Effect of rebar diameter on the shear behavior of Y-shaped shear connectors: A finite element study
محورهای موضوعی : Structural Engineering in Energy-Efficient Buildingsمائده دوامی 1 , علیرضا میرزا گل تبار روشن 2 , Hamidreza Tavakoli 3
1 - 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology (NIT), Babol, Mazandaran, Iran)
2 - دانشگاه صنعتی نوشیروان بابل، دانشکده مهندسی عمران
3 - Babol Noshirvani University of Technology
کلید واژه: Shear connector, Rebar diameter, Finite element analysis, Load–slip curve, Ductility, Y-shaped connector,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigates the influence of rebar diameter on the shear performance of Y-shaped shear connectors in steel–concrete composite beams under ambient temperature. A detailed three-dimensional finite element (FE) model was developed in ABAQUS 6.14, incorporating nonlinear material behavior, realistic contact interactions, and appropriate boundary conditions to replicate push-out tests. The model was validated against experimental data from Kim et al. , showing excellent agreement in load–slip response and failure mode.
Five connector models with rebar diameters of 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 mm were analyzed while maintaining identical concrete and geometric parameters. The simulation results revealed that increasing rebar diameter significantly enhances both shear strength and stiffness of the connector, but slightly reduces ductility. Stress contour analysis showed that larger diameters lead to a more uniform stress distribution at the connector–concrete interface, reducing localized damage near the connector root.
The optimum rebar diameter range was identified as 12–14 mm, providing the best balance between strength, stiffness, and deformation capacity. The developed FE model and the findings of this study can serve as a reliable numerical foundation for the design and optimization of novel Y-shaped shear connectors in composite beam applications.
[1] Johnson, R. P. (2011). Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
[2] Ollgaard, J. G., Slutter, R. G., and Fisher, J. W. (1971). “Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal-weight concrete.” AISC Engineering Journal, 8(2), 55–64.
[3] Kim, S., Jeong, Y., and Choi, B. (2015). “Experimental study on Y-type shear connectors in steel–concrete composite structures.” Engineering Structures, 90, 50–60.
[4] Hu, S., Zhao, X., and Chen, Z. (2018). “Finite element analysis of novel shear connectors under static shear load.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 144, 180–191.
[5] Xu, M., and Chen, A. (2020). “Effect of connector geometry on shear transfer and slip capacity.” Thin-Walled Structures, 157, 107–125.
[6] Chen, Y., Li, H., and Fang, Q. (2021). “Behavior of shear connectors in high-strength concrete composite beams.” Structures, 33, 415–428.
[7] Valente, I., and Cruz, P. (2004). “Experimental analysis of perfobond and stud connectors in composite beams.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(3–5), 465–479.
[8] Zhao, X., Oehlers, D. J., and Bradford, M. A. (2004). “Shear connectors and composite beams subjected to elevated temperatures.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 60(8), 1313–1331.
[9] Oehlers, D. J., and Bradford, M. A. (1999). Composite Steel and Concrete Structural Members. Elsevier.
[10] Nie, J., Fan, J., and Cai, C. S. (2008). “Experimental study of stud shear connectors in steel–concrete composite bridge girders.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, 13(6), 623–634.
[11] Xue, W., Zhang, J., and Lu, Y. (2022). “Numerical modeling of Y-shaped shear connectors using ABAQUS.” Engineering Structures, 257, 114045.
