Redesigning the Clean Area Facility Layout through the Application of Systematic Layout Planning (SLP): A Case Study
محورهای موضوعی : Layout Planning
Anastasia Nayusti Palulun
1
,
Rosmalina Hanafi
2
1 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
2 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
کلید واژه: Clean Area Design, Facility Layout Planning, Material Flow Efficiency, Operations Management, Systematic Layout Planning,
چکیده مقاله :
Facility layout design represents a fundamental component of operations management, particularly in optimizing space utilization, enhancing material flow, and improving overall operational efficiency. This study focuses on a company engaged in the processing and distribution of broiler chickens, where the current clean area layout was identified as inefficient due to excessive material flow distances and suboptimal workspace arrangement. To address these issues, the study analyzes the existing design and proposes improvements using the established methods of Systematic Layout Planning (SLP). Data collection involved direct observation, interviews, and literature review. The SLP method emphasizes qualitative analysis through activity relationship charts and diagrams. The findings demonstrate that the layout developed through the SLP method substantially enhances material flow efficiency and promotes a more systematic organization of the workspace. The SLP-based design improves overall production flow and supports higher levels of productivity and operational sustainability by eliminating unnecessary movements and establishing a streamlined sequence of operations. Based on these findings, SLP is recommended as the preferred approach for redesigning the clean area layout to support more efficient production processes.
Facility layout design represents a fundamental component of operations management, particularly in optimizing space utilization, enhancing material flow, and improving overall operational efficiency. This study focuses on a company engaged in the processing and distribution of broiler chickens, where the current clean area layout was identified as inefficient due to excessive material flow distances and suboptimal workspace arrangement. To address these issues, the study analyzes the existing design and proposes improvements using the established methods of Systematic Layout Planning (SLP). Data collection involved direct observation, interviews, and literature review. The SLP method emphasizes qualitative analysis through activity relationship charts and diagrams. The findings demonstrate that the layout developed through the SLP method substantially enhances material flow efficiency and promotes a more systematic organization of the workspace. The SLP-based design improves overall production flow and supports higher levels of productivity and operational sustainability by eliminating unnecessary movements and establishing a streamlined sequence of operations. Based on these findings, SLP is recommended as the preferred approach for redesigning the clean area layout to support more efficient production processes.
[1] Suarjana, I. W. G., Pomalingo, M. F., & Parhusip, B. R. (2022). Re-layout of the work area using the ergonomic participatory method. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research, 8(6), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjeis.v8n6.2177
[2] Tashtoush, T., Melero, D., Duarte, T., & Cruz, H. D. La. (2020). Recreational, Fitness, and Health Center: Facility Layout Design Case Study. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(6), 2620–2626. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.6.11968
[3] Heragu, S.S. (2022). Facilities Design (5th ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003285090
[4] Chakroun, A., Zribi, H., Hani, Y., Elmhamedi, A., & Masmoudi, F. (2022). Facility Layout Design through Integration of Lean Manufacturing in Industry 4.0 Context. International Federation of Automatic Control, 55(10), 798–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.507
[5] Farahani, A., Farahani, H., Farahani, G., & Mousavi, S. (2022, September). Flexible personnel scheduling in large multi-product unpaced asynchronous assembly lines. In 2022 27th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICAC55051.2022.9911088
[6] Wanniarachchi, W.N.C., Gopura, R.A.R.C., Punchihewa, H.K.G. (2016). Development of a Layout Model Suitable for the Food Processing Industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2796806
[7] Tompkins, J. A., White, J. A., Bozer, Y. A., & Tanchoco, J. M. A. (2010). Facilities Planning (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563164
[8] Muther, R. Hales, L (2015). Systematic Layout Planning (4th ed.), Management & Industrial Research Publications. https://richardmuther.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Systematic-Layout-Planning-SLP-4th-edition-soft-copy.pdf
[9] Salins, S.S., Zaidi, S.A.R., Deepak, D. et al. (2024). Design of an improved layout for a steel processing facility using SLP and lean Manufacturing techniques. Int J Interact des Manuf 18, 3827–3848 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01828-9
[10] Simatupang, J., Siregar, I., & Tarigan, U. P. P. (2020). Relayout Lantai Produksi PT. Gunung Selamat Lestari dengan Metode SLP dan CORELAP [Relayout of PT. Gunung Selamat Lestari Production Floor Using SLP and CORELAP Methods]. JURITI PRIMA (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri Prima), 3(2), 18–25. https://jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id/index.php/juriti/article/view/1314
[11] Naufalah, A. R., Sanusi, M. R. E., Lazuardy, A., & Wibowo, N. (2022). Redesign The Facility Layout with Systematic Layout Planning Method on Battery Workshop at PT GMF Aeroasia. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Industrial & Mechanical Engineering and Operations, 977–987. https://doi.org/10.46254/bd05.20220277
[12] Tampubolon, J., Simangunsong, L. D. A., Sibuea, M. D. A., Sembiring, A., & Mardhatillah, A. (2020). Prayer Paper Production Facility Layout Redesign Using Systematic Layout Planning Method and CRAFT. International Journal of Science, Technology, and Management, 1(4), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v1i4.84
[13] Wahyudi, H., Daywin, F. J., Doaly, C. O., Gozali, L., & Kosasih, W. (2021). Redesigning of Facility Layout in PT. Ocean Centra Furnindo Using Group Technology, CORELAP and CRAFT Method. Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 824–839. https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2021indonesia/134.pdf
[14] Jasrotia, M. S., & Sengottaiyan, K. (2024). SLP (Systematic Layout Planning) for Enhanced Plant Layout Efficiency. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 13(6), 820–827. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr24610212609
[15] Adiyanto, O., & Clistia, A. F. (2020). Perancangan Ulang Tata Letak Fasilitas Produksi UKM Eko Bubut dengan Metode Computerized Relationship Layout Planning (CORELAP) [Redesign of the Production Facility Layout for Eko Bubut SME Using the Computerized Relationship Layout Planning (CORELAP) Method]. JISI: Jurnal Integrasi Sistem Industri, 7(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.24853/jisi.7.1.49-56
[16] Sibuea, S., Hutabarat, W. P., & Sembiring, A. C. (2020). Relayout Gudang Produk Jadi PT. Jaya Beton Indonesia Menggunakan Metode Systematic Layout Planning dan CORELAP [Relayout of PT. Jaya Beton Indonesia Finished Goods Warehouse Using Systematic Layout Planning and CORELAP Methods]. JURITI PRIMA (Junal Ilmiah Teknik Industri Prima), 3(2), 7–14 https://doi.org/10.34012/juritiprima.v3i2.1372
[17] Tejaningrum, A., & Hasna, G. M. (2024). Determination of Activity Relationship Chart (ARC) Method in Office Layout Evaluation: A Case Study at XYZ Bandung Apartment. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 9(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijabim.v9i2.3417
