Enhancing Reading Comprehension through Visual Narrative Strategies among Iranian EFL Learners: A Multi-Level Proficiency Approach
محورهای موضوعی :Mustafa Fakher 1 , Nesa Nabifar 2 , Davud Kuhi 3
1 - Department of English, T. C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 - Department of English, T. C., Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 - English Language Department, M. C., Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran
کلید واژه: Visual Narrative Strategies, Reading Comprehension, Multimodal Literacy, EFL Learners, Irani-an Education, Proficiency Levels,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigates the efficacy of Visual Narrative Strategies (VNS), a pedagogical model integrating visual content with learner interaction, on reading comprehension outcomes among Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Specifically targeting pre-intermediate and upper-intermediate proficiency levels, the research examines how personalized interpretation and dialogic engagement with visuals can enhance comprehension. A cohort of 120 learners aged 13–20 from two private language institutes in Urmia, Iran, was randomly divided into ex-perimental and control groups across the two proficiency tiers. The experimental groups partici-pated in ten VNS-based sessions incorporating image-rich texts, guided group discussions, and reflective tasks. Reading comprehension was measured using the Preliminary English Test (PET) and Oxford Placement Test (OPT), both pre- and post-intervention. Paired t-tests and Two-Way ANOVA analyses revealed statistically significant gains in the experimental groups' post-test scores across both proficiency levels, with no significant interaction effects between treatment and proficiency. These findings substantiate the role of VNS in facilitating cognitive engage-ment and textual understanding. The study aligns with current trends in multimodal literacy and offers practical implications for curriculum designers, language educators, and EFL policy mak-ers seeking to promote effective and inclusive language instruction.
This study investigates the efficacy of Visual Narrative Strategies (VNS), a pedagogical model integrating visual content with learner interaction, on reading comprehension outcomes among Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Specifically targeting pre-intermediate and upper-intermediate proficiency levels, the research examines how personalized interpretation and dialogic engagement with visuals can enhance comprehension. A cohort of 120 learners aged 13–20 from two private language institutes in Urmia, Iran, was randomly divided into ex-perimental and control groups across the two proficiency tiers. The experimental groups partici-pated in ten VNS-based sessions incorporating image-rich texts, guided group discussions, and reflective tasks. Reading comprehension was measured using the Preliminary English Test (PET) and Oxford Placement Test (OPT), both pre- and post-intervention. Paired t-tests and Two-Way ANOVA analyses revealed statistically significant gains in the experimental groups' post-test scores across both proficiency levels, with no significant interaction effects between treatment and proficiency. These findings substantiate the role of VNS in facilitating cognitive engage-ment and textual understanding. The study aligns with current trends in multimodal literacy and offers practical implications for curriculum designers, language educators, and EFL policy mak-ers seeking to promote effective and inclusive language instruction.
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., Kim, J. Y., Crassas, M. E., & Doyle, B. (2015). Reading comprehension. Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehen-sion, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761436
Ajayi, L. (2011). Multimodal texts and new pedagogies: Implications for English language teaching. English Language Teaching, 4 (2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p215
Azadi, H., Tahririan, M. H., & Hashemi, M. R. (2018). The effect of multimodal instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (6), 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.06
Beavis, C., Dezuanni, M., O'Mara, J., & Rowsell, J. (2022). Digital literacies, learning and the arts: Reimagining meaning making in schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164999
Brumberger, E. R. (2011). The rhetoric of visual literacy: Exploring the role of visuals in professional communica-tion pedagogy. Technical Communi-cation, 58 (2), 141–154.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Chun, D. M. (2016). Multimedia applica-tions. In F. Helm & L. Ortega (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language research (pp. 355–372). Routledge.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual cod-ing theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3 (3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01669798
Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2011). eVoc strategies: 10 ways to use technology to build vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 64 (5), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.5.6
Fathi, V., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). En-hancing Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension through task-based instruction. Journal of Applied Re-search in Higher Education, 12 (4), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2019-0178
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hsin, C.-T., Tsai, M.-J., & Chen, S.-C. (2021). Effects of multimedia annota-tion modes on EFL learners’ vocabu-lary acquisition and reading compre-hension. Language Learning & Tech-nology, 25 (1), 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/102303
Jewitt, C. (2020). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jian, I.-L., & Ko, Y. (2017). Picture-word integration in text processing: Evi-dence from eye movements. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29 (1), 1–19. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2017/jian/jian.pdf
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental mod-els: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and conscious-ness. Harvard University Press.
Ko, Y., & Wang, Y. (2018). Using digital storytelling to enhance EFL learners’ English proficiency and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learn-ing, 31 (3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1370004
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of vis-ual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Lau, K. (2016). Investigating the relation-ship between reading strategy use and reading comprehension in Chinese EFL learners. System, 60, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108975487.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2010). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in mul-timedia learning. Educational Psy-chologist, 38 (1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
Naderi, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2019). The impact of multimodal in-put on reading comprehension of Ira-nian EFL learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12210a
Nasri, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2019). The effect of pictorial input on speaking fluency and lexical re-trieval of Iranian EFL learners. Inter-national Journal of Instruction, 12 (1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12109a
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cam-bridge University Press.
Newfield, D., & Stein, P. (2020). Multi-modal pedagogies in diverse class-rooms: Representation, relations and re-design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025069
Nikolova, O. (2020). The effects of visual aids on vocabulary retention and re-call in EFL classrooms. RELC Jour-nal, 51 (1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219896214
OECD. (2021). PISA 2018 results (Volume V): Effective policies, successful schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5cac1dc-en
Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical perspective. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813039
Renkl, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Learning with texts and pictures: Hypertext and multimedia environments. Education-al Psychologist, 52 (2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1262270
Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2020). Multi-modal literacy: Researching class-room practices. Teachers College Press.
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813039
Sadeghi, K., Fazilatfar, A. M., & Karbalaei, A. (2022). Reading comprehension difficulties in Iranian EFL contexts: A review of challenges and solutions. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7 (1), 1–11.
Schrader, P. G., & Rapp, D. N. (2016). In-tegrating visual and linguistic knowledge during reading. Discourse Processes, 53 (1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.996312
Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. Teachers College Press.
Shariati, M., & Barabadi, E. (2019). The effectiveness of using authentic mate-rials in improving EFL learners’ read-ing comprehension. Journal of Lan-guage Teaching and Research, 10 (4), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.03
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural theory in sec-ond language education: An intro-duction through narratives. Multilin-gual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093119
Tsai, M.-J., Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). Scientific reading comprehen-sion performance and behavioral pat-terns of students in different online inquiry learning environments. Com-puters & Education, 165, 103803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103803
UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian Journal of Lan-guage and Literacy, 33 (3), 211–224.
