An Integrated Method for evaluation of Detailed Plans by Using Plan Process Result (PPR) and Process Policy-Plan/Program Implementation (PPIP) )Case Study: (
محورهای موضوعی : Sustainable Development
1 - Phd. In Urban Management, Faculty of Fine Arts, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
کلید واژه: Plan Process Result, Process Policy-Plan/Program Implementation, Region 6 of Shiraz Detailed Plan,
چکیده مقاله :
|
An Integrated Method for evaluation of Detailed Plans by Using Plan Process Result (PPR) and Process Policy-Plan/Program Implementation (PPIP) )Case Study: ( This article provides an overview on the current debate on evaluation in urban planning. An initial evaluation state of the art is presented in three parts: the evolution of evaluation theory and methods, the contemporary planning debate around different perspectives and paradigms, and the nature and extent of evaluation practice in planning emphasis on PPIP and PPR . The second part of the article focuses on the Application this method in different planning systems especially in Iran. and evaluate positivism theory of detail plan. This comprehensive literature review provides the background to set a general principle to evaluate the implementation of urban plans. The research results, in addition to exam the strengths and weaknesses of the preparation and implementation of the detailed plan and provide solutions to increase citizen participation in the process theory and planning.
|
|
An Integrated Method for evaluation of Detailed Plans by Using Plan Process Result (PPR) and Process Policy-Plan/Program Implementation (PPIP) )Case Study: ( This article provides an overview on the current debate on evaluation in urban planning. An initial evaluation state of the art is presented in three parts: the evolution of evaluation theory and methods, the contemporary planning debate around different perspectives and paradigms, and the nature and extent of evaluation practice in planning emphasis on PPIP and PPR . The second part of the article focuses on the Application this method in different planning systems especially in Iran. and evaluate positivism theory of detail plan. This comprehensive literature review provides the background to set a general principle to evaluate the implementation of urban plans. The research results, in addition to exam the strengths and weaknesses of the preparation and implementation of the detailed plan and provide solutions to increase citizen participation in the process theory and planning.
|
1. Behzadfar, Mostafa. (2009), Urban planning plans and programs, Tehran: Honar Publications
2. Pourahmad, Ahmad; Hataminejad, Hossein; and Hosseini, Hadi. (2006). Pathology of state urban development plans. Geographic Researches, 167, 38-180.
3. Secretariat of the Supreme Council of State Urban Planning and Architecture. (2004). Collection of approvals of the Supreme Council of State Urban Planning and Architecture. Tehran: Secretariat of the Supreme Council of State Urban Planning and Architecture
4. Dalir, Karim; and Maleki, Saeed. (2007). Investigations of Occupancy Changes of Urban Lands in comprehensive and detailed plans of Ilam during 1993-2003. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 8, 93-65.
5. Rezaee, Mohammadreza; and Rahimi, Esmaeil. (2013). Investigating the causes of changing the occupancy of lands in detailed urban plans and its effect on municipal services Case study of Marvdasht. Urban Research and Planning 13, 96-77.
6. Zista, Consulting Engineers. (1993). Comprehensive urban assessment plan of Iran (Maragheh, Arak, Yazd, Bandar Abbas, Shiraz, Zahedan, Rasht). Tehran: Plan and Budget Organization.
7. Saeednia, Ahmad. (2004). Green Book, Guide of Municipalities (fifth volume), Urban Plans in Iran. Tehran: State Municipalities and Rural Municipality.
8. Sharmand, Consulting Engineers. (2000). Methods of Implementing Urban Development Plans. Third Volume. Tehran: Publications of State Municipalities Organization.
9. Shafiee Dastjerdi, Masoud. (2013). Renovation of worn tissues and the need to change attitudes in the preparation and implementation of comprehensive and detailed plans (Case study: Isfahan). Bagh-e-Nazar. 24, 91-104.
10. Shahr-va-khaneh, Consulting Engineers. (2004). Reviewing the comprehensive plan of Shiraz. Volume 1. Shiraz: Fars Province Road and Urbanization Dept.
11. Saremi, Hamidreza; and Tootzari, Soheila. (2014). Assessment and assessment of the level of enjoyment of urban areas of Tehran using TOPSIS technique. City Identity. 18, 47-60.
12. Tabibian, Manouchehr; Asoodeh, Ali. (2014). The application of Plan, Process, Result (PPR) in assessing urban plans. Urban Environment. 4, 35-50.
13. Azizi, Mohammadmehdi; Abooyi Ardakan, Mohammad; and Noori, Nasrin. (2012). Investigating the role of actors and urban management tools in the integration of Tehran management. City Identity. 10, 5-16.
14. Farnahad, Consulting Engineers. (2004). Review of the detailed plan of District 6 of Shiraz Municipality. Shiraz: Fars Province Road and Urbanization Organization.
15. Farivarsadri, Bahram. (2014). Developments of urban planning in Iran in contemporary era. Tehran: Azarakhsh.
16. Gharagzeloo, Zahra. (1986). The role of assessment in the process of urban and regional planning and its common techniques. Tehran: Tehran Building and Housing Research Center.
17. Urban Coordination and Planning Deputy Dept. (2014). Shiraz Municipality Statistical Yearbook. Shiraz: Statistics, Information and Computer Services Dept. of Shiraz Municipality.
18. Moosavi, Seyedali; Rafieian, Mojtaba. (2004). Assessing the feasibility of comprehensive and detailed plans of cities in East Azerbaijan province. School of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Tabriz University. 17, 201-177.
19. Naghsh-e Jahan-e-pars, Consulting Engineers. (1995). Detailed Plan of District 6 of Shiraz Municipality. Shiraz: Fars Province Road and Urbanization Organization.
20. Noorian, Farshad; Vahidi Borji, Goldis. (2015). Assessment of Land Occupancy planning in urban development projects based on needs assessment and location indicators (Study sample: Bojnourd city). Amayesh Sarzamin. 1,49-69.
21. Alexander, E. (2006). Problems and prospects: dilemmas in evaluation and directions for the future. Evaluating and Planning. Evolution and Prospects (pp. 267-276). USA: Routledge press.
22. Alexander, E. R., & Faludi, A. (1989). Planning and plan implementation: notes on evaluation criteria. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16(2), 127-140.
23. Berke, P., Backhurst, M., Day, M., Ericksen, N., Laurian, L., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2006). What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(4), 581-600.
24. Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning practice and Research, 15(4), 299- 318.
