تدوین و انتخاب استراتژی توسعه مدیریت سبز دانشگاه گیلان بر اساس تحلیل SWOT و ماتریس برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک کمی (QSPM)
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت محیط زیست
نرگس بنائیان
1
,
مرتضی زنگنه
2
,
سیدحسین پیمان
3
1 - استادیار گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت.
2 - استادیار گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت.
3 - دانشیار گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت.
کلید واژه: نقاط قوت و ضعف, مدیریت سبز, دانشگاه گیلان, ماتریس برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک,
چکیده مقاله :
در سال‌های اخیر، با افزایش نگرانی‌های زیست‌محیطی، استفاده از ابزارهای علمی و کاربردی در این حوزه، مورد استقبال قرارگرفته است. دانشگاه‌ها مستعدترین مکان برای توسعه فعالیت‌های زیست‌محیطی هستند و تلاش می‌کنند به‌طور مسئولانه‌تری عملکردهای زیست‌محیطی را در اولویت کار خود قرار دهند. مطالعه حاضر به بررسی و انتخاب راهبردهای توسعه مدیریت سبز در دانشگاه گیلان به‌عنوان یکی از دانشگاه‌های پیشرو در مدیریت سبز در آموزش عالی پرداخته است. با توجه به وضعیت دانشگاه گیلان، 14 و 17 گویه به ترتیب به‌عنوان عوامل داخلی (قوت و ضعف) و خارجی (فرصت و تهدید) در مدیریت سبز دانشگاه از طریق انجام تحلیل سلسله مراتبی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. ضعف در زیرساخت‌ها بالاترین رتبه اهمیت را دارد که به دلیل فرسودگی ساختمان‌ها و تأسیسات، عدم وجود تأسیسات کنترل‌کننده انرژی، و غیره باعث مصرف بالای انرژی، مواد و کاغذ شده است. سپس ارزیابی عوامل داخلی و خارجی، تلفیق و رسم ماتریس فاصله، نشان داد که مدیریت سبز دانشگاه گیلان در وضعیتی قرار دارد که راهبردهای تهاجمی بر سایر راهبردها ارجحیت دارد. راهبردهای تهاجمی به تفصیل معرفی شده و بر اساس ماتریس برنامه‌ریزی استراتژیک کمی مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که راهبردهای حمایت از طرح‌های پژوهشی سبز، فرهنگ‌سازی عمومی و سیاست‌های تشویقی به‌ترتیب مؤثرترین و بهترین راهکارها در جهت توسعه مدیریت سبز دانشگاه گیلان می‌باشند.
In recent years, with the increase of environmental concerns, application of scientific and practical tools in this field has been welcomed. Universities are the most appropriate place to develop environmental activities and strive to prioritize environmental practices more responsibly. The present study examines and selects green management development strategies in the University of Guilan as one of the leading universities in green management in higher education. According to the University of Guilan situation, 14 and 17 items were examined respectively as internal factors (strengths and weaknesses) and external factors (opportunities and threats) in the green management of the university through hierarchical analysis. One of the most important weaknesses is lack of infrastructure and fundamental facilities, which have led to high consumption of energy, materials and paper due to the deterioration of buildings and equipment, lack of energy control facilities, and etc. Evaluation of internal and external factors, integration and drawing of space matrix, showed that the green management of University of Guilan is in a situation where aggressive strategies take precedence over other strategies. Offensive strategies were quantitatively evaluated and ranked based on the strategic planning matrix. The results showed that the strategies of supporting green research projects, public culture and incentive policies are the most effective and best strategies for the development of green management at the University of Guilan, respectively.
1. Alitaleshi MS, Nejadkooraki F, Azimzadeh HR, Ghaneian MT. A green management strategy for energy, wastewater and air pollutants control systems in educational hospitals of Yazd, Iran in 2013. Health Sytem Research. 2015;11(4):775-80. (In Persian)
2. Borangi F, Zaimdar M. Comparative analysis between green management indicators in institutions. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development. 2018;3(2):1-5. (In Persian)
3. Group IE. Instructions and executive guide of environmental system and green management. Environmental Protection Agency2016.
4. Tavakoli A, Hashemi AL, Sabet A, Razeghi S. Providing a structural model of green human resource management based on human resource management systems. Quarterly Journal of Human Resource Management Research, Imam Hossein University. 2018;10(1):77-103.
5. Wang T. An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Schools‖. International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing. 2016;6(2):30-8.
6. Salaki N, Movahed Mohammadi H, Rezaei A. Necessity of green management component in the development of green university. Fourth International Conference on Environmental Planning and Management; Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran2017. (In Persian)
7. Kasravi M, Mohajeri S. Implementation of Green University plan using ARIZ71 problem solving algorithm. Journal of Elite and Engineering Sciences. 1397;3(5):98-109. (In Persian)
8. Shabani A, Hooshman A. Investigation and comparison of current models in hospital green management. Health Management. 2016;7(1):15-24. (In Persian)
9. ghorbani M, Babolhavaeji F, F. N. Sustainable management indicators for green libraries. National Library and Information Studies. 2018;28(1):47-67. (In Persian)
10. Kazemi M, Esmaeili MR, Beigi Firouzi AE. Development and selection of tourism development strategy in Lorestan province based on SWOT analysis and quantitative strategic planning matrix. Geography and development. 1392;32:47-60. (In Persian)
11. Aramesh H, Beigi Firouzi AE, Sargolzayi A. Development and selection of tourism development strategy of Mirjaveh Special Economic Zone based on SWOT analysis and QSPM Public Management Researches. 2018;11(40):113-36.
12. Razmjouyi D, Saeidi S. Development of transit development strategy in Anzali port using SWAT matrix method and quantitative strategy planning matrix. Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 2015;14 (4). (In Persian)
13. Dara M, Zaimdar M. Presenting a Green Management Model in Door and Window Manufacturing Factories - A Case Study of a Reassuring Manufacturing Factory. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2015. (In Persian)
14. Darvishi Z, Morabi Heravi H. Development of a strategy to focus on rural industries (non-agricultural economy) to achieve sustainable development by SWOT analysis. Environmental management and sustainable development. 2019; 3(10): 13-7. (In Persian)
15. Sadeghi H, Khanzadeh M. Strategic Analysis of Agricultural Sector Development by SWOT Method and QSPM Matrix: A Case Study of Lake Urmia Water Basin. Agricultural Economics and Development. 1398; 27(108): 91-120.
16. Salaki N, Movahed Mohammadi H, Rezaei A, Musavi Bahram Abadi SS. The study of the barriers and strategies of the green university development as perspective of faculty members in university college of agriculture and natural resources, University of Tehran. Environmental Sciences. 2018; 16(4): 113-34. (In Persian)
17. Rad SA, Jabbari AR. Designing a Green University Model for Iran Farhangian University. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. 2020;8(2):45-64. (In Persian)
18. Meiboudi M, Lahijanian AM, Shobeiri SM, Jozi SM, Azizinejad R. Designing a new and integrated evaluation system for selecting and ranking green schools in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2017. (In Persian)
19. Hekmatnia H, Mousavi MN. Application of the model in geography with emphasis on urban and regional planning, second edition. Yazd: New Science Publications; 1389.
20. Saaty TL. The analytic hierarchy process.: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
21. Ebrahimzadeh A, Kazemi zad SA, Eskandari sani M. Strategic planning of tourism development with emphasis on religious tourism. Journal of Human Geography Research. 1390; 43(76): 115-41. (In Persian)
22. Rakhshaninasab H-R, Safari K. Strategic Planning Management of Solid Waste in Zahedan City Using SWOT Method. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;18(3):149-64.
23. Hunger JD, Wheelen TL. Essentials of Strategic Management. USA: Prentice Hall, 2000.
24. Nohegar A, Hosseinzade MM, Pirasteh A. Evaluation of Qeshm Island tourism potetial using SWOT strategic management model. Geography and Development Iranian Journal. 2009; 15: 151-72. (In Persian)
25. Harisson JS, C.H. J. Foundations in Strategic Management. USA: SOUTH-WESTERN; 2011.
26. Khalili S. Strategic management and planning. Tehran: Yadvareh publication; 2014.
27. Eydi A, Abdollahi B. Design of Educational Strategic Program in Rah-Artin Company by SWOT approach. Quarterly Journal of Training and Development of Human Resources. 2015; 1(3):69-89. (In Persian)
28. Unknown. Guilan Province. Free encyclopedia Wikipedia. 2021.
29. Unknown. Combined learning design project for green entrepreneurship education: Sponsored by the Erasmus Plus Foundation, European Union, 2016-2019, Available from: www.Greentproject.eu.
30. Unknown. Approved by the Council of Ministers on April 20, 2020 Budget Law of 2020. Article 38, paragraph (g). 2020.
31. Nademi Y. Research Budget and Economic Growth in Iran: Markov Switching Approach. Economical Researches and Policies. 2017;25(82). (In Persian)
32. Khalili F, Rajaei Y. Study of the problems of research in Islamic Azad University of Abhar and provide appropriate solutions. Management sciences. 2008; 2(6):79-116. (In Persian)
