Effect of Submerged Arc Welding Parameter on Crack Growth Energy on St37
محورهای موضوعی : Engineering
J.A Khodaii
1
(Department of Mechanical Engineering ,Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran)
A Mostafapour
2
(Department of Mechanical Engineering ,University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran)
M.R Khoshravan
3
(Department of Mechanical Engineering ,University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran)
کلید واژه: Optimization, Submerged arc welding, Crack growth energy, Welding parameter,
چکیده مقاله :
In this article the influence of welding parameters such as electrical current, feed rate and stick out on crack growth energy was investigated. Therefore, prepared specimens were welded in various conditions. Using the Minitab software, 18 states of 36 possible states were chosen and applied. Then a crack was crated on the weld metal and the force-displacement diagram was plotted. Comparison of results shows that in high electricity current, the extra heat flux is the dominant factor, which causes coarse grains of microstructures. On the other hand, in low electricity current, lack of fusion and penetration reduce the crack propagation energy. Furthermore, the neural network could predict the amount of energy with high accuracy.
[1] Yawar J., Lal H., 2015, Effect of various parameters on flux consumption, carbon and silicon in submerged arc welding (Saw),International Journal on Emerging Technologies 6(2):176-180.
[2] Sharma M., Gupta D., Karun., 2014, Submerged arc welding: A review, International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology 4(3): 1814-1817.
[3] Yang Y., 2008, The Effect of Submerged Arc Welding Parameters on the Properties of Pressure Vessel and Wind Turbine Tower Steels, University of Saskatchevan.
[4] Murugan N., Gunaraj V., 2005, Prediction and control of weld bead geometry and shape relationships in submerged arc welding of pipes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 168(3): 478-487.
[5] Dhas J.E.R., Kumanan S., 2010, Weld quality prediction of submerged arc welding process using a function replacing hybrid system, Advances in Production Engineering & Management 5: 5-12.
[6] Juang S.C., Tarng Y.S., 2002, Process parameter selection for optimizing the weld pool geometry in the tungsten inert gas welding of stainless steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 122(1): 33-37.
[7] Yang L.J., Bibby M.J., Chandel R.S., 1993, Linear regression equations for modeling the submerged-arc welding process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 39(1-2): 33-42.
[8] Murugan N., Gunaraj V., 2005, Prediction and control of weld bead geometry and shape relationships in submerged arc welding of pipes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 168(3): 478-487.
[9] Reed R.P., 1983, The Economic Effects of Fracture in the United States, US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
[10] Hasson D.F., Zanis C.A., Anderson D.R., 1984, Fracture toughness of HY-130 steel weld metals, Welding Journal 63(6):197-202.
[11] Om H., Pandey S., 2013, Effect of heat input on dilution and heat affected zone in submerged arc welding process, Sadhana 38(6): 1369-1391.
[12] Shen S., Oguocha I.N.A., Yannacopoulos S., 2012, Effect of heat input on weld bead geometry of submerged arc welded ASTM A709 Grade 50 steel joints, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 212(1): 286-294.
[13] Cretegny L., Saxena A., 1998, Fracture toughness behavior of weldments with mis-matched properties at elevated temperature, International Journal of Fracture 92(2): 119-130.
[14] Zúñiga D.F., Kalthoff J.F., Canteli A.F., Grasa J., Doblaré M., 2013, Upper shelf fracture toughness of as welded manual metal arc weld metal, ECF15.
[15] Irwin G.R., 1948, Fracture dynamics, Fracturing of Metals 1948: 147-166.
