Effects of First Language Metalinguistic Comments on Task-based Instruction: Durable Gains of Third Person /-s/ by Adult Iranian EFL Learners

محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Soheil Rahimi ¹ , Moussa Ahmadian ² , Majid Amerian ³ , Hamid Reza Dolat Abadi ⁴

1 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran
3 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran
4 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Arak University, Arak, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/07/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/11/01 تاریخ انتشار : 1397/11/12

کلید واژه: Metalinguistic comment, Form-focused instruction, Focus on Form, Task-based Instruction, Focus on Forms,

چکیده مقاله :

This study investigated the effect of first language (L1) metalinguistic comments on Iranian EFL learners’ acquisition of third person /-s/ as measured by the learners’ performance on a grammaticality judgment test. Accordingly, two intact university classes- randomly assigned to experimental and comparison groups- were homogenized based on their scores on language proficiency and grammatically judgment tests. During 6 hours of task-based instructions, the experimental group was treated by L1 metalinguistic comments and the comparison group through L2 metalinguistic comments. Using ANCOVA and t-test to compare the groups’ scores, the results indicated that although the mean accuracy scores of both groups were improved on the immediate posttest, the experimental group outperformed the comparison group on the delayed posttest.It can be postulated that L1 metalinguistic comments lead to more durable gains than L2 metalinguistic comments in EFL classrooms. The findings suggest that L1 use may aid language learners to become more cognitively conscious of L2 grammar features.

منابع و مأخذ:

Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching: A course in second language acquisition (6th ed.).New York, NY:Pearson.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221-241.

Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46.

Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed language learning and task-based teaching. In E. Hinkel (Eds.),    Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 713-728).  Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009a). Investigating learning difficulty in terms of implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S.  Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp. 143-166). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R. (2009b). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S.  Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp. 31-64). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R. (2009c). Retrospect and prospect. In R. Ellis, S.  Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp. 335-353). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philip, J., & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement and the noticing hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541-577.

Loewen, S. (2009). Grammaticality judgment tests and the measurement of implicit and explicit L2 knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp. 94-112). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Loewen, S. (2011). Focus on form. In E. Hinkel (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 576-592). New York, NY: Routledge.

Loewen, S., Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2009). The incidental acquisition of third person -s as implicit and explicit Knowledge. In R. Ellis, S.  Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp. 262-281). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories. New York, NY:Routledge.

Myhill, D., Jones, S., & Wilson, A. (2016). Writing conversations: Fostering metalinguistic discussion about writing. Research Papers in Education, 31(1), 23–44.

Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative contexts. New York, NY: Routledge.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.

Reinders, H., & Ellis, R. (2009). The effects of two types of input on intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philip & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning and teaching (pp. 281-302). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Savignon, S. J. (2005). Communicative language teaching: Strategies and goals. In E. Hinkel (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 635-652). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Eds.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Applied Linguistics.

Skehan, P. (1996).  A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.

Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87.

Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183-203.

Trendak, O. (Ed.). (2015). Exploring the role of strategic intervention in form-focused instruction. London, UK: Springer.

Turnball, M., & Arnett, K. (2002). Teachers’ use of the target and first languages in second and foreign language classrooms. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 204-218.

Ur, P. (2011). Grammar teaching: research, theory, and practice. In E. Hinkel (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 507-522). New York, NY: Routledge.

Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

VanPatten, B. (Ed.). (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.