طراحی مدل تبیین ارتباط میان مؤلفه¬های عملکرد سبز، مسئولیت اجتماعی و مدیریت کیفیت جامع در صنعت فولاد کشور
محورهای موضوعی : توسعه پایدارعلی صفاری دربرزی 1 , پوریا مالکی نژاد 2 , مهران ضیائیان 3
1 - استادیار، مجتمع آموزش عالی بم، بم، ایران. * (مسوول مکاتبات)
2 - دکتری مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی دانشکده مدیریت و نوآوری، دانشگاه شهید اشرفی اصفهانی، اصفهان، ایران.
کلید واژه: عملکرد سبز سازمانی, مدیریت کیفیت جامع, مسئولیت اجتماعی, مدل¬سازی ساختاری تفسیری, مدل¬سازی معادلات ساختاری.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: در جهان رقابتی امروز کیفیت محصولات تولیدی به عنوان یک مزیت رقابتی در دستیابی به عملکرد و سودآوری بهتر شناخته میشود. از سوی دیگر نقش مسئولیت اجتماعی سازمانها در جهان امروز و لزوم استفاده از آن بر کسی پوشیده نیست. هدف از این پژوهش، بررسی مؤلفههای عملکرد سبز، مسئولیت اجتماعی و مدیریت کیفیت جامع و سپس نحوه اثرگذاری این مؤلفهها بر یکدیگر است.
روش بررسی: به منظور انجام این پژوهش در ابتدا با استفاده از مطالعه پیشینه پژوهش، مؤلفههای اثرگذار بر هر بخش شناسایی گردید. در ادامه با استفاده از تکنیک مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری، ارتباط میان مؤلفهها با استفاده از نظرات 35 تن از خبرگان صنعتی و دانشگاهی متخصص در حوزه فولاد شکل گرفت. سپس با طراحی پرسشنامه حاوی 50 سؤال، مدل ساختاری شکل‌گرفته به منظور برازش در نرم‌افزار SmartPLS3 قرار گرفت. پاسخدهندگان پرسشنامه را در این بخش تعداد 279 تن از کارکنان، مدیران و خبرگان صنعت فولاد کشور شکل دادهاند.
یافتهها: نتایج پژوهش حاکی از قرارگیری 12 مؤلفه شناسایی شده در این پژوهش در 7 سطح کلی دارد. همچنین بر اساس مدل ساختاریافته پژوهش، مؤلفه رهبری در سطح آغازین مدل قرار یافته و مؤلفه مسئولیت اجتماعی نسبت به جامعه به عنوان خروجی مدل مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است.
بحث و نتیجهگیری: بر اساس یافته‌های پژوهش به منظور بهبود در مدیریت کیفیت جامع، مدیریت سازمانها از طریق هماهنگی بهتر با کارکنان و در میان گذاشتن برنامه‌های استراتژیک با کارکنان موجبات بهبود فعالیت در مدیریت کیفیت جامع را فراهم میآورند که این موضوع به حرکت هرچه بهتر مدل میانجامد.
Background and Objective: In today's competitive world, the quality of manufactured products is recognized as a competitive advantage in achieving better performance and profitability. On the other hand, the role of corporate social responsibility in today's world and the need to use it is not hidden from anyone. The purpose of this study is to investigate the components of green performance, social responsibility and total quality management and then how these components affect each other.
Material and Methodology: in this study, first, by studying the research background, the components affecting each section were identified. Then, using interpretive structural modeling technique, the relationship between the components was formed using the opinions of 35 industrial and academic experts. Then, by designing a questionnaire containing 50 questions, the formed structural model was fitted through SmartPLS3 software. Respondents of the questionnaire in this section are 279 employees, managers and experts of the country's steel industry.
Findings: The results of the study indicate the placement of 12 components identified in this study at 7 general levels. Also, based on the structured model of the research, the leadership component is at the initial level of the model and the component of social responsibility towards society as the output of the model is examined.
Discussion and Conclusion: According to the research findings, in order to improve the overall quality management, the management of organizations through better coordination with employees and sharing strategic plans with employees to improve activities in total quality management, which is a model to move better.
1. Li D, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Chen X, Cao C. Impact of quality management on green innovation. J Clean Prod. 2018;170:462–70.
2. Amoako GK, Dzogbenuku RK, Abubakari A. Do green knowledge and attitude influence the youth’s green purchasing? Theory of planned behavior. Int J Product Perform Manag. 2020.
3. Abbas J, Sağsan M. Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. J Clean Prod. 2019;229:611–20.
4. Wijethilake C. Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. J Environ Manage. 2017;196:569–82.
5. Davenport M, Delport M, Blignaut JN, Hichert T, Van der Burgh G. Combining theory and wisdom in pragmatic, scenario-based decision support for sustainable development. J Environ Plan Manag. 2019;62(4):692–716.
6. Masocha R. Does environmental sustainability impact innovation, ecological and social measures of firm performance of SMEs? Evidence from South Africa. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):3855.
7. Amores-Salvadó J, Martín-de Castro G, Navas-López JE. Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. J Clean Prod. 2014;83:356–65.
8. Yu Y, Huo B. The impact of environmental orientation on supplier green management and financial performance: The moderating role of relational capital. J Clean Prod. 2019;211:628–39.
9. Haldorai K, Kim WG, Garcia RLF. Top management green commitment and green intellectual capital as enablers of hotel environmental performance: The mediating role of green human resource management. Tour Manag. 2022; 88: 104431.
10. SYAFRI W, PRABOWO H, NUR SA, MUAFI M. The Impact of Workplace Green Behavior and Green Innovation on Green Performance of SMEs: A Case Study in Indonesia. J Asian Financ Econ Bus. 2021;8(5):365–74.
11. Zhang D, Rong Z, Ji Q. Green innovation and firm performance: evidence from listed companies in China. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019; 144: 48–55.
12. Zwain AAA, Lim KT, Othman SN. TQM and academic performance in Iraqi HEIs: associations and mediating effect of KM. TQM J. 2017;
13. Almahamid SM, Qasrawi ST. The impact of TQM practices and KM processes on organisational performance. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 2017;
14. Alshourah S. Total quality management practices and their effects on the quality performance of Jordanian private hospitals. Manag Sci Lett. 2021;11(1):67–76.
15. Habib M, Abbas J, Noman R. Are human capital, intellectual property rights, and research and development expenditures really important for total factor productivity? An empirical analysis. Int J Soc Econ. 2019;
16. Fok L, Zee S, Morgan Y-CT. Green practices and sustainability performance: the exploratory links of organizational culture and quality improvement practices. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2022;
17. Ho Y-C, Wang WB, Shieh WL. An empirical study of green management and performance in Taiwanese electronics firms. Cogent Bus Manag. 2016; 3(1):1266787.
18. Gazzola P, Pellicelli M. Sustainable Management and Total Quality Management in Public Organizations with Outsourcing. Econ Quant Methods (Varese Dep Econ Univ Insubria). 2009;
19. Saunila M, Ukko J, Rantala T. Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation. J Clean Prod. 2018;179:631–41.
20. Green KW, Inman RA, Sower VE, Zelbst PJ. Impact of JIT, TQM and green supply chain practices on environmental sustainability. J Manuf Technol Manag. 2019;
21. Mirghfouri, S H, Morvati Sharifabadi A, Asadian Ardakani F. Designing a Model for Risk Assessment in Supply Chain with Artificial Neural Network Approach (Case Study: Iran-Yazd Alloy Steel Company. Industrial Management Studies, 2014; 11 (30): 1-21. (In Persian)
22. Xie X, Huo J, Zou H. Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J Bus Res. 2019;101:697–706.
23. Cancino CA, La Paz AI, Ramaprasad A, Syn T. Technological innovation for sustainable growth: An ontological perspective. J Clean Prod. 2018;179:31–41.
24. Ma Y, Hou G, Xin B. Green process innovation and innovation benefit: The mediating effect of firm image. Sustainability. 2017;9(10):1778.
25. Farias LMS, Santos LC, Gohr CF, de Oliveira LC, da Silva Amorim MH. Criteria and practices for lean and green performance assessment: systematic review and conceptual framework. J Clean Prod. 2019.
26. Sari K, Suslu M. A modeling approach for evaluating green performance of a hotel supply chain. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;137:53–60.
27. Mahmood HK, Hashmi MS, Shoaib M, Danish R, Abbas J. Impact of TQM practices on motivation of teachers in secondary schools empirical evidence from Pakistan. J Basic Appl Sci Res. 2014;4(6):1–8.
28. Yusr MM, Mokhtar SSM, Othman AR, Sulaiman Y. Does interaction between TQM practices and knowledge management processes enhance the innovation performance? Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 2017;
29. Hollingworth D, Valentine S. Corporate social responsibility, continuous process improvement orientation, organizational commitment and turnover intentions. Int J Qual Reliab Manag. 2014;
30. Shafiq M, Lasrado F, Hafeez K. The effect of TQM on organisational performance: empirical evidence from the textile sector of a developing country using SEM. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2019;30(1–2):31–52.
31. Ooi K-B. TQM: A facilitator to enhance knowledge management? A structural analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2014;41(11):5167–79.
32. Bastas A, Liyanage K. Integrated quality and supply chain management business diagnostics for organizational sustainability improvement. Sustain Prod Consum. 2019;17:11–30.
33. Bastas A, Liyanage K. Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review. J Clean Prod. 2018;181:726–44.
34. Raimi L. Understanding Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Ibero-American Hospitality Industry’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance (Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility, Volume 11). Emerald Publishing Limited; 2017.
35. Campbell JL. 2017 Decade Award Invited Article Reflections on the 2017 Decade Award: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Financial Crisis. Acad Manag Rev. 2018;43(4):546–56.
36. Asrar-ul-Haq M, Kuchinke KP, Iqbal A. The relationship between corporate social responsibility, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Case of Pakistani higher education. J Clean Prod. 2017;142:2352–63.
37. Hadj TB. Effects of corporate social responsibility towards stakeholders and environmental management on responsible innovation and competitiveness. J Clean Prod. 2020; 250:119490.
38. Su L, Swanson SR. Perceived corporate social responsibility’s impact on the well-being and supportive green behaviors of hotel employees: The mediating role of the employee-corporate relationship. Tour Manag. 2019; 72:437–50.
39. Andalib Ardakani D. Research methods and statistics with problem solving approach. Tehran: Termeh Publications. 2016. (In Persian)
40. Warfield JN. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1974; (1):81–7.
41. Hosseini Bamkan, S M; Maliki Nejad P; Ziaeian M. Investigation and analysis of urban service supply chain (Case study: Isfahan Municipality). Urban Management, 2019; 56, 73-92. (In Persian)
42. Naderi Bani M, Ebrahimzadeh Pezeshki R, Abolghasemi M, Maliki Nejad P. Designing a Conceptual Model for Achieving Organizational Entrepreneurship with a Combined Approach to Mikhailov Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis and Interpretive Structural Modeling (Case Study: Yazd Sports and Youth Organization). Journal of Applied Research in Sports Management, 2017. 6, 127-139. (In Persian)
43. Barclay D, Higgins C, Thompson R. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: personal computer adoption ans use as an Illustration. 1995.
44. Davari A, Rezazadeh A. Structural equation modeling with PLS software. Tehran: University Jihad Publications. 2015. (In Persian)
45. Abbas J. Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. J Clean Prod. 2020; 242:118458.
46. Dai R, Zhang J. Green process innovation and differentiated pricing strategies with environmental concerns of South-North markets. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2017; 98:132–50.
47. Yuan B, Xiang Q. Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: Based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod. 2018; 176:895–908.
48. Kuo T-H, Kuo Y-L. The effect of corporate culture and total quality management on construction project performance in Taiwan. Total Qual Manag. 2010; 21(6):617–32.
49. Bigliardi B, Bertolini M, Wong SK. The influence of green product competitiveness on the success of green product innovation. Eur J Innov Manag. 2012;
50. Malik MS, Kanwal L. Impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure on financial performance: case study of listed pharmaceutical firms of Pakistan. J Bus Ethics. 2018; 150(1):69–78.
51. Wong SKS. Environmental requirements, knowledge sharing and green innovation: Empirical evidence from the electronics industry in China. Bus Strateg Environ. 2013;22(5):321–38.
52. AlNuaimi BK, Khan M, Ajmal MM. The role of big data analytics capabilities in greening e-procurement: A higher order PLS-SEM analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;169:120808.
53. Moya-Clemente I, Ribes-Giner G, Pantoja-Díaz O. Identifying environmental and economic development factors in sustainable entrepreneurship over time by partial least squares (PLS). PLoS One. 2020; 15(9): e0238462.
54. Turker D. Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. J Bus ethics. 2009; 85(4):411–27.
