• صفحه اصلی
  • A Model for Internal and External Organizational Capabilities in Payam Noor University and Reviewing its Effects on Organizational Performance with Intellectual Capital as Mediating Role

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JSM-2302-1781 بازدید : 340 صفحه: 55 - 71

10.30495/jsm.2023.1980899.1781

20.1001.1.23222301.2023.9.4.4.9

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

A Model for Internal and External Organizational Capabilities in Payam Noor University and Reviewing its Effects on Organizational Performance with Intellectual Capital as Mediating Role

محورهای موضوعی : Organizations

Homa Masoumi 1 , Hassan Soltani 2 , Abbas Babaei Shahr Abad 3 , Sanjar Salajeghe 4 , Mehdi Mohammad Bagheri 5

1 - Department of Management,Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
2 - Department of Management, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University , Shiraz, Iran
3 - Department of Management,Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
4 - Department of Management,Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
5 - Department of Management,Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/12/03 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/03/10 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/07/09

کلید واژه: competency-based perspective, organizational capability, relationship-based perspective, knowledge-based perspective, Organizational Performance, Intellectual Capital,

چکیده مقاله :

In this study, we adopt a comprehensive model to examine how different capabilities account for organizational performance. Also, mediating effects of intellectual capital were considered. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gain information about organizational capabilities and performance. Participants were professors, experts, and general managers of the faculties of economics, management, and social sciences of Shiraz Payam Noor University. Thus, this research aims to design and present a model of internal and external organizational capabilities in universities, which was done using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based on Partial Least Squares (PLS).The results showed that market-sensing, audience knowledge, relational, and innovation capabilities positively influence intellectual capital at Shiraz Payam Noor University. Further, the results showed that intellectual capital has direct and significant influences on organizational performance. Finally, the results showed that intellectual capital has mediating effects on the relationships between organizational capabilities (market-sensing, audience knowledge, relational, and innovation) and organizational performance at Shiraz Payam Noor University. Intellectual capital is the mediator in the relationships between organizational capabilities and organizational performance. This study shows the mediating effects of intellectual capital on the relationships between organizational capability - both in external and internal dimensions - and organizational performance. Study findings benefit organizations that intend to increase organizational performance, especially organizational and educational.

چکیده انگلیسی:

In this study, we adopt a comprehensive model to examine how different capabilities account for organizational performance. Also, mediating effects of intellectual capital were considered. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gain information about organizational capabilities and performance. Participants were professors, experts, and general managers of the faculties of economics, management, and social sciences of Shiraz Payam Noor University. Thus, this research aims to design and present a model of internal and external organizational capabilities in universities, which was done using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) based on Partial Least Squares (PLS).The results showed that market-sensing, audience knowledge, relational, and innovation capabilities positively influence intellectual capital at Shiraz Payam Noor University. Further, the results showed that intellectual capital has direct and significant influences on organizational performance. Finally, the results showed that intellectual capital has mediating effects on the relationships between organizational capabilities (market-sensing, audience knowledge, relational, and innovation) and organizational performance at Shiraz Payam Noor University. Intellectual capital is the mediator in the relationships between organizational capabilities and organizational performance. This study shows the mediating effects of intellectual capital on the relationships between organizational capability - both in external and internal dimensions - and organizational performance. Study findings benefit organizations that intend to increase organizational performance, especially organizational and educational.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Akbari, M., Hataminejad, M., Houshmand, M. (2020). Effects of technology transfer, outsourcing, and organizational capabilities on innovative performance. Journal of Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 49-76: (8)3.
    2.
  2. Tourang, K. (2017). A local model for assessing impacts of knowledge management on performance in elite universities of Iran with organizational procedure capabilities as mediators. Mazandaran University, Faculty of economic and administrative sciences.
    3.
  3. Heidari, M., Nikouei, M. (2019). A review on mediating effects of intellectual capital, innovation, and organizational strategies between knowledge-sharing and organizational performance. Educational management researches, 11th issue; 41: 15-33.
    4.
  4. Salmani Jelodar, E. (2016). Identifying effects of knowledge-sharing personal obstacles on innovation inside government and private organizations. Tehran, articles of modern management paradigms second international conference, innovation and entrepreneurship.
    5.
  5. Safari, A., Mosharaf Javadi, M., Mirzayifar, M. (2017). Impacts of intellectual capital on organizational performance; organizational agility and competitive edge's mediating effects, executive management; 9(17): 149-168.
    6.
  6. Motevalian, M. (2016). Roles of intellectual capital and learning organization's corporate culture in informal learning and knowledge-sharing. Tehran, articles of Iran's management and social sciences conference.
    7.
  7. Nowrouzi Cheshmeh Ali, E., Rowshan, A., Vafadar, M. (2017). An analysis of intellectual capital's effects on organizational performance with knowledge management as the mediator in Iranian Oil Terminals Company.
    8.
  8. Al‐kalouti, J, Vikas, A., Garza‐, A. & Zwiegelaar, B. (2020). Investigating innovation capability and organizational performance in service firms, Strategic Change. 2020;29:103–113.
    9.
  9. Andreeva, T., & Garanina, T. (2016). Do all elements of intellectual capital matter for organizational performance? Evidence from Russian context. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 397e412.
    10.
  10. Attia, A., & Essam Eldin, I. (2018). Organizational learning, knowledge management capability and supply chain management practices in the Saudi food industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6), 1217e1242.
    11.
  11. Barkat, W., Loo-See, B., Adeel, B. and Riaz, A. (2018). Impact of intellectual capital on innovation capability and organizational performance: An empirical investigation, Serbian Journal of Management 13 (2) (2018) 365 – 379.
    12.
  12. Baxter, R., & Matear, S. (2004). Measuring intangible value in business-to-business buyereseller relationships: An intellectual capital perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(6), 491e500.
    13.
  13. Bollen, L., Vergauwen, P., & Schnieders, S. (2005). Linking intellectual capital and intellectual property to company performance. Management Decision, 43(9), 1161e1185.
    14.
  14. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measure and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63e76.
    15.
  15. Brennan, N., & Connell, B. (2000). Intellectual capital: Current issues and policy implications. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(3), 206e240.
    16.
  16. Campbell, A. J. (2003). Creating customer knowledge competence: Managing customer relationship management programs strategically. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(5), 375e383.
    17.
  17. Chen, J., Zhu, Z., & Xie, H. Y. (2004). Measuring intellectual capital: A new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 195e212.
    18.
  18. Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68e81.
    19.
  19. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organization. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37e52.
    20.
  20. Díaz-Fern_andez, M. C., Gonzalez-Rodríguez, M. R., & Simonetti, B. (2015). Top management team’s intellectual capital and firm performance. European Management Journal, 33(5), 322e331.
    21.
  21. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660e679.
    22.
  22. Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Lance Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A meta-analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1348e1380.
    23.
  23. Gummesson, E. (2002). Total relationship marketing (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann Publications.
    24.
  24. Gummesson, E. (2002). Total relationship marketing (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann Publications.
    25.
  25. Hejazi, R., Ghanbari, M., & Alipour, M. (2016). Intellectual, human and structural capital effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s Q. Knowledge and Process Management, 23(4), 259e273.
    26.
  26. Hussinki, H., Kianto, A., Vanhala, M., & Ritala, P. (2019). Happy employees make happy customers: The role of intellectual capital in supporting sustainable value creation in organizations Intellectual Capital Management as a Driver of Sustainability. Springer.
    27.
  27. Jayani Rajapathirana, R., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, v3(1), 44e55.
    28.
  28. Johansson, A. E., Raddats, C., & Witell, L. (2019). The role of customer knowledge development for incremental and radical service innovation in servitized manufacturers. Journal of Business Research, 98, 328e338.
    29.
  29. Joshi, A. W., & Stump, R. L. (1999). The contingent effect specific asset investments on joint action in manufacturer-supplier relationships: An empirical test of the
    30.
  30. Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J.-C., & Vanhala, M. (2014). The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(3), 362e375.
    31.
  31. Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J.-C., & Vanhala, M. (2014). The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(3), 362e375.
    32.
  32. Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 553e570.
    33.
  33. moderating role of reciprocal asset investments, uncertainty, and trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 291e305.
    34.
  34. Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135e152.
    35.
  35. Mu, J. (2015). Marketing capability, organizational adaptation and new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 151e166.
    36.
  36. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizationa advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242e266.
    37.
  37. Nguyen, H., & Harrison, N. (2019). Leveraging customer knowledge to enhance process innovation: Moderating effects from market dynamics. Business Process Management Journal, 25(2), 307e322.
    38.
  38. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    39.
  39. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    40.
  40. Nora, L. (2019). Trust, commitment, and customer knowledge: Clarifying relational commitments and linking them to repurchasing intentions. Management Decision..
    41.
  41. Pedro, E., Leit~ao, J., & Alves, H. (2018). Intellectual capital and performance: Taxonomy of components and multi-dimensional analysis axes. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 407e452. McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and Human Interaction: Toward a Social
    42.
  42. Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review: Measurement, reporting and management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 155e176.
    43.
  43. Pham, T. S. H., Monkhouse, L. L., & Barnes, B. R. (2017). The influence of relational capability and marketing capabilities on the export performance of emerging market firms. International Marketing Review, 34(5), 606e628.
    44.
  44. Psychology of Time. Guilford Press.
    45.
  45. Ramadan, B. M., Dahiyat, S. E., Bontis, N., & Al-Dalahmeh, M. A. (2017). Intellectual capital, knowledge management and social capital within the ICT sector in Jordan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 437e462.
    46.
  46. Rehman, Sh. and, Rapiah, M. & Hazeline, A. (2019). The mediating role of organizational capabilities between organizational performance and its determinants, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research volume 9, Article number: 30.
    47.
  47. Roberts, K., Varki, S., & Brodie, R. (2003). Measuring the quality of relationships in consumer services: An empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1/2), 169e196.
    48.
  48. Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2019). The central role of knowledge integration capability in service innovation-based competitive strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 144e156.
    49.
  49. Sharabati, A.-A. A., Naji Jawad, S., & Bontis, N. (2010). Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan. Management Decision, 48(1), 105e131.
    50.
  50. Sharma, S., & Cao, S. Y. (2016). Innovation capability, marketing capability and firm performance: A two-nation study of China and Korea. Asian Business & Management, 15(1), 32e56.
    51.
  51. Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance Improvement, 37(7), 56e59.
    52.
  52. Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance Improvement, 37(7), 56e59.
    53.
  53. Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450e463.
    54.
  54. Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55e79.
    55.
  55. Tiwana, A. (2000). The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    56.
  56. Tseng, S. M., & Fang, Y. Y. (2015). Customer knowledge management performance index. Knowledge and Process Management, 22(2), 68e77.
    57.
  57. Tseng, S.-M. (2016). Knowledge management capability, customer relationship management, and service quality. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(2), 202e221.
    58.
  58. Wang, Z., Sharma, P. N., & Cao, J. (2016). From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A predictive model comparison. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4650e4658.
    59.
  59. Yang, Z., Jiang, Y., & Xie, E. (2019). Buyer-supplier relational strength and buying firm’s marketing capability: An outside-in perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 27e37
    60.

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]