ارزیابی ریسک محیط‌زیستی کارخانه فولاد با استفاده از روش های ANP و TOPSIS (مطالعه موردی: کارخانه فولاد ویان همدان)
محورهای موضوعی :
ارزیابی پی آمدهای محیط زیستی
فاطمه زحمتکش
1
,
مریم کیانی صدر
2
,
مهرداد چراغی
3
1 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه محیط زیست، دانشکده علوم پایه، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه محیط زیست، دانشکده علوم پایه، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - دانشیار، گروه محیط زیست، دانشکده علوم پایه، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران.
تاریخ دریافت : 1395/07/05
تاریخ پذیرش : 1395/10/08
تاریخ انتشار : 1401/03/01
کلید واژه:
ارزیابی ریسک,
ANP,
کارخانه فولاد ویان,
TOPSIS,
محیط‌زیست,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه وهدف: یکی از اصلی‌ترین شاخص‌های توسعه یافتگی کشورها و جوامع، تولید و مصرف فولاد می‌باشد. مطالعه حاضر با هدف شناسایی و تجزیه و تحلیل ریسک‌های تهدید کننده کارخانه فولاد ویان در سال 1395 به انجام رسید.
روش بررسی: پس از شناسایی ریسک‌ها، تجزیه و تحلیل و رتبه بندی آن‌ها با استفاده از روش TOPSIS صورت پذیرفت. جهت تعیین نمره احتمال ریسک از روش ANP استفاده شد. در نهایت با استفاده از روش TOPSIS شدت احتمال وقوع ریسک و منابع آلودگی ریسک محاسبه گردید.
یافته ها: بر اساس نتایج حاصل از محاسبه های ریسک ها در رده های مختلف می توان بیان کرد که از میان ریسک های محیط زیستی کارخانه فولاد ویان، 14 ریسک در رده جزئی تا متوسط و 3 ریسک در رده غیر قابل تحمل قرار دارند. بر اساس مقایسات زوجی انجام شده در محیط نرم افزار Super Decisions بهترین راهکار در بین همه راهکارها، نصب دستگاه‌های کنترل ذرات و گاز مانند سیکلون ها و غبارگیرهای کیسه‌ای و کم ترین راهکار وقوع ریسک، تعمیر به‌موقع دستگاه ها به‌منظور کاهش انتشار گازهای آلاینده شناسایی گردید.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: نتایج حاصل از روش TOPSIS نشان داد که مراحل تولید فاضلاب بهداشتی و چک و بازدید دستگاه‌های لوله‌گذاری، خط انتقال آب و گاز هر دو به سطح ریسک خیلی بالا می باشند که می‌توان با اقدامات پیشگیرانه و کنترلی، نسبت به حذف یا کاهش آن‌ها اقدام نمود.
چکیده انگلیسی:
Background and Objective: One of the main indicators of the development of countries and societies is the production and consumption of steel. The aim of this study was to identify and analyze the threatening risks of Wian Steel Plant in 2016.
Material and Methodology: After identifying the risks, they were analyzed and ranked using the TOPSIS method. ANP method was used to determine the risk probability score. Finally, using TOPSIS method, the severity of the risk and the sources of risk contamination were calculated.
Findings: Based on the results of risk calculations in different categories, it can be stated that among the environmental risks of Wian Steel Plant, 14 risks in the minor to medium category and 3 risks in the unbearable category. Are located. Based on pairwise comparisons made in the Super Decisions software environment, the best solution among all solutions is to install particle and gas control devices such as cyclones and bag dust collectors and the least risk solution is to repair the devices in a timely manner to reduce emissions. Pollutants were identified.
Discussion and Conclusion: The results of TOPSIS method showed that the stages of sanitary wastewater production and check and inspection of piping devices, water and gas transmission line are both very high risk level that can be eliminated by preventive and control measures. Or take action to reduce them.
منابع و مأخذ:
Jabal Ameli, M.S., Rezaeifar, A., Chaee bakhsh Langroudi, A. (2007). Project Risk Rating Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Process, Faculty of Engineering Journal, 41 (7), 871-863. (In Persian)
Jozi, S.A., Shams Khozani, N. (2010). Assessing the environmental risks of the gas unit of Shahid Modhaj Zargan thermal power plant in Ahvaz by analyzing the failure modes and its effects on the environment (EFMEA). Fifth National Conference on Environmental Crises in Iran and Strategies for Improving Them, Ahvaz. (In Persian)
Chutia, R., & Krishna, G. (2018). Fuzzy risk analysis in poultry farming based on a novel similarity measure of fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing, 66: 60-76.
Reza Zadeh Niavarani, M.R. (2004). Application of FMEA method in identifying and evaluating environmental aspects and introduction of EFMEA, Method Monthly, 88, p.20. (In Persian)
Teacher, GH., Warsaw, K., Mubarak Hassan, E. (2012). Environmental risk assessment and presentation of risk reduction solutions in the steel plant of the National Iranian Steel Industrial Group by FMEA method, the first national conference on environmental protection and planning, Hamedan, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Farda Environmental Thinkers Company. (In Persian)
Mahdavi Adeli, M., & Abbasi, A. (2015). Technical and economic study of the effect of using electric arc furnace slag of Khuzestan Steel Company as an alternative to aggregate in structural concrete, International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Infrastructure, Tabriz, Permanent Secretariat of the Conference. (In Persian)
Wian Steel Environmental Assessment Report (Bresso Company) (2003). (In Persian)
Chatterjee, K., Zavadskas, E., Tamošaitienė, J., Adhikary, K., Kar, Sa. (2018). A Hybrid MCDM technique for risk Management in construction projects. Symmetry, 10 (2): 46.
Daneshparvar, B., Rasi Nezami, S., Feizi, A., Aghlmand, R. (2022). Comparison of results
of flood hazard zoning using AHP and ANP methods in GIS environment: a case
study in Ardabil province, Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 9 (1), 1–7.
Fountzoula, C., Aravossis, K. (2022). Decision-making methods in the public sector during 2010–2020: a systematic review. Advances in Operations Researche, 20: 64-78.
Janes, A., Kadoic, N., Begicevic, N. (2018). Differences in prioritization of the BSC’s strategic goals using AHP and ANP methods.Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 42 (2), 193–217.
Ranjbar, R., & Hossein, P. (2015). Assessing the environmental aspects of the accumulation and harvesting unit of Kaveh South Kish Steel Complex in Iran by the method of analysis of failure cases and its effects EFMEA, International Conference on Science and Engineering, Emirate - Dubai, Vira Capital Idea Institute. (In Persian)
Shafiee, M., Jozi, S.A. (2010). Environmental risk assessment of Hillah protected area using multi-criteria decision making method. Master Thesis in Environmental Management, Islamic Azad University - Ahvaz Science and Research Branch. (In Persian)
Saffarian, S., Jozi, S.A. (2011). Analysis of environmental risks of Abadan gas power plant using TOPSIS method. Journal of Environmental Science, 58: 53-66. (In Persian)
Fathabadi, B., Amiri Zarandi, E. (2014). Investigation and evaluation of air pollutants in Khayyam Foolad Neishabour Company (design phase), the first international HSE conference on construction, mining, oil and gas projects, Tehran, Iran Institute of Seismic Reinforcement and Improvement. (In Persian)
Ghodsipour, S.H. (1389). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Eighth Edition, Amirkabir University of Technology. (In Persian)
Abbaspour, M. (1389). Environmental Engineering, Tehran, Vice Chancellor for Research, Islamic Azad University, Volume II. (In Persian)
Ransikarbum, K., Pitakaso, R., Kim, N., Ma, J. (2021). Multicriteria decision analysis framework for part orientation analysis in additive manufacturing. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 8 (4), 1141–1157
Warsaw maker, K., & Vise, Z. (2015). Investigation of Environmental and Safety Risks (Case Study of Khuzestan Steel Industries), International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Infrastructure, Tabriz. (In Persian)
Hepu, D. Y., Chung – Hsing & R. j. Willis. (2000). Inter – Company Comparision Using Modified TOPSIS with Objective Weights. Computer and Operations Research, 27(10), pp. 527-529.
Heller, S. (2006). Managing Industrial Risk-having a Tasted and Proven System to Prevent and Assess Risk. Hazardous Material, 130 (17), 58-63.
Jozi, S.A., & Salati, P. (2012). Environmental risk assessment of low density polyethylene unit using the method of failure mode and effect analysis. Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 18 (1), 103−113.
Steen, R.J.C.A., Leonards, P.E.G., Brinkman, U.A.T., Barcelo, D., Tronczynski, J., Albinis, T.A., Cofino, W.P. (1999). Ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals in European estuaries. Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 18 (7), 1574–1581.
Smit, HTJ., & Trigeorgis L. (2006). Strategic Planning: Valuing and Managing Portfolios of Real Options. R&D Management, 36(4):403-419.
Hatefi, M., & Tamosaitienė, J. (2019). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25 (2), 114-131.
_||_
Jabal Ameli, M.S., Rezaeifar, A., Chaee bakhsh Langroudi, A. (2007). Project Risk Rating Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Process, Faculty of Engineering Journal, 41 (7), 871-863. (In Persian)
Jozi, S.A., Shams Khozani, N. (2010). Assessing the environmental risks of the gas unit of Shahid Modhaj Zargan thermal power plant in Ahvaz by analyzing the failure modes and its effects on the environment (EFMEA). Fifth National Conference on Environmental Crises in Iran and Strategies for Improving Them, Ahvaz. (In Persian)
Chutia, R., & Krishna, G. (2018). Fuzzy risk analysis in poultry farming based on a novel similarity measure of fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing, 66: 60-76.
Reza Zadeh Niavarani, M.R. (2004). Application of FMEA method in identifying and evaluating environmental aspects and introduction of EFMEA, Method Monthly, 88, p.20. (In Persian)
Teacher, GH., Warsaw, K., Mubarak Hassan, E. (2012). Environmental risk assessment and presentation of risk reduction solutions in the steel plant of the National Iranian Steel Industrial Group by FMEA method, the first national conference on environmental protection and planning, Hamedan, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Farda Environmental Thinkers Company. (In Persian)
Mahdavi Adeli, M., & Abbasi, A. (2015). Technical and economic study of the effect of using electric arc furnace slag of Khuzestan Steel Company as an alternative to aggregate in structural concrete, International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Infrastructure, Tabriz, Permanent Secretariat of the Conference. (In Persian)
Wian Steel Environmental Assessment Report (Bresso Company) (2003). (In Persian)
Chatterjee, K., Zavadskas, E., Tamošaitienė, J., Adhikary, K., Kar, Sa. (2018). A Hybrid MCDM technique for risk Management in construction projects. Symmetry, 10 (2): 46.
Daneshparvar, B., Rasi Nezami, S., Feizi, A., Aghlmand, R. (2022). Comparison of results
of flood hazard zoning using AHP and ANP methods in GIS environment: a case
study in Ardabil province, Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 9 (1), 1–7.
Fountzoula, C., Aravossis, K. (2022). Decision-making methods in the public sector during 2010–2020: a systematic review. Advances in Operations Researche, 20: 64-78.
Janes, A., Kadoic, N., Begicevic, N. (2018). Differences in prioritization of the BSC’s strategic goals using AHP and ANP methods.Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 42 (2), 193–217.
Ranjbar, R., & Hossein, P. (2015). Assessing the environmental aspects of the accumulation and harvesting unit of Kaveh South Kish Steel Complex in Iran by the method of analysis of failure cases and its effects EFMEA, International Conference on Science and Engineering, Emirate - Dubai, Vira Capital Idea Institute. (In Persian)
Shafiee, M., Jozi, S.A. (2010). Environmental risk assessment of Hillah protected area using multi-criteria decision making method. Master Thesis in Environmental Management, Islamic Azad University - Ahvaz Science and Research Branch. (In Persian)
Saffarian, S., Jozi, S.A. (2011). Analysis of environmental risks of Abadan gas power plant using TOPSIS method. Journal of Environmental Science, 58: 53-66. (In Persian)
Fathabadi, B., Amiri Zarandi, E. (2014). Investigation and evaluation of air pollutants in Khayyam Foolad Neishabour Company (design phase), the first international HSE conference on construction, mining, oil and gas projects, Tehran, Iran Institute of Seismic Reinforcement and Improvement. (In Persian)
Ghodsipour, S.H. (1389). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Eighth Edition, Amirkabir University of Technology. (In Persian)
Abbaspour, M. (1389). Environmental Engineering, Tehran, Vice Chancellor for Research, Islamic Azad University, Volume II. (In Persian)
Ransikarbum, K., Pitakaso, R., Kim, N., Ma, J. (2021). Multicriteria decision analysis framework for part orientation analysis in additive manufacturing. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 8 (4), 1141–1157
Warsaw maker, K., & Vise, Z. (2015). Investigation of Environmental and Safety Risks (Case Study of Khuzestan Steel Industries), International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Infrastructure, Tabriz. (In Persian)
Hepu, D. Y., Chung – Hsing & R. j. Willis. (2000). Inter – Company Comparision Using Modified TOPSIS with Objective Weights. Computer and Operations Research, 27(10), pp. 527-529.
Heller, S. (2006). Managing Industrial Risk-having a Tasted and Proven System to Prevent and Assess Risk. Hazardous Material, 130 (17), 58-63.
Jozi, S.A., & Salati, P. (2012). Environmental risk assessment of low density polyethylene unit using the method of failure mode and effect analysis. Chemical Industry & Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 18 (1), 103−113.
Steen, R.J.C.A., Leonards, P.E.G., Brinkman, U.A.T., Barcelo, D., Tronczynski, J., Albinis, T.A., Cofino, W.P. (1999). Ecological risk assessment of agrochemicals in European estuaries. Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 18 (7), 1574–1581.
Smit, HTJ., & Trigeorgis L. (2006). Strategic Planning: Valuing and Managing Portfolios of Real Options. R&D Management, 36(4):403-419.
Hatefi, M., & Tamosaitienė, J. (2019). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25 (2), 114-131.
