The Contributions of Input Enhancement of Collocations to the Reading Comprehension Performance of Iranian Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Learners
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language PedagogyTahere Mohammadi 1 , Alireza Amjadiparvar 2
1 - Faculty of the Humanities, English Department, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 - Faculty of the Humanities, English Department, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
کلید واژه: input enhancement, collocations, reading comprehension, Field Dependence/ Independence,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study aimed at examining the possible impact of input enhancement of collocations on the reading comprehension among Iranian Field-Dependent (FD) and Field-Independent (FI) students. Firstly, 120 intermediate female EFL learners took a Nelson proficiency test and the results were used to select 90 students who were given Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) to distinguish the FD learners from the FI ones. Ultimately, 28 FD and 28 FI learners were left. These learners were classified into four groups, two of which consisted of 14 FD, and the other two comprised 14 FI learners. One FD and one FI group served as the experimental groups while the other two were control groups. A reading pretest was given to all groups and the researchers incorporated techniques of input enhancement of collocations in the texts covered in the experimental groups. In control groups, the same materials with no enhancement were administered. Having finished the eight treatment sessions, the researchers gave all four groups the reading comprehension posttest whose results were used to examine the research questions. Since the two independent variables of the current study were categorical, and the dependent variable and covariate were continuous, ANCOVA was employed to do the data analysis. Based on the statistical analysis outcome, input enhancement of collocations had a significant impact on the reading comprehension performance of Iranian field-dependent learners. Yet, it had no significant effect on the Iranian FI learners’ reading comprehension performance. Finally, the findings showed that input enhancement of collocations had a significant effect on the reading comprehension performance of Iranian FD and FI EFL learners differently; that is, FD learners outperformed the FI ones. The findings of the study imply that teacher training courses should include some training on input enhancement techniques and cognitive styles so that teachers’ awareness regarding input enhancement andtheir cognitive styles were raised.
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, P. (2017). Skills and strategies: Their differences, their relationships, and why they matter. In K. Mokhtari (Ed.), Improving reading comprehension through metacognitive reading strategies instruction (pp. 33-50). Rowman and Littlefield.
Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students’ academic achievement, field-dependent/independent cognitive styles, and attitude toward computers. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 289-297.
Boutin, F., & Chinien, C. (2005). Cognitive style and ICT mediated testing: Listening comprehension and speaking ability in L2 (Vol. 2005). 10.1109/ITHET.2005.1560245
Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning And Teaching. Tesol Quarterly, 14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586319
Chapelle, C. (1988). Field independence: A source of language test variance? Language Testing, 5(1), 62-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228800500105
Chapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (2006). Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning, 36, 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00367.x
Cho, S., Xu, Y., & Rhodes, J. A. (2010). Examining English language learners' motivation of, and engagement in, reading: A qualitative study. Reading Matrix, 10(2), 205-221.
Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. Jossey-Bass.
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31, 349-365. 10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00047-2
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fani, M., & Hashamdar, M. (2017). The comparative effect of using visual and auditory input enhancement on the use of cohesive devices in the writing of Iranian EFL filed-dependent and independent learners. Journal of Language Horizons, 1(2), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2018.17417.1070
Fazlali, B., & Shahini, A. (2019). The effect of input enhancement and consciousness-raising techniques on the acquisition of lexical and grammatical collocation of Iranian EFL learners. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 24(2), 1-21.
Fowler, W. S., & Coe, N. (1976). Nelson English language tests: Book 1, elementary. Nelson.
Ghonsooly, B., & Eghtesadee, A. R. (2006). Role of cognitive style of field dependence/independence in using metacognitive and cognitive reading strategies by a group of skilled and novice Iranian students of English. Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8(4), 119-150.
Goudarzi, Z., & Moini, M. R. (2012). The effect of input enhancement of collocations in reading on collocation learning and retention of EFL learners. International Education Studies, 5(3), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n3p247
Hansen, J., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The relationship of field-dependent/independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning, 31, 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb01389.x
Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2018). Effects of metalinguistic feedback on the grammatical accuracy of Iranian field (in)dependent L2 learners’ writing ability. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 141-161.
Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and Second Language Proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.24
Hwang, H., & Duke, N. K. (2020). Content counts and motivation matters: Reading comprehension in third-grade students who are English learners. AERA Open, 6(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419899075
Hwang, W. (1997). Field-independence and English language listening comprehension of Taiwanese university students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Kansas.
Jamieson, J. (1992). The cognitive styles of reflection/impulsivity and field independence/dependence and ESL success. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4), 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1992.tb05398.x
Jones, C., & Waller, D. (2017). The effect of input enhancement on vocabulary learning: Is there an impact upon receptive and productive Knowledge? TESOL International Journal, 12(1), 48-62.
Kharaghani, N., & Ghonsooly, B. (2015). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension ability of Iranian English learners receiving reciprocal teaching and cooperative grouping intervention program. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1006
Kheirzadeh, S., & Kassaian, Z. (2011). Field-dependence/independence as a factor affecting performance on listening comprehension sub-skills: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.188-195
Khodadady, E., Bagheri, N., & Charbgoo, Z. (2016). Primary school students’ cognitive styles and their achievement in English as a foreign language. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 851-858. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.04
Lewis, M. (Ed.). (2000). Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach (Vol. 4). Language Teaching Publications.
Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? Tesol Quarterly, 35(3), 459-491. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588031
McCarthy, C., & O’Dell, p. (2006). English collocations in use. Oxford University Press.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529283
Mohamadian, Z., & Sabbagh Shabestari, S. (2017). The effect of implicit input enhancement on learning grammatical collocations. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 5(2), 81-90.
Naseri, E., & Khodabandeh, F. (2019). Comparing the impact of audio-visual input enhancement on collocation learning in traditional and mobile learning contexts. Applied Research on English Language, 8(3), 383-422. https://doi.org/10.22108/ARE.2019.115716.1434
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Niroomand, S. M., & Rostampour, M. (2004). The impact of field dependence/independence cognitive styles and gender differences on lexical knowledge: The case of Iranian academic EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(10), 2173-2179. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.10.2173-2179
Nozari, A., & Siamian, H. (2015). The relationship between field dependent-independent cognitive style and understanding of English text reading and academic success. Material Socio-medical, 27, 39-41. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.27.39-41
Pearson, P. D., & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In S. E. Israeli (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 12–56). The Guilford Press.
Pei, C. (2008). Review of empirical studies on collocation in the field of SLA. CELEA Journal, 31(6), 72-81.
Prodromou, L. (2003). Idiomaticity and the non-native speaker. English Today, 19(2), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078403002086
Quintana, J. (2015). PET practice tests. Oxford University Press.
Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, notetaking, and field independence–dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.508
Sadeghi, K., Abolfazli, Z., & Pourghafour, E. (2013). The relationship between cognitive style and use of reading strategies by Iranian EFL learners. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(1), 8-18.
Salamian, V. (2002). The relationship between field-dependence/independence and performance on LC global and local questions [Unpublished master's thesis]. Shiraz University.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2005). Cognitive Style as a Factor Affecting Task-Based Reading Comprehension Test Scores.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2007). Is Field Dependence or Independence a Predictor of EFL Reading Performance? TESL Canada Journal, 24, 82-108. 10.18806/tesl.v24i2.140
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003
Schmidt, R. W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1-65). University of Hawaii Press.
Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.
Stansfield, C., & Hansen, J. (1983). Field dependence-independence as a variable in second language cloze test performance. Tesol Quarterly, 17, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586422
Szudarski, P., & Carter, R. (2016). The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners' acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(2), 245-265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12092
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6 ed.). Pearson Inc.
Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012870
Torabian, A., & Tajadini, M. (2017). Fostering EFL learners’ reading comprehension: Animation film technique. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(2), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.55
Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (1998). Reading in a second language: Process, product, and practice. London: Longman. http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/rug01:000449803
Vahabi, S. (2006). The relationship between EFL learners FD/FI cognitive style, proficiency, and communication strategies in writing. ILI Language Teaching Journal, 2, 145-150.
Witkin, H. A., Ottman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures test. Consulting Psychologists.
Yamini, M., & Ahmadi, A. (2003). Relationship between field dependence/independence and listening comprehension strategy used by female Iranian English majors. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 46(187), 61-72.
