Relationship between Learning Style Preferences and Nationality Background: A Case Study of Iranian and Iraqi University EFL Students
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language PedagogySediqeh Vahdat 1 , Zohreh Gooniband Shooshtari 2 , Faezeh Mohammadnejad 3
1 - Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 - Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 - Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
کلید واژه: Iranian students, Iraqi students, Learning processes, Learning style preference, Nationality background,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigated the relationship between learning style preferences and the nationality background of Iranian and Iraqi University EFL students. A total number of 40 male and female participants, 20 Iraqi and 20 Iranian, majoring in EFL, took part in this study. To conduct the study, a qualitative-quantitative method was used which encompassed two kinds of data-gathering instruments: a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. The first instrument was Cohen, Oxford, and Chi's (2001) online learning style survey questionnaire which assessed the participants’ general approaches to learning, and the second instrument was a semi-structured interview that asked some other questions not covered by the questionnaire. Prior to using the learning style survey questionnaire, a pilot study was conducted to validate and refine the questionnaire. Statistical procedures such as descriptive statistics which consisted of Mean, Skewness, Kurtosis, and Standard Deviation were used. Moreover, the Chi-square, Cramer’s V, and T value were used to analyze the collected data. The obtained results revealed that the relationship between learning style preferences and nationality background was meaningful and the learning styles of students from these two nationalities were different from each other. From a quantitative standpoint, Iranian learners were more open-oriented learners, while Iraqi participants were more closure-oriented in their learning process. The results also revealed that not only the Learning Style Preferences (LSPs) were different across groups, but also were various for individuals in each group. The results of this study offer valuable insights for teachers who are working with learners from diverse nationalities.
This study investigated the relationship between learning style preferences and the nationality background of Iranian and Iraqi University EFL students. A total number of 40 male and female participants, 20 Iraqi and 20 Iranian, majoring in EFL, took part in this study. To conduct the study, a qualitative-quantitative method was used which encompassed two kinds of data-gathering instruments: a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. The first instrument was Cohen, Oxford, and Chi's (2001) online learning style survey questionnaire which assessed the participants’ general approaches to learning, and the second instrument was a semi-structured interview that asked some other questions not covered by the questionnaire. Prior to using the learning style survey questionnaire, a pilot study was conducted to validate and refine the questionnaire. Statistical procedures such as descriptive statistics which consisted of Mean, Skewness, Kurtosis, and Standard Deviation were used. Moreover, the Chi-square, Cramer’s V, and T value were used to analyze the collected data. The obtained results revealed that the relationship between learning style preferences and nationality background was meaningful and the learning styles of students from these two nationalities were different from each other. From a quantitative standpoint, Iranian learners were more open-oriented learners, while Iraqi participants were more closure-oriented in their learning process. The results also revealed that not only the Learning Style Preferences (LSPs) were different across groups, but also were various for individuals in each group. The results of this study offer valuable insights for teachers who are working with learners from diverse nationalities.
Ahmad, A. (2011). Language learning style preferences of low English proficiency (LEP) students in a tertiary institution. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research; 7(2): 33-62.
Ahmadi, M. R. (2017). The impact of motivation on reading comprehension. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 1-7. https://ijreeonline.com/article-1-35-en.html.
Akbarzadeh, M., & Fatemipour, H. (2014). Examining the match or mismatch between teaching style preferences and upper intermediate EFL learners' learning style preferences. Journal of Science Direct Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9(8), 137-142.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2021). Characteristics of Saudi EFL learners' learning styles. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p82.
Al-Khaza'leh, B., & Awad Mohammed, I. (2020). Matching the students' learning preferences with teacher's teaching methods: The case of international EFL students in Malaysia. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 5(2), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v5i2.198
Anggrawan, A. (2021). Interaction between learning preferences and methods in face-to-face and online learning. ICIC International Express Letters, 15(4), 319-326. https://10.24507/icicel.15.04.319.
Alqunayeer, H. S., & Zamir, S. (2015). Identifying learning styles in EFL classroom. International Journal of Learning, 1(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.18178/IJLT.1.2.82-87.
Asadipiran, N. (2016). Identifying young learners' learning styles among Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(7), 1444-1450. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0607.16.
Auyeung, P., & Sands, J. (1996). A cross-cultural study of the learning style of accounting students. School of Accounting and Finance, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland 4111, Australia, 3(6), 261-274.
Bahrami Maleki, N., & Seifoori, Z. (2021). Gender variation in Iranian EFL learners' multiple intelligences and learning styles. Journal of English Language Research, 2(2), 31-45.
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C. E. (2000). Using learning styles to predict foreign language achievement at the college level. Procedia-Social-and Behavioral Sciences, 1(28): 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00064-0.
Brown, D. B. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. (4th ed.). New York: Pearson education.
Budeva, D., Kehaiova, M., & Petkus, E. (2015). Nationality as a determinant of learning styles: Comparing marketing students from Bulgaria and the USA. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 9(1): 97-106.
Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. C. (2002). Learning style survey: Assessing your own learning styles. Center for advanced research on learning acquisition. university of Minnesota. online document. Retrieved May 30, 2010, 2002.
De Vita, G. (2001). Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction in the multicultural
classroom: A business and management perspective. Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, 38(2), 165-174.
Ehrman, M. E. (1996). Understanding second language difficulties. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
Ellis, A. K. (2001). Research on educational innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Eye on education, Inc.
Holtbrugge, D., & Mohr, A. (2010). Cultural determinants of learning style preferences. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4), 622-637.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications Inc.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview student learning styles. J. W. Keefe (ed.), Diagnosing and prescribing programs.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs.
Liegle, J., & Janicki, T. (2006). The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of
web-based learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 885-898.
Mohr, T, A. (2010). Cultural determinants of learning style preferences. Academy of Management Learning & Education. 9(4), 622-637.
Naimie, Z., Siraj, S., Yang Piaw, C., Shagholi, R., & Abuzaid, R. (2010). Do you think your match is made in heaven? Teaching styles/learning styles match and mismatch revisited. Journal of Science Direct Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 349-353.
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Heinle and Heinle. An international Thomson publishes Boston, Massachusetts 02116 U.S.A.
Oxford, R. (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Second language teaching & curriculum center, Hawaii at Manoa.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 9(3), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x.
Pratt, D.D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult education of quarterly, 4(2), 203-220.
Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly.
Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. Boston, MA: (ed.) Heinle and Heinle.
Reid, M. J. (1998). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.slv.vic.gov.au/
Saad, N. (2017). Learning style preferences among United IT students: Analysis of gender and ethnicity. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(8), 635-642. http://doi.10.18488/journal.1.2017.78.635.642.
Shabani, M. (2012). Different learning style preferences of male and female Iranian non-academic EFL learners. English Language Teaching; 5(9), 127-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p127
Song, D., & Oh, E. (2011). Learning styles based on the different cultural background of KFL learners in online learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 14(3), 133-154.
Tabatabaei, O., & Mashayekhi, S. (2012). The relationship between EFL learners' learning styles and their second language achievement. Journal of Science Direct Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70(2), 245-253.
