Assessment of Almond (Pronus sp) Orchards Nutritional Balance utilizing Deviation from Optimum Percentage (DOP) Method on Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari Province
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Crop Nutrition ScienceArezoo Ahmadzadeh Chaleshtori 1 , ebrahim panahpour 2 , Ramin Iranipour 3 , Abdolamir Moezzi 4
1 - Faculty member of Payame Noor University, department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari, Shahrekord, Iran. |Department of Soil Science, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 - Department of Soil Science, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
3 - Department of Soil Science, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran. |Assistant Professor, Soil and Water Research Department, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Shahrekord, Iran.
4 - Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
کلید واژه: Nutrition, Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari province, <i>DOP, Almond Gardens, DRIS method</i>,
چکیده مقاله :
BACKGROUND: Deviation from Optimum Percentage (DOP) Method is one of the most prominent procedures in order to evaluation of almond nutritional balance.OBJECTIVES: The aims of current research were to determine the nutritional requirement of almond orchards on saman area of Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari Province.METHODS: In order to evaluation nutritional balance of almond trees, an experiment was designed utilizing the Deviation from Optimum Percentage (DOP) technique. This was conducted in the orchards of Zayandehroud River with a length of 60 km, and an information database was accommodated. In current research, 36 gardens were selected and the leaf samples were prepared. The selected leaf samples were deterged and squelched for proving ground analysis. The high yield orchards were selected to provide reference data at the end of growth period and on this subject, 30% of high yield gardens were chosen.RESULT: The DOP indicators were evaluated and the nutritional requirements arrangement was assigned. The findings revealed that the trees nutritional requirements were in the following order: Cu>S>Zn>Mn>P>Ca>Mg>B>N>K>Fe>Mo.CONCLUSION: The final repercussions exhibited that among the considered nutrients, the highest and least nutrient shortage was dedicated to copper and molybdenum, respectively.
Beaton Jones, J. and V. W. Case. 1990. Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. In: Westerman, R. L. 1990. Soil testing and plant analysis. 3rd Ed. Madison Wisconsin, USA: SSSA, Inc.
Beaufils, E. R. 1973. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Soil Science Bull. No. 1 University of Natal, Pieteariznurp, South Africa.
Bhargava, B. S. and K. L. Chadha. 1988. Developing leaf nutrient guide in fruit crops. Fertilizer News. 33: 21–29.
Brakke, F. H. and N. Salih. 2002. Reliability of foliar analysis of Norway spruce stands in a nordic gradient. Silva Fennica. 36: 489-504.
Daryashenas, A. and H. Rastagar. 2002. Determination of the nutrient norms for citrus in southern Iran with DRIS approach. Soil and Water Research Institute. Technical Publication. No. 1132. Tehran. Iran. 26p.
Davee, D. E, T. L Righetii, E. Fallahi. and S. Robbins. 1986. An evaluation of the DRIS approach for identifying mineral limitations on yield in ‘Napolean’ sweet cherry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111: 988-993.
General, B. 2008. Statistical yearbook of Golestan province in 2007. 778p.
Hartz, T. K, E. M. Miyao. and J. G. Valencia. 1998. Evaluation of the nutritional status of processing tomato. HORTSC. 33: 830-832.
Havlin, J. L, J. D. Beaton, S. L. Tisdale. and W. L. Nelson. 1999. Soil fertility and fertilizers, an introduction to nutrient management. PrenticeHall, Inc.
Jimenez, S. J, Y. Pinochet, J. A. Gogorcena. and M. A. M. Betran. 2007. Influence of different vigour cherry rootstocks on leaves and shoots mineral composition. Sci. Hort. 112: 73-79.
Jones, B. J. R. 1998. Field sampling procedures for conducting plant analysis. In: Kalra YP, Editors.
Malakouti, M. J. 1991. Comprehencive method for diagnosing of plant and advising on fertilizers in Iranian. Tarbiatmodares University Technology.
Monge, E., L. Montañés, J. Val. and M. Sanz. 1995. A comparative study of the DOP and DRIS methods, for evaluating the nutritional status of peach trees. ISHS ActaHortic. 383: 191-199.
Montanes, L., L. Heras, J. Abadia. and M. Sanz. 1993. Plant analysisinterpretation based on a new index: deviation from optimum percentage (DOP). J. Plant Nutr. 16: 1289-1308.
MouraoFilho, F. A. A. 2004. DRIS: Concepts and applications on nutritional diagnosis infruit crops. Sci. Agri. 61: 550-560.
Schumann, A. 2009. Potential use of DRIS for leaf nutrient diagnosis in Florida citrus. Citrus Industry.
Sumner, M. E. 1986. Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) as a guide to orchard fertilization. International seminar on Leaf Diagnosis as a Guide to Orchard Fertilization. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center for Asia and Pacific Region Suweon, Korea. Bulletin No. 231. Taiwan. 21p.
Sharma, J., S. D. Shikhamany, R. K. Singh. and H. B. Raghupathi. 2005. Diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in Thompson seedless grape grafted on Dog Ridge rootstock by DRIS. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36: 2823-2838.
Walworth, J. L. and M. E. Sumner. 1987. The Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). In: BA, Stewart. 1987. Adv. in Soil Sci. p. 149-188.
