Peer scaffolding in an EFL writing classroom: An investigation of writing accuracy and scaffolding behaviors
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language PedagogyParastou Gholami Pasand 1 , Abdorreza Tahriri 2
1 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Arak University, Iran
2 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Guilan, Iran
کلید واژه: Microgenetic Analysis, Peer Scaffolding, Writing Accuracy, interaction, academic writing,
چکیده مقاله :
Considering the tenets of Sociocultural Theory with its emphasis on co-construction of knowledge, L2 writing can be regarded as a co-writing practice whereby assistance is provided to struggling writers. To date, most studies have dealt with peer scaffolding in the revision phase of writing, as such planning and drafting are remained untouched. The present study examines the impact of peer scaffolding on writing accuracy of a group of intermediate EFL learners, and explores scaffolding behaviors employed by them in planning and drafting phases of writing. To these ends, 40 freshmen majoring in English Language and Literature in the University of Guilan were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group consisting of dyads in which a competent writer provided scaffolding to a less competent one using the process approach to writing. Results of independent samples t-tests revealed that learners in the experimental group produced more accurate essays. Microgenetic analysis of one dyad’s talks showed that scaffolding behaviors used in planning and drafting phases of writing were more or less the same as those identified in the revision phase. These findings can be used to inform peer intervention in L2 writing classes, and assist L2 learners in conducting successful peer scaffolding in the planning and drafting phases of writing.
Baradaran, A., & Sarfarazi, B. (2011).The impact of scaffolding on the Iranian EFL learners’ English academic writing.Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 2265-2273.
Barnard, R. (2002). Peer tutoring in the primary classroom: A sociocultural interpretation of classroom interaction. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 37(1), 57-72.
Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella & W. Levelt (Eds.), The child's concept of language (pp. 241-255). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004).Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265-272.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: J.P. Lantolf & G., Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research. (pp. 33-56).Norwood, NJ: Albex.
Glendinnig, E. & Mantell, H. (1991).Write ideas, intermediate course in writing skills. Singapore: Longman.
Guerrero, M. C. M. de, Villamil, O. S. (1994). Social cognitive dimensions of interaction in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 78, 484-496.
Guerrero, M. C. M. de, Villamil, O. S. (2000).Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in the L2 peer revision.The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51-58.
Hekamäki, L. (2005). Scaffolded assistance provided by EFL teacher during whole class interaction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).University of Jyväskyalä, Jyväskyalä.
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Many, J. E., Dewberry, D., Taylor, D. L., & Coady, K. (2009).Profiles of three preservice ESOL teachers' development of instructional scaffolding.Reading Psychology, 30(2), 148-174.doi:10.1080/02702710802275256.
Mirzaee, A., Domakani, M. R. & Roshani, N. (2010). L2 discourse co-construction within the learner’s ZPD. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2, 91-115.
Neguyen, M. H. (2013). EFL students’ reflections on peer scaffolding in making a collaborative oral presentation. English Language Teaching, 6(4), 64-73.
Rezaei, M. (2012).Mediated learning experience: Teacher vs. peer scaffolding modes in L2 writing classes. Iranian EFL Journal, 8, 71-96.
Riazi, M. & Rezaei, M. (2011).Teacher- and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. In A. Feryok (Ed.) CLESOL 2010: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference for Community Language and ESOL. (pp. 55-63)
Richards, J.C. & Renandya, W.A. (2002).Methodology in language teaching.An analogy of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rommetveit, R.(1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), culture, communication and cognition: Vygotsyan perspectives (pp. 183-204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smalley, R. L., Ruetten, M. K., & Kozyrev, J. R. (2001). Refining composition skills. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle publishers.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173.
Taylor, P.A. (1989). Essentials of writing. Canada: Prentice- Hall.
Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51-75.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J.V. Werstch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L. S. Vygotsky, Collected works (pp. 39-285), R. Rieber & A. Carton (Ed.), New York: Plenum.
Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework.The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 9(2), 159-180.
Wigglesworth, G. & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445-466.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. & Ross, G. (1976).The role of tutoring in problem solving.Child Psychology, 17, 89-100.
Young, R. F. & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conference. Modern Language Journal, 88, 519-535.
