ارزیابی پیامدهای رقابتی توسعه محصول سبز تحت وجود قابلیت‌های تکنولوژی محوری شرکت‌های دانش بنیان: تحلیل راف توسعه یافته (ERST)
محورهای موضوعی : اقتصاد محیط زیست
حمیده عجم اکرامی
1
(
دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حسابداری، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران.
)
محمدرضا عبدلی
2
(
دانشیار، گروه حسابداری، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
)
حسن ولیان
3
(
استادیار، گروه حسابداری، واحد شاهرود، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شاهرود، ایران.
)
کلید واژه: پیامدهای رقابتی توسعه محصول سبز, قابلیت‌های تکنولوژی محوری, تحلیل راف توسعه یافته.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: با تغییرات محیط‌زیست، شکل راهبردی عملیات شرکت‌ها در عرصه‌های رقابتی به تناوب ماهیت و نوع صنعت تغییر می‌کند. هدف این پژوهش ارزیابی پیامدهای رقابتی توسعه محصول سبز تحت وجود قابلیت‌های تکنولوژی محوری شرکت‌های دانش بنیان براساس تحلیل راف توسعه یافته می‌باشد. روش بررسی: روش شناسی این پژوهش ترکیبی است و برای انجام آن از تحلیل‌های فراترکیب برای شناسایی مولفه‌ها و گزاره‌های پژوهش در بخش کیفی و مجموعه راف برای تعیین اثرگذارترین مولفه‌ها و گزاره‌ها در بخش کمی، استفاده شده است. جامعه هدف در بخش کیفی، پژوهش‌های مشابه و خبرگان دانشگاهی در مدیریت بودند. اما جامعه هدف در بخش کمی ۲۲ نفر از مدیران شرکت‌های دانش بنیان محصولات مواد غذایی بودند که باتوجه به الزام تحلیل تئوری راف، این حد از جامعه آماری مورد قبول می‌باشد. بازه زمانی مطالعه ی حاضر، یکساله بوده است. یافت ها: نتایج پژوهش از شناسایی ۴ مولفه پیامدهای رقابتی توسعه محصول سبز و ۵ مضمون قابلیت‌های تکنولوژی محوری در بخش کیفی حکایت داشت. همچنین نتایج در بخش کمی نشان داد، سیستم اطلاعات مدیریت اثربخش به عنوان اثرگذارترین قابلیت تکنولوژی محوری شرکت‌های دانش بنیان محرکی مثبت در پیامدهای توسعه محصول سبز تلقی می‌گردند. بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتیجه کسب‌شده نشان می‌دهد که سیستم‌های اطلاعات مدیریت به عنوان یکی از مهمترین دستاوردهای تکنولوژی محوری به عنوان قابلیت‌های شرکت‌های دانش بنیان می‌تواند، در یک چرخه‌ی سیستماتیک نسبت به تعیین اطلاعات از بیرون شرکت و انجام فرآیندها بر روی آن جهت اخذ تصمیم‌های اثربخش اقدام نماید و ستاده‌ی آن افزایش بهره‌وری‌های زیست‌محیطی به عنوان پیامد مطلوب توسعه‌ی محصول سبز در این شرکت‌ها می‌باشد.
Background and Objective: The Purpose of this research is evaluating the Competitive of Green Product Development Consequences in the Existence of Technology-Based Capabilities of Knowledge-Based Companies: Extended Rough Set Theory (ERST). Material and Methodology: The methodology of this research is hybrid and to perform it, hyper-combined analyzes have been used to identify the components and propositions of the research in the qualitative part and the rough set has been used to determine the most effective components and propositions in the quantitative part. The target population was qualitative, similar research and academic experts in management. However, the target population was a quantitative part number of 22 executives of knowledge-based companies in food products, which is acceptable from the statistical population due to the requirement of Rough Set Theory. Findings: The results of the study indicated the identification of 4 components of competitive implications for green product development and 5 themes of technology-centric capabilities in the quality sector. Also, the results in the quantitative part showed that the effective management information system is considered as the most effective technology capability of knowledge-based companies as a positive stimulus in the consequences of green product development. Discussion and Conclusion: The result shows that management information systems as one of the most important achievements of technology as the capabilities of knowledge-based companies can, in a systematic cycle to determine information from outside the company and perform processes on it to make effective decisions and staff. It is the increase of environmental productivity as a favorable consequence of green product development in these companies.
1. Khezerlou, S., Pashazadeh, Y. (2019). The Role of Technology-Based Business Strategy in Innovation with the Mediating Role of Technological Competence, Network Competence and Human Resource Competence. Journal of Business Management Perspective, 18(39): 29-47. (In Persian)
2. Horngren, C. T.; Datar, S. M.; and Rajan, M. V. (2012). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, 14th Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc
3. Hosinzadeh, M., Valiyan, H., Abdoli, M. (2021). Dynamic Competitive Capabilities and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 12(1): 133-157. (In Persian)
4. Pan, X., Oh, K, S., Wang, M. (2021). Strategic Orientation, Digital Capabilities, and New Product Development in Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability, 13(22): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212703
5. Andalib, D., Moghtaderi, A. (2018). Investigating and Analyzing the Development Green Product in the Tile Industry in Yazd Province. New Marketing Research Journal, 8(3): 59-78. (In Persian)
6. Demirel, P and Kesidou, E. (2019). Sustainability-oriented Capabilities for Eco-Innovation: Meeting the Regulatory, Technology and Market Demands, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5): 847-857.
7. Chen, T.B. & Chai, L.T. (2010). Attitude towards the Environment and Green Products: Consumers’ Perspective. Management Science and Engineering. 4(2): 27-39.
8. Du, L., Wu, A., Liu, G., Li, H., Yu, B., Zhen, H., Wang, X. (2020). Green auto fluorescence eleocytes from earthworm as a tool for detecting environmental iron pollution, Ecological Indicators, 108(3): 105-155.
9. Ayoobian, N., Mousarezaei, R. (2018). The Role of Nuclear Power in the Reduction of Environmental Pollutants and Climate Changes Compared to other Power Plants in Iran. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology (JonSat), 39(2): 49-60. (In Persian)
10. Karimi, D., Mousavi Madani, N. (2017). Investigating the effectiveness of laws and regulations governing air pollution in Iran. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(4): 571-581. (In Persian)
11. Majhi, S.G., Mukherjee, A. and Anand, A. (2021). Business value of cognitive analytics technology: a dynamic capabilities perspective, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0128
12. Dou, Y., Xue, X., Wang, Y., Xue, W. and Huangfu, W. (2021). Evaluation of enterprise technology innovation capability in prefabricated construction in China, Construction Innovation, https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2020-0196
13. Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information & Management, 41(8): 933-945.
14. Sirkora, A. (2021). European Green Deal – legal and financial challenges of the climate change, ERA Forum, 21(2): 681-697.
15. Yan, J. and Hu, W. (2021). Environmentally specific transformational leadership and green product development performance: the role of a green HRM system, International Journal of Manpower, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2020-0223.
16. Ambastha, A., Momaya, K. (2003). Competitiveness of Firms: Review of Theory, Frameworks and Models, Singapore Management Review, 26(1): 45-58.
17. Booth, E, M., Philip, G. (1998). Technology, Competencies, and Competitiveness: The Case for Reconfigurable and Flexible Strategies, Journal of Business Research, 41(1): 29- 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00009-X
18. Liu, L., Jiang, Z. (2016). Influence of technological innovation capabilities on product competitiveness, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(5): 883-902. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2015-0189
19. Teece, D. J, Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
20. Hoseinzadeh Shahri, M., Shahini, S. (2018). The impact of Dynamic Capability and Innovation Capability on Competitive Advantage. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 10(19), 123-141. (In Persian)
21. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180
22. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.
23. Naghshbandi, S.N., Varga, L. and Hu, Y. (2021). Technology capabilities for an automated and connected earthwork roadmap, Construction Innovation, https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2021-0022
24. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (1999). Success in high technology markets: Is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science, 18(4): 547–568.
25. Li, J., Xia, J., & Zajac, E. J. (2018). On the duality of political and economic stakeholder influence on firm innovation performance: Theory and evidence from Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1): 193–216.
26. Fung, M. K. (2018). Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Technological Capability in the Information Technology Sector: A Resource-Based Perspective, Journal Business Ethics, DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3605-4.
27. Zhang, Q., Xie, Q., Wang, G. (2016). A survey on rough set theory and its applications, CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 1(4): 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trit.2016.11.001
28. Pawlak, Z. (2005). Rough sets and flow graphs, Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing, 36(41): 1-11.
29. Jirakraisiri, J., Badir, Y.F. and Frank, B. (2021). Translating green strategic intent into green process innovation performance: the role of green intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 22(7): 43-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-08-2020-0277
30. Baah, C., Opoku-Agyeman, D., Acquah, I.S.K., Issau, K. and Moro Abdoulaye, F.A. (2021). Understanding the influence of environmental production practices on firm performance: a proactive versus reactive approach, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(2): 266-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2020-0195.
31. Bıçakcıoğlu, N., Theoharakis, V. and Tanyeri, M. (2020). Green business strategy and export performance: An examination of boundary conditions from an emerging economy, International Marketing Review, 37(1): 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-11-2018-0317
32. Birou, L.M., Green, K.W. and Inman, R.A. (2019). Sustainability knowledge and training: outcomes and firm performance, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(2): 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-05-2018-0148
33. Aziz, N.A.A., Foong, S.Y., Ong, T.S., Senik, R., Attan, H. and Arshad, Y. (2018). Intensity of market competition, strategic orientation and adoption of green initiatives in Malaysian public listed companies, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(8): 1334-1351. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2017-0078
34. Sabzevari, M., Sajadi, S, M., Hajimolana, S, M. (2021). Modeling risks in configuring a green supply chain for new product development (case study: fast-moving consumer goods), IRANIAN JOURNAL OF TRADE STUDIES (IJTS), 25(98): 155-184.
35. Wang, Y., Su, X., Wang, H. and Zou, R. (2019). Intellectual capital and technological dynamic capability: evidence from Chinese enterprises, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(4): 453-471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2018-0096
36. Owens, D. and Khazanchi, D. (2018). Exploring the impact of technology capabilities on trust in virtual teams, American Journal of Business, 33(4): 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-04-2017-0008
