supply chain quality management on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 331-350.
    20.
  20. Popovic, Tamara. & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana. & Kraslawski, Andrzej. & Carvalho, Ana. (2018). Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP 11822.
    21.
  21. Rayat Pisheh, S., et al. (2015). Applying a Hybrid Qualitative Approach to Provide a Comprehensive Supply Chain Sustainability Assessment Model. Journal of New Research in Decision Making, 1(1), Spring. (In Persian).
    22.
  22. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53,49-57.
    23.
  23. Rezaei Taleshi, A. (1390). Designing a model for evaluating sustainable supply chain using multi-criteria decision making method. Master Thesis, University of Tehran, Department of Industrial Engineering. (in Persian).
    24.
  24. Sanjeeb, Roy. & Miki, Das. & Syed Mithun, Ali. & Ahmed Shoyeb, Raihan. & Sanjoy Kumar, Paul. & Golam, Kabir. (2020). Evaluating strategies for environmental sustainability in a supply chain of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP 121389.
    25.
  25. Sarainia, A., et al. (2017). Development of a Model to Investigate the Impact of Sustainable Foresight on the Strategic Integration of Supply Chain with Value Creation Approach (Case Study: Iran Khodro Supply Chain). Management Futures Research Quarterly, Year 28, Issue 109, Summer. (in Persian).
    26.
  26. Sayadi Turanloo, H. & Mirghfouri, S. H. & Yavari, M. A. & Saghafi, S. (2020). Analysis of the role of knowledge management in sustainable supply chain management with interpretive structural modeling approach (Case study: Agricultural Jihad Organization of Yazd Province). Scientific Journal of Supply Chain Management, 22, 67, Summer. (in Persian).
    27.
  27. Sherafati, M. & Bashiri, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza. & Pishvaee, M. (2020). Achieving sustainable development of supply chain by incorporating various carbon regulatory mechanisms. Transportation Research Part, D 81, 102253.
    28.
  28. Shirmohammadi, A. & Vafaei, F. & Namamian, F. & Taban, M. (2020). Designing a Business Sustainability Model in the Supply Chain Using a Hybrid Approach. Business Management, 12 (3), 627-651. (In Persian).
    29.
  29. Tafreshi Motlagh, A. et al. (2017). Lean / Green Supply Chain Relationship Model and Corporate Sustainability. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences Quarterly, 11 (44), Spring. (In Persian).
    30.
  30. Venkatesh, Mani. & Gunasekaran, Angappa. & Delgado, Catarina. (2018). Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, PROECO 6947.
    31.
  31. Yazdani, H, R. & Mohammadi, F. (2019). 30 Basic Skills Qualitative Researchers Need to Know. Tehran, Negah Danesh Publication. (in Persian).
    32.
  32. Zaman, M.D.K. (2018). Business, ethics and the environment. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 3 (8), 9-16.
    33.
  33. Zhang, L., Pang, M., Wang, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). Environmental sustainability of small hydropower schemes in Tibet: An emergy-based comparative analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 97-104.
    34.
_||_

  1. Raj, A., Biswas, I., & Srivastava, S. K. (2018). Designing supply contracts for the sustainable supply chain using game theory. Journal of cleaner production, 185, 275-284.
    2.
  2. Amani, N., Taghizadeh, H., & Iranzadeh, S. (2020). Discriminant Analysis of Supply Chain Stability Clusters Based on Lean Tools. Journal of Executive Management, 12(23), 67-94.
    3.
  3. Chandra, D., & Kumar, D. (2021). Evaluating the effect of key performance indicators of vaccine supply chain on sustainable development of mission indradhanush: A structural equation modeling approach. Omega, 101, 102258.
    4.
  4. Dakov, I., & Novkov, S. (2008, May). Sustainable Supply chain management–Scope, activities and interrelations with other concepts. In 5th International Conference on Business and Management(pp. 16-17).
    5.
  5. Dehghan Nairi, M. & Shapouri, Sh. (2019). Presenting the model of sustainable development of the steel industry with a combined approach. Organizational Resource Management Research, 9(1), Spring. (In Persian).
    6.
  6. Dehghani, M. (2005). Review of the situation of the ceramic tile industry. Commercial Reviews, 11, 74-79. (In Persian).
    7.
  7. Ghasemi, , et al. (2015). Presenting a Model for Assessing Supply Chain Sustainability with a Hybrid Approach. Journal of Executive Management and Scientific-Research, 7, 14. (in Persian).
    8.
  8. Govindan, K., Jafarian, A., Khodaverdi, R., & Devika, K. (2014). Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food. International journal of production economics, 152, 9-28.
    9.
  9. Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23-31.
    10.
  10. Ince, H., Ozkan, A. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2020). The Impact of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Supply Chain Collaboration on Turkish Firms Performance: Moderator Effect of Uncertainty. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 16(19), 28-55.
    11.
  11. Isfahani Zanjani, M. & Najafi, A. & Naqilo, A. & Mohammadi, N. (2020). Explaining meta-analysis of supply chain sustainability issues and risk management. Journal of Business Management Exploration, 12 (23), 217-253. (In Persian).
    12.
  12. Kerdpitak, C., Chakphet, T., Maneechay, S., & Jaepho, S. (2020). The mediating role of sustainable supply chain in the relationship between ECO-strategic orientation and the reverse logistic in Thai electronic industry. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9, 10-18.
    13.
  13. Khalili Nasr, Arash. & Tavana, Majid. & Alavi, Behrouz.& Hassan Mina.(2020). A Novel Fuzzy Multi-Objective Circular Supplier Selection and Order Allocation Model for Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP 124994.
    14.
  14. Khoshsima, G. & Ebrahiminejad, M. (2008). An Empirical Study on the Correlation between KM Level and Efficiency in Ceramic Tile Industry. Lnai 5345, 160-172.
    15.
  15. Kodrat, K. F., Sinulingga, S., Napitupulu, H., & Hadiguna, R. A. (2020, May). Evaluation the effect of supply chain management on firm performance in passion fruit syrup company. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering(Vol. 801, No. 1, p. 012123). IOP Publishing.
    16.
  16. Liu, S. & Kasturiratne, D. & Moizer, J. (2012). A hub- and-spoke model for multi- dimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, No. 41, pp 581- 588.
    17.
  17. Ming, Xu. & Yuanyuan, Cui. & Meng, Hu. & Xinkai, Xu. & Zhechi, Zhang. & Sai, Liang. & Shen, Qu. (2019). Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP
    18.
  18. Motavalian, S. & Tabesh, M. & Roozbehani, A. (2012). Sustainability assessment of urban water supply and distribution systems: evaluation method and sustainability criteria. 4th Iran Water Resources Management Conference, Tehran, pp. 98-112. (In Persian).
    19.
  19. Nguyen, H., Ha, H & Doan, T. (2020). Retracted: The impact of supply chain quality management on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam.Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 331-350.
    20.
  20. Popovic, Tamara. & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana. & Kraslawski, Andrzej. & Carvalho, Ana. (2018). Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP 11822.
    21.
  21. Rayat Pisheh, S., et al. (2015). Applying a Hybrid Qualitative Approach to Provide a Comprehensive Supply Chain Sustainability Assessment Model. Journal of New Research in Decision Making, 1(1), Spring. (In Persian).
    22.
  22. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53,49-57.
    23.
  23. Rezaei Taleshi, A. (1390). Designing a model for evaluating sustainable supply chain using multi-criteria decision making method. Master Thesis, University of Tehran, Department of Industrial Engineering. (in Persian).
    24.
  24. Sanjeeb, Roy. & Miki, Das. & Syed Mithun, Ali. & Ahmed Shoyeb, Raihan. & Sanjoy Kumar, Paul. & Golam, Kabir. (2020). Evaluating strategies for environmental sustainability in a supply chain of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, JCLP 121389.
    25.
  25. Sarainia, A., et al. (2017). Development of a Model to Investigate the Impact of Sustainable Foresight on the Strategic Integration of Supply Chain with Value Creation Approach (Case Study: Iran Khodro Supply Chain). Management Futures Research Quarterly, Year 28, Issue 109, Summer. (in Persian).
    26.
  26. Sayadi Turanloo, H. & Mirghfouri, S. H. & Yavari, M. A. & Saghafi, S. (2020). Analysis of the role of knowledge management in sustainable supply chain management with interpretive structural modeling approach (Case study: Agricultural Jihad Organization of Yazd Province). Scientific Journal of Supply Chain Management, 22, 67, Summer. (in Persian).
    27.
  27. Sherafati, M. & Bashiri, M. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza. & Pishvaee, M. (2020). Achieving sustainable development of supply chain by incorporating various carbon regulatory mechanisms. Transportation Research Part, D 81, 102253.
    28.
  28. Shirmohammadi, A. & Vafaei, F. & Namamian, F. & Taban, M. (2020). Designing a Business Sustainability Model in the Supply Chain Using a Hybrid Approach. Business Management, 12 (3), 627-651. (In Persian).
    29.
  29. Tafreshi Motlagh, A. et al. (2017). Lean / Green Supply Chain Relationship Model and Corporate Sustainability. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences Quarterly, 11 (44), Spring. (In Persian).
    30.
  30. Venkatesh, Mani. & Gunasekaran, Angappa. & Delgado, Catarina. (2018). Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, PROECO 6947.
    31.
  31. Yazdani, H, R. & Mohammadi, F. (2019). 30 Basic Skills Qualitative Researchers Need to Know. Tehran, Negah Danesh Publication. (in Persian).
    32.
  32. Zaman, M.D.K. (2018). Business, ethics and the environment. Journal of ASIAN Behavioural Studies, 3 (8), 9-16.
    33.
  33. Zhang, L., Pang, M., Wang, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). Environmental sustainability of small hydropower schemes in Tibet: An emergy-based comparative analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 97-104.
    34.

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]