تحلیل محتوای دیدگاه محققان مراکز تحقیقات کشاورزی در خصوص مخالفت با کشت و مصرف محصولات تراریخته در ایران

محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش های ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی

یحیی صافی سیس ¹ , احمد رضوانفر ²

1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران
2 - استاد گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/02/30 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/11/10 تاریخ انتشار : 1398/12/01

کلید واژه: پژوهشگران مراکز تحقیقات کشاورزی, تحلیل محتوا, کشت و مصرف, محصولات تراریخته,

چکیده مقاله :

در حالی که اطلاعات علمی موثقی در سطح جامعه در خصوص نتایج کشت و مصرف محصولات تراریخته وجود ندارد و کشمکش ها بین موافقان و مخالفان باعث ادامه روند حاضر شده است، به نظر می رسد، پژوهشگران تنها گروهی هستند که با دانش بالا، می توانند پاسخگوی مصرف کنندگان، کشاورزان و دولت مردان باشند. در همین راستا، پژوهش حاضر بر مبنای پارادایم کیفی و با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای کیفی به منظور تحلیل دیدگاه پژوهشگران مراکز تحقیقات کشاورزی در خصوص مخالفت با کشت و مصرف محصولات تراریخته در ایران انجام شد. به منظور جمع آوری داده ها از شیوه مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته با 23 نفر از پژوهشگران، با رویکرد نمونه گیری هدفمند و روش نمونه گیری گلوله برفی استفاده شد. یافته های این پژوهش نشان داد در کل سه عامل تخریب محیط زیست، به خطر افتادن سلامتی انسان و کشت و مصرف تحمیلی، ضعف ملاحظات اخلاقی و فقدان استقلال ملی از دلایل مخالفت با کشت و مصرف محصولات تراریخته از دیدگاه پژوهشگران مراکز تحقیقات کشاورزی می باشند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

While there is no reliable scientific information about the results of the cultivation and consumption of transgenic products at the community level, and the controversy between the proponents and opponents has led the process to continue, researchers seem to be the only group that due to high knowledge, they can be responsive to consumers, farmers and the Governors. In this regard, the present study was conducted on the basis of qualitative paradigm and using content analysis to analyze the views of researchers at agricultural research centers on the opposition to cultivation and consumption of transgenic products in Iran. In order to collect the data, a semi-structured interview method with 23 researchers was used with purposeful sampling and snowball sampling. The findings of this study showed that the three factors of "environmental degradation", "endangering human health" and "Imposing cultivation and consumption, weak ethical considerations and lack of national independence" are the reasons for the opposition to the cultivation and consumption of transgenic products from the viewpoint of researchers at agricultural research centers.

منابع و مأخذ:

آقایی، م. ج. (1395). نقش انقلاب‏های تکنولوژیک در توسعه کشاورزی و امنیت غذایی. نشریه دو ماهانه علمی انجمن ایمنی زیستی ایران، دوره 8، شماره 41. صفحات 17-14.

قوچانی، ا. م.، غنیان، م.، و برادران، م. (1395). واکاوی عوامل اثرگذار بر نگرش متخصصان نسبت به برنج تراریخته ایرانی. علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، دوره  12, شماره 2، صفحات 72 -53.

یزدان پناه، م.، فروزانی، م.، و بختیاری، ز. (1395). بررسی تمایل کارشناسان سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان خوزستان نسبت به تولیدات تراریخته. مجله علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، دوره 12، شماره 1، صفحات 117-103.

Aerni, P. (2001). Assessing stakeholder attitudes to agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 47(3): 2–7.

Alganozkok, G. (2015). consumer attitudes towards consumption of genetically modified products. International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Nutrition Research, 3(2): 78-91.

Al-Khayri, J. M. (2012). Socio-Demographic Factors Influencing Public Perception of Genetically Modified. Food Technol, 7(3): 101-112.

Amin, L., & Hashim, H. (2015). Factors influencing stakeholders attitudes toward genetically modified aedes mosquito. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3): 655-681.

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing Plus
Open, 2(11): 8-14.

Bloom, V. (2010). Nourishing the planet in the 21st century. Plant science classroom material for high schools in Ontario. Canada: Nutrients for Life Foundation.

Chen, M. F., & Li, H. L. (2007). The consumers’ attitude toward genetically modified food in Taiwan. Food Quality and Preference, 18(4): 662–674.

Devos, Y., Maeseele, P., Reheul, D., Van Speybroeck, L., & De Waele, D. (2008). Ethics in the societal debate on genetically modified organisms: A (re) quest for sense and sensibility. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(1): 29-61.

Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3): 93-99.

Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Kitterlin, M., Jahangiry, S., Zarafshani, K., Van Passel, S., & Azadi, H. (2016). Attitudes of agricultural experts toward genetically modified crops: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2): 509-524.

Ghasemi, S., Karami, E., & Azadi, H. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: A case study in Southwest Iran. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3): 1201-1227.

Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., Alimirzaei, E., & Azadi, H. (2018). Behavioral intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-stakeholder analysis, Environ Dev Sustain, 20, 233–253.

Ghoochani, O. M., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., & Azadi, H. (2017). Multi stakeholders’ attitudes toward Bt rice in Southwest, Iran: Application of TPB and multi attribute models. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1): 141-163.

Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2): 105-112.

Han, J. H. (2006). The effects of perceptions on consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) foods. Doctoral Dissertations. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.

Herdt, R. (2005). The State of Food and Agriculture, 2003–2004: Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor? Agricultural Economics, 32(1): 109-110.

Hill, R., Stanisstreet, M., Boyes, E., & Sullivan, O. (1998) Reactions to a new technology: students’ ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(2): 203–216.

Harlander, S. K. (1991). Social, moral, and ethical issues in food biotechnology. Food Technology, 45(5): 152–160.

Kramkowska, M., Grzelak, T., & Czyzewska, K. (2013). Benefits and risks associated with genetically modified food products. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 20(3): 23-41.

Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.

Lukošiutė, I., & Petrauskaitė-Senkevič, L. (2017). evaluation of lithuanian consumers’attitudes to modified food. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 1(43):103-111.

Ma, Y. (2015). Consumers’ Different Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Food in the United States and China. Studies in Asian Social Science, 2(2): 1-17.

26. perceived risk model for the introduction of genetically modified food in Spain. Food Policy, 34(6): 519–528.


27. Mohapatra, A. K., Priyadarshini, D., & Biswas, A. (2010). Genetically Modified Food: Knowledge and Attitude of Teachers and Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 489–497.

Ormandy, E. H., Schuppli, C. A., & Weary, D. M. (2009). Worldwide trends in the use of animals in research: the contribution of genetically-modified animal models. Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA, 37(1): 63-68.

Pandey, A., Kamle, M., Yadava, L., Muthukumar, M., Kumar, P., Gupta, V., & Pandey, B. (2010). Genetically modified food: its uses, future prospects and safety assessments. Biotechnology, 9(4): 444-458.

Rao, N. C. (2013). Biotechnology for Second Green Revolution in Indian Agriculture. Productivity, 54(1), 126-141.

Robins, R. (2006). Gene technology and its citizen-subjects. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 4(1): 45-59.

Rzymski, P., & Królczyk, A. (2016). Attitudes toward genetically modified organisms in Poland: to GMO or not to GMO? Food Security. 8(2): 689–697.

Sharma, R. (2012). Ensuring the success of feed the future: Analysis and recommendations on gender integration. Global agricultural development initiative issue briefs are published by The Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

Stone, G. D., Altieri, M. A., Pental, D., Richards, P., Suryanarayana, M., & Tripp, R. (2002). Both sides now: Fallacies in the genetic-modification wars, implications for developing countries, and anthropological perspectives. Current Anthropology, 43(4): 611-630.

Von Roten, F. C., & Alvarez, E. (2008). Women’s perceptions of biotechnologies: The case of genetically modified foods in Switzerland. Women in Biotechnology, 3(15): 263-275.

Wheeler, S. (2009). Exploring the influences on Australian agricultural professionals’ genetic engineering beliefs: An empirical analysis. Technology Transfer, 34(4): 422–439.

Zhong, F., Marchant, M. A., Ding, Y., & Lu, K. (2002). GM foods: A Nanjing case study of Chinese consumers’ awareness and potential attitudes. Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management, 5(4): 136–144.

Yazdanpanah, M., Hayati, D., & Zamani, G. H. (2011). investigating agricultural professionals’intentions and behaviours towards water conservation: using a modified theory of planned behaviour. international journal of environmental physiology and toxicology, 9(1): 1-22.

Yang, T., Ames, G., & Berning, J. (2015). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchasing behaviors on genetically modified foods in Taiwan. Journal of Food Distributions Research, 46(1): 30-36.

Zhang, M., Chen, C., Hu, W., Chen, L., & Zhan, J. (2016). Influence of source credibility on consumer acceptance of genetically modified foods in China. Sustainability, 8(9): 899-921