Predicting EFL Learners' L2 Willingness to Communicate through their Intercultural Sensitivity
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)
1 - Department of English Language, Shah. C., Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
کلید واژه: Intercultural Sensitivity, Iranian EFL Learners, Willingness to Communicate,
چکیده مقاله :
Despite extensive research on WTC and IS individually, few studies have investigated how IS predicts WTC among Iranian EFL learners, where limited exposure to English-speaking cultures and traditional pedagogical approaches may shape unique communicative dynamics. The primary objectives of this thesis were threefold: first, to assess the level of IS among Iranian EFL learners; second, to measure their L2 WTC; and third, to investigate whether IS significantly predicts WTC. By exploring these objectives, the study aimed to provide insights into how cultural openness influences communicative readiness in an EFL setting characterized by limited authentic L2 interaction. The research adopted a quantitative, correlational-predictive design, conducted among intermediate and advanced Iranian EFL learners at private language institutes in Shahreza and Isfahan. 93 participants were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using two validated instruments: the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS) and the L2 WTC Questionnaire. All analyses were conducted using SPSS, with significance set at p < .05. The results revealed Iranian EFL learners exhibited a moderate-to-high level of IS. Similarly, learners displayed a significant degree of WTC. Most notably, regression analysis confirmed that IS significantly predicts WTC. The study’s implications are both theoretical and practical. Theoretically, it validates and extends models like Bennett’s (1986, 1993) Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity and Schumann’s (1978) acculturation theory, suggesting that IS facilitates WTC by enhancing learners’ relatedness to the target culture and reducing intercultural anxiety. Practically, the findings advocate for integrating intercultural competence into EFL curricula through activities like role-playing, virtual exchanges, and exposure to authentic cultural materials to boost interaction confidence and WTC. Policymakers should prioritize teacher training and resource allocation to support intercultural learning, particularly in contexts like Iran with limited L2 exposure. Language institutes can adopt data-driven approaches using ISS and WTC assessments to tailor instruction. These strategies can enhance learners’ ability to navigate cultural diversity and communicate effectively in globalized settings.
Despite extensive research on WTC and IS individually, few studies have investigated how IS predicts WTC among Iranian EFL learners, where limited exposure to English-speaking cultures and traditional pedagogical approaches may shape unique communicative dynamics. The primary objectives of this thesis were threefold: first, to assess the level of IS among Iranian EFL learners; second, to measure their L2 WTC; and third, to investigate whether IS significantly predicts WTC. By exploring these objectives, the study aimed to provide insights into how cultural openness influences communicative readiness in an EFL setting characterized by limited authentic L2 interaction. The research adopted a quantitative, correlational-predictive design, conducted among intermediate and advanced Iranian EFL learners at private language institutes in Shahreza and Isfahan. 93 participants were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using two validated instruments: the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS) and the L2 WTC Questionnaire. All analyses were conducted using SPSS, with significance set at p < .05. The results revealed Iranian EFL learners exhibited a moderate-to-high level of IS. Similarly, learners displayed a significant degree of WTC. Most notably, regression analysis confirmed that IS significantly predicts WTC. The study’s implications are both theoretical and practical. Theoretically, it validates and extends models like Bennett’s (1986, 1993) Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity and Schumann’s (1978) acculturation theory, suggesting that IS facilitates WTC by enhancing learners’ relatedness to the target culture and reducing intercultural anxiety. Practically, the findings advocate for integrating intercultural competence into EFL curricula through activities like role-playing, virtual exchanges, and exposure to authentic cultural materials to boost interaction confidence and WTC. Policymakers should prioritize teacher training and resource allocation to support intercultural learning, particularly in contexts like Iran with limited L2 exposure. Language institutes can adopt data-driven approaches using ISS and WTC assessments to tailor instruction. These strategies can enhance learners’ ability to navigate cultural diversity and communicate effectively in globalized settings.
Aliakbari, M. (2016). Willingness to Communicate in English among Iranian EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n4p1
Andrade, C. (2021). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88.
Aydın, S., & Öztürk, G. (2022). The interplay between intercultural sensitivity and willingness to communicate in EFL contexts: The role of self-efficacy. System, 110, 102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102926
Barrios Espinosa, E., & Napiórkowska, M. (2024). Affective factors, intercultural sensitivity, and willingness to communicate orally outside class: A study with EFL secondary school learners in Poland and Spain. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241234225
Bennett, M. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90005-2
Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In R. M. Paige (Ed.), Education for the intercultural experience (pp. 21–71). Intercultural Press.
Bennett, M. J. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. In J. S. Wurzel (Ed.), Toward multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 62–77). Intercultural Resource Corporation.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Cetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University).
Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (2000). The development and validation of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale. Human Communication, 1(1), 1–15.
Chen, J., Wang, L., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Promoting intercultural communicative competence and willingness to communicate in EFL learners through virtual reality: A mixed-methods examination. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2496827
Chen, X., & Hu, B. (2023). On the intercultural sensitivity of university students in multicultural regions: A case study in Macao. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1090775.
Çiloğlan, F. (2019). The relationship between intercultural sensitivity and English language achievement. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 1114-1127. https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/1255
Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22(2), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X03022002003
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cooksey, R. W. (2020). Descriptive statistics for summarising data. In R. W. Cooksey (Ed.), Illustrating statistical procedures: Finding meaning in quantitative data (pp. 61–139). Springer.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2019). The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward teacher, and perceived linguistic competence on FLE and FLCA. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(10), 865–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1614187
Dewaele, J.-M., & Dewaele, L. (2018). Learner-internal and learner-external predictors of Willingness to Communicate in the FL Classroom. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 2(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.37
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (Eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.
Eslami, Z., & Valizadeh, K. (2024). Developing pragmatic awareness through contrastive analysis: Persian taarof and Western directness in EFL instruction. Language and Intercultural Communication, 24(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2023.2176789
Fallah, N. (2019). The relationship between EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and their teacher immediacy attributes: A structural equation modeling approach. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1607051
Fukushima, T., & Taguchi, E. (2023). Sustained effects of virtual exchange on Japanese EFL learners’ intercultural sensitivity. ReCALL, 35(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000021
Ghahramanian, A., Zamanzadeh, V., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 20(6), 1064–1073.
Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510.
Hammer, M. R. (2012). The Intercultural Development Inventory: A new frontier in assessment and development of intercultural competence. In M. Vande Berg, R. M. Paige, & K. H. Lou (Eds.), Student learning abroad: What our students are learning, what they’re not, and what we can do about it (pp. 115–136). Stylus Publishing.
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Multilingual Matters.
Iqbal, M. (2021). Globalization and EFL learners’ willingness to communicate: The mediating role of intercultural sensitivity. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 9(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2021-0008
Iqbal, T. (2021). Importance of intercultural sensitivity. MAP Education and Humanities, 1(2), 1–6.
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H., & Kriz, M. (2012). Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: A clue for enhancing learners’ motivation? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.582587
Jedynak, M. (2021). Intercultural sensitivity and adult learners’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language. Anglica Wratislaviensia, 59, 93–107. https://wuwr.pl/awr/article/view/13730
Kaya, A., & Erten, İ. H. (2024). Negotiating cultural identity in L2 communication: Turkish EFL learners’ intercultural sensitivity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(3), 789–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2139685
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 154-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.204
Khajavy, G. H., MacIntyre, P. D., & Barabadi, E. (2024). Intercultural sensitivity as a predictor of language learning outcomes: Evidence from Iranian EFL classrooms. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 98, 101925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101925
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2008). On the need for a new understanding of language and its development. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v3i3.281
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314
Latif, M. W., & Wasim, A. (2024). Investigating EFL instructors’ approaches to classroom-based assessment culture: An explanatory sequential mixed-method approach. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 57.
Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2023). Investigating the association of informal digital learning of English with EFL learners’ intercultural competence and willingness to communicate. BMC Psychology, 11, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01365-2
Li, M., Razali, F., & Mohamad Arsad, N. (2021). Influence of language learning strategies on willingness to communicate in Chinese among students with high and low anxiety. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 159–169.
Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). Regional disparities in intercultural sensitivity among Chinese EFL learners: The urban-rural divide. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2023.2193327
MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00623.x
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3–26.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq037
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clément, R., & Conrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003035
MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16–25.
Moradi Khazaei, M. (2012). Willingness to Communicate in Iranian EFL Learners: The Effect of Class Size. English Language Teaching, 5(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p1
Moradi, M., & Farhangian, S. (2024). Face sensitivity as a moderator of intercultural sensitivity and L2 willingness to communicate in Iran. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 53(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-024-10057-w
Munezane, Y. (2019). Willingness to communicate and its high-evidence factors: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. System, 80, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.10.002
Nasiri, M., Suzani, M., Babamoradi, P., & Mohammadi, N. (2016). On the relationship between willingness to communicate and deculturation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(6), 1273–1278.
Nasiri, N., & Pishghadam, R. (2023). Cultural conflicts in EFL learning: Iranian learners’ negotiation of Western values. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 20(4), 378–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2146657
Nasiri, N., Motallebzadeh, K., & Fatemi, M. A. (2016). On the relationship between EFL teachers’ professional identity and their intercultural sensitivity. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(4), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2016.1193262
Nasiri, N., Motallebzadeh, K., & Fatemi, M. A. (2024). Critical media analysis in EFL classrooms: Effects on intercultural sensitivity and resistance. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 32(2), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2189291
Nordquist, R. (2020, March 26). English as a Foreign Language (EFL). ThoughtCo.
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Pearson Education.
Oxford, R. L., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 12–28.
Öz, H. (2023). Understanding the links between cultural intelligence, intercultural sensitivity, and L2 WTC: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication, 23(1), 56–72.
Pasand, P. G., & Hassaskhah, J. (2023). Developmental patterns of intercultural sensitivity in an online community of practice: Evidence from Iranian EFL learners. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(2), 331–345.
Peng, J. (2021). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective. Multilingual Matters.
Peng, J. (2025). Willingness to communicate in instructed second language acquisition: Combining a macro- and micro-perspective (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
Peng, J. E. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203–213.
Peng, J. E. (2021). Willingness to communicate in a second language: A 25-year retrospective. In T. Yashima (Ed.), Willingness to communicate in a second language (pp. 3–14). De Gruyter.
Phaisan, S., Seepho, S., & Tran, T. T. T. (2023). Integrating intercultural communicative competence into an online EFL classroom: An empirical study of a secondary school in Thailand. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00174-1
Pishghadam, R. (2012). The concept of "meta-empathy" in foreign language education. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(2), 97–114.
Pishghadam, R., & Naji, F. (2011). Issues in Iranian university students’ English proficiency. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 1–7.
Portalla, T., & Chen, G.-M. (2010). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Intercultural Communication Studies, 19(3), 21–36.
Pourakbari, A. (2015). Intercultural sensitivity: An empirical study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i2.7474
Pourghasemian, H., Rezaei, S., & Zarei, G. R. (2019). Intercultural sensitivity: A comparative study among Business English undergraduate learners in two countries of Iran and China. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(6), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejelt/5758
Rahimi, A., & Soltani, M. (2011). The effect of intercultural tasks on Iranian EFL learners’ intercultural sensitivity. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 1-24.
Rajan, P. M., Alam, S., Khor, K. K., Ramendran, C., & Subramaniam, S. P. R. (2021). Intercultural communication and barriers in Malaysian public universities: The mediating effect of intercultural willingness to communicate. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 21(2), 103–124.
Rashid, S., Zhu, S., Xu, L., & Baralt, M. (2018). English-medium instruction and willingness to communicate: A mixed-methods study at an English-medium instruction university in China. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(6), 748–769.
Ren, W., Chen, Y., & Lin, C. (2023). Intercultural sensitivity, language anxiety, and willingness to communicate: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(1), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09877-5
Ren, X., Ye, Y., & Geng, X. (2023). On the intercultural sensitivity of university students in multicultural regions: A case study in Macao. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 9995804.
Sabzalipour, B., Shafiee, S., & Ashtari, A. (2021). EFL Teachers’ Behavior: Effects on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in English. International Journal of Research in English Education, 6(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijree.6.3.1
Sajjad, T., Khan, H. F., Yasmeen, R., & Waqas, A. (2023). Language of actions: The effects of teacher’s kinesics on student learning and learning environment. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12, 53.
Schieffelin, B. B., & Ochs, E. (1986). Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge University Press.
Schumann, J. H. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Newbury House.
Shirvan, M. E., Taherian, T. H., & Yazdanmehr, E. (2019). Willingness to communicate in a second language. In D. Gabrys-Barker & J. Bielska (Eds.), Foreign language learning anxiety in students of English as a foreign language (pp. 43–60). Springer.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1273–1296.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
Tavakoli, M., & Davoudi, M. (2017). Willingness to Communicate Orally: The Case of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 5(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1515/jolace-2017-0015
Tümen Akyıldız, S., & Gömleksiz, M. N. (2019). A study on the development of intercultural effectiveness: Intercultural perspective and academic achievement of EFL learners. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29(2), 123–147.
Vande Berg, M., Paige, R. M., & Lou, K. H. (Eds.). (2012). Student learning abroad: What our students are learning, what they’re not, and what we can do about it. Stylus Publishing.
Weaver, C. (2005). Using the Rasch model to develop a measure of second language learners' willingness to communicate within a language classroom. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(4), 396–415.
Weda, S., Sakti, A. E. F., Rahman, F., & Atmowardoyo, H. (2021). Willingness to communicate in English: A survey of Indonesian EFL university students. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14441a
Wilczewski, M., & Alon, I. (2022). Language, communication and cross-cultural adaptation: Building an intellectual agenda. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 87, 134–147.
Williams, M. N., Grajales, C. A., & Kurkiewicz, D. (2013). Assumptions of multiple regression: Correcting two misconceptions. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(11), 1–14.
Xu, X., & Li, M. (2018). Intercultural competence, L2 proficiency, and willingness to communicate among Chinese EFL learners. System, 75, 111–121.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00136
Yashima, T., & Arano, K. (2015). Understanding EFL learners’ situational willingness to communicate within a dynamic systems theory framework. Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 726–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12279
Yashima, T., Ikeda, M., & Nakahira, S. (2024). The dynamic interplay of international posture and intercultural sensitivity in Japanese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3259
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Haidary, A. (2014). Willingness to Communicate and Identity Styles of Iranian EFL Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1535-1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.577
