طراحی مدل عملکرد تحصیلی و موفقیت تحصیلی بر اساس سبکهای یادگیری و مهارتهای فراشناختی خواندن با میانجیگری اشتیاق تحصیلی دانشآموزان پسر مقطع متوسطه دوم
محورهای موضوعی : تربیتیعباس پناهنده 1 , حسین داوودی 2 , داوود تقوایی 3 , سهراب عبدی زرین 4
1 - دکتری تخصصی مشاوره، اصفهان، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه مشاوره، واحد خمین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمین، ایران.
3 - دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، واحد اراک، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اراک، ایران.
4 - دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.
کلید واژه: موفقیت تحصیلی, اشتیاق تحصیلی, سبکهای یادگیری, دانشآموزان پسر, مقطع متوسطه دوم, مهارتهای فراشناختی خواندن, عملکرد تحصیلی,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف طراحی مدل عملکرد تحصیلی و موفقیت تحصیلی بر اساس سبکهای یادگیری و مهارتهای فراشناختی خواندن با میانجیگری اشتیاق تحصیلی دانشآموزان پسر مقطع متوسطه دوم انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانشآموزان پسر مقطع متوسطه دوم شهر اصفهان در سال تحصیلی 99-1398 بود که با روش نمونهگیری خوشه ای چندمرحله ای، تعداد 225 نفر به عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. شرکتکنندگان به پرسشنامههای عملکرد تحصیلی (Fam & Taylor, 1999)، سبکهای یادگیری (Felder & Slomon, 1997)، راهبردهای فراشناختی خواندن (Mokhtari & Reichard, 2002) و اشتیاقتحصیلی (Fredricks et al, 2002) پاسخ دادند و معدل تحصیلی معیار موفقیتتحصیلی دانشآموزان در نظر گرفته شد. ارزیابی مدل پیشنهادی با استفاده از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری و با نرم افزار Amos-24 انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد برازش کلی مدل مناسب بود و شاخص های تایید مدل در سطح مناسب بودند. اثر مسقیم مهارت های فراشناختی خواندن، سبکیادگیری درونداد و اشتیاقتحصیلی بر عملکرد تحصیلی (001>p)، اثر مستقیم مهارتهای فراشناختی خواندن، سبک یادگیری فهم و اشتیاقتحصیلی بر موفقیتتحصیلی (001>p) و اثر مسقیم مهارتهای فراشناختی خواندن، سبکیادگیری ادراک و پردازش بر اشتیاقتحصیلی (001>p)، معنادار بودند. ضرایب غیرمستقیم نشان داد که سبکیادگیری ادراک و پردازش از طریق اشتیاقتحصیلی، تاثیر غیرمستقیم معناداری بر عملکرد تحصیلی و موفقیتتحصیلی دارند (001>p). بنابراین، می توان نقش سبکهای یادگیری، مهارتهای فراشناختی خواندن و اشتیاق تحصیلی در عملکرد تحصیلی و موفقیت تحصیلی دانش آموزان را مهم قلمداد کرد.
The purpose of this study was to determaine the structural equation model of academic prformance and academic success based on learning styles and metacognitive skills of reading by mediating role of academic engagement in male students in the secondary schoos. The statistical population consisted of all male students of secondary schools in Isfahan city in academic year of 2019-20. By using of cluster sampling method, 225 male students were selected as the sample. Participants responded to Fam & Taylor's (1999) Academic Performance Questionnaire, Felder & Slomon's (1996) Learning Styles Questionnaire, Friedrichs et al.'s (2004) Academic Engagement Questionnaire, and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Inventory (Mokhtari & Reichard, 2002). Academic grade point average was used as a criteria for academic success. Evaluation of the proposed model was performed using structural equation modeling by software of Amos-24. The results showed that the direct effect of input learning style, metacognitive skills of reading and academic engagement on academic performance (p<0.001), direct effect of cognitive learning style, metacognitive skills of reading and academic engagement on academic success (p<0.001) and direct effect of cognitive learning Intuitive and metacognitive skills of reading significant on the academic engagement (p<.001). Indirect coefficients also showed that perceptual and processing learning style through academic engagement had a significant indirect effect on academic performance and success(p<0.001). Therefore, the role of learning styles, metacognitive skills of reading and academic engagememt on academic performance and academic success are important.
Abasian, R., Abedi, A., Nasr Azadani, S., & Seifi, Z. (2014). Effect of panoura and Philipuo’s meta
cognitive training program on the self-concept of children with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(2), 63-77. [in Persian].
Abbasi, M., Pirani, Z., Razmjoiy, L., & Bonyadi, F. (2015). Role of procrastination and motivational self-regulation in predicting students' behavioral engagement. Educational Strategy in Medeical Sciences, 8 (5), 295-300. [in Persian].
Allen, L. A., & Woolfolk, R. L. (2010). Cognitive behavioral therapy for somatoform disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 33(3), 579–593.
Bahri, L., & Yousefi, F. (2014). [Examine the psychometric properties the questionnaire behavioral and emotional involvement in the academic middle school students]. Journal of Teaching and Learning; 66 (2), 21- 45. [in Persian].
Bezen, S., Aykutlu, I., & Bayrak, C. (2018). An examination of the relationship between high school students’ self-efficacy perceptions concerning electromagnetism and their academic success. SHS Web of Conferences, 48, 01049.
Brown, D., & Cinamon, R. G. (2015). Personality traits’ effects on self-efficacy and outcome expectations for high school major choice. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 16(3), 343–361.
Chevalier, T. M., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K. C., & Deacon, S. H. (2016). The role of metacognitive reading strategies, metacognitive study and learning strategies, and behavioral study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students With and Without a History of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 34–48.
D’Alessio, F. A., Avolio, B. E., & Charles, V. (2019). Studying the impact of critical thinking on the academic performance of executive MBA students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 275-283.
Darash, N., Shahi, S., & Razavi, A. (2018).The Effect of George Play’s Mathematics Teaching Method on Problem Solving Skill and Mathematics Achievement of 5th GradeGirls Students. Journal of Psychological, 25(2), 239-240. [in Persian].
Deepika, J., Gyanesh, K. T., & Ishdutta, A. (2018). Metacognitive awareness and academic locus of control as the predictors of academic adjustmen, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 49(4), 432-441.
Domhnall, S., & Michael, C. (2018). Mens sana: An investigation into the relationship between psychological traits and academic success of first year engineering students. 3rd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education.
Dortaj, F. (2004). Investigating the Effect of Process-Based Subjective Simulation on Improving. Students' Academic Performance, Constructing and Norming Academic Performance. PhD Thesis, Tehran, Allameh Tabataba'i University. [in Persian].
Duhaylongsod, L., Snow, C. E., Selman, R. L., & Donovan, M. S. (2015). Toward disciplinary literacy: Dilemmas and challenges in designing history curriculum to support middle school students. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 587 –608.
Ebrahimi, N., Sabaghian, Z., & Abolghasemi, M. (2011). Investigating relationship of hope and academic success of college students. Research and Planing in Higher Education, 17 (2), 1-16. [in Persian].
Fani, H., & Khalifeh, M. (2010). An Investigation into the relationship among perception of teacher's behavior, academic self-concept and academic performance. New Approach in Educational Sciences, 1(1), 37-64. [in Persian].
Farmanbar, R., Hosseinzadeh, T., Asadpoor, M., & Yeganeh, M. (2013). Association between nursing and midwifery students’ learning styles and their academic achievements, based on Kolb's model. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, 22 (86),60-68. [in Persian].
Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
Felder, R. M. & Soloman, B. A. (1997). Index of learning styles Questionnaire. Retrieved 6 February, 2006. Ncs u.edu/learningstyles/ ilsweb.html.
Fletcher, S., Potts, J., & Ballinger, R.(2008).The pedagogy of integrated coastal management. The Geographical Journal. 174 (4), 374 –386.
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, C., & Paris, A.H. (2002). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 7(4), 59–109.
Ghadampour, E., Farhadi, A., & Naghibeiranvand, F. (2016). The relationship among academic burnout, academic engagement and performance of students of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. Research in Medical Education, 8 (2), 60-68. [in Persian].
Green, J., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., Marsh, H. W., & McInerney, D. (2012). Academic motivation, self-concept, engagement, and performance in high school: Key processes from a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1111–1122.
Gutierrez, M., Sancho, P., Galiana, L., & Tomás, J. M. (2018). Autonomy support, psychological needs satisfaction, school engagement and academic success: A mediation model. Universitas Psychologica, 17(5), 1–12.
Hasan, K. K. (2013). Impacts of reading metacognitive strategies and reading attitudes on school success. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(5), 312-317.
Hejāzi, E., Rastegar, A., & Ghorban Jahromi, R. (2008). A Predicting model of mathematics achievement: The role of achievement goals and different dimentions of academic engagement. Educational Innovations, 7(4), 29-46. [in Persian].
Hosseinchari, M., Samawi, A., & Kurdestani, D. (2010). Adaption and investigating psychometric properties of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies Inventory for use in Iranian high School students. Psychological Study, 6(1), 163-184.
Houshmand Moghadam Fard, Z., & Shams, A. (2016). Relationship between creativity, learning styles and educational achievement of agricultural undergraduate students in the university of Zanjan. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 8(36), 30-43. [in Persian].
Howard, P. J. (2019). Can Academic Library Instant Message Transcripts Provide Documentation of Undergraduate Student Success? Journal of Web Librarianship, 13(1), 61-87.
İlçin, N., Tomruk, M., Yeşilyaprak, S. S., Karadibak, D., & Savcı, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in Turkish physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 291.
kahdouei, S., & falsafinejad, M. (2017). Designing and evaluation causal model of educational success in high schools. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 7(28), 33-64. [in Persian].
Karaali, G. (2015). Metacognition in the Classroom: Motivation and Self-Awareness of Mathematics Learners. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 25 (5), 439-452.
Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: preserving the role of experience in management education. Academy of Management. Learning and Education, 1, 137-149.
Khanal, L., Giri, J., Shah, S., Koirala, S., & Rimal, J. (2019). Influence of learning-style preferences in academic performance in the subject of human anatomy: an institution-based study among preclinical medical students. Advances in medical education and practice, 10, 343-355.
Kırmızı, F. S. (2010). Relationship between reading comprehension strategy use and daily free reading time. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4752–4756.
Kobal, D., & Musek, J. (2001). Self-concept and academic achievement: Slovenia and France. Personality and individual differences, 30(5), 887-899.
Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory - Version 3.1 2005 Traditional Specifications. Hay Group Holdings, Inc, Boston.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning:experience as the source of learning and development.(2th ed.) Pearson education.
Lau, R. (2018). Learning style preferences of Australian accelerated postgraduate pre-registration nursing students: A cross-sectional survey. Nurse Education in Practice, 28, 280–284.
Lee, J., Shute, V.J. (2010). Personal and social- contextual factor in K- 12 academic performance: Anintegrative perspective on student learning. Educational psychology, 45(3), 185- 202.
Lone, P. A. (2020). Impact of Learning Style on Academic Achievement of urban Secondary School Students. Studies in Indian Place Names, 40(60), 2415-2429.
Manolis, C., Burns, D., Assudani, R., & Chinta, R. (2013). Assessing experiential learning styles: a methodological reconstruction and validation of the Kolb Learning StyleInventory. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 44 –52.
Mansoor, S., & Mansoor, T. (2018). Corelation of personality and learning style of students with their academic perfrmance. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 68(4), 963-68.
Marks, A. B., & Moss, S. A. (2015). What makes a law student succeed or fail? A longitudinal study correlating law student applicant data and law school outcomes. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(2), 205-265.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of psychology, 52, 397- 422.
Matovu, M. (2017). A structural equation modelling of the academic self-concept scale. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 185-198.
McCloskey, G., Perkins, L. A., & Van Diviner, B. (2008). Assessment and intervention for executive function difficulties. Routledge.
Modaressi, M, Farzad, V., & Kooshki, Sh. (2018). The role of self-determination on academic performance in adolescent students with mediating academic engagement and attitude toward e-learning. Research in School and Virtual Learning, 5(19), 85-100. [in Persian].
Mohebi Nooredinvand, M., Shehni Yeilagh, M., & Sharifi, H. (2014). The relationship of psychological capital (hope, optimism, resiliency and self-efficacy) with the achievement goals and academic performance of the first-year students. Research in Curriculum Planning, 11(40), 61-79. [in Persian].
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A, (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259.
Moradi, D., Karami, M., Ghanei, R.G., Nemati, S. M., & Dehvan, F. (2018). Evaluation of the relationship between self-esteem and academic success in nursing students of Kurdistan university of medical sciences, Sanandaj, Iran in 2018. ScientificJournal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty, 4(2), 71-78. [in Persian].
Moradi, K., Asadzadeh, H., Karami, A., & Najafi, M. (2018). The psychometric properties of the adolescents' positive development inventory. Developmental Psychology, 14(55), 315-327. [in Persian].
Mukesh, M. (2011). The relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement. Educational Technology, 5 (3), 201-205.
Navjot, K., Sarita S., & Deepika, V. (2014). Exploratory analysis of intellectual abilities, metacognitive skills and academic performance of rural adolescents, Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 5(4), 527–535.
Nishimura, T., Shigeo, K., & Shigeo, M. (2015). Autonomous motivation and metacognitive strategies as predictors of academic performance. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology. 59 (1), 77-87.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
Peng C. (2012). Self-regulated learning behavior of college students of science and their academic achievement. Physics Procedia, 33, 1446-1450.
Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: an overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73–81.
Rashidi, Z., & Moghadami, M. (2017). The relationship between learning styles with academic achievement and creativity of students senior Department of Education, Psychology and Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University Roudehen Branch. Innovation and Creativity Human Sciences, 7(2), 1-38. [in Persian].
Reyes, T. Y. N. (2003). Relationship among academic performance, test anxiety, personality traits, self-concept, and assertiveness in first-year psychology students at National University of San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Rezaei, A. (2010). Relationship between Kolb's learning modes and Honey and Mumford's learning styles with students’ age and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 6(18), 1-20. [in Persian].
Robert, C., McEwan., & Robert, D. (2018) Patterns of academic success and engagement among college students with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 33(3), 257-272.
Salehi, E., Hedjazi, Y., & Hosseini, S. (2015). Relation between learning style, personality traits and academic performance among agricultural students. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 46(3), 409-416. [in Persian].
Salmalian, Z., Kazem- nezhad L. E., & Gholami-chaboki, B. (2018). A study of the relationship between academic achievement and students' locus of control. Research in Medical Education, 9(4), 48-39. [in Persian].
Samadi, M. (2011). Study of felder and slomon psychometric properties questionnaire of learning styles. New Educational Approaches, 6(1), 39-60. [in Persian].
Sbrocco, R. (2009). Student academic engagement and the academic achievement gap between black and white middle school students: does engagement increase student achievement?. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/57326.
Schramm, K. (2008). Reading and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 231-243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seif, A. (2018). Training Psychology (Learning and Instruction psychology). Tehran: Agah press. [in Persian].
Seyed Sarabi, M., & Asgari, Sh. (2019). Predicting academic self-handicapping behaviors based on academic desire, resilience, and distress tolerance in female students. Recent Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 3(25), 21-31.
Shamsabad, H. (2003). Study of learning styles and relationship between learning styles with academic achievement and gender in high school male and female students of Zanjan, Zanjan: Research Council of Zanjan Education Organization. [in Persian].
Singh, S. K. (2015). Mental Health and Academic Achievement of College Students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 2(4), 112-119.
Stadtfeld, C., Voros, A., Elmer, T., Boda, Z., & Raabe, I. J. (2018). Integration in emerging social networks explains academic failure and success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201811388.
Swe, K. M. M., & Hann, K. W. (2020). Does Learning Style Make a Difference on Student’s Academic Performance? Learning Style Preferences of Medical Students from University Tunku Abdul Rahman. Asian Journal of Medicine and Health, 18(2), 33-40.
Van Zwanenberg, N., Wilkinson, L., & Anderson, A. (2000). Felder and Silvermans index of learning styles and Honey and Mumfords learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance? Education Psychology, 20, 365-381.
Weiss, C. C., & García, E. (2015). Student engagement and academic performance in México: Evidence and puzzles from Pisa. Comparative Education Review, 59(2), 305-331
Wong, L.-H. (2011). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19–E23.
Wooley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension assisting children with learning difficulties.Amsterdam: Springer,Reading Comprehension pp 15-34.
Yun, H., Kwak, E., & Kwon, S. (2019). The relationship between personality types, learning style, and academic achievement in first year nursing students. The journal of the convergence on culture technology, 5(2), 247-255.
Yusriyah, H. R., eryansyah, E., & kurniawan, D. (2020). The correlation among interest and enthusiasm in learning english and english academic achievement of 12th grade students of man sungailiat, doctoral dissertation, Sriwijaya University.
Zang, L-F., & Streanberg, R. J. (2011). The Nature of Intellectual styles. Routledge, New York.
Zare, H., Ahmadi Azghandi, A., Noferesti, A., & Hosseinaei, A. (2012). The effect of metacognitive instruction of problem solving on mathematical learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2(2), 40-58. [in Persian].
Zywno, M. S. (2003). A contribution of validation of score meaning for Felder– Solomons index of learning style. Proceeding 2003, ASEE, Conference and Exposition, Washington, D. C. American Society for Engineering Education.
_||_