Design and Validation of a Model for Enhancing the Quality of Clinical Education

محورهای موضوعی : 0

fatemeh sadat saadatfard ¹ , Gholamreza Sharifirad ² , Siamk Mohebbi ³ , Zabihollah Gharlipour ⁴

1 - PH.d student in Department of Educational Management, Qo.C., Islamic AzadUniversity, Qom, Iran.
2 - Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences
3 - Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences.
4 - Department of Health Education and Promotion, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences.

تاریخ دریافت : 1404/04/24 تاریخ پذیرش : 1404/07/03 تاریخ انتشار : 1404/07/06

کلید واژه: Clinical Education, Human Resources, Effective Planning, Educational Quality, Thematic Analysis,

چکیده مقاله :

This study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating a model to enhance the quality of clinical education for medical students at Qom University of Medical Sciences, focusing on the strategic relationship between human resources and effective planning.The research design was a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative part, a qualitative case study was conducted with the participation of 15 clinical education experts (purposeful intensity sampling up to theoretical saturation). Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Attride–Stirling thematic analysis method in NVivo software. The trustworthiness of the research was ensured based on Lincoln and Guba’s criteria.In the quantitative part, this study was descriptive and survey-based; a researcher-made questionnaire (40 items in 10 components) derived from the qualitative findings was distributed among medical externs and interns. Two samples were used: validation (n = 200) and status evaluation (n = 162). Content validity was confirmed (CVI > 0.79), and reliability was found satisfactory (overall Cronbach’s alpha = 0.77; components between 0.72 and 0.88). To examine construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis (LISREL) was performed, and one-sample t-tests were used to assess the status of components compared to the criterion mean. Thematic analysis led to the identification of 40 basic themes, 10 organizing themes, and one global theme (“enhancement of clinical education quality”). Among the organizing themes, effective planning and human resources had the highest coding frequency. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit. The results of the one-sample t-test indicated that the mean of all components was significantly lower than the criterion mean, indicating an undesirable current status from the students’ perspective. The validated model emphasizes the interdependence between human resources and effective planning and highlights the need for coordinated interventions and continuous evaluation to improve clinical education.

چکیده انگلیسی:

This study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating a model to enhance the quality of clinical education for medical students at Qom University of Medical Sciences, focusing on the strategic relationship between human resources and effective planning.The research design was a sequential exploratory mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative part, a qualitative case study was conducted with the participation of 15 clinical education experts (purposeful intensity sampling up to theoretical saturation). Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Attride–Stirling thematic analysis method in NVivo software. The trustworthiness of the research was ensured based on Lincoln and Guba’s criteria.In the quantitative part, this study was descriptive and survey-based; a researcher-made questionnaire (40 items in 10 components) derived from the qualitative findings was distributed among medical externs and interns. Two samples were used: validation (n = 200) and status evaluation (n = 162). Content validity was confirmed (CVI > 0.79), and reliability was found satisfactory (overall Cronbach’s alpha = 0.77; components between 0.72 and 0.88). To examine construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis (LISREL) was performed, and one-sample t-tests were used to assess the status of components compared to the criterion mean. Thematic analysis led to the identification of 40 basic themes, 10 organizing themes, and one global theme (“enhancement of clinical education quality”). Among the organizing themes, effective planning and human resources had the highest coding frequency. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit. The results of the one-sample t-test indicated that the mean of all components was significantly lower than the criterion mean, indicating an undesirable current status from the students’ perspective. The validated model emphasizes the interdependence between human resources and effective planning and highlights the need for coordinated interventions and continuous evaluation to improve clinical education.

منابع و مأخذ:

Alshama, M. (2022). Quality of clinical education in undergraduate medical education. Journal of Medical Education Studies, 6(2), 85–94.
Arafi, M. (2012). The relationship between clinical teaching styles and students’ satisfaction. Journal of Medical Education, 11(3), 27–35. [In Persian]
Aziz, A., Karimi, N., & Azarpira, N. (2012). Relationship between motivational factors and satisfaction with clinical education. Development of Education in Medical Sciences, 8(3), 66–74. [In Persian]
Azizi, A. (1992). Fundamentals of medical education. Tehran: Center for Academic Publishing. [In Persian]
Bigzadeh, J., Hajian, Z., & Mahdavi, F. (2019). Structural challenges in clinical education. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Journal, 12(4), 23–31. [In Persian]
Dehghani, Gh., Adib, Y., Alizadeh, M., Termehzanouzi, V., & Pourabbas, A. (2023). Designing and validating a socially responsive clinical curriculum. Research in Medical Education, 15(4), 21–34. [In Persian]
Esmaeili, R., Jafari, N., & Naseri, M. (2019). Structural factors affecting the quality of clinical education. Research in Medical Education, 14(2), 112–121. [In Persian]
Ip, W. Y., & Chan, D. S. K. (2005). Hong Kong nursing students’ perception of the clinical environment: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42(6), 665–672.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
Mardani, M., Shams Khorramabadi, M., Mossadegh, A. A., & Rezapour, S. (2010). The effect of “emergency clinical skills training” on medical students’ learning. Yafteh Scientific Journal, 12(3), 45–50. [In Persian]
Mohammadpour, A., Najafi, S., Khosrovan, Sh., & Mansourian, M. (2013). Factors affecting the quality of clinical education from the perspective of students and instructors at Gonabad Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. Development of Education in Medical Sciences, 7(16), 107–115. [In Persian]
Mollahadi, M. (2009). Analysis of teacher–student interaction in clinical medical education. Quarterly Journal of Medical Education Studies, 3(2), 21–29. [In Persian]
Niknam, M., Taheri, M., & Ashrafi, M. (2014). The role of clinical education in training general practitioners. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 13(1), 25–33. [In Persian]
Papp, I., Markkanen, M., & von Bonsdorff, M. (2003). Clinical environment as a learning environment: Student nurses’ perceptions concerning clinical learning experiences. Nurse Education Today, 23(4), 262–268.
Pournamdar, S., Naderi, A., & Mohammadi, F. (2015). Analysis of clinical education challenges from the perspective of medical students. Development of Education in Medical Sciences, 9(2), 55–62. [In Persian]
Salehi, S., Abedi, H., Alipour, L., Najafipour, S., & Fatehi, N. (2001). The gap between theoretical and clinical nursing education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 1(3), 43–49. [In Persian]
Salehi, S., Ghanbari, N., & Dehnavi, R. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of teaching methods in clinical nursing education. Development of Education in Medical Sciences, 4(1), 21–30. [In Persian]

Sandler, C., Moore, J., & Green, D. (2014). The supportive role of faculty in clinical education. Nurse Education Today, 34(7), 1055–1060.
Seidi, J., Fotouhi, P., Rahimi, S., Salavati Ghasemi, Sh., Azadnia, A., & Gholamveisi, B. (2023). Factors influencing the quality of clinical education from the students’ perspective. Nursing Education, 12(2), 58–65. [In Persian]
Soltani, M., Rezaei, R., & Rezvani, N. (2008). The educational environment of hospital clinical wards: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 8(1), 43–50. [In Persian]
Taheri, A., Forghani, S., Atapour, Sh., & Hassanzadeh, A. (2011). Factors influencing effective clinical education from the perspective of instructors and students of the School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(9), 1131–1139. [In Persian]
Taheri, N., Kiyali, M., Yaghoubi, M., & Kalini, Z. (2011). Stressful factors in clinical education from the perspective of nursing students of Abadan Nursing Faculty (Year 2009). Modern Care Journal, 8(3), 159–165. [In Persian]
Tavakoli, R., Fallah, S., & Mirzaei, M. (2014). Assessing the quality of clinical education in teaching hospitals. Birjand Medical Sciences Journal, 21(1), 15–22. [In Persian]
Varaskara, M., Dabas, M., & Adil, P. (2023). Clinical learning environment: Challenges and strategies. Medical Education Perspectives, 8(1), 54–60.
Yardley, S., Teasdale, J., & Durao, T. (2012). Understanding clinical reasoning in medical students. Medical Teacher, 34(3), e239–e246.
Zamani, H. (2003). Evaluating interns’ satisfaction with internal medicine and neonatology courses. Arak University of Medical Sciences. [In Persian]