Management accounting research methodologies: searching for the bests

محورهای موضوعی : International Journal of Finance, Accounting and Economics Studies

Fraydoon Rahnamay Roodposhti ¹ , Marziyeh Shariati ²

1 - Professor and faculty member of Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch
2 - PhD Student of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch

تاریخ دریافت : 1390/02/22 تاریخ پذیرش : 1390/05/29 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/03/11

کلید واژه: Ontology, Epistemology, Methodology, Paradigm,

چکیده مقاله :

Management needs qualitative and comprehensive information for decision making. Managers are always searching for useful information in order to reach their firm's goals and strategies. The development in technology, globalization and focusing on costumers needs has changed the information that managers need to maintain their position in a competitive environment and take advantage of profitable opportunities. In this paper, a basic research has been conducted to study the theoretical, philosophical and historical basis of these changes with the aim of presenting appropriate methodologies for management accounting research andsuitable techniques for the organizations. The findings of the study indicate that there is no one right global technique for organizations with different structures. It seems that the development of management accounting research methodologies is more consistent with Feyerabend's point of view. According to this perspective management accounting can stop searching for a universal accepted theory and start searching for solutions suitable for its own situation

منابع و مأخذ:

• Abdel-Kader, M. and Luther, R.(2006). IFAC's Conception of the evolution of management accounting, Advances in management accounting, Vol. 15, pp.229-247.
• Bell, J.  Ansari, Sh. K, T. & Lawrence, K. (2004). Strategy and management accounting, retrieved from http://college.cengage.com/accounting/ansari/management/1e/students/modules/mod11.pdfon 05/17/2014 
• Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979).Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, London: Heinemann
• Chalmers, A.F. (1999). What is this thing called science?,Third Edition, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett
• Chenhall, R. H. and Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). The relationship between strategicpriorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empiricalinvestigation using a systems approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 243-264.
• Eftekhari, Gh. (2009). Failed attempt to impose a philosophical insight into the scientific method in the twentieth century, Journal of Political Science, third year, third issue, pp. 7-45
• Feyerabend, Paul. (1975). Against method, fourth edition retrieved from http://thehangedman.com/teaching-files/hps/feyerabend-am1.pdf on 2014/22/06
• Jensen, M.C.& Meckling, W.H. (1998).Divisional performance measurement, Social science research network retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=94109
  on 2014/17/06
• Institute of management accountants. (2008). Definition of management accounting, Statements on management accounting, retrieved from http://www.imanet.org/PDFs/Public/Research/SMA/Definition%20of%20Mangement%20Accounting.pdf on 06/01/2014
• Lazarus, L. (2009). Lakatos’ notion of a “Research Programme.” Does it succeed in saving the notion of scientific progress? Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/863058/Lakatos_notion_of_a_Research_Programme._Does_it_succeed_in_saving_the_notion_of_scientific_progress on 2014/15/06
• Nabavi, L. (2005). Basics and logic of methodology, Tarbiat modares university publication, Iran, Tehran.
• Newall, P. (2005). Anything goes: Feyerabend and method, The Galilean, retrieved on 2014/22/06 from http://www.galilean-library.org/site/index.php/page/index.html/_/essays/philosophyofscience/anything-goes-feyerabend-and-method-r7
• Nørreklit, H, Nørreklit, L & Mitchell, F. (2009). Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice, retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/0951-3574.htm
• Rahnamay roodposhti, F. (2008). Strategic management accounting, Islamic azad university science and research branch publication, Iran, Tehran
• Smyth, S.(2011). Scientific revolutions, Progress and accounting research, Irish Accounting Review, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p57
• Storage, W. (2012). Paul Feyerabend – The worst enemy of science, retrieved from http://themultidisciplinarian.com/2012/08/07/the-worst-enemy-of-science on 05/17/2014
• Sulaiman, S. Omar, N. &Abdul-Rahman, I. K. (2005). Nafma as a value creation tool: Malaysian scenario, Malaysian accounting review, Volume 4 No. 1
• Zimmerman, J. l.( 2014) Accounting for decision making and control, McGraw Hill, international edition, United states of America, New York