ارزیابی روش‌های پیاده‌سازی و راه‌حل‌های هوشمندسازی سازگار با محیط‌زیست: مطالعه موردی شهر تهران
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت محیط زیست
ساحل زارعی
1
,
مسعود حق لسان
2
1 - دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، گروه معماری و شهرسازی، واحد بین الملل ارس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه معماری و شهرسازی، واحد ایلخچی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلخچی، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
کلید واژه: هوشمندسازی, محیط‌زیست, روش‌های عملیاتی و اجرائی, شهرسازی, شهر هوشمند تهران.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: شهر هوشمند در سال‌های اخیر و در واکنش به شهری‌سازی روزافزون و تغییرات آب و هوایی جهان اهمیت یافته است. رشد شهرها به‌طور ذاتی باعث شده برای هدایت شهرها از شیوه‌های جدید هوشمندسازی استفاده شود. ﺑﺮﺍﯼ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺎﺯﯼ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ چشم‌انداز ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﯼ ﺷﻬﺮﯼ، ﻧﯿﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﮐﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﯿﺎﺭﻫﺎﯼ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪﯼ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﯽ ﺷﻬﺮ است. هوشمند سازی محیط‌زیست، ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري چندبعدی، ﻣﺘﺸﮑﻞ از اقلیم و اکوسیستم، آلودگی‌ها و مدیریت پایدار منابع است. ﻫﺪف اﺻﻠﯽ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ پیشرو، ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ وﺿﻌﯿﺖ هوشمندسازی شهر تهران ﺑـﺮ اﺳـﺎس شاخص‌های زیست‌محیطی اﺳﺖ.
روش بررسی: روش مطالعه و تحقیق این پژوهش به صورت کیفی و تحلیل داده‌ها و تطبیق اسناد مربوط به محیط‌زیست و ارتباط آن با هوشمندسازی شهری می‌باشد.
یافته ها: یافته های ﺣﺎﺻﻞ از ﺗﺤقیقی که بر اساس شاخص‌های در نظر گرفته از شهر هوشمند در شهر تهران انتخاب گشته (دولت هوشمند، زندگی هوشمند محیط‌زیست هوشمند، اقتصاد هوشمند و در نهایت شهروند هوشمند) نشان داد که در این پژوهش تأثیرات فعالیت‌های انسانی بر محیط‌زیست با تمرکز بر هوشمند سازی زیست‌محیطی، که در آن محیط‌زیست از حالت منحصربه‌فرد خارج‌شده و کاهش‌یافته است.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: همان‌گونه که آمار آلودگی هوای شهر تهران نشان می‌دهد تهران در دو سال گذشته فقط دو روز هوای پاک داشته است بنابراین به نظر می‌رسد با هوشمندسازی شهری می‌توان راهکارهای راهبردی در بعد محیط‌زیست مانند استفاده از انرژی‌های پاک و تجدیدپذیری، گسترش کیفی محیط‌زیست و استفاده از آب و پساب را تا حدودی کنترل کرد.
Background and Objective: Smart city has become important in recent years in response to the increasing urbanization and climate changes in the world. The growth of cities has inherently led to the use of new ways of smarting to guide cities. For smart urban planning in the future perspective of urban spaces, it is necessary to know the complete criteria of smartness and a special examination of the city. Environmental intelligence is a multidimensional structure consisting of climate and ecosystem, pollution and sustainable management of resources. The main goal of this research is to investigate the smartness of Tehran city based on environmental indicators.
Material and Methodology: The study and research method of this research is qualitative and data analysis and matching documents related to the environment and its relationship with urban smartness.
Findings: The findings of a research that was selected based on the considered indicators of the smart city in Tehran (smart government, smart life, smart environment, smart economy and finally smart citizen) showed that in this research the effects of human activities on Environment with a focus on environmental smartness, where the environment is removed from the unique state and reduced.
Discussion and Conclusion: As the air pollution statistics of Tehran city show, Tehran had only two days of clean air in the last two years, so it seems that with urban smartness, strategic solutions in the environmental dimension such as the use of clean and renewable energies, the qualitative expansion of the environment can be implemented and controlled the use of water and sewage to some extent.
1. Karadag, t., 2013. An Evaluation of the Smart City Approach. (Master thesis). Middle East Technical University.
2. Katz, B., Bradley, J., 2013. The Metropolitan Revolution: How Cities and Metros Are Fixing Our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy; Brooking Institution Press: Washington, DC, USA.
3. Al Sharif, R., Pokharel, Sh., 2022. Smart City Dimensions and Associated Risks: Review of literature. 77, 103542
4. Hossain, H.I., Haseeb, M., Kamarudin, F., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., Szczepan´ska-Woszczyna, K., 2013. The Role of Globalization, Economic Growth and Natural Resources on the Ecological Footprint in Thailand: Evidence from Nonlinear Causal Estimations, 9, 1103.
5. Datta, A., 2015. The Smart Entrepreneurial City: Dholera and a 100 other utopias in India. In C. McFarlane, S. Marvin & A. Luque-Ayala, A. (Eds.), Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False dawn. London: Routledge, pp. 52-70.
6. Liu. D., Qi. X., 2022. Smart governance: The era requirements and realization path of the modernization of the basic government governance ability. Procedia Computer Science 199, the 8th International Conference on Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2020 & 2021), pp. 674–680.
7. Roustaei, Sh., Pourmohammadi, M. R., Ghanbari, H., 2018. Smart city theory and evaluation of its infrastructure components in urban management, case study: Tabriz Municipality. Geography and urban-regional planning (26): 197-216. (In Persian)
8. Rezaei Zadeh Mahabadi, K., Azarmahr, M., 2018. Investigating the creation of a smart city with an emphasis on environmental protection and biodiversity. Conference on civil engineering, architecture and urban planning in the countries of the Islamic world. (In Persian)
9. Damavandi, H., 2015. The application of the ecological footprint method in evaluating the sustainability of urban development (case example: Sari city). Master's thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian)
10. Swamy, V., 2022. Smart solutions for environmentally friendly smart cities. Translation Sahel Zarei. Tehran: Nazar Research Institute Publication.
11. Sadat Mousavi, H. S., Jahani, A., Danehkar, A., Etemad, V., Sahragerd, F. 2023. The use of neural network in modeling the effect of environmental factors on the abundance of vegetation in the central Alborz protected area. Natural Environment 76(2): 185-201. (In Persian)
12. Rahimi Nasab, L., Vazifeh Doust, H., Hamdi, K. 2023. Investigating the role of Internet of Things technology as an environmentally friendly technology in expanding and improving businesses based on customer value. Sustainability, Development and Environment 4(2): 109-125. (In Persian)
13. Khatibi, A., Shahbazi, M., Turabi, Z., 2022. Investigating the tendency of investors to make the building smarter based on the model (TAM) (case study: coastal areas of Mazandaran province). Coastal Geographical Studies 3(3): 19-36. (In Persian)
14. Kharazmi, O. A., Gafouryan, M., Sabouri, M., Sardar, S. 2022. Smart environment challenges in Mashhad metropolis using DPSIR model. Geography and Development of Urban Space 9(2): 17-36. (In Persian)
15. Taghavai, M., Shafiei, M., 2022. Analysis of indicators and explanation of strategies for realizing urban smartness (case study: Isfahan city). Spatial Planning 12(1): 51-80. (In Persian)
16. Mohammad Rezapour, B., 2022. Obstacles and solutions for smartening intra-city transportation with a crisis management approach (case example: Urmieh city). Safe City 5(2): 16-34. (In Persian)
17. Shahbazi, Y., Mirdamadi, H., Chanaghlou, M., 2022. Finite element modeling of intelligent adaptive laminated composite beam. Civil and Environmental Engineering (Technical College) 52(3): 185-195. (In Persian)
18. Rajabi, A., Rasouli, S. H., Teymouri, S., Safaei Namin, R. 2021. Evaluation of the effects of smartening in the sustainability of small cities, case study: Nowshahr. Geographers 1(1). (In Persian)
19. Baluochi, A., Behbuodi, M., Turabi, M., 2021. Designing a model for a smart city inspired by the assumptions of modern government services and evaluating its infrastructure components in Bandar Abbas municipality. Iranian Public Administration Studies 4(2): 159-189. (In Persian)
20. Kamali, I., Shamsaei Zafarghandi, F. A., Mehr Nejad, I. 2019. Designing a smart building with maximum resilience with regard to energy management (case study: a five-story residential building located in the metropolis of Tehran). Safe City 2(6): 1-13. (In Persian)
21. Rahmani, M., Shakouri Ganjavi, H., Kazemi, A. 2017. Presenting a multi-objective optimization model for increasing energy efficiency in residential buildings. Industrial Management 9(1): 103-128. (In Persian)
22. Khodakarami. J., Ghobadi, P. 2016. Optimizing energy consumption in an office building equipped with an intelligent management system. Engineering and Energy Management 6(2): 12-23. (In Persian)
23. Ghorbani, R., Noushad, S. 2008. Smart growth strategy in urban development, principles and solutions. Geography and Development (12): 163-180. (In Persian)
24. Mosannenzadeh, F., Vettoratob. D. 2014. Defining smart city: Aconcepttual frame work based on key word analaysis. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. ISSN 1970-9889, e- ISSN 19709870.
25. Sinkiene, J., Grumadaite, K., Radzvickiene, L. L., 2014. Diversity of theoretical approaches to the concept of smart city. 8th International Scientific Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bm. 2014. 112.
26. Albino, V., Beradi, U., Dangelico, R.M., 2015. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22(1): 3-21.
27. Marsal-Llacuna, M. L., et al., 2015. Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative. Technological Forecasting and Social Change (90): 611-622.
28. Zygiaris, S., 2013. Smart city reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the knowledge economy 4(2): 217-231.
29. Bacic, Z., et al. 2018. Integrated sensor systems for smart cities. Tehnicki Vjesnik (25): 277- 284, doi: 10.17559/TV-20160620125732
30. Barrionuevo, J. M., Berrone, P., Ricart, J. E., 2012. Smart cities, sustainable progress. IESE Insight 1(14): 50-57.
31. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., Arribas, D., 2012. Smart cities in perspective: A comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 1(25): 229- 246.
32. Caragliu, A., et al., 2011. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of urban technology 18(2): 65-82.
33. Komninos, N., 2011. Intelligent cities: Variable geometries of spatial intelligence. Intelligent Buildings International 3(3): 172-188.
34. Nam, T., Pardo, T. A., 2011. Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People and Institutions. in Proceedings of the 12th Annual Digital Government Research Conference, College Park, Maryland, June 12-15.
35. Harrison, C., Donnelly, I. A., 2011. A theory of smart cities. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011, Hull, UK.
36. Alawdhi, S., Aldama- Nalda, H., Chourabi, J. R., Gil- Garcia, S., Leung, S., Mellouli, T., Nam, T., A., Pardo, H. J., Scholl, S., 2012. Building Understanding of Smart City Initiatives. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (7443): 40-53.
37. Abbas, R. A., (2017). A comparison of smart city indicators for three top ten US cities. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Arlington. (In Persian)
38. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., Yousef, W., 2012. Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research (25): 137-149.
39. Ojo, A., Curry, E., Janowski, T., Dzhusupova, Z., 2015. Designing Next Generation Smart City Initiatives: The SCID Framework. In Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities (pp. 43-67). Springer International Publishing.
40. Giffinger, R., et al., 2007. Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities. University of Ljubljana, Evert Meijers. Project homepage www.smart-cities.eu
41. Giffinger, R., Gudrun, H., 2010. Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities? ACE: architecture, city and environment 4(12): 7-26.
42. Bătăgan, L., 2011. Smart Cities and Sustainability Models. InformaticaEconomică 15(3): 80-87.
43. Chourabi, H., Taewoo, N., Shawn, W.J., Ramon, G.G., SehlMellouli, K.N., Theresa, A.P., Hans J.S., 2012. Understanding smart Cities: An integrative framework. 2012 45th
44. Air Quality Control Company. 2011. Air Quality Report of Tehran. Tehran, Municipality Publications. (In Persian)
