بررسی تأثیر جابک سازی زنجیره تأمین بر ارزش برند (مورد مطالعه: شرکت ایران خودرو دیزل)

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی

Zahra Bahrami shah bekandi ¹ , Taher Kalantari ² , Niloofar ImanKhan ³

1 - Management/Office of Legal Advisers
2 - Faculty member/Imam Khomeini Maritime University
3 - Business Management Manager / Islamic Azad University of Firoozkooh

تاریخ دریافت : 1396/11/29 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/04/27 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/04/27

کلید واژه: چابک‌سازی, ارزش برند, زنجیره تأمین,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تأثیر چابکسازی زنجیره تأمین بر ارزش برند در شرکت ایران خودرو دیزل بوده است. پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از لحاظ روش به صورت توصیفی – همبستگی بود. و از لحاظ زمانی در زمره پژوهش‌های مقطعی می‌باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش، کلیه کارشناسان شرکت ایران خودرو دیزل مشتمل بر 800 نفر بود. با استناد به جدول مورگان، نمونه‌ای به حجم 260 نفر به شیوه نمونه‌گیری تصادفی انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها پرسشنامه چابک‌سازی زنجیره تأمین و پرسشنامه ارزش برند بود. روایی محتوایی پرسشنامه‌ها با استناد به نظر متخصصان و اساتید دانشگاهی بررسی و تأیید شد. همچنین جهت بررسی پایایی پرسشنامه‌ها به ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استناد شد که مقدار آلفا برای پرسشنامه چابک‌سازی زنجیره تأمین، 911/0 و برای پرسشنامه ارزش برند، 855/0 محاسبه شد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها نیز از آزمون مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که چابک‌سازی زنجیره تامین و ابعاد آن، قابلیت پیش‌بینی ارزش برند شرکت ایران خودرو دیزل را دارند. و همچنین اینکه چابک‌سازی زنجیره تأمین بر وفاداری به برند، آگاهی از برند، تداعی برند، تمایل به گسترش برند و کیفیت برند تأثیرگذار می‌باشند

چکیده انگلیسی:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of supply chain chains on brand value in Iran Khodro Diesel Company. The purpose of the research is applied and in terms of the method is descriptive - correlation. In terms of time, it is part of cross-sectional research. The statistical population of this study was all experts of Iran Khodro Diesel Company, including 800 people. Based on the Morgan table, a sample of 260 individuals was selected and randomly selected. The data gathering tool was Supply Chain Aid Questionnaire and Brand Value Questionnaire. Content validity of the questionnaires was reviewed and confirmed by experts and professors of the university. The reliability of the questionnaires was also counted by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The alpha value for the supply chain agility questionnaire was 0.911 and for the brand value questionnaire was 0.885. The structural equation model was used to analyze the data. The findings showed that supply chain agility and its dimensions have the potential to predict brand value of Iran Khodro Diesel. Also, supply chain resilience is based on brand loyalty, brand awareness, brand association, brand awareness and brand quality.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Aghaei, M., Vahedi, E., Safari Kahreh, M. & Pirooz, M. (2014). An examination of the relationship between Services Marketing Mix and Brand Equity Dimensions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 865 – 869.


2. Ahmadi, A., Fekri, R., Babayanpoor, M. & Fathian, M. (2016). Agility of supply chain after-sales service of heavy vehicles in Iran. Management Improvement Journal, 10, 01-122.


3. Aminbeidokhti, A., Mohammadi,A. & Hosseinpoor, O. (2016). The Relationship between Organizational Entrepreneurship and Organizational Agility: Testing the Mediator Role of Organizational Commitment. Higher Education Letter, 9, 135-155.


4. Ansari, M. & Nasabi, V. (2013). Creating a Brand-Specific Value Through Advertising Blend: Assessing the Mediator of Knowledge, Loyalty, and Brand Relationship. Journal of Business Management, 14, 37-51.


5. Azar, A. (2002). Path Analysis and Reasoning in Management Science. Journal of Qom Higher Education Complex, 15, 59-96.


6. Azizi, S. Darvishi, Z. & Nemayan, F. (2011). The Factors Determining the Brand Value by Financial Approach in Companies Acquired in Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Business Management, 6, 4-9.


7. Ben Saeed, N., Nematiyan, M. & Albonaiemi, E. (2015). Effective factors on the value of international brands in Iranian consumers (Case Study of Samsung brand in Khuzestan market). International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), 2, 974-984.


8. Bravo Gil, R., Fraj Andrés, E., Martínez Salinas, E. (2007). Family as a source of consumer-base brand equity. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16, 188-199.


9. Christopher. M. (2000). The Agile supply chain competing in volatile Markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 37-44.


10. Dashti, M.A., & Jalalian, N. (2016). The study of relationship between coach-oriented management style and organizational agility in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. TB, 15, 44-54.


11.  Dehdashti, Z., Yarahmadi, A., Lorestani, H. & Kashipazan, A. (2015). An Investigation into the Effects of Self-Definition of Consumers on Their Attitudinal and Behavioral Loyalty with Regards to the Mediating Role of Consumer Identification through Brand (Case Study: Mashhad Leather Company). Journal of Brand Management, 2, 93-114.


12. Espadinha-Cruz, P., Grilo, A., Puga-Leal, R., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2011). A model for evaluating Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green practices interoperability in supply chains. In Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), IEEE International Conference. 1209-1213.


13. Fakhari, M. & Saeedniya, H. (2014). An Investigation of the Impact of Marketing Mix Elements on Consumer Behaviour through the Role of Brand Equity. New marketing research, 75-90.


14. Ghazizade, M., Solimani, B. & Talebi, S. (2010). Study the impact of advertising on brand equity. Second International Financial Services Marketing Conference. Tehran.


15. Hongwei, H. & Yan, L. (2011). Key service drivers for high-tech service brand equity: The mediating role of overall service quality and perceived value. Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 77–99.


16. Iranzade, S. Ranjba, A. & Porsadegh, N. (2012). The effect of marketing mix on brand equity. New marketing research, 3,155-172.


17. Jafarnejad, A., Morovati, A. & Asadian, F. (2016). Selected topics in supply chain management. Mehraban book Institute.


18. Kalantari, T. & Khoshalhan, F. (2018). Readiness assessment of leagility supply chain based on fuzzy  cognitiv maps and interpretive structural modeling: a case study. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33/4, 442–456.


19. Khoshsima, GH.R. (2005) An analysis of the standard correlation between agility and strategic   performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Industrial Management Studies, 11, 115-145.


20. Khosravi, M., Delafrooz, N., Shahroodi, K., & Rezaei, B. (2015). Developing a model to measure the impact of corporate social responsibility and identity on corporate brand equity (Case study: Pars Khazar Industrial Company. Journal of Business Management, 7, 621-642.


21. Maskell, B. (2011). The age of agile manufacturing. Supply Chain Management, An International Journal, 6, 1-5.


22. Rezavandi, A., Sohili, K., Alami, S. & Yazdanpanah, R. (2013). Investigating the Effect of Advertising and Promotion on Brand Brands. Case Study: Pasargad Bank in Qom. International Management Conference, Challenges and Solutions.


23. Rimienė, K. (2011). Supply chain agility concept evolution (1990-2010). Economics & Management, pp892-899.


24. Seethamraju, R. & Krishna Sunder, D. (2013). Influence of ERP systems on business process agility, IIMB Management Review, 25, pp137–149.


25. Seyedhoseini, S.M., Ali Ahmadi, A., Fekri, R. & Fathian, M. (2008).Agile New product                  Dvevlopment Model Using Path Analysis Method for Iranian Auto Industries. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management,4, 77-89.


26. Solimani, A. & Talebi, A. (2011). Financial indicators for tracking brand status and value, Journal of BRAND, 5, 26-30.


27. Stadtler, H. (2015). Supply chain management: An overview, In Supply chain management and advanced planning, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 3-28. ‏


28. Stavrulaki, E., & Davis, M. (2010). Aligning products with supply chain processes and strategy. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21, 127-151.


29. Wang, S., Li, P. & Wang, Y. (2015). How do IT Competence, Organizational Agility and Entrepreneurial Actions Coevolve: The Case of Entrepreneurial E-tailors on Ecommerce Platforms. In The Fourteenth Wuhan International Conference on E-business.


30. Wendler, R. (2014). Development of the organizational agility maturity model. In Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS 2014), Federated Conference, 1197-1206.


31. Wood, L. (2010). Dimensions of Brand Purchasing Behavior: Consumer in the 18-24 Age Group. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4, pp9-24.


32. Zehir, C., Shahin, A., Kitapç, H. & Özshahin, M. (2011). The Effects of Brand Communication and Service Quality In Building Brand Loyalty Through Brand Trust; The Empirical Research On Global Brands, 7th International Strategic Management Conference. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1218–1231.