Team Design Training: Learning Preferences as a Factor for Identification and Prediction of Students’ Abilities in Design Teams

محورهای موضوعی : Architecture

Babak Khorshidi ¹ , Omid Dezhdar ² , Saied Haghighi ³

1 - Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
2 - Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
3 - Department of Architecture, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/05/07 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/06/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/03/20

کلید واژه: Learning Preferences, Team Design, Team, Team Design Training, Design Studio,

چکیده مقاله :

It is vitally important to recognize the differences in abilities among learners and then adapt training programs to their characteristics in team design training (TDT). According to this background, the present study aims to identify and predict students' team design ability and its dimensions, content, and process, using their learning preferences (LPs) within the modes of receiving/perceiving information, viz., abstract conceptualization/concrete experience (AC/CE) and processing/internalizing it, namely, active experimentation/reflective observation (AE/RO) in Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (KELT). In this respect, the self-and-peer assessment (S&PA) outcomes in the design teams indicate a significant correlation between the students' bipolar LPs (BLPs) and their team design ability along with its dimensions, implying that their team design ability can be well predicted from their LPs. It is thus expected that learners who prefer to exploit AC in receiving/perceiving information and AE in processing/internalizing it and those correspondingly choosing CE and AE for the same purposes will have better ability in the content and process dimensions of team design, respectively. Considering the impact of both dimensions and their effectiveness ratio on the overall team design ability, it is concluded that learners who wish to process/internalize information by AE will exhibit higher team design ability.

چکیده انگلیسی:

It is vitally important to recognize the differences in abilities among learners and then adapt training programs to their characteristics in team design training (TDT). According to this background, the present study aims to identify and predict students' team design ability and its dimensions, content, and process, using their learning preferences (LPs) within the modes of receiving/perceiving information, viz., abstract conceptualization/concrete experience (AC/CE) and processing/internalizing it, namely, active experimentation/reflective observation (AE/RO) in Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (KELT). In this respect, the self-and-peer assessment (S&PA) outcomes in the design teams indicate a significant correlation between the students' bipolar LPs (BLPs) and their team design ability along with its dimensions, implying that their team design ability can be well predicted from their LPs. It is thus expected that learners who prefer to exploit AC in receiving/perceiving information and AE in processing/internalizing it and those correspondingly choosing CE and AE for the same purposes will have better ability in the content and process dimensions of team design, respectively. Considering the impact of both dimensions and their effectiveness ratio on the overall team design ability, it is concluded that learners who wish to process/internalize information by AE will exhibit higher team design ability.

منابع و مأخذ:

Adachi, C., Tai, J. H. M., & Dawson, P. (2018). Academics' perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
Anderson, G., Keith, M. J., Francisco, J., & Fox, S. (2018). The Effect of Software Team Personality Composition on Learning and Performance: Making the" Dream" Team. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2018.059
Austin, S., Steele, J., Macmillan, S., Kirby, P., & Spence, R. (2001). Mapping the conceptual design activity of interdisciplinary teams. Design studies, 22(3), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00026-0
Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Student+Engagement+Techniques%3A+A+Handbook+for+College+Faculty%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781119686897
Boyer, E. L., & Mitgang, L. D. (1996). Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice. A Special Report. California Princeton Fulfillment Services. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED396659
Brown, E., Cristea, A., Stewart, C., & Brailsford, T. (2005). Patterns in authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia: A taxonomy of learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 77–90. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/patterns-in-authoring-of-adaptive-educational-hypermedia-a-taxono
Calhoun, D. C. (2014). Teaching teamwork to college students through cooperative learning: Faculty attitudes and instructional best practices (Doctoral dissertation, Notre Dame of Maryland University). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Teaching-Teamwork-to-College-Students-through-and-Calhoun/ec7a3b1331678970c724409a20669bd82173878e
Cardoso, T., Pestana, F., & Pina, J. (2019). Assessing A B-Learning Teaching Approach And Students' Learning Preferences In Higher Education. In Edulearn19 Proceedings (pp. 10007-10012). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2502
Carmel‐Gilfilen, C. (2012). Uncovering pathways of design thinking and learning: Inquiry on intellectual development and learning style preferences. Journal of Interior Design, 37(3), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2012.01077.x
Carrizosa, K., & Sheppard, S. (2000, October). The importance of learning styles in group design work. In 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 00CH37135) (Vol. 1, pp. T2B-12). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897593
Casakin, H., & van Timmeren, A. (2014, July). Analogies as creative inspiration sources in the design studio: the teamwork. In Atiner Conference Paper Series No: ARC2014-1188, Athens, Greece. https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.1-1-4
Cash, P., Dekoninck, E., & Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2020). Work with the beat: How dynamic patterns in team processes affect shared understanding. Design Studies, 69, 100943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.04.003
Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2000). Learning style, academic belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational psychology, 20(3), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/713663740
Coffield, F. J., Moseley, D. V., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/64981
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of educational research, 64(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001
Cools, E., Evans, C., & Redmond, J. (2009). Using styles for more effective learning in multicultural and e-learning environments. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/17504970910951110
Coorey, J. (2016). Active learning methods and technology: Strategies for design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(3), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12112
Demirbaş, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process through learning styles. Design studies, 24(5), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00013-9
Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and instruction, 17(3), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.007
Demirkan, H., & Demirbaş, Ö. O. (2008). Focus on the learning styles of freshman design students. Design studies, 29(3), 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.002
Demirkan, H. (2016). An inquiry into the learning-style and knowledge-building preferences of interior architecture students. Design Studies, 44, 28-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.009
Dewey, J. (2008). Art as experience. In The richness of art education (pp. 33-48). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087906092_003
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00190240
Eigbeonan, A. B. (2013). Effective Constructivism for the arch-design studio. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 3(4), 5-12. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22287396.2013.3.4.1.3
Emam, M., Taha, D., & ElSayad, Z. (2019). Collaborative pedagogy in architectural design studio: A case study in applying collaborative design. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(1), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.03.005
Espey, M. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking using team-based learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344196
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681. https://semanticscholar.org/paper/Learning-and-Teaching-Styles-in-Engineering-FeldeSilverman/a100c5a533d61342b9ce6024023608e7398f9a20
Gardner, B. S., & Korth, S. J. (1998). A framework for learning to work in teams. Journal of Education for Business, 74(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329809601657
Grossman, R., Friedman, S. B., & Kalra, S. (2017). Teamwork processes and emergent states. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes, 243-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118909997.ch11
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self-and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123776
Hsu, C. H. (1999). Learning styles of hospitality students: Nature or nurture? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4319(98)00045-0
Hosseini Largani, M. (1998). Comparing learning styles in male and female Bachelor's, Master's, and Ph.D. students enrolled in humanities, medicine, and technical engineering programs at the universities in Tehran. Master's Thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian) https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/search?f_auf=12960&f_srf=3&origin=creator_statistic
Karimi Moshaver, M. (2012). The relationship between learning styles and student performance in architecture design studios. Bagh-e Nazar, 9(20), 3-12. (In Persian) https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_1172.html
Karvan, F. (2021). Design process: From idea to presentation, based on reflective thought and learning styles in architecture students. Soffeh, 31(2), 23-38. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.52547/sofeh.31.2.23
Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in physiology education. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193-212. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566
Kolb, D. A. (2007). The Kolb learning style inventory. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct. https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr topics/organizational-and-employee-development/Documents/lsitechmanual.pdf
Kolb, D. A. (2014) 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press. https://bookscouter.com/book/9780133892406-experiential-learning-experience-as-the-source-of-learning-a
Kozlowski, S. W., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological science in the public interest, 7(3), 77-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
Kvan, T., & Jia, Y. (2005). Students learning styles and their correlation with performance in architectural design studio. Design Studies, 26(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.004
Kyprianidou, M., Demetriadis, S., Tsiatsos, T., & Pombortsis, A. (2012). Group formation based on learning styles: can it improve students' teamwork? Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 83-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9215-4
Layman, L., Cornwell, T., & Williams, L. (2006). Personality types, learning styles, and an agile approach to software engineering education. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education, Houston, Texas. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121474
Leary, T. (2004). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Wipf and Stock Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1957-02556-000
Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4318600
Martin, E., & Paredes, P. (2004). Using learning styles for dynamic group formation in adaptive collaborative hypermedia systems. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on web-engineering, Munich, pp. 188–198. http://hdl.handle.net/10486/3680
McEwan, D., Ruissen, G. R., Eys, M. A., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2017). The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PloS one, 12(1), e0169604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169604
Mor, Y., & Mogilevsky, O. (2013). The learning design studio: collaborative design inquiry as teachers' professional development. Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.22054
Morgan Jr., B. B., Glickman, A. S., Woodard, E. A., Blaiwes, A. S., & Salas, E. (1986). Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment. Battelle Columbus Labs Research Triangle Park Nc. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada185237
Muñoz Martínez, Y., & Porter, G. L. (2020). Planning for all students: promoting inclusive instruction. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(14), 1552-1567. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1544301
National Council of Architectural Registration Boards. (2012). EDU education guidelines. Retrieved April 28, 2013, from NCARB http://www.ncarb.org/en/Studying-Architecture/~/media/Files/PDF/Guidelines/EDU_Guidelines.pdf
Newland, P., Powell, J. A., & Creed, C. (1987). Understanding architectural designers' selective information handling. Design Studies, 8(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(87)90026-3
Piaget, J., & Duckworth, E. (1970). Genetic epistemology. American Behavioral Scientist, 13(3), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427001300320
Patrício, L., & Franco, M. (2022). A systematic literature review about team diversity and team performance: Future lines of investigation. Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12010031
Pressman, A. (2014). Designing relationships: The art of collaboration in architecture. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Designing-Relationships-The-Art-of-Collaboration-in-Architecture/Pressman/p/book/9780415506281
Raban, R., & Litchfield, A. (2007). Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in group work. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1272
Riebe, L., Girardi, A., & Whitsed, C. (2016). A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education. Small Group Research, 47(6), 619-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416665221
Roberts, A. (2006). Cognitive styles and student progression in architectural design education. Design studies, 27(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.07.001
Rodriguez, C., Hudson, R., & Niblock, C. (2018). Collaborative learning in architectural education: Benefits of combining conventional studio, virtual design studio, and live projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12535
Royal Institute of British Architects. (2010). Criteria for validation. Retrieved April 28, 2013, from http://www.architecture.com/files/ribaprofessionalservices/education/validation/ribavalidationcriteriafromseptember2011parts1,23.pdf
Sgambi, L., Kubiak, L., Basso, N., & Garavaglia, E. (2019). Active learning for the promotion of students' creativity and critical thinking: an experience in structural courses for architecture. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(2), 386-407. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-11-2018-0018
Sharp, J. E. (1998, November). Learning styles and technical communication: Improving communication and teamwork skills. In FIE'98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from'Teacher-Centered'to'Learner-Centered'Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36214) (Vol. 1, pp. 512-517). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1998.736906
Sottilare, R. A., Shawn Burke, C., Salas, E., Sinatra, A. M., Johnston, J. H., & Gilbert, S. B. (2018). Designing adaptive instruction for teams: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28, 225-264. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40593-017-0146-z
Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design studies, 23(5), 473-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2
Taghvaei, N. (2002). Comparing learning styles among teachers and students of pre-university centers for boys in the fields of humanities, experimental sciences, and mathematics in the city of Varamin. Master's Thesis, Tarbiat Moallem University, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian) http://jafarhashemlou. blogfa.com/post/20
Tezel, E., & Casakin, H. (2010). Learning Styles and Students' Performance in Design Problem Solving. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2/3), 262. https://www.archnet.org/publications/5340
Tucker, R. (2007). Southern drift: The learning styles of first-and third-year students of the built environment. Architectural Science Review, 50(3), 246-255. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5030
Tucker, R. (2013). The architecture of peer assessment: Do academically successful students make good teammates in design assignments? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.604122
Tucker, R., Abbasi, N., Thorpe, G., Ostwald, M., Williams, A., & Wallis, L. (2014). Enhancing and assessing group and team learning in architecture and related design contexts, Deakin University. https://dro.deakin.edu.au/articles/book/Enhancing_and_assessing_group_and_team_learning_in_architecture_and_related_design_contexts/20913850/1
Tucker, R. (2017). Teaching teamwork in design: A framework for understanding effectiveness in student teams. In Collaboration and student engagement in design education (pp. 1-27). IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/teaching-teamwork-in-design/165673
Urionabarrenetxea, S., Fernandez-Sainz, A., & Garcia-Merino, J. D. (2021). Team diversity and performance in management students: Towards an integrated model. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100478
Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven-course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262346
Walker, A. (2001). British psychology students' perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 1(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2001.1.1.28
Webster, R., & Sudweeks, F. (2006). Enabling effective collaborative learning in networked virtual environments. Current developments in technology-assisted education, 2, 1437-1441. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=F265EDD508F7FAD0638B55896DE790B3?doi=10.1.1.68.4183&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Yazici, H. J. (2005). A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education and Training, 47(3), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910510592257