3D Numerical Modeling of Seismic-Induced Settlement of Pile Groups in Liquefiable Sands
محورهای موضوعی : Soil-Structure Interaction
shima aghakasiri
1
,
sanaz aghakasiri
2
,
محمود قضاوی
3
,
farzad farrokhzad
4
,
Saeed Farokhi Zadeh
5
1 - Department of Civil Engineering, ST.C , Islamic Azad University, Teharn, Iran.
2 - Department of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology (NIT), Babol, Mazandaran, (Iran)
3 - استاد، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، دانشگاه خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی
4 - Department of Civil Engineering, Mazandaran Institute of Technology, Mazandaran (Iran)
5 - Assistant Professor, Department of civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, south Tehran branch, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: 3D numerical modeling, Liquefaction, settlement, Pile groups, Finite difference method,
چکیده مقاله :
During historical seismic events, soil liquefaction beneath structures founded on shallow foundations has caused substantial economic losses. As reported in various case histories, structures located on liquefiable soils experience excessive settlement, tilting, and significant lateral deformation due to the low bearing capacity of such soils. Seismic-induced ground deformation in liquefiable soils poses significant challenges to the stability and serviceability of pile-supported structures. This study presents a comprehensive three-dimensional numerical investigation into the settlement behavior of pile groups embedded in liquefiable sands under seismic loading. Using the finite difference-based software FLAC3D, the coupled effects of soil liquefaction, excess pore water pressure generation, and dynamic soil-structure interaction were considered. Parametric analyses were conducted to assess the influence of pile spacing, group configuration, and input motion characteristics on the magnitude of post-earthquake settlement. The results highlight the critical role of 3D interaction effects in amplifying or mitigating the settlement response. This study provides valuable insights into the design and performance assessment of deep foundations in liquefaction-prone areas.
During historical seismic events, soil liquefaction beneath structures founded on shallow foundations has caused substantial economic losses. As reported in various case histories, structures located on liquefiable soils experience excessive settlement, tilting, and significant lateral deformation due to the low bearing capacity of such soils. Seismic-induced ground deformation in liquefiable soils poses significant challenges to the stability and serviceability of pile-supported structures. This study presents a comprehensive three-dimensional numerical investigation into the settlement behavior of pile groups embedded in liquefiable sands under seismic loading. Using the finite difference-based software FLAC3D, the coupled effects of soil liquefaction, excess pore water pressure generation, and dynamic soil-structure interaction were considered. Parametric analyses were conducted to assess the influence of pile spacing, group configuration, and input motion characteristics on the magnitude of post-earthquake settlement. The results highlight the critical role of 3D interaction effects in amplifying or mitigating the settlement response. This study provides valuable insights into the design and performance assessment of deep foundations in liquefaction-prone areas.
1. Seed, H.B. and I.M. Idriss, Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations division, 1971. 97(9): p. 1249-1273.
2. Holzer, T.L. and T.L. Youd, Liquefaction, ground oscillation, and soil deformation at the Wildlife Array, California. Bulletin of the Seismological society of America, 2007. 97(3): p. 961-976.
3. Ansari, A., et al., Liquefaction hazard assessment in a seismically active region of Himalayas using geotechnical and geophysical investigations: a case study of the Jammu Region. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2022. 81(9): p. 349.
4. Subedi, M. and I.P. Acharya, Liquefaction hazard assessment and ground failure probability analysis in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 2022. 9: p. 1-17.
5. Bhattacharya, S., et al., Collapse of Showa Bridge during 1964 Niigata earthquake: A quantitative reappraisal on the failure mechanisms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2014. 65: p. 55-71.
6. Arango-Serna, S., et al., New seismic monitoring center in South America to assess the liquefaction risk posed by subduction earthquakes. Journal of Seismology, 2023. 27(3): p. 385-407.
7. Towhata, I., Review of lessons learnt in 1964 after the Niigata earthquake. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 2024. 10(10): p. 241-246.
8. Núñez-Jara, S., et al., Spatial variability of shear wave velocity: implications for the liquefaction response of a case study from the 2010 Maule Mw 8.8 Earthquake, Chile. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2024. 12: p. 1354058.
9. Khosravi, M. and S. Zaregarizi, Liquefaction Potential and Sediment Ejecta Manifestation of Thinly Interbedded Sands and Fine-Grained Soils: Palinurus Road Site in Christchurch Subjected to 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2024. 150(5): p. 04024026.
10. Mijic, Z. and J.D. Bray, Insights from liquefaction ejecta case histories for the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2024. 176: p. 108267.
11. Towhata, I., Summary of geotechnical activities in response to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake; follow-up of my TC203 Ishihara Lecture in 2019. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2023. 164: p. 107640.
12. Minarelli, L., et al., Liquefied sites of the 2012 Emilia earthquake: a comprehensive database of the geological and geotechnical features (Quaternary alluvial Po plain, Italy). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022. 20(8): p. 3659-3697.
13. Pratama, A., T. Fathani, and I. Satyarno. Liquefaction potential analysis on Gumbasa Irrigation Area in Central Sulawesi Province after 2018 earthquake. in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. IOP Publishing.
14. Omarov, M., Liquefaction potential and post-liquefaction settlement of saturated clean sands: And effect of geofiber reinforcement. 2010.
15. Martin, G.R., H.B. Seed, and W.L. Finn, Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading. Journal of the geotechnical engineering division, 1975. 101(5): p. 423-438.
16. Seed, H.B., I.M. Idriss, and I. Arango, Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. Journal of geotechnical engineering, 1983. 109(3): p. 458-482.
17. Montoya, B.M., J.T. DeJong, and R.W. Boulanger. Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. in Bio-and chemo-mechanical processes in geotechnical engineering: Géotechnique symposium in print 2013. 2014. ICE Publishing.
18. Kumari, D. and W.-N. Xiang, Review on biologically based grout material to prevent soil liquefaction for ground improvement. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019. 13(1): p. 48-53.
19. Dhakal, R., M. Cubrinovski, and J.D. Bray, Geotechnical characterization and liquefaction evaluation of gravelly reclamations and hydraulic fills (Port of Wellington, New Zealand). Soils and Foundations, 2020. 60(6): p. 1507-1531.
20. Gowda, G., et al., Effect of Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading on Seismic Performance of Pile Foundations. Civil Engineering Journal, 2022. 7: p. 58-70.
21. Esfeh, P.K. and A.M. Kaynia, Numerical modeling of liquefaction and its impact on anchor piles for floating offshore structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2019. 127: p. 105839.
22. Shabanpour, A. and M. Ghazavi, Numerical investigation of the effect of shaft surface geometry of tapered pile group with circular and square cross-sections on bearing capacity and group efficiency inquiry. Sharif Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023. 38(4.1): p. 61-71.
23. Elgamal, A., J. Lu, and Z. Yang, Liquefaction-induced settlement of shallow foundations and remediation: 3D numerical simulation. Journal of earthquake engineering, 2005. 9(spec01): p. 17-45.
24. De Alba, P.A., Pile settlement in liquefying sand deposit. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1983. 109(9): p. 1165-1180.
25. Su, D. and X.-s. Li, Centrifuge investigation on seismic response of single pile in liquefiable soil. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-CHINESE EDITION-, 2006. 28(4): p. 423.
26. Rollins, K. and J. Hollenbaugh. Liquefaction induced negative skin friction from blast-induced liquefaction tests with auger-cast piles. in Procs., 6th Intl. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand, New Zealand Geotechnical Society. 2015.
27. Rollins, K. and S. Strand. Downdrag forces due to liquefaction surrounding a pile. in Proc., 8th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. 2006. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
28. Souri, M., et al., Numerical modeling of a pile-supported wharf subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral ground deformations. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023. 154: p. 105117.
29. Basavanagowda, G., et al. Behavior of pile group in liquefied soil deposits under earthquake loadings. in Seismic Design and Performance: Select Proceedings of 7th ICRAGEE 2020. 2021. Springer.
30. Kwon, S.Y. and M. Yoo, Study on the dynamic soil-pile-structure interactive behavior in liquefiable sand by 3D numerical simulation. Applied Sciences, 2020. 10(8): p. 2723.
31. Russo, G., G. Marone, and L. Di Girolamo, Hybrid energy piles as a smart and sustainable foundation. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 2021. 2(3): p. 306-322.
32. Chatterjee, K. and D. Choudhury. DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF PILE GROUP IN LIQUEFIABLE SOIL USING FLAC3D. in Proceedings of the 5th Indian Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference (5IYGEC): Extended Abstracts. 2015. Shweta Publications.
33. Zhong, C., Z. Chen, and J. Zhou, Numerical Investigations of Pile Group Foundations under Different Pile Length Conditions. Applied Sciences, 2024. 14(5): p. 1908.
34. Maheshwari, B. and M. Firoj, Seismic response of combined piled raft foundation using advanced liquefaction model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2024. 181: p. 108694.
35. Ahmadi, M.M., et al., Effects of loading frequency on soil–pile interaction using numerical nonlinear three-dimensional analyses. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2025. 25(1): p. 04024301.
36. Code, B.B., Building officials and code administrators. International (BOCA), 1973.
37. Focht Jr, J. and M. ONeill. Piles and other deep foundations. in International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. 11. 1985.
38. Haldar, S., Babu, G. S., "Failure Mechanisms of Pile Foundations in Liquefiable Soil: Parametric Study", International Journal of Geomechanics, 2010, 10 (2), 74-84.
39. Liyanapathirana, D. S., Poulos, H. G., "Pseudostatic Approach for Seismic Analysis of Piles in Liquefying Soil", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131 (12), 1480-1487.2005.
